Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Mechanism for analogous illusory motion perception in flies and humans

View ORCID ProfileMargarida Agrochao, View ORCID ProfileRyosuke Tanaka, Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas, and View ORCID ProfileDamon A. Clark
  1. aDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
  2. bInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
  3. cDepartment of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
  4. dDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS September 15, 2020 117 (37) 23044-23053; first published August 24, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002937117
Margarida Agrochao
aDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Margarida Agrochao
Ryosuke Tanaka
bInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryosuke Tanaka
Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas
bInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damon A. Clark
aDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
bInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
cDepartment of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
dDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Damon A. Clark
  • For correspondence: damon.clark@yale.edu
  1. Edited by John G. Hildebrand, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, and approved July 13, 2020 (received for review March 1, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Most of the time, visual circuitry in our brains faithfully reports visual scenes. Sometimes, however, it can report motion in images that are in fact stationary, leading us to perceive illusory motion. In this study, we establish that fruit flies, too, perceive motion in the stationary images that evoke illusory motion in humans. Our results demonstrate how this motion illusion in flies is an artifact of the brain’s strategies for efficiently processing motion in natural scenes. Perceptual tests in humans suggest that our brains may employ similar mechanisms for this illusion. This study shows how illusions can provide insight into visual processing mechanisms and principles across phyla.

Abstract

Visual motion detection is one of the most important computations performed by visual circuits. Yet, we perceive vivid illusory motion in stationary, periodic luminance gradients that contain no true motion. This illusion is shared by diverse vertebrate species, but theories proposed to explain this illusion have remained difficult to test. Here, we demonstrate that in the fruit fly Drosophila, the illusory motion percept is generated by unbalanced contributions of direction-selective neurons’ responses to stationary edges. First, we found that flies, like humans, perceive sustained motion in the stationary gradients. The percept was abolished when the elementary motion detector neurons T4 and T5 were silenced. In vivo calcium imaging revealed that T4 and T5 neurons encode the location and polarity of stationary edges. Furthermore, our proposed mechanistic model allowed us to predictably manipulate both the magnitude and direction of the fly’s illusory percept by selectively silencing either T4 or T5 neurons. Interestingly, human brains possess the same mechanistic ingredients that drive our model in flies. When we adapted human observers to moving light edges or dark edges, we could manipulate the magnitude and direction of their percepts as well, suggesting that mechanisms similar to the fly’s may also underlie this illusion in humans. By taking a comparative approach that exploits Drosophila neurogenetics, our results provide a causal, mechanistic account for a long-known visual illusion. These results argue that this illusion arises from architectures for motion detection that are shared across phyla.

  • vision
  • Drosophila
  • neural circuits
  • peripheral drift illusion

Footnotes

  • ↵1M.A. and R.T. contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: damon.clark{at}yale.edu.
  • Author contributions: M.A., R.T., E.S.-G., and D.A.C. designed research; M.A., R.T., and E.S.-G. performed research; M.A., R.T., E.S.-G., and D.A.C. analyzed data; and M.A., R.T., and D.A.C. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2002937117/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

Detailed materials and methods are reported in SI Appendix. All experimental data are available in Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vt4b8gtpd), and scripts to analyze the data and run the computational models are available in GitHub (https://github.com/ClarkLabCode/IllusionPaperCode).

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mechanism for analogous illusory motion perception in flies and humans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Mechanism for analogous illusory motion perception in flies and humans
Margarida Agrochao, Ryosuke Tanaka, Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas, Damon A. Clark
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2020, 117 (37) 23044-23053; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002937117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Mechanism for analogous illusory motion perception in flies and humans
Margarida Agrochao, Ryosuke Tanaka, Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas, Damon A. Clark
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2020, 117 (37) 23044-23053; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002937117
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Neuroscience
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 117 (37)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490