Antibody-dependent enhancement of influenza disease promoted by increase in hemagglutinin stem flexibility and virus fusion kinetics
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Robert G. Webster, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, and approved June 19, 2019 (received for review December 14, 2018)

Significance
Next-generation influenza vaccines and broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) are in clinical development. Some of these do not block virus–receptor interactions and thus are predicted to provide protection via alternative mechanisms at the postentry stage or use Fc-dependent mechanisms. Nonneutralizing antibodies have the potential to mediate enhancement of respiratory disease (ERD). Our study describes ADE with two different functional MAbs that destabilized HA stem domain, increased influenza virus fusion kinetics, and led to enhanced lung pathology and ERD in a dose-dependent manner in a mice model. This study underlines careful preclinical evaluation of next-generation influenza vaccines or antibody-based therapeutics that do not block influenza virus receptor binding.
Abstract
Several next-generation (universal) influenza vaccines and broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) are in clinical development. Some of these mediate inhibitions of virus replication at the postentry stage or use Fc-dependent mechanisms. Nonneutralizing antibodies have the potential to mediate enhancement of viral infection or disease. In the current study, two monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 72/8 and 69/1, enhanced respiratory disease (ERD) in mice following H3N2 virus challenge by demonstrating increased lung pathology and changes in lung cytokine/chemokine levels. MAb 78/2 caused changes in the lung viral loads in a dose-dependent manner. Both MAbs increased HA sensitivity to trypsin cleavage at a higher pH range, suggesting MAb-induced conformational changes. pHrodo-labeled virus particles’ entry and residence time in the endocytic compartment were tracked during infection of Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. Both MAbs reduced H3N2 virus residence time in the endocytic pathway, suggesting faster virus fusion kinetics. Structurally, 78/2 and 69/1 Fabs bound the globular head or base of the head domain of influenza hemagglutinin (HA), respectively, and induced destabilization of the HA stem domain. Together, this study describes Mab-induced destabilization of the influenza HA stem domain, faster kinetics of influenza virus fusion, and ERD in vivo. The in vivo animal model and in vitro assays described could augment preclinical safety evaluation of antibodies and next-generation influenza vaccines that generate antibodies which do not block influenza virus–receptor interaction.
Nonneutralizing antibodies may play a role in protection from disease following infection with diverse viruses, including HIV, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and influenza (1⇓–3), supporting the design of novel influenza vaccines (1, 4⇓–6). Such antibodies may provide protection in vivo via a plethora of Fc-dependent functions, including antibody-mediated cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) (7), antibody-dependent cell phagocytosis (ADCP), and antibody-dependent complement-mediated lysis (ADCL) (6, 8). However, nonneutralizing or low-affinity neutralizing antibodies following vaccination or infection have also been correlated with augmenting influenza disease postinfection in animal models and several human observational studies (9⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–15). The phenomenon of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) is well defined for other viral diseases, including dengue. However, to date, ADE of influenza disease or viruses with type 1 fusion proteins following administration of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) has not been described.
In the current study, we evaluated two murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs 78/2 and 69/1) that were shown to promote influenza virus infection of a murine macrophage-like cell line in vitro (16). In animal challenge studies, mice pretreated with different doses of these MAbs, followed by challenge with H3N2 influenza virus, demonstrated ADE in the form of enhanced lung pathology in a MAb dose-dependent manner. To understand the mechanism of ADE caused by these MAbs, several in vitro assays were performed to evaluate the ability of these MAbs to increase HA triggerability at different pHs, to quantify viral fusion kinetics, and to determine structural stability of different HA domains. These studies show that by binding to HA, the MAbs can destabilize the HA stem, promoting pH-induced HA postfusion conformation changes leading to faster virus fusion kinetics that may cause enhanced lung pathology in vivo in the absence or presence of increased viral load.
This study highlights the need to carefully evaluate new influenza vaccines and/or antibody-based therapeutics in multiple functional assays in vitro and in animal models that can predict both protection and enhanced disease following influenza virus challenge (17).
Results
MAbs 78/2 and 69/1 Enhance Lung Pathology Following H3N2 Viral Challenge.
To evaluate the potential of antibodies to mediate ADE of influenza disease in vivo following influenza viral challenge, two H3N2-specific MAbs were evaluated in mice. MAb 78/2 binds to the globular head domain of H3N2 hemagglutinin and neutralizes virus infection at high concentration while increasing the number of virus-infected cells at lower concentrations in vitro. MAb 69/1 binds to a different site on the globular head domain, distant to the receptor binding domain, does not neutralize virus at any dose, and increases H3N2 virus infection of the P388D1 cell line at lower antibody concentrations (16).
