Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Letter

Scientists who leave research to pursue other careers in science are still scientists

View ORCID ProfileShane M. Hanlon
  1. aSharing Science Program, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC 20009

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS September 3, 2019 116 (36) 17624; first published August 15, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909427116
Shane M. Hanlon
aSharing Science Program, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC 20009
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shane M. Hanlon
  • For correspondence: shane.michael.hanlon@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In their study, Milojević et al. (1) set out to examine the relationships between number of publications by (primarily academic) research scientists, whether those scientists were lead or supporting authors, and how long they remained in their research career. The authors found trends between how productive (measured by number of publications) researchers were early in their career and how long they remained researchers. Additionally, they found that a growing number of researchers never transition from supporting authors to lead authors, although no relationship exists between being a supporting author and time spent as a researcher. The authors argue that this change in authorship structure (from lead to supporting, from single to teams) is a net positive and “critical to the production of contemporary science.” They also make the point that while universities and institutions do not necessarily reward supporting authors as much as lead authors, universities should.

These are all salient points and valuable insights to move the needle on what has previously been accepted as the “correct” way(s) to conduct research. Unfortunately, the language used in the paper potentially prevents readers from discovering these points.

The issues begin with the title: “Changing demographics of scientific careers: The rise of the temporary workforce.” The authors define “temporary” as, essentially, anyone who leaves an academic/research career. (The authors do not make a distinction and use the 2 paths interchangeably. For purposes here, I will use “research.”) More troubling, per the language in the paper, “temporary workforce” is analogous to “temporary scientists.” Other problematic language exists throughout, starting in the abstract by referring to “careers of scientists” as only researchers, “scientific career survivability” as only careers in research, and scientists with “full careers” as those who have authored multiple papers over a 20-y period. Possibly most egregious is the use of “dropout” to define those who leave academia and “transient” for authors with a single publication.

“Dropout” is not an appropriate language choice. “Transient” may be acceptable when paired with “authors,” but even then nonresearch scientists still publish, especially those in science communication and journalism. In some cases, they publish more than researchers.

When a scientist stops their research career, that does not mean that they are no longer a scientist—they just change how they contribute to science. Sometimes this shift in contribution is not completely voluntary. Parenthood can influence the role of scientists, especially women who may be forced to change how they contribute to science (2) or from a career in science altogether (3). Gender of one’s advisor can also have an effect on the productivity of graduate students, potentially shaping their trajectory (4).

I am no longer a researcher; however, I still contribute to science. I changed how I contribute to science, as have many of my peers and colleagues who are not active researchers. To say that all of us who pursued science, no matter if we have bachelor’s or master’s degrees, PhDs, or more, have dropped out of science does not reflect the facts.

Footnotes

  • ↵1Email: shane.michael.hanlon{at}gmail.com.
  • Author contributions: S.M.H. wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

Published under the PNAS license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. S. Milojević,
    2. F. Radicchi,
    3. J. P. Walsh
    , Changing demographics of scientific careers: The rise of the temporary workforce. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 12616–12623 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. E. A. Cech,
    2. M. Blair-Loy
    , The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 4182–4187 (2019).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. M. A. Mason,
    2. N. H. Wolfinger,
    3. M. Goulden
    , Do Babies Matter?: Gender and Family in the Ivory Tower (Rutgers University Press, 2013).
  4. ↵
    1. P. Gaule,
    2. M. Piacentini
    , An advisor like me? Advisor gender and post-graduate careers in science. Res. Policy 47, 805–813 (2018).
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Scientists who leave research to pursue other careers in science are still scientists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Scientists who leave research to pursue other careers in science are still scientists
Shane M. Hanlon
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2019, 116 (36) 17624; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1909427116

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Scientists who leave research to pursue other careers in science are still scientists
Shane M. Hanlon
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2019, 116 (36) 17624; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1909427116
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences

This Letter has a Reply and related content. Please see:

  • Changing demographics of scientific careers: The rise of the temporary workforce - December 10, 2018
  • Relationship between Letter and Reply - August 15, 2019
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (36)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Reflection of clouds in the still waters of Mono Lake in California.
Inner Workings: Making headway with the mysteries of life’s origins
Recent experiments and simulations are starting to answer some fundamental questions about how life came to be.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Radoslaw Lecyk.
Cave in coastal Kenya with tree growing in the middle.
Journal Club: Small, sharp blades mark shift from Middle to Later Stone Age in coastal Kenya
Archaeologists have long tried to define the transition between the two time periods.
Image credit: Ceri Shipton.
Mouse fibroblast cells. Electron bifurcation reactions keep mammalian cells alive.
Exploring electron bifurcation
Jonathon Yuly, David Beratan, and Peng Zhang investigate how electron bifurcation reactions work.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490