Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Brief Report

Physics of virus transmission by speaking droplets

View ORCID ProfileRoland R. Netz and View ORCID ProfileWilliam A. Eaton
PNAS October 13, 2020 117 (41) 25209-25211; first published September 24, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011889117
Roland R. Netz
aFachbereich Physik, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roland R. Netz
  • For correspondence: rnetz@physik.fu-berlin.de eaton@nih.gov
William A. Eaton
bLaboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for William A. Eaton
  • For correspondence: rnetz@physik.fu-berlin.de eaton@nih.gov
  1. Edited by Peter B. Moore, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved August 15, 2020 (received for review June 11, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

To make the physics of person-to-person virus transmission from emitted droplets of oral fluid while speaking easily understood, we present simple and transparent algebraic equations that capture the essential physics of the problem. Calculations with these equations provide a straightforward way of determining whether emitted droplets remain airborne or rapidly fall to the ground, after accounting for the decrease in droplet size from water evaporation. At a relative humidity of 50%, for example, droplets with initial radii larger than about 50 μm rapidly fall to the ground, while smaller, potentially virus-containing droplets shrink in size from water evaporation and remain airborne for many minutes. Estimates of airborne virion emission rates while speaking strongly support the proposal that mouth coverings can help contain the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • COVID-19
  • virus transmission
  • speaking droplets
  • SARS-CoV-2

The physics of water droplets is a well-studied subject, and its relevance to virus transmission is long known (1⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–10). It is a subject that has aroused renewed interest because of the COVID-19 pandemic and has motivated scientists to perform new kinds of experiments. Recently published laser light-scattering experiments of Anfinrud and coworkers (11, 12) show that the number of oral fluid droplets emitted into the air while speaking is orders of magnitude larger than previously detected using less sensitive methods (7) and that blocking such droplets is easily accomplished with a cloth mouth cover (11, 13). Previous physics calculations of droplet evaporation to determine whether droplets containing viruses remain floating in air or rapidly fall to the ground typically involve numerical simulations, which hide the fundamental mechanisms (4). In addition, the mathematics employed is too complex to be understood by other than physical scientists. We have investigated various aspects of this problem and present simple and transparent algebraic equations that capture the essential physics. Derivations of all equations are given in ref. 14.

Results and Discussion

Our equations answer two important questions. First, how long does it take for a virus-containing droplet of a given size to fall to the ground by gravity to potentially contaminate a surface? Second, for a given relative humidity, how much time does it take for water evaporation to reduce a virus-containing droplet to a size that leaves it floating in air for a sufficiently long time to allow direct transmission of the virus to another person? The answer to the first question is easily obtained by simply equating the gravitational and Stokesian viscous forces on a falling object (mg = 6πηRv) to obtain the terminal velocity (v). This simplistic treatment must be justified and is given in ref. 14. The mean time for a particle to reach the ground isτsed=9ηz02ρR2g=ϕz0R2,[1]where τsed is the mean time for a droplet of radius R to reach the ground from a height, z0, with both R and z0 in units of micrometers. The prefactor, ϕ = 9η/(2ρg) = 0.85 × 10−2 μm∙s, is calculated from the viscosity of air at 25 °C, η = 1.86 × 10−8 g⋅μm−1⋅s−1, water density ρ = 10−12 g/μm3, and the gravitational constant g = 9.8 × 106 μm/s2. A few examples are instructive. In the absence of water evaporation, droplets placed initially at z0 = 1.5 m (the average height above ground for the mouth of a standing human adult) with radii of 1, 10, or 100 μm will require 1.3 × 104 s (∼3.5 h), 130 s, and 1.3 s, respectively, to fall to the ground.

Whether or not a virus-containing droplet will remain airborne to cause an infection requires determination of the rate of evaporation of water, which is defined by the diffusion equation in terms of the water vapor concentration profile outside of the spherical droplet. The most important effect to consider in the size regime of interest is the cooling of the droplet from the heat loss due to water evaporation, which can be determined by solving the coupled heat flux and water diffusion equations and slows down evaporation (14). The osmotic effect of nonvolatile droplet contents further decreases the evaporation rate by reducing the water vapor pressure at the droplet surface (14).

