New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Effects of rapid evolution on species coexistence
Edited by Dolph Schluter, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, and approved November 30, 2018 (received for review October 3, 2018)

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Significance
Understanding the dynamics of competing species is essential for explaining the origin and maintenance of species diversity. However, ecologists have typically ignored the potential for rapid evolution to alter the contemporary population dynamics of competing species. By disrupting the ability of aquatic plants to evolve in response to interspecific competition, we show that competition drives evolutionary change and this evolutionary change simultaneously feeds back to alter the abundance of competing species over just a few generations. Rather than increasing niche differences as classic theory predicts, evolution causes population trajectories to converge by changing the competitive hierarchy. Our results suggest that understanding how species diversity is maintained requires explicitly accounting for the effects of rapid evolution on competitive population dynamics.
Abstract
Increasing evidence for rapid evolution suggests that the maintenance of species diversity in ecological communities may be influenced by more than purely ecological processes. Classic theory shows that interspecific competition may select for traits that increase niche differentiation, weakening competition and thus promoting species coexistence. While empirical work has demonstrated trait evolution in response to competition, if and how evolution affects the dynamics of the competing species—the key step for completing the required eco-evolutionary feedback—has been difficult to resolve. Here, we show that evolution in response to interspecific competition feeds back to change the course of competitive population dynamics of aquatic plant species over 10–15 generations in the field. By manipulating selection imposed by heterospecific competitors in experimental ponds, we demonstrate that (i) interspecific competition drives rapid genotypic change, and (ii) this evolutionary change in one competitor, while not changing the coexistence outcome, causes the population trajectories of the two competing species to converge. In contrast to the common expectation that interspecific competition should drive the evolution of niche differentiation, our results suggest that genotypic evolution resulted in phenotypic changes that altered population dynamics by affecting the competitive hierarchy. This result is consistent with theory suggesting that competition for essential resources can limit opportunities for the evolution of niche differentiation. Our finding that rapid evolution regulates the dynamics of competing species suggests that ecosystems may rely on continuous feedbacks between ecology and evolution to maintain species diversity.
Footnotes
↵1S.P.H. and M.M.T. contributed equally to this work.
- ↵2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: simon.hart{at}usys.ethz.ch.
↵3Present address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Author contributions: S.P.H., M.M.T., and J.M.L. designed research; S.P.H. and M.M.T. performed experiments; M.M.T. led the laboratory genetic analyses; S.P.H. analyzed data; and S.P.H. wrote the first draft of the paper and all authors contributed substantially to revisions.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Data Deposition: Data relating to this work have been deposited on figshare (doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7599095.v1).
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1816298116/-/DCSupplemental.
Published under the PNAS license.
Log in using your username and password
Purchase access
Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.
Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
More Articles of This Classification
Biological Sciences
Related Content
- No related articles found.
Cited by...
- No citing articles found.