To test the impact of these MAbs on H3N2 virus infection in vivo, BALB/c mice were prophylactically treated with 15, 1.5, or 0.15 mg/kg of MAb 78/2 or 69/1 or mock treated with PBS followed by challenge with 104 TCID50 of A/Hong Kong/1/68 (H3N2) virus intranasally, 24 h after MAb treatment (Fig. 1A). The concentrations of MAbs were measured at 24 h postinjection in the sera and lungs on the day of viral challenge (at day 0) using biotin-labeled antibodies. Antibody concentrations were similar for the two MAbs in sera and lung tissues (SI Appendix, Table S1). Weight loss in the mock PBS control animals on days 2 to 5 following viral challenge was modest (average of 5%), and most animals started to gain weight by day 6. MAbs 78/2 or 69/1 treatment did not impact body weight loss after H3N2 viral challenge compared with the mock PBS-treated control group at any pretreatment dose (Fig. 1 B and C). Animals were killed on days 2 and 6 and plaque assays using Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells were performed to measure viral load in the mouse lung homogenates. MAb 69/1 did not significantly impact lung viral load at any dose level compared with the mock-treated group on 2 d postinfection (dpi) (Fig. 1D). At 6 dpi, the average lung viral load in 69/1-treated animals (medium and low doses) was 2- to 3-fold higher compared with the PBS control group, but did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 1E). In contrast, MAb 78/2 had a dose-dependent effect on lung viral loads. Lungs from mice pretreated with the highest dose of MAb 78/2 (15 mg/kg) showed significant reduction in lung viral titers compared with the mock-treated PBS control group on day 2 (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1F) and on 6 dpi (P < 0.0005) (Fig. 1G), while mice treated with the lowest dose of MAb 78/2 (0.15 mg/kg) had significantly higher viral lung titers compared with the mock-treated group on day 6 dpi (P < 0.005) (Fig. 1G). Therefore, MAb 78/2 exhibited a dose-dependent reduction or enhancement of viral load in vivo.
Experimental plan, mouse weight loss, and lung viral titers following prophylactic treatment with MAb 78/2 or 69/1 and challenge with A/Hong Kong/1/68 (H3N2) virus. (A) Mice were prophylactically treated intraperitoneally (IP) with the indicated antibody at the specified dose 24 h before intranasal challenge with 104/10 µL TCID50 of A/Hong Kong/1/68 (H3N2) virus. Mice were killed, and blood and lungs were collected on days 2 and 6 postchallenge. (B and C) The mice were weighed every day for 6 d. Mouse weights were normalized to day 0 weight (treated as 100%) and plotted as percent weight change relative to day 0 weight. (D–G) Mouse lungs treated with MAb 69/1 (D and E) or MAb 78/2 (F and G) from days 2 (D and F) and 6 (E and G) postchallenge were homogenized and used in a plaque assay to determine viral load in the lungs. Statistical significance among groups was calculated using Abnova, P < 0.001 (***), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.05 (*). n/a, not applicable.
In addition to viral load measurements, lung immunohistochemistry was performed on day 2 post-H3N2 virus challenge (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). Influenza nucleoprotein (NP) positive cells were observed in bronchial epithelial cells in all infected lungs. Furthermore, influenza NP positive cells were observed at higher frequency in alveolar cells (arrowhead) of animals treated with MAb 69/1 and MAb 78/2 (at 1.5 mg/kg and 0.15 mg/kg), suggesting increased localized viral foci in small airways in the lungs of MAb-pretreated animals (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). Virus-infected cells were stained using rabbit anti-NP antibodies and lung macrophages (CD11c+) on 2 dpi (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). The majority of infected cells were bronchioalveolar epithelial cells, and not macrophages (CD11c−). However, accumulation of infiltrating macrophages near the virus-infected cells was observed in the MAb-pretreated animals compared with PBS-treated controls, especially for the MAb 69/1 middle dose (1.5 mg/mL) and MAb 78/2 lowest dose (0.15 mg/mL) (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). On both days, mouse H&E-stained lungs were blindly evaluated by a certified veterinary pathologist using 5 parameters: whole lung pathology, bronchioles-hyperplasia, bronchioles-peribronchiolitis (lymphocyte cuffs), perivasculitis, and alveolar inflammation (interstitial pneumonia). On day 2 following viral challenge, the lung pathology was minimal, with lesion scores between 0 and 2 for all groups. However, on day 6, the combined histopathological scores of mice treated with MAb 69/1 at the medium dose (1.5 mg/kg) exhibited enhanced lung pathology compared with the PBS control group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Mice treated with MAb 78/2 demonstrated a dose-dependent impact on lung pathology following H3N2 influenza virus challenge. Lungs from animals treated with the high dose (15 mg/kg) had lower lesion scores, while the mice pretreated with the lowest dose of MAb 78/2 (0.15 mg/kg) had more cellular infiltration and significantly higher lung lesion scores (P < 0.05) compared with the mock-treated group (Fig. 2). Neither of the MAbs 78/2 or 69/1 significantly altered C3 complement levels in the mouse lungs either at day 2 or day 6 following H3N2 challenge at any MAb dosage level (SI Appendix, Fig. S3).
