Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Social Sciences

Heritability of education rises with intergenerational mobility

Per Engzell and Felix C. Tropf
PNAS December 17, 2019 116 (51) 25386-25388; first published December 2, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912998116
Per Engzell
aNuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1NF, United Kingdom;
bLeverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1JD, United Kingdom;
cSwedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: per.engzell@nuffield.ox.ac.uk
Felix C. Tropf
aNuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1NF, United Kingdom;
dLaboratoire de Sociologie Quantitative, École Nationale de la Statistique et de l’Administration Économique, 99120 Palaiseau, France;
eDepartment of Sociology, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics, 99120 Palaiseau, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Kenneth W. Wachter, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved November 13, 2019 (received for review August 9, 2019)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As an indicator of educational opportunity, social scientists have studied intergenerational mobility—the degree to which children’s attainment depends on that of their parents—and how it varies across place or time. We combine this research with behavior genetics to show that societal variation in mobility is rooted in family advantages that siblings share over and above genetic transmission. In societies with high intergenerational mobility, less variance in educational attainment is attributable to the shared sibling environment. Variance due to genetic factors is largely constant, but its share as a part of total variance, heritability, rises with mobility. Our results suggest that environmental differences underlie variation in intergenerational mobility, and that there is no tension between egalitarian policies and the realization of individual genetic potential.

  • educational attainment
  • intergenerational mobility
  • heritability

Intergenerational education mobility—how strongly educational attainment persists from parent to child—is commonly used to indicate societies’ degree of openness or equality of opportunity (1, 2). A limitation of this literature is that it often is silent on the channels of transmission. Yet, we may view genetic transmission differently from other advantages such as parents’ ability to pay for good neighborhoods, schools, or access to college (3, 4). Insofar as genetic factors capture relevant abilities, their influence is consistent with meritocratic norms (5⇓–7). Such norms can be motivated on grounds of efficiency, as a society’s viability depends on its ability to attract competent leaders and innovators (8, 9).

In other words, it matters not only whether education is inherited, but also how (3). One approach to the “how” question comes from behavior genetics (10). By comparing outcomes for family members with varying degree of genetic resemblance—typically, twins—we can partition variance in an outcome to that attributable to genetic factors (heritability, h2), shared sibling environment (c2), and idiosyncratic factors (e2) (11). While such studies potentially tell us much about the distribution of opportunities, societal comparison has rarely been central to them. In this study, we ask: Where intergenerational mobility is higher, does the balance of “nature” and “nurture” in educational attainment differ?

Results

Intergenerational Mobility.

Fig. 1A plots the parent–offspring correlation in years of schooling for children born in the 1940s to 1980s in 10 countries for which genetic data are available. A lower correlation implies more intergenerational mobility. These data, from the World Bank, confirm previous research: Educational mobility increased in the past and is higher in northern Europe and Australia—places with liberal welfare states—than in the United States or southern Europe (2, 12).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Genetic and environmental influences on educational attainment. (A) Trends in intergenerational mobility across 10 countries: Australia (AUS), Denmark (DNK), Finland (FIN), Germany (DEU), Italy (ITA), Norway (NOR), Spain (ESP), Sweden (SWE), United Kingdom (GBR), and United States (USA). (B and C) Association of intergenerational mobility with heritability (h2) and shared environmental influences (c2). Superimposed lines show the least-squares line of best fit, with 95% confidence intervals indicated by shaded areas; marker labels encode the country and decade of birth for each cohort.

Behavior Genetics Estimates.

In Fig. 1 B and C, we link intergenerational correlations with genetic data from twin studies (11). On the vertical axes, h2 (Fig. 1B) tells us to what extent differences in educational attainment result from the genetic lottery, while c2 (Fig. 1C) indicates the importance of other family background factors. In societies with high mobility—that is, a lower intergenerational correlation—the relative explanatory power of genetic factors (h2) is stronger, while that of shared sibling environment (c2) is weaker. Table 1 shows that this result remains when controlling for gender and adjusting standard errors for correlation between male and female subsamples. The residual component e2 is largely unrelated to mobility.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Correlation of standardized and destandardized variance components with the intergenerational correlation

Absolute and Relative Variance.

