Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

An evolutionary perspective on nutrition and social decision making

Charles L. Raison and David A. Raichlen
PNAS February 13, 2018 115 (7) E1331; published ahead of print January 24, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721889115
Charles L. Raison
aDepartment in Human Development and Family Studies, School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706;bDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: raison@wisc.edu
David A. Raichlen
cSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

This article has letters. Please see:

  • Impact of nutrition on social decision making
  • Reply to Raison and Raichlen: Why does nutrition impact social decision making?
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We were intrigued by findings reported by Strang et al. (1) that the balance of carbohydrate to protein in a breakfast preparation influenced subsequent human social decision making. Specifically, compared with a low-carbohydrate/high-protein breakfast, consumption of a high-carbohydrate/low-protein breakfast increased participants’ tendency to punish violations of social norms, assessed as increased rejection rates of unfair offers in the ultimatum game. Said differently, participants that consumed more protein were more willing to tolerate being taken advantage of, an interpretation of the findings supported by the fact that among a number of biological variables measured, only increased tyrosine was found to mediate the effect of breakfast consumption on subsequent behavior in response to social norm violations.

We commend Strang et al. (1) for identifying tyrosine as a putative proximal biological mechanism that accounts for their behavioral findings. However, proximal explanations often leave unanswered deeper questions of why observed phenomena exist in the first place (2). In this case, the deeper question is: Why should eating protein make people more willing to be taken advantage of? In the spirit of Dobzhansky’s dictum that “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” (3), here we’d like to consider the possibility that the findings of Strang et al. (1) reflect an evolved mechanism that conferred a survival advantage across hominin evolution. We suggest that an evolutionary approach may lead to new questions that should drive future research agendas in this area.

Based on ethnographic evidence from modern hunter-gatherers and archeological evidence from ancient human groups, the need to share protein while minimizing conflict was likely more pressing across hominin evolution than any need to share more carbohydrate-rich foodstuffs, because protein frequently came in the form of kills that both allowed for—and mandated—food sharing, whereas carbohydrate-rich foodstuffs were typically obtained on a more continuous basis (4). In the context of the closely related kin groups prototypical across human evolution, we propose the hypothesis that behavioral adaptations that responded to protein consumption with a relaxed sense of tit-for-tat fairness may have enhanced individual survival and reproduction. More specifically, we suggest that when sharing large prey, this type of social tolerance may have been less metabolically costly (and hence less costly to the survival and reproduction of involved individuals) than would have been the case when sharing carbohydrate food stuffs, which typically came in smaller amounts on a more regular basis. Thus, it is possible that either protein-mediated social tolerance or carbohydrate-mediated social punishment is adaptive. Testing these adaptive hypotheses will require an ultimatum game based on food sharing itself, along with tests in groups living different lifestyles, since previous cross-cultural experiments with the ultimatum game show a high degree of variation in strategy (4). In the end, an evolutionary explanation for metabolically mediated perceptions of fairness may provide the basis for more detailed experimental interventions that alter cognition and behavior than would be available from the consideration of proximal mechanisms alone.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: raison{at}wisc.edu.
  • Author contributions: C.L.R. designed research; and C.L.R. and D.A.R. wrote the paper.

  • Conflict of interest statement: In the prior 12 months, C.L.R. has served as a consultant for Usona Institute, Emory Healthcare, North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals.

Published under the PNAS license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Strang S, et al.
    (2017) Impact of nutrition on social decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:6510–6514.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Tinbergen N
    (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Ethology 20:410–433.
    .
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Dobzhansky T
    (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 35:125–129.
    .
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Marlowe F
    (2010) The Hadza: Hunter-Gatherers of Tanzania (Univ of California Press, Berkeley).
    .
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An evolutionary perspective on nutrition and social decision making
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
An evolutionary perspective on nutrition
Charles L. Raison, David A. Raichlen
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2018, 115 (7) E1331; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1721889115

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
An evolutionary perspective on nutrition
Charles L. Raison, David A. Raichlen
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2018, 115 (7) E1331; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1721889115
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

  • SNPs deciding the rapid growth of cyanobacteria are alterable
  • Reply to Zhou and Li: Plasticity of the genomic haplotype of Synechococcus elongatus leads to rapid strain adaptation under laboratory conditions
  • Genetic variant rs17185536 regulates SIM1 gene expression in human brain hypothalamus
Show more

Related Content

  • Impact of nutrition on social decision making
  • Nutrition impacting social decisions
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Reply to Raison and Raichlen: Why does nutrition impact social decision making?
  • Scopus (1)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490