Histopathology analysis of the lungs of mice treated with MAbs 78/2 or 69/1 before H3N2 challenge. Mice were killed at day 6 post-H3N2 viral challenge and the lungs were collected for histopathological analysis. The lungs were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, embedded in parafilm, sectioned, and stained with H&E. (A) Representative combined images of H&E-stained lungs infected with H3N2 virus treated with either 69/1 or 78/2 antibodies. Lung treated with 1.5 mg/kg of MAb 69/1 and 0.15 mg/kg MAb 78/2 showed more pathological changes (bronchitis, bronchiolitis, and alveolitis) compared with other groups (scale bar indicates 250 μm). (B) Histopathological evaluation of lung was based on combined scores of 5 parameter of whole lung, bronchioles-hyperplasia, bronchioles-peribronchiolitis (lymphocyte cuffs), perivasculitis (vascular cuffs), and alveolar inflammation (interstitial pneumonia). 0, no lesions; 1, minimal lesions; 2, mild lesions; 3, moderate lesions; 4, severe lesions. Median values are shown in the box and whisker plots for each group. The box extends from the 25th to the 75th percentile and the error bars represent the lowest and highest values. Statistical analyses were performed using the Bonferroni multiple comparison test using ANOVA, P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.05 (*).
Impact of MAb Treatment on Lung Cytokine/Chemokine Levels Post-H3N2 Virus Challenge.
Local inflammatory responses can be a driver of cellular infiltration and alveolar epithelial cell damage in lungs. Therefore, cytokine and chemokine levels were measured in the mouse lung homogenates following H3N2 viral challenge at 2 and 6 dpi using a cytokine/chemokine protein array (SI Appendix, Table S2 and Fig. S4). In lungs from high-dose MAb 69/1-pretreated animals (15 mg/kg), significantly higher levels of IL-3, IL-12 (p70), IL-13, and IFNγ were measured, while eotaxin was elevated only in mice treated with the medium dose of MAb 69/1 (1.5 mg/kg) at 6 dpi. Elevated levels of GM-CSF and TNFα were measured in all MAb 69/1-treated animals, irrespective of dose. Both IL-13 and eotaxin are known chemokines for eosinophils. Interestingly, elevated levels of IL-13 mRNA and proteins were previously shown to be involved in chronic lung disease after influenza infection at sites of active viral RNA remnants (18). Lungs from mice prophylactically treated with the lowest dose of MAb 78/2 (0.15 mg/kg) showed significantly higher levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β, several Th2 cytokines (IL-5 and IL-10), and two chemokines (MIP-1α and MIP-1β) (SI Appendix, Table S2 and Fig. S4). IL-2 and IL-12 (p40) levels were significantly lower in lungs of animals treated with either MAb compared with the uninfected or mock PBS-treated controls.
Together, the animal studies identified both antibody-specific and dose-dependent patterns of elevated lung cytokine/chemokines and enhanced respiratory disease in animals pretreated with MAbs 78/2 and 69/1 following H3N2 virus challenge.
MAbs 78/2 and 69/1 Increase pH-Dependent HA Trypsin Sensitivity.