That relative genetic influence h2 is higher in more mobile societies could mean 2 things. Either 1) environmentally induced (and thereby total) variance is decreasing and/or 2) a lucky genetic draw is reaping higher rewards in absolute terms. If possibility 2, structural inequality may simply be replaced by genetic inequality, which could be seen as no less troubling. To test this, we destandardize h2,c2,e2 by total population variance (Table 1). Doing so supports possibility 1 over possibility 2: the prevailing result is that high mobility goes together with a lower absolute influence of the shared environment, c2′. In other words, h2 and mobility correlate because mobility reduces total variance while genetic variance remains constant, not because genes matter more in an absolute sense.

Discussion

Our results indicate that social mobility is improved by reducing social inheritance, a process that brings genetic influences to the fore. Besides their general interest, these findings speak to several academic debates. In social mobility research, there has been controversy about the extent to which policy can achieve lasting change. Critics have seen political attempts to increase mobility as either inadequate (13) or futile, adding the assumption that inheritance is largely genetic in origin (14). Our study challenges these views by showing that societal variation in mobility is not only substantial but firmly rooted in the removal of environmental barriers.

Meanwhile, geneticists have surmised that more ample opportunities may translate into a higher h2 for developmental outcomes (15, 16). Based on this, it stands to reason that h2 should be higher in societies where education policy promotes social mobility (17). Yet, comparative evidence has been lacking, and the canonical reference is to a study of Norwegian cohorts over time (18). A separate literature examines differences in h2 between socioeconomic strata within a society, focusing mostly on IQ, but with mixed results (16, 17).

Our study contributes to these debates using large-scale cross-national data on an outcome of high policy relevance. Nevertheless, educational attainment is an incomplete proxy for social standing, and our results might have looked different with access to comparable data on income, wealth, or occupational prestige. Notably, research typically finds larger environmental components for economic outcomes (19). The intergenerational correlation is also distinct from causal effects of parental education, or the sibling correlation (20).

Lastly, it remains debatable whether genetic advantages should be seen as less troubling than socially inherited ones. While social inheritance may be easier to subvert, we should want to compensate for genetic bad luck when we can (21). Research using molecular genetic data can shed further light on the mechanisms underlying genetic influence (10, 22). Such research tells us that individual genetic variation contributes to social mobility and not just inheritance (23). More work in this vein will help grow the evidence base for policies aimed at ameliorating disadvantage.

Materials and Methods

Intergenerational Mobility.

Estimates are from the Global Database on Intergenerational Mobility (GDIM) (24) compiled by the World Bank (2) from various sample surveys. The main respondent is the daughter or son who also reports about the parents. We use the correlation between child (yc) and parent (yp) years of schooling,rIG=Corr(yc,yp)=Cov(yc,yp)Var(yc)Var(yp),[1]for the parent with highest education. We smooth country trends by averaging the value for each cohort with the adjacent ones.

Behavior Genetics Estimates.

Genetic variance components are from a metaanalysis by Branigan et al. (11). The h2 (heritability) and c2 (shared environmental variance) are estimated from the correlation in educational attainment among identical (rMZ) and fraternal (rDZ) twin pairs,h2=2×(rMZ−rDZ),[2]c2=rMZ−h2,[3]e2=1−h2−c2,[4]where e2 is a residual component reflecting nonshared environment and measurement error. To compare absolute and relative variances, we destandardize the components,h2′=h2⋅Var(yc),[5]and do likewise for c2 and e2. Total population variance Var(yc) is estimated from the GDIM.