There are three different size regimes that require different theoretical treatments (14): droplet radii R < 70 nm, 70 nm < R < 60 μm, and R > 60 μm. We can ignore consideration of droplets with R < 70 nm because they are in the size regime of single virions (τsed = several days), which are not emitted without a surrounding layer of oral fluid. Droplets larger than 60 μm fall rapidly to the ground, so are of less concern here. They are dealt with theoretically elsewhere (14). We shall, therefore, only be concerned with the regime 70 nm < R < 60 μm. In the following, we assume that the droplet has escaped from any surrounding water vapor cloud (6) to be in ambient air.

The time (τev) it takes for complete evaporation of a pure water droplet of initial radius R0, including cooling, isτev=R02θ(1−RH),[2]where RH is the relative humidity, θ = 2αDwcgvw = 4.2 × 102 μm2/s at 25 °C is a constant with units of diffusion, and the numerical prefactor, α = 0.36, accounts for evaporation cooling effects (14). The diffusion constant for a water molecule in air, Dw, is 2.5 × 107 μm2/s, the water number concentration, cg, in saturated air is 7.7 × 105 μm−3, and the water molecular volume, vw, in liquid water is 3.0 × 10−11 μm3, all at 25 °C.

The theory is more complex for inclusion of the osmotic effect of the nonvolatile contents of a droplet, the so-called droplet nucleus. In this case, the mean time for a droplet of initial radius R0 to shrink to a radius R from water evaporation is given byt(R)/τev=1−R2R02−2Rdn23R02ln(R0(R−Rdn)R(R0−Rdn)),[3]where Rdn is the equilibrium droplet nucleus radius, which, based on a solute volume fraction for saliva of 0.03, is estimated to be ∼R0/3. The last term in Eq. 3 accounts for the vapor pressure reduction due to solutes. At R ≤1.5 Rdn, the evaporation time enters the solute-dominated regime and diverges, albeit only logarithmically, in the limit R→Rdn. Therefore, for times prior to achieving perfect equilibrium, the logarithmic term is small enough to be neglected, and Eq. 3 simplifies tot(Rdn)≈R02−Rdn2θ(1−RH).[4]At a relative humidity of RH = 0.5, a common value for room air, the mean evaporation times for droplets with initial radii, R0, of 1, 10, and 100 μm are 4.2 ms, 0.42 s, and 42 s, while the corresponding sedimentation mean times, τsed, from Eq. 1 are 1.3 × 104 s, 130 s, and 1.3 s. Consequently, the 1- and 10-μm droplets will dry out and stay floating for even longer, which will be determined by the radius of the droplet nuclei, Rdn. Thus, droplets with an initial radius of Ro = 20 μm will shrink to a droplet nucleus radius of ∼7 μm in tRdn≈1.7 s (Eq. 4), with the droplet nuclei remaining airborne for about 4 min (Eq. 1).

It is useful to define a “critical radius,” R0crit, where the evaporation and settling times are equal, that is, t(Rdn) = τsed. R0crit is obtained by combining Eqs. 1 and 4 (with Rdn = R0/3) to giveR0crit=[1.1ϕθz0(1−RH)]1/4.[5]For RH = 0.5 and z0 = 1.5 m, the critical radius is 42 μm. This means that droplets with radii greater than 42 μm will fall to the ground before drying out, while droplets with radii less than 42 μm will remain floating in the air in a dry state. A more accurate value for the critical radius of ∼50 μm is obtained by solving equations that take into account evaporation of droplets while sedimenting (14).

Can we say anything useful about the number of emitted virions while speaking? Table 1 shows the calculated values for initial droplet radii (R0) from 1 μm to 40 μm, using previously determined droplet production rates while speaking and saliva virion concentrations, which predicts that the number of emitted virions per minute while continuously speaking ranges from 3 to ∼2 × 105. Comparing the evaporation times at a relative humidity of 50% with the sedimentation times in Table 1 shows that, for all radii in this range, droplet nuclei remain airborne for times sufficiently long that their airborne lifetime will be determined by the turnover time of the air handling system (see ref. 14). It is not known what fraction of the virions in these concentration measurements are infectious, but it has been argued that, in some systems, as few as a single active virion can cause an infection (15). The very large range of virion emission rates in Table 1 calls for both an accurate determination of the fraction of airborne virions that are infectious and accurate droplet size distributions at the high rate of emission determined by laser light scattering (11, 12).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Theoretical virion emission rates (k), evaporation times (t(Rdn)), and sedimentation times (τsed) for initial radii (R0) and for droplet nuclei radii (Rdn = R0/3), all for z0 = 1.5 m, 25 °C, and 50% relative humidity (RH = 0.5)

Overall, the above analysis strongly supports the concept that simply speaking can be a major mechanism of person-to-person COVID-19 transmission and that covering the mouth in public, as suggested by the work of Anfinrud and coworkers (11⇓–13) and others (10, 17), could help to more rapidly contain and potentially end the pandemic.