Following the findings of enhanced lung pathology after influenza virus challenge of animals pretreated with MAbs 78/2 and 69/1, we evaluated the direct effects of the MAbs on HA conformation and function in vitro. Susceptibility to trypsin cleavage was used as a correlate of pH-induced changes in HA conformation (Fig. 3 A and B and SI Appendix, Fig. S5). Uncleaved H3-HA0 was mixed with MAbs 78/2, 69/1, or CR8020, and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h at pHs ranging from 5.5 to 6.5 (Fig. 3A). At the lowest pH tested (pH 5.5), 80% of H3-HA0 was cleaved by trypsin. Pretreatment with the broadly neutralizing stem-targeting MAb CR8020 (19) blocked the pH-induced conformational change and protected the H3-HA0 from trypsin cleavage (Fig. 3A, Bottom Lane and Fig. 3B purple bars). In contrast, MAbs 78/2 and 69/1 increased the pH sensitivity of H3-HA0, resulting in more trypsin cleavage at higher pH (5.75 and 6.0) compared with no antibody control (Fig. 3 A and B; open vs. green and red bars).
MAb 69/1 and low dose of 78/2 promote disordering and flexibility of the H3N2 HA domain. (A and B) MAbs 69/1 and 78/2 increase HA pH sensitivity to trypsin digestion. (A) H3 Aichi HA was incubated with or without the indicated antibody at the specified pH at 37 °C for 1 h. The samples were neutralized, and TPCK-trypsin was added at a 1:1 trypsin to HA mass ratio, the samples were incubated at 22 °C for 2 h, trypsin inhibitor was added to stop the reaction. Samples were resolved by nonreducing SDS/PAGE and subjected to Western blot analysis. (B) Densitometry analysis of Western blots of A from 5 independent experiments. Bars indicate percent change between sample at indicated pH with trypsin and sample at pH 6.5 with trypsin. SDs are shown as whiskers. Statistical significance compared with H3 only group was calculated using the Bonferroni multiple comparison method, P < 0.0001 (****), P < 0.01 (**). (C–F) Negative stain EM of MAbs 69/1 and 78/2 bound to HA. Fabs of 69/1 (C) or 78/2 (D) were combined with H3 Aichi HA (H3N2) (A/Aichi/2/1968) at 8 times molar excess of Fab and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The Fab/HA trimer complex was purified with a S200i SEC column and added to 400-mesh copper grids then stained with 2% uranyl formate followed by micrographs using Appion. Particles were selected using DoGPick and 2D classes were produced. (C) Negative stain 2D classes of 69/1 Fab in complex H3 Aichi HA (H3N2) (A/Aichi/2/1968). (D) 2D classes of 78/2 Fab in complex with H3 Aichi HA. Highlighted boxes are featured classes in F. (E) Unliganded H3 Aichi HA from the same imaging session as 78/2. (F) H3 Aichi HA model (PDB 3VUN) illustrating the head and stem domains of HA (Left). Image false coloring was done with Photoshop. Selected 2D class averages of unliganded, 69/1 (blue), and 78/2 (purple) Fabs in complex with H3 (yellow). Comparison of the unbound HA to the antibody-bound HA reveals that the stem region of the antibody-bound HA appears as a lighter, diffuse density. This weaker density indicates increased flexibility or disorder of HA stem.
MAbs 78/2 and 69/1 Binding to HA Globular Head Domain Induces Disordering of HA Stem Domain.
To structurally visualize the impact of MAbs 78/2 and 69/1 on HA conformation, 78/2 and 69/1 Fabs were combined with H3-HA0 and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Negative stain electron microscopy images were acquired as described (20). Both antibodies bind to the HA with 1 or 2 Fabs per HA trimer as observed in the 2D class averages (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). The two antibodies, 69/1 and 78/2, bind to distinct epitopes on the HA and at different angles of approach. MAb 78/2 binds closer to the HA receptor binding site (Fig. 3 D and F shown in pink), while MAb 69/1 Fab binds lower on the HA, at the base of the head and close to the stem domain (Fig. 3 C and F shown in blue). Surprisingly, after binding of the Fab of either MAb the HA stem region becomes less ordered relative to unbound HA trimer, as suggested by the more diffused density in the 2D classes (Fig. 3 C and D vs. Fig. 3E).
MAbs 78/2 and 69/1 Enhance H3N2 Virus Fusion Kinetics.
