Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Reply

Reply to Loisel et al.: Soil in climate mitigation and adaptation

Ronald Amundson and Léopold Biardeau
  1. aEnvironmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
  2. bDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS May 21, 2019 116 (21) 10213; first published May 14, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905360116
Ronald Amundson
aEnvironmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: earthy@berkeley.edu
Léopold Biardeau
bDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We thank Loisel et al. (1) for their response to our article (2), which questions the ability of soil C sequestration to be the negative emissions strategy that has been widely advocated (ref. 3 and https://www.4p1000.org/). Loisel et al. acknowledge this but suggest we did not adequately articulate additional benefits. While this was not our focus, we did indeed acknowledge soil management as a climate adaptation strategy.

Loisel et al.’s letter (1) illuminates the chasm that exists between scientific conceptions of problems and the paths to their solutions (if they have one). Soil scientists have rolled both climate mitigation and adaption into a call for soil C sequestration. These are two different policy issues. Soil C sequestration for mitigation (globally) is likely a super wicked policy problem (4) because (i) it has urgency, (ii) it has no central authority, and (iii) those who seek to end the problem are also causing it. To physically achieve CO2 reductions (ref. 3 and https://www.4p1000.org/) requires immediate international adaptation of practices maintained continuously for decades. In the United States (our focus), there is no serious policy discussion in progress that would implement such a program. This political challenge underscores the problems that natural scientists fail to appreciate when attempting to enter the policy arena (5).

Soil C management for soil health is a separate issue. Unlike mitigation, it lacks some of the immediate urgency but is a wicked policy problem (6, 7) because the “problem” has multiple definitions and no stopping point at a definitive solution. We noted (2) that this indeed seems to be an important objective. For example, the 1985 US Farm Bill tied commodity support to the adoption of conservation practices. The result has been (along with the voluntary adoption of reduced tillage) a steady decline in the rates of soil erosion in the United States (8). Thus, we agree with Loisel et al. (1) that farm policy can be used as a tool, but social science and policy must determine the political climate that can institute them. The linkage of soil health to government programs is not, however, a climate mitigation strategy in disguise. It is a “faux paradigm shift,” in which an eventual change in administrations can quickly dismantle the policy (4). For example, the rapid removal of land from the US Conservation Reserve Program in the past decade has reversed what initially appeared to be a paradigm shift in land management, due to economic changes.

Loisel et al. (1) set up a cardboard portrayal of modern agriculture (excessive tillage, erosion, etc.), which is at odds with the ways farming has been steadily changing by both technology and policy. While some C is already being sequestered by these changes, it is so small that it is insignificant to the climate system. We conclude that soil scientists are not effective at proposing policy, speaking policy-effective language (9), or anticipating the milieu of issues involved in this process, but they should instead work with and support the funding of experts (5) to more effectively continue the never-ending process (6, 7) to manage soil in a socially acceptable and beneficial way.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: earthy{at}berkeley.edu.
  • Author contributions: R.A. and L.B. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Published under the PNAS license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Loisel J,
    2. Casellas Connors JP,
    3. Hugelius G,
    4. Harden JW,
    5. Morgan CL
    (2019) Soils can help mitigate CO2 emissions, despite the challenges. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:1021110212.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Amundson R,
    2. Biardeau L
    (2018) Opinion: Soil carbon sequestration is an elusive climate mitigation tool. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:11652–11656.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Lal R
    (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Levin K,
    2. Cashore B,
    3. Bernstein S,
    4. Graeme A
    (2012) Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci 45:123–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Grundmann R
    (2016) Climate change as a wicked social problem. Nat Geosci 9:562–563.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Rittel WJ,
    2. Webber MM
    (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Game ET,
    2. Meijaard E,
    3. Sheil D,
    4. McDonald-Madden E
    (2014) Conservation in a wicked complex world: Challenges and solutions. Conserv Lett 7:271–277.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Nearing MA,
    2. Xie Y,
    3. Liu B,
    4. Ye Y
    (2017) Natural and anthropogenic rates of soil erosion. Int Soil Water Cons Res 5:77–84.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Amundson R
    (2017) Whose security is important? Communicating environmental risk about soil to a diverse audience. Global Soil Security, Progress in Soil Science, eds Field DJ, Morgan CLS, McBratney AB (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), pp 383–387.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply to Loisel et al.: Soil in climate mitigation and adaptation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reply to Loisel et al.: Soil in climate mitigation and adaptation
Ronald Amundson, Léopold Biardeau
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2019, 116 (21) 10213; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1905360116

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Reply to Loisel et al.: Soil in climate mitigation and adaptation
Ronald Amundson, Léopold Biardeau
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2019, 116 (21) 10213; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1905360116
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Physical Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences

This article has a Letter. Please see:

  • Relationship between Letter and Reply - May 14, 2019

See related content:

  • Opinion: Soil carbon sequestration is an elusive climate mitigation tool
    - Nov 13, 2018
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (21)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490