Twin studies make some strong model assumptions such as no genetic parental assortative mating, no gene–environment interaction, and that different types of twins share environmental influences effectively to the same extent. In our comparative study design, we mainly need to assume that potential model violations do not correlate with mobility patterns.

Quality Control and Matching.

The GDIM spans cohorts born from the 1940s through the 1980s; genetic variance components span cohorts born throughout the century. We match each twin estimate to the GDIM based on country, gender, and the closest year of birth. Of the 34 estimates available, we exclude 2 cohorts that lack overlap in the GDIM data, and a further 3 that are from local or nonrepresentative samples in the United States. This leaves a total of 26 data points. The data contain a few negative variance estimates, which we set to zero.

Data Availability.

Data and code to replicate all findings can be found at https://osf.io/c549j/. There we also show that our results are robust to analytical decisions taken, including the choice of parent, whether to smooth over cohorts, whether to exclude nonrepresentative US samples, whether to recode negative variance estimates, and how to account for clustering. Moreover, we confirm that our results are not driven by any one country, by repeating analyses excluding each.

Acknowledgments

P.E. was supported by Nuffield College, the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, The Leverhulme Trust, and FORTE Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Grant #2016-07099). F.C.T. was supported by the Laboratory of Excellence in Economics and Decision Sciences (LabEx Ecodec) funded under the French National Research Agency (ANR) Investissements d’Avenir (Grant #ANR-11-LABX-0047). We thank the World Bank and authors of the heritability metaanalysis (Amelia R. Branigan, Kenneth J. McCallum, and Jeremy Freese) for making their estimates available.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: per.engzell{at}nuffield.ox.ac.uk.
  • Author contributions: P.E. and F.C.T. designed research; P.E. performed research; P.E. analyzed data; and P.E. and F.C.T. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

References

  1. ↵
    1. R. Breen,
    2. J. O. Jonsson
    , Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 31, 223–243 (2005).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. A. Narayan et al.
    , Fair Progress?: Economic Mobility Across Generations Around the World (The World Bank, 2018).
  3. ↵
    1. C. Jencks,
    2. L. Tach
    , “Would equal opportunity mean more mobility?” in Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Research from Sociology and Economics, S. L. Morgan, D. B. Grusky, G. S. Fields, Eds. (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 2006), pp. 23–58.
  4. ↵
    1. D. Conley et al.
    , Is the effect of parental education on offspring biased or moderated by genotype?Soc. Sci. 2, 82–105 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. G. Guo,
    2. E. Stearns
    , The social influences on the realization of genetic potential for intellectual development. Soc. Forces 80, 881–910 (2002).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. F. Nielsen
    , Achievement and ascription in educational attainment: Genetic and environmental influences on adolescent schooling. Soc. Forces 85, 193–216 (2006).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. R. Plomin
    , Blueprint: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are (MIT Press, 2018).
  8. ↵
    1. E. Dal Bó,
    2. F. Finan,
    3. O. Folke,
    4. T. Persson,
    5. J. Rickne
    , Who becomes a politician?Q. J. Econ. 132, 1877–1914 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. A. Bell,
    2. R. Chetty,
    3. X. Jaravel,
    4. N. Petkova,
    5. J. Van Reenen
    , Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. Q. J. Econ. 134, 647–713 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. D. Cesarini,
    2. P. M. Visscher
    , Genetics and educational attainment. npj Sci. Learning 2, 4 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. A. R. Branigan,
    2. K. J. McCallum,
    3. J. Freese
    , Variation in the heritability of educational attainment: An international meta-analysis. Soc. Forces 92, 109–140 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. R. Breen,
    2. R. Luijkx,
    3. W. Müller,
    4. R. Pollak
    , Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: Evidence from eight European countries. Am. J. Sociol. 114, 1475–1521 (2009).
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. R. Erikson,
    2. J. Goldthorpe
    , The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies (Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1992).
  14. ↵
    1. G. Clark
    , The Son Also Rises: Surnames and the History of Social Mobility (Princeton University Press, 2014).
  15. ↵
    1. S. Scarr-Salapatek
    , Race, social class, and IQ. Science 174, 1285–1295 (1971).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. D. C. Rowe,
    2. K. C. Jacobson,
    3. E. J. G. Van den Oord
    , Genetic and environmental influences on vocabulary IQ: Parental education level as moderator. Child Dev. 70, 1151–1162 (1999).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. E. M. Tucker-Drob,
    2. T. C. Bates
    , Large cross-national differences in gene × socioeconomic status interaction on intelligence. Psychol. Sci. 27, 138–149 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. A. C. Heath et al.
    , Education policy and the heritability of educational attainment. Nature 314, 734–736 (1985).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. K. Majlesi,
    2. P. Lundborg,
    3. S. Black,
    4. P. Devereux
    , Poor little rich kids? The role of nature versus nurture in wealth and other economic outcomes and behaviors. Rev. Econ. Stud., doi:10.1093/restud/rdz038 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. A. Björklund,
    2. K. G. Salvanes
    , “Education and family background: Mechanisms and policies” in Handbook of the Economics of Education, E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, L. Woessmann, Eds. (Elsevier, 2011), vol. 3, pp. 201–247.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. A. S. Goldberger
    , Heritability. Economica 46, 327–347 (1979).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. J. J. Lee et al.
    , Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nat. Genet. 50, 1112–1121 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. D. W. Belsky et al.
    , Genetic analysis of social-class mobility in five longitudinal studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E7275–E7284 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Development Research Group
    , GDIM. Global Database on Intergenerational Mobility (World Bank, 2018). https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/brief/what-is-the-global-database-on-intergenerational-mobility-gdim. Accessed 25 July 2018.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Heritability of education rises with intergenerational mobility
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Heritability of education rises with intergenerational mobility
Per Engzell, Felix C. Tropf
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2019, 116 (51) 25386-25388; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1912998116

