Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Gaze deflection reveals how gaze cueing is tuned to extract the mind behind the eyes

View ORCID ProfileClara Colombatto, View ORCID ProfileYi-Chia Chen, and Brian J. Scholl
PNAS August 18, 2020 117 (33) 19825-19829; first published August 5, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010841117
Clara Colombatto
aDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Clara Colombatto
  • For correspondence: clara.colombatto@yale.edu yichiachen@ucla.edu brian.scholl@yale.edu
Yi-Chia Chen
bDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yi-Chia Chen
  • For correspondence: clara.colombatto@yale.edu yichiachen@ucla.edu brian.scholl@yale.edu
Brian J. Scholl
aDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: clara.colombatto@yale.edu yichiachen@ucla.edu brian.scholl@yale.edu
  1. Edited by Michael S. A. Graziano, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Michael S. Gazzaniga June 22, 2020 (received for review June 2, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Significance

We report an empirical study of gaze deflection—a common experience in which you turn to look in a different direction when someone “catches” you staring at them. We show that gaze cueing (the automatic orienting of attention to locations at which others are looking) is far weaker for such displays, even when the actual eye and head movements are identical to more typical intentional gazes. This demonstrates how gaze cueing is driven by the perception of minds, not eyes, and it serves as a case study of both how social dynamics can shape visual attention in a sophisticated manner and how vision science can contribute to our understanding of common social phenomena.

Abstract

Suppose you are surreptitiously looking at someone, and then when they catch you staring at them, you immediately turn away. This is a social phenomenon that almost everyone experiences occasionally. In such experiences—which we will call gaze deflection—the “deflected” gaze is not directed at anything in particular but simply away from the other person. As such, this is a rare instance where we may turn to look in a direction without intending to look there specifically. Here we show that gaze cues are markedly less effective at orienting an observer’s attention when they are seen as deflected in this way—even controlling for low-level visual properties. We conclude that gaze cueing is a sophisticated mental phenomenon: It is not merely driven by perceived eye or head motions but is rather well tuned to extract the “mind” behind the eyes.

  • attention
  • gaze cueing
  • intentionality
  • social perception
  • gaze deflection

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: clara.colombatto{at}yale.edu, yichiachen{at}ucla.edu, or brian.scholl{at}yale.edu.
  • Author contributions: C.C., Y.-C.C., and B.J.S. designed research; C.C. and Y.-C.C. performed research; C.C. and Y.-C.C. analyzed data; and C.C., Y.-C.C., and B.J.S. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. M.S.A.G. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.

  • This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2010841117/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

All raw data are available in SI Appendix. The preregistration for experiment 2 can be viewed at https://aspredicted.org/yw8az.pdf, and that for experiments 3a and 3b can be viewed at https://aspredicted.org/mm4pc.pdf.

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text

References

  1. ↵
    1. N. J. Emery
    , The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24, 581–604 (2000).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. S. Milgram,
    2. L. Bickman,
    3. L. Berkowitz
    , Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 13, 79–82 (1969).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. J. Driver et al.
    , Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Vis. Cogn. 6, 509–540 (1999).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. C. K. Friesen,
    2. A. Kingstone
    , The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 5, 490–495 (1998).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. A. Frischen,
    2. A. P. Bayliss,
    3. S. P. Tipper
    , Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychol. Bull. 133, 694–724 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. S. R. H. Langton,
    2. V. Bruce
    , Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Vis. Cogn. 6, 541–567 (1999).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. S. R. H. Langton,
    2. R. J. Watt,
    3. V. Bruce
    , Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 50–59 (2000).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. I. Krajbich,
    2. C. Armel,
    3. A. Rangel
    , Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1292–1298 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. S. R. H. Langton
    , Gaze perception: Is seeing influenced by believing? Curr. Biol. 19, R651–R653 (2009).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. A. C. Gallup et al.
    , Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 7245–7250 (2012).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. J. Florey,
    2. C. W. G. Clifford,
    3. S. Dakin,
    4. I. Mareschal
    , Spatial limitations in averaging social cues. Sci. Rep. 6, 32210 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Z. Sun,
    2. W. Yu,
    3. J. Zhou,
    4. M. Shen
    , Perceiving crowd attention: Gaze following in human crowds with conflicting cues. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 79, 1039–1049 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. T. Vestner,
    2. S. P. Tipper,
    3. T. Hartley,
    4. H. Over,
    5. S.-A. Rueschemeyer
    , Bound together: Social binding leads to faster processing, spatial distortion, and enhanced memory of interacting partners. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148, 1251–1268 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. F. Capozzi,
    2. J. Ristic
    , Attention AND mentalizing? Reframing a debate on social orienting of attention. Vis. Cogn. 28, 97–105 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. A. Kingstone,
    2. G. Kachkovski,
    3. D. Vasilyev,
    4. M. Kuk,
    5. T. N. Welsh
    , Mental attribution is not sufficient or necessary to trigger attentional orienting to gaze. Cognition 189, 35–40 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. A. Guterstam,
    2. H. H. Kean,
    3. T. W. Webb,
    4. F. S. Kean,
    5. M. S. A. Graziano
    , Implicit model of other people’s visual attention as an invisible, force-carrying beam projecting from the eyes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 328–333 (2019).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. M. J. C. Crump,
    2. J. V. McDonnell,
    3. T. M. Gureckis
    , Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One 8, e57410 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gaze deflection reveals how gaze cueing is tuned to extract the mind behind the eyes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Gaze deflection reveals how gaze cueing is tuned to extract the mind behind the eyes
Clara Colombatto, Yi-Chia Chen, Brian J. Scholl
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2020, 117 (33) 19825-19829; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2010841117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Gaze deflection reveals how gaze cueing is tuned to extract the mind behind the eyes
Clara Colombatto, Yi-Chia Chen, Brian J. Scholl
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2020, 117 (33) 19825-19829; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2010841117
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 117 (33)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Methods and Materials
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Tropical cyclone Ita just offshore near Cape Flattery, Queensland, Australia.
Trends in tropical cyclone intensity
A study suggests that tropical cyclones have been increasing in intensity over the past four decades, consistent with predictions of physical theory and numerical simulations.
Image credit: NOAA/NASA.
Framboidal (raspberry-like) magnetite grains in the Tagish Lake meteorite, magnetically aligned following formation in water.
Prebiotic and meteorite fluid chemistry
Atomic-scale analysis of the Tagish Lake meteorite finds that its raspberry-like magnetite grains formed in a sodium-rich, high-pH environment, providing insight into the chemistry of the earliest fluids in the Solar System.
Image credit: Chi Ma.
Full-hemisphere view of Earth at night.
Likelihood of life and intelligence emerging
Bayesian analysis of the chronology of life’s emergence and development on Earth suggests that if Earth’s history were repeated, the emergence of intelligence might be a sufficiently rare event that it would not be guaranteed to reoccur.
Image credit: NASA Earth Observatory image by Joshua Stevens, using Suomi NPP VIIRS data from Miguel Román, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.
Man standing in a lab.
Featured Profile
Profile of NAS member and biochemist Edward H. Egelman.
Two men standing on a large tree branch
Opinion: We have been in lockdown, but deforestation has not
Some governments are using the pandemic as a smokescreen to eviscerate regulations. Meanwhile, deforestation is spiking along with COVID-19.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2020 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490