To further understand the impact of antibody-induced HA conformational changes on influenza virus infection, a virus fusion kinetics assay was developed with pHrodo-labeled A/Hong Kong/1/1968 (H3N2) virions to track the virus in the endocytic pathway of infected cells. This assay follows individual pHrodo-labeled virions in the endosome/lysosome compartment of MDCK cells (SI Appendix, Figs. S7 and S8). The pH sensitivity of the pHrodo fluorescence was demonstrated by using a broad pH range. The increase in fluorescent units was clearly pH dependent and increased significantly between pH 6.0 and pH 4.0 (SI Appendix, Fig. S7A). Furthermore, the addition of increasing concentrations of ammonium chloride resulted in deacidification of endosomes and reduction of fluorescent influenza virus particles (SI Appendix, Fig. S7B). This assay was reproducible with similar kinetics, as measured by number of pHrodo particles, in multiple experiments (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). Importantly, fusion of the virus with host cell membranes in the endocytic compartment resulted in the loss of fluorescence (Movie S1). To confirm the pHrodo signals are associated with virions in the endocytic compartments, the MDCK cells were immunostained with an antiinfluenza NP antibody after infection with pHrodo green-labeled H3N2 virus. The green pHrodo fluorescence signals were associated with the influenza virus as confirmed by anti-NP staining (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). In contrast, in the presence of chloroquine, which blocks endosome acidification, the virions were stained with anti-NP but the green fluorescent signal of the pHrodo-labeled virus was absent due to increase in the endosomal pH (SI Appendix, Fig. S9, Lower). Staining with antibodies against Lamp1, an endosomal/lysosome pathway marker, further confirmed the localization of the internalized virions in the low pH endocytic pathway (SI Appendix, Fig. S10). MAb 78/2 or MAb 69/1 binding to H3N2 virus in the endocytic compartment was confirmed by colocalization of MAbs and labeled virions in the same compartment in infected MDCK cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). Addition of MAb 78/2 at 100 μg/mL resulted in a delay in the accumulation of virions in MDCK cells and a reduction in number of virions per cell in agreement with the neutralization activity of this MAb at high doses (SI Appendix, Fig. S12).
To further understand the impact of the MAbs on virus fusion kinetics, over 100 virions per group were imaged over a period of 68 min to determine particle residence time within the endosome/lysosome compartment in absence or presence of the MAbs at 37 °C (Fig. 4). In the absence of antibodies (PBS), the residence time of H3N2 influenza virus within the endosome/lysosome compartment averaged 26 min (range of 11 to 72 min) in MDCK cells (Fig. 4 A and K, black). Residence time of other influenza viral strains, A/California/07/2009 (H1N1pdm09) and B/Brisbane/60/2008 were not significantly different from H3N2 A/HongKong/1/68 (SI Appendix, Fig. S13).
MAbs 78/2 and 69/1 promote fusion kinetics of A/HongKong/1/68 (H3N2) virus in MDCK cells at 37 °C. (A) Residence time distributions of pHrodo-virus particles in no antibody treatment control. The majority of particles show residence time between 10 and 30 min. (B–D) Residence time distributions of palivizumab-treated viral particles is similar among different doses or compared with PBS control, indicating similar fusion kinetics. (E–G) Residence time distributions of pHrodo-virus particles treated with different doses of MAb 78/2. Low dose of MAb 78/2-treated virus shows shifting of the residency time to <20 min, indicating low dose MAb 78/2 accelerates the virus fusion kinetics. (H–J) Residence time distributions of pHrodo-virus particles treated with different doses of MAb 69/1. All doses tested show significant shifting of the viral residency time to <20 min, indicating MAb 69/1 promotes faster virus fusion kinetics. At least three biological replicates were done for PBS control and experimental groups and the representative graphs are shown. (K) Residency time distribution of all samples. Median residency times are shown in black lines with 95% CI. One-way ANOVA between PBS and each treatment group was calculated. **: P < 0.01; ***: P < 0.001; ****: P < 0.0001.
The anti-RSV F MAb, palivizumab, used as a negative control (21, 22), did not significantly impact virus residence time of the pHrodo-labeled H3N2 virus particles in the endocytic pathway at any concentration tested (Fig. 4 B–D and K, blue). When MAb 78/2 was added at 10, 1.0, and 0.1 μg/mL, the high and medium concentrations did not change the endosome/lysosome virus residence time, but the lowest MAb concentration (0.1 µg/mL) reduced H3N2 virus residence time to an average of 18 min, suggesting faster virus fusion kinetics (Fig. 4 E–G and K, pink). Surprisingly, MAb 69/1 significantly reduced the residence time of H3N2 pHrodo-labeled virus particles in the endocytic pathway at all three antibody concentrations (average 12 to 16 min), suggesting faster virus fusion kinetics in the presence of this MAb (Fig. 4 H–J and K, green). These studies were repeated comparing the kinetics of pHrodo-labeled H3N2 virus particle accumulation and residence time in MDCK cells at 33 °C (representing upper respiratory tract temperature) vs. 37 °C (representing lower respiratory tract temperature). The virion internalization rate in the endosomes was somewhat slower at 33 °C compared with 37 °C (SI Appendix, Fig. S14A), but the average residence time in the endocytic compartment was not significantly different at the two temperatures for H3N2 virus (SI Appendix, Fig. S14B). At 33 °C, both MAb 78/2 and MAb 69/1, at 1 and 0.1 μg/mL, significantly shortened the residence time of the pHrodo-labeled H3N2 virus particles, suggesting enhanced fusion kinetics (SI Appendix, Fig. S15).