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Heritability of education rises with intergenerational mobility
Per Engzell, Felix C. Tropf
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2019, 116 (51) 25386-25388; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1912998116
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (51)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

 Coral reef bleaching frequently makes headlines, but researchers are still trying to sort out the cellular mechanisms at work.  Image credit: The Ocean Agency/XL Catlin Seaview Survey.
Inner Workings: A microscopic mystery at the heart of mass-coral bleaching
Coral reef bleaching frequently makes headlines, but researchers are still trying to sort out the cellular mechanisms at work.
Image credit: The Ocean Agency/XL Catlin Seaview Survey.
A deep-learning algorithm could potentially improve diagnosis and classification of neurological abnormalities. Image courtesy of Weicheng Kuo, Christian Hӓne, Pratik Mukherjee, Jitendra Malik, and Esther Lim Yuh
Brain hemorrhage detection by artificial neural network
A deep-learning algorithm could potentially improve diagnosis and classification of neurological abnormalities.
Image courtesy of Weicheng Kuo, Christian Hӓne, Pratik Mukherjee, Jitendra Malik, and Esther L. Yuh.
A study finds a shift in onset of El Niño events from eastern to western Pacific and increased frequency of extreme El Niño events since the late 1970s. Image courtesy of NOAA National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS).
Changing El Niño properties
A study finds a shift in onset of El Niño events from eastern to western Pacific and increased frequency of extreme El Niño events since the late 1970s.
Image courtesy of NOAA National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS).
A study explores how various types of food affect both human health and the environment. Image courtesy of Pixabay/esigie.
Environmental and health impacts of food
A study explores how various types of food affect both human health and the environment.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/esigie.
Profile of NAS member and molecular biologist Mary Lou Guerinot. Image courtesy of Olga Zhaxybayeva (Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH).
Featured Profile
Profile of NAS member and molecular biologist Mary Lou Guerinot
Image courtesy of Olga Zhaxybayeva (Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2020 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490