Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Shearwaters know the direction and distance home but fail to encode intervening obstacles after free-ranging foraging trips

Oliver Padget, View ORCID ProfileGeoff Stanley, Jay K. Willis, View ORCID ProfileAnnette L. Fayet, Sarah Bond, Louise Maurice, Akiko Shoji, Ben Dean, Holly Kirk, Ignacio Juarez-Martinez, Robin Freeman, Mark Bolton, and View ORCID ProfileTim Guilford
  1. aDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  2. bDepartment of Physics, Oxford University, OX1 3PJ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  3. cBritish Geological Survey, OX10 8ED Wallingford, United Kingdom;
  4. dGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan;
  5. eZoological Society of London, Institute of Zoology, NW1 4RY London, United Kingdom;
  6. fCentre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, SG19 2DL Sandy, United Kingdom

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS October 22, 2019 116 (43) 21629-21633; first published October 7, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903829116
Oliver Padget
aDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: oliver.padget@zoo.ox.ac.uk tim.guilford@zoo.ox.ac.uk
Geoff Stanley
bDepartment of Physics, Oxford University, OX1 3PJ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Geoff Stanley
Jay K. Willis
aDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annette L. Fayet
aDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Annette L. Fayet
Sarah Bond
aDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise Maurice
cBritish Geological Survey, OX10 8ED Wallingford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akiko Shoji
dGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ben Dean
aDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holly Kirk
aDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ignacio Juarez-Martinez
aDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robin Freeman
eZoological Society of London, Institute of Zoology, NW1 4RY London, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Bolton
fCentre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, SG19 2DL Sandy, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim Guilford
aDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, OX1 3SZ Oxford, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tim Guilford
  • For correspondence: oliver.padget@zoo.ox.ac.uk tim.guilford@zoo.ox.ac.uk
  1. Edited by Carol A. Barnes, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, and approved September 10, 2019 (received for review March 6, 2019)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Procellariiform seabirds homing from distant foraging locations present a natural situation in which the homing route can become obstructed by islands or peninsulas because birds will not travel long distances over land. By measuring initial orientation from Global Positioning System (GPS) tracks during homing, we found that the Manx shearwater fails to encode such obstacles while homing, implying a navigation system that encodes the direction of home rather than a learned route. Nonetheless, shearwaters timed their journeys home, implying that their navigational system provides them with information about both direction and distance home, providing evidence that for routine, yet long-distance navigation, seabirds probably ascertain homeward direction by comparing their current position and the location of home with 2 or more intersecting field gradients.

Abstract

While displacement experiments have been powerful for determining the sensory basis of homing navigation in birds, they have left unresolved important cognitive aspects of navigation such as what birds know about their location relative to home and the anticipated route. Here, we analyze the free-ranging Global Positioning System (GPS) tracks of a large sample (n = 707) of Manx shearwater, Puffinus puffinus, foraging trips to investigate, from a cognitive perspective, what a wild, pelagic seabird knows as it begins to home naturally. By exploiting a kind of natural experimental contrast (journeys with or without intervening obstacles) we first show that, at the start of homing, sometimes hundreds of kilometers from the colony, shearwaters are well oriented in the homeward direction, but often fail to encode intervening barriers over which they will not fly (islands or peninsulas), constrained to flying farther as a result. Second, shearwaters time their homing journeys, leaving earlier in the day when they have farther to go, and this ability to judge distance home also apparently ignores intervening obstacles. Thus, at the start of homing, shearwaters appear to be making navigational decisions using both geographic direction and distance to the goal. Since we find no decrease in orientation accuracy with trip length, duration, or tortuosity, path integration mechanisms cannot account for these findings. Instead, our results imply that a navigational mechanism used to direct natural large-scale movements in wild pelagic seabirds has map-like properties and is probably based on large-scale gradients.

  • animal navigation
  • animal cognition
  • spatial cognition
  • map and compass
  • gradient map

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: oliver.padget{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk or tim.guilford{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk.
  • ↵2Present address: School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

  • Author contributions: O.P., S.B., L.M., and T.G. designed research; O.P., A.L.F., S.B., A.S., B.D., H.K., I.J.-M., R.F., M.B., and T.G. performed research; O.P., G.S., J.K.W., and T.G. analyzed data; and O.P., G.S., S.B., L.M., and T.G. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • Data deposition: Tracking data are deposited in Movebank, https://doi.org/10.5441/001/1.k20j58qt.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1903829116/-/DCSupplemental.

  • Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Shearwaters know the direction and distance home but fail to encode intervening obstacles after free-ranging foraging trips
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Shearwaters know the direction and distance home but fail to encode intervening obstacles after free-ranging foraging trips
Oliver Padget, Geoff Stanley, Jay K. Willis, Annette L. Fayet, Sarah Bond, Louise Maurice, Akiko Shoji, Ben Dean, Holly Kirk, Ignacio Juarez-Martinez, Robin Freeman, Mark Bolton, Tim Guilford
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2019, 116 (43) 21629-21633; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1903829116

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Shearwaters know the direction and distance home but fail to encode intervening obstacles after free-ranging foraging trips
Oliver Padget, Geoff Stanley, Jay K. Willis, Annette L. Fayet, Sarah Bond, Louise Maurice, Akiko Shoji, Ben Dean, Holly Kirk, Ignacio Juarez-Martinez, Robin Freeman, Mark Bolton, Tim Guilford
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2019, 116 (43) 21629-21633; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1903829116
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Evolution
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (43)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490