Resolving the Dust Bowl paradox of grassland responses to extreme drought
- aDepartment of Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523;
- bDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131;
- cKey Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation of Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P.R. China;
- dCollege of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P.R. China;
- eCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Sarah E. Hobbie, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, and approved July 14, 2020 (received for review December 16, 2019)

Significance
During the Dust Bowl drought, central US grasslands responded unexpectedly to a decade of hot, dry conditions. Grass species adapted to high temperatures with higher water use efficiency (C4 grasses) decreased, while those preferring cooler climates (C3 grasses) increased. We reproduced this surprising response by experimentally imposing extreme drought in two native grasslands. Analysis of historical climate records revealed that during extreme drought years, the proportion of annual precipitation that occurs during cooler months increases. This previously unidentified shift in seasonal precipitation patterns during extreme drought years provides a mechanism for C3 grasses to increase despite overall hot, dry conditions. Thus, alterations in precipitation seasonality may be as important as reduced precipitation amount when forecasting ecosystem responses to extreme drought.
Abstract
During the 1930s Dust Bowl drought in the central United States, species with the C3 photosynthetic pathway expanded throughout C4-dominated grasslands. This widespread increase in C3 grasses during a decade of low rainfall and high temperatures is inconsistent with well-known traits of C3 vs. C4 pathways. Indeed, water use efficiency is generally lower, and photosynthesis is more sensitive to high temperatures in C3 than C4 species, consistent with the predominant distribution of C3 grasslands in cooler environments and at higher latitudes globally. We experimentally imposed extreme drought for 4 y in mixed C3/C4 grasslands in Kansas and Wyoming and, similar to Dust Bowl observations, also documented three- to fivefold increases in C3/C4 biomass ratios. To explain these paradoxical responses, we first analyzed long-term climate records to show that under nominal conditions in the central United States, C4 grasses dominate where precipitation and air temperature are strongly related (warmest months are wettest months). In contrast, C3 grasses flourish where precipitation inputs are less strongly coupled to warm temperatures. We then show that during extreme drought years, precipitation–temperature relationships weaken, and the proportion of precipitation falling during cooler months increases. This shift in precipitation seasonality provides a mechanism for C3 grasses to respond positively to multiyear drought, resolving the Dust Bowl paradox. Grasslands are globally important biomes and increasingly vulnerable to direct effects of climate extremes. Our findings highlight how extreme drought can indirectly alter precipitation seasonality and shift ecosystem phenology, affecting function in ways not predictable from key traits of C3 and C4 species.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: aknapp{at}colostate.edu.
Author contributions: A.K.K., S.L.C., Y.L., and M.D.S. designed research; R.J.G.-N., L.E.B., C.J.W.C., J.E.G., A.M.H., A.K.P., and I.J.S. performed research; A.C., R.J.G.-N., L.E.B., A.M.H., X.L., and I.J.S. analyzed data; and A.K.K. and M.D.S. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Data deposition: The data reported in this paper are available in Dryad (https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.3j9kd51dv).
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1922030117/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability.
Data from the field experiments are available via Dryad (https://datadryad.org/stash, doi:10.5061/dryad.3j9kd51dv). All climate data are publicly available at NOAA’s National Climate Data Center (www.ncdc.noaa.gov/) and the PRISM Climate Data website (www.prism.oregonstate.edu/).
Published under the PNAS license.
Citation Manager Formats
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Ecology