Data Availability.

All study data are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Philip Anfinrud and Adriaan Bax, whose experiments and insights motivated this work, and thank Adriaan Bax for many helpful discussions. This work was supported by the European Research Council via Advanced Investigator Grant Agreement 835117, and the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the NIH.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: rnetz{at}physik.fu-berlin.de or eaton{at}nih.gov.
  • Author contributions: R.R.N. and W.A.E. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

View Abstract

References

  1. ↵
    1. W. F. Wells
    , On air-borne infection—Study II droplets and droplet nuclei. Am. J. Hyg. 20, 611–618 (1934).
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. J. P. Duguid
    , The size and the duration of air-carriage of respiratory droplets and droplet-nuclei. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 44, 471–479 (1946).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. L. Morawska
    , Droplet fate in indoor environments, or can we prevent the spread of infection? Indoor Air 16, 335–347 (2006).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. X. Xie,
    2. Y. Li,
    3. A. T. Y. Chwang,
    4. P. L. Ho,
    5. W. H. Seto
    , How far droplets can move in indoor environments—Revisiting the Wells evaporation-falling curve. Indoor Air 17, 211–225 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. D. K. Milton,
    2. M. P. Fabian,
    3. B. J. Cowling,
    4. M. L. Grantham,
    5. J. J. McDevitt
    , Influenza virus aerosols in human exhaled breath: Particle size, culturability, and effect of surgical masks. Plos Path. 9, e1003205 (2013).
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. L. Bourouiba,
    2. E. Dehandschoewercker,
    3. J. W. M. Bush
    , Violent expiratory events: On coughing and sneezing. J. Fluid Mech. 745, 537–563 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Z. T. Ai,
    2. A. K. Melikov
    , Airborne spread of expiratory droplet nuclei between the occupants of indoor environments: A review. Indoor Air 28, 500–524 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. J. Yan et al.; EMIT Consortium
    , Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 1081–1086 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. S. Poulain,
    2. L. Bourouiba
    , Disease transmission via drops and bubbles. Phys. Today 72, 68–69 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. N. H. L. Leung et al.
    , Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat. Med. 26, 676–680 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. P. Anfinrud,
    2. V. Stadnytskyi,
    3. C. E. Bax,
    4. A. Bax
    , Visualizing speech-generated oral fluid droplets with laser light scattering. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 2061–2063 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. V. Stadnytskyi,
    2. C. E. Bax,
    3. A. Bax,
    4. P. Anfinrud
    , The airborne lifetime of small speech droplets and their potential importance in SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 11875–11877 (2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. V. Stadnytskyi,
    2. C. E. Bax,
    3. A. Bax,
    4. P. Anfinrud
    , “Talking can spread COVID-19” (video recording, 2020). https://youtube.com/watch?v=qzARpgx8cvE. Accessed 24 March 2020.
  14. ↵
    1. R. R. Netz
    , Mechanisms of airborne infection via evaporating and sedimenting droplets produced by speaking. J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 7093–7101 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. M. P. Zwart,
    2. J. A. Daròs,
    3. S. F. Elena
    , One is enough: In vivo effective population size is dose-dependent for a plant RNA virus. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002122 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. R. Woelfel,
    2. V. M. Corman,
    3. W. Guggemos,
    4. M. Seilmier,
    5. S. Zange
    , Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature 581, 465–469 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. L. Morawska,
    2. J. Cao
    , Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality. Environ. Int. 139, 105730 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physics of virus transmission by speaking droplets
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physics of virus transmission by speaking droplets
Roland R. Netz, William A. Eaton
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2020, 117 (41) 25209-25211; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2011889117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Physics of virus transmission by speaking droplets
Roland R. Netz, William A. Eaton
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2020, 117 (41) 25209-25211; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2011889117
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 117 (41)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Medical Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Large piece of gold
News Feature: Tracing gold's cosmic origins
Astronomers thought they’d finally figured out where gold and other heavy elements in the universe came from. In light of recent results, they’re not so sure.
Image credit: Science Source/Tom McHugh.
Dancers in red dresses
Journal Club: Friends appear to share patterns of brain activity
Researchers are still trying to understand what causes this strong correlation between neural and social networks.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Yeongsik Im.
White and blue bird
Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490