Discussion
Efforts are ongoing to develop new antibody-based therapeutics against influenza and next generation influenza vaccines with broader coverage and long-term immunity (23). One major focus is on conserved proteins and protein subdomains. Some of the broadly cross-reactive antibodies and new immunogens will elicit antibodies that do not block virus–receptor interactions and thus are predicted to provide protection via alternative mechanisms, including blocking postentry HA conformational changes and fusion in low pH late endosomes, or Fc-dependent functions such as ADCC, ADCP, and ADCL or virus budding and release. In addition to HA, neuraminidase (NA), M2e, and internal proteins are being targeted for next-generation influenza vaccine candidates and therapeutic antibodies (24, 25).
In the absence of sterilizing immunity, there is always the risk of ADE of respiratory disease that may become evident only after influenza exposure in some individuals with low or no neutralizing antibodies specific for the globular head domain of the circulating strain. The frequency and severity of ADE may depend on the levels of vaccine-induced (nonneutralizing) antibodies in the lower respiratory tract, and their ability to interact with various innate cells via FcR and to bind/activate complement (17). Fc-dependent ADE is well established for dengue infections with heterosubtypic strains mediated by low-affinity cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies (26, 27). Therefore, it is important to develop robust animal models and in vitro assays that could help to evaluate the benefit/risk of novel vaccine candidates as well as therapeutic antibodies.
In the current study, we evaluated MAb 78/2 or MAb 69/1 that bind to the HA of H3N2 A/Hong Kong/1/68 (highly homologous to H3N2 A/Aichi/2/68, see SI Appendix, Fig. S16) (16). The main findings of our study are: 1) BALB/c mice challenged with A/Hong Kong/1/68 (H3N2) influenza virus 24 h after prophylactic treatment with MAbs 78/2 or 69/1 (or PBS) demonstrated evidence of increased lung pathology and infiltration of cells into the alveolar air space. We also measured viral load, cytokine/chemokine levels, complement levels, and weight loss. ADE was antibody and dose dependent. MAb 78/2 was protective at the high dose (15 mg/kg), but enhanced viral loads at the low dose (0.15 mg/kg) on both day 2 and 6 dpi, and lung pathology on 6 dpi. MAb 69/1 showed no protection and was associated with enhanced lung pathology and cellular infiltrates at the medium dose (1.5 mg/kg) on 6 dpi. It showed moderate but nonsignificant increase in viral loads in total lung homogenates but exhibited increased viral NP staining in alveolar tissues at the medium and low MAb doses (Figs. 1 and 2 and SI Appendix, Fig. S1). The HA sequences of the H3N2 virus from mouse lungs with or without MAb treatment were identical (SI Appendix, Fig. S17). Therefore, the increased viral loads or the enhanced pathogenicity observed were not due to selection of escape mutations. 2) Both MAbs shifted the pH-induced HA0 sensitivity to trypsin cleavage to a higher pH range, suggesting antibody-induced conformational changes. 3) Both Fabs bound the H3 HA and induced destabilization of the HA stem. 4) Tracing pHrodo-labeled virus particles in MDCK cells (FcR−) revealed that the MAbs reduced virus residence time in the endocytic pathway both at 37 °C and at 33 °C, suggesting faster virus fusion kinetics.
