New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Echolocating bats detect but misperceive a multidimensional incongruent acoustic stimulus
Edited by Thomas D. Albright, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, and approved September 25, 2020 (received for review April 11, 2020)

Significance
How do we build a perception from incoming sensory information? To accurately perceive the environment, the brain has to integrate information across different sensory modalities and to analyze multiple sensory dimensions within