Benjamin de Haas explains individual differences in eye movement patterns.
New Research In
Physical Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Edited by Anthony J. Bebbington, Clark University, Worcester, MA, and approved January 17, 2018 (received for review September 18, 2017)
Significance
Emerging evidence shows that the boundaries of protected areas (PAs) and their level of protection regularly change, yet little is known regarding the underlying causes of these legal changes and their impacts on ecosystems. For PA degazettements (i.e., protection removals) in the state of Rondônia in the Brazilian Amazon we show that the PAs less effective in stemming deforestation are more likely to be degazetted. For those already deforested PAs degazettement had limited, if any, additional impact on deforestation. Consistent with the scientific literature recognizing that governance shapes conservation outcomes, governance that improves PA outcomes also improves their legal durability. Our evidence on such relationships suggests directions for research and the need for policymakers to reexamine conventional wisdom regarding PAs.
Abstract
Protected areas (PAs) remain the dominant policy to protect biodiversity and ecosystem services but have been shown to have limited impact when development interests force them to locations with lower deforestation pressure. Far less known is that such interests also cause widespread tempering, reduction, or removal of protection [i.e., PA downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD)]. We inform responses to PADDD by proposing and testing a bargaining explanation for PADDD risks and deforestation impacts. We examine recent degazettements for hydropower development and rural settlements in the state of Rondônia in the Brazilian Amazon. Results support two hypotheses: (i) ineffective PAs (i.e., those where internal deforestation was similar to nearby rates) were more likely to be degazetted and (ii) degazettement of ineffective PAs caused limited, if any, additional deforestation. We also report on cases in which ineffective portions were upgraded. Overall our results suggest that enhancing PAs’ ecological impacts enhances their legal durability.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: antentil{at}gmail.com.
Author contributions: A.T.T., A.P., R.E.G.K., and M.B.M. designed research; A.T.T., A.P., R.E.G.K., S.Q., R.M., and M.B.M. performed research; A.T.T. and A.P. analyzed data; A.T.T., R.E.G.K., and S.Q. prepared data; M.B.M. conceived the idea; and A.T.T., A.P., R.E.G.K., S.Q., R.M., and M.B.M. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1716462115/-/DCSupplemental.
Published under the PNAS license.
- Anteneh T. Tesfawa,1,
- Alexander Pfaffb,
- Rachel E. Golden Kronera,c,
- Siyu Qina,
- Rodrigo Medeirosd, and
- Michael B. Masciaa
- aMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA 22202;
- bSanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
- cDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030;
- dAmericas Field Division, Conservation International, RJ 20040-006 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Edited by Anthony J. Bebbington, Clark University, Worcester, MA, and approved January 17, 2018 (received for review September 18, 2017)
Significance
Emerging evidence shows that the boundaries of protected areas (PAs) and their level of protection regularly change, yet little is known regarding the underlying causes of these legal changes and their impacts on ecosystems. For PA degazettements (i.e., protection removals) in the state of Rondônia in the Brazilian Amazon we show that the PAs less effective in stemming deforestation are more likely to be degazetted. For those already deforested PAs degazettement had limited, if any, additional impact on deforestation. Consistent with the scientific literature recognizing that governance shapes conservation outcomes, governance that improves PA outcomes also improves their legal durability. Our evidence on such relationships suggests directions for research and the need for policymakers to reexamine conventional wisdom regarding PAs.
Abstract
Protected areas (PAs) remain the dominant policy to protect biodiversity and ecosystem services but have been shown to have limited impact when development interests force them to locations with lower deforestation pressure. Far less known is that such interests also cause widespread tempering, reduction, or removal of protection [i.e., PA downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD)]. We inform responses to PADDD by proposing and testing a bargaining explanation for PADDD risks and deforestation impacts. We examine recent degazettements for hydropower development and rural settlements in the state of Rondônia in the Brazilian Amazon. Results support two hypotheses: (i) ineffective PAs (i.e., those where internal deforestation was similar to nearby rates) were more likely to be degazetted and (ii) degazettement of ineffective PAs caused limited, if any, additional deforestation. We also report on cases in which ineffective portions were upgraded. Overall our results suggest that enhancing PAs’ ecological impacts enhances their legal durability.
- protected area
- hydropower
- impact evaluation
- land-use change
- land-cover change
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: antentil{at}gmail.com.
Author contributions: A.T.T., A.P., R.E.G.K., and M.B.M. designed research; A.T.T., A.P., R.E.G.K., S.Q., R.M., and M.B.M. performed research; A.T.T. and A.P. analyzed data; A.T.T., R.E.G.K., and S.Q. prepared data; M.B.M. conceived the idea; and A.T.T., A.P., R.E.G.K., S.Q., R.M., and M.B.M. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1716462115/-/DCSupplemental.
Published under the PNAS license.
Determinants and impacts of protected area removals
Sign up for Article Alerts
Article Classifications
- Social Sciences
- Sustainability Science
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
A lack of understanding is undermining decision makers’ capacity to develop policies that ensure the planet can sustainably meet future human food demands.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Olga Klochanko.
Researchers report negative emotional contagion, or the coordination of emotional states between multiple individuals, in common ravens, suggesting convergent emotional evolution in birds and mammals.
Image courtesy of Jessie E. C. Adriaense.
A study examines trends in global fishing fleets and finds that by 2015, 68% of the global fishing fleet became motorized, and that the overall number of fleet vessels increased to 3.7 million, despite a consistent decrease in the catch per unit of effort.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/3282700.
A method to determine gender from fingerprints suggests pottery making was not a primarily female activity in ancient Puebloan society, challenging previous assumptions about gendered divisions of labor in ancient societies.
Image courtesy of John Kantner.