Our data highlight the need to assess the safety of antibody-based therapeutics and next generation influenza vaccines, especially ones that induce nonreceptor blocking antibodies. Preclinical evaluation of prophylactic or therapeutic administration of MAbs or polyclonal antibodies should be conducted using a broad antibody dose range and followed by careful examination of the lungs for evidence of macroscopic and microscopic changes and lung cytokine/chemokine levels in animal models. Such safety signals may not be linked to increased virus load in total lung homogenates, or increase in body weight loss. Instead, they may be associated with antibody-mediated effects leading to local cell damage, and/or increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines that attract macrophages, neutrophils, and eosinophils as previously described in severe cases of 2009 H1N1 pandemic disease in human cases (10⇓–12), in swine and ferret models of mismatch vaccination challenge (14, 15, 28⇓–30), and in some mouse models of HA-targeting nonneutralizing antibodies (13). In each of these examples, the common feature was the absence or very low titers of neutralizing antibodies targeting the HA globular head domain of the challenge virus. The specificity of the nonneutralizing polyclonal antibodies was only deciphered in some cases (13, 15), and the exact mechanisms leading to ADE were only partially demonstrated (10, 15). Evaluation of lung pathology is an important correlate of morbidity following influenza infection that may not be linked to other disease parameters such as weight loss and viral loads (3, 31).
Vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD) in infants vaccinated with formaldehyde-inactivated respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines after first exposure to RSV, was linked to cytokine imbalance (i.e., high Th2/Th1 ratios) and absence of neutralizing antibodies (32, 33), which is observed in cotton rat model of RSV by increased lung pathology and lung cytokines. In our study, there was a significant increase in Th2 cytokines in the lungs of animals pretreated with MAb 78/2 (low dose). In addition, several chemokines were elevated in animals treated with both MAbs that could partially explain the significant cell infiltrates in the bronchi and alveolar spaces of the mouse lungs.
Some of the differences between the mouse challenge model and in vitro MDCK-based assays, especially for MAb 69/1, may reflect differences between in vitro and in vivo systems. Both MAbs used in the current study were previously shown to increase infection of the macrophage-like cell line P388D1 in an Fc-dependent manner (16). MAb 78/2 increased the viral load in the low-dose group (0.15 mg/kg) pretreated mouse lung homogenates, in agreement with the in vitro dose-dependent increase in virus infection, while MAb 69/1 did not significantly increase the viral load in mouse lung homogenates compared with the mock-treated group, even though it enhanced infection in P388D1 cells across broad dose range, with no evidence of neutralization. However, immunohistochemical analysis of lung sections revealed higher numbers of influenza NP positive cells within the alveoli of both MAb-treated animals that were accompanied by increase in the number of macrophages, which likely contribute to local inflammatory reactions. However, these alveolar macrophages were not directly infected with the H3N2 virus (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). The majority of cells infected by influenza are FcR− epithelial cells lining the respiratory tract. This observation suggests that MAb 69/1 increased viral infection in localized viral foci in small airways in the lungs, however, it was not apparent in the viral titers measured by in vitro plaque assay using homogenized whole lung tissue. To understand the impact of these antibodies on influenza virus HA, we evaluated the two MAbs in several in vitro assays including negative stain EM, pH-dependent trypsin sensitivity, and a novel assay that follows fusion kinetics of individual virus particles in the endocytic pathway of MDCK (FcR−) cells. These assays provided additional important information demonstrating the ability of these MAbs to alter the conformation status of the HA trimers that could influence the virus fusion kinetics (34⇓–36). Furthermore, the two MAbs decreased the residence time of pHrodo-labeled H3N2 virus particles in the endocytic compartment both at 37 °C and at 33 °C, representing the lower and upper respiratory tracts, respectively. Thus, this study demonstrated that binding of certain antibodies to the influenza HA may result in destabilization of the HA stem, distal to its binding site, leading to increase in virus fusion kinetics.
In summary, this study demonstrates that some antibodies, which do not block influenza virus-receptor binding, may impart destabilizing effects on the virions that could result in increased virus fusion kinetics. Furthermore, the in vivo outcome of treatment with such antibodies may lead to ADE of influenza virus disease predominantly mediated by lung pathology that is either linked or unlinked to increase in lung viral load. The ADE model and in vitro assays described in the current study can be used as a benchmark to carefully evaluate next generation influenza vaccines or antibody-based therapeutics that are not designed to block virus binding to its receptor and therefore may have the potential to mediate not only virus neutralization but also enhancement of viral infection/disease.
Methods
Mouse Viral Challenge Studies.
Female BALB/c mice (4 to 6 wk old) were separated into 8 groups of 12 (2 groups with 11 mice each) and intraperitoneally injected with either 15, 1.5, 0.15 mg/kg of MAb 78/2, or 69/1, or PBS (mock treated). After 24 h, mice were challenged intranasally with A/Hong Kong/1/1968 (H3N2) influenza virus at the dose of 104/10 µL TCID50. Mice were weighed daily. Mice were killed by CO2 asphyxiation on day 2 and day 6 postchallenge and blood and lungs were collected. The left lobe was collected for viral titer determination and cytokine analysis. The right lobe of the lung was inflated with 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological analysis. All animal experiments were approved by the US FDA Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under Protocol 2009–20. The animal care and use protocol meets or exceeds NIH guidelines and adhered to standards of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC). Lung histopathology was performed on lung tissue fixed in situ with 10% neutral buffered formalin, and lung cytokines were measured using Bio-Plex Pro mouse cytokine 23-plex assay as described in SI Appendix.
Mouse Lung Viral Titers.
Measurements of viral titers in mouse lungs were determined in MDCK cells using plaque assays. Briefly, all lungs were homogenized in 1 mL DMEM, 7.5% BSA using an Omni tissue homogenizer. Lung homogenate, serially diluted 10-fold, was added to a MDCK monolayer plated 24 h previously. The inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The cells were washed and covered with a 1:1 solution of 1 µg/mL N-tosyl-l-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin in 2× EMEM to 1.5% agarose. Plates were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C, the cells were fixed with methanol, the agar plugs were removed, and the cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution. The plaques were counted using an inverted microscope.
pHrodo-H3N2 Virus Fusion Kinetics Assay.
MDCK cells were seeded on chamber slides 24 h before the experiment. pHrodo-labeled virus was treated with antibody or PBS in FluoroBrite DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS at 4 °C for 1 h before infection (at 0.05 multiplicity of infection). For ammonium chloride treatments, cells were pretreated with ammonium chloride at 37 °C for 30 min (20 mM and 100 mM) or 15 min (300 mM). A corresponding dose of ammonium chloride was included during the whole experiment. Cells were stained with Cell Mask at 37 °C for 15 min and washed with PBS once before infection. The movie was taken with Leica DMi8 microscope for 90 min, and pictures were taken at 4-min intervals. For each sample, 8 stages were randomly chosen and paired with the control well. pHrodo-virus particles were traced during the time they appeared within 108 min postvirus infection. The infection assay was performed either at 33 °C (temperature of upper respiratory tract) or at 37 °C (temperature of lower respiratory tract).
Statistical Analysis.
The statistical significance of group differences was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a Bonferroni multiple comparison test. Correlations were calculated with a Pearson test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant with a 95% confidence interval.
Acknowledgments
MAbs 69/1 and 78/2 were a kind gift from Dr. R. G. Webster (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital). We thank Carol Weiss and Keith Peden for thorough review of the manuscript. The following reagent was obtained through BEI Resources, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH: Influenza A virus, A/Hong Kong/1/1968 (H3N2) (mother clone), NR-28620.
Footnotes
↵1K.L.W., J.T., and L.K. contributed equally to this work.
- ↵2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: Surender.Khurana{at}fda.hhs.gov.
Author contributions: S.K. designed research; K.L.W., J.T., L.K., J.L., E.M.C., J.M., H.L.T., K.T., A.B.W., and S.K. performed research; K.L.W., J.T., L.K., H.L.T., K.T., A.B.W., and S.K. analyzed data; and A.B.W., H.G., and S.K. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1821317116/-/DCSupplemental.
Published under the PNAS license.
References
- ↵
- G. Alter,
- D. Barouch
- ↵
- C. S. Nelson et al
- ↵
- T. C. Sutton et al
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- S. Jegaskanda
- ↵
- J. E. M. van der Lubbe et al
- ↵
- S. Jegaskanda et al
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- M. D. Co et al
- ↵
- K. K. To et al
- ↵
- Z. W. Ye et al
- ↵
- ↵
- S. Khurana et al
- ↵
- ↵
- J. E. Crowe Jr
- ↵
- S. P. Keeler et al
- ↵
- D. C. Ekiert et al
- ↵
- ↵
- A. Mejías et al
- ↵
- A. Mejías et al
- ↵
- ↵
- A. K. Wheatley,
- S. J. Kent
- ↵
- S. Khurana
- ↵
- S. B. Halstead,
- E. J. O’Rourke,
- A. C. Allison
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- T. C. Sutton,
- E. W. Lamirande,
- R. Czako,
- K. Subbarao
- ↵
- ↵
- M. Connors et al
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- D. K. Das et al
Citation Manager Formats
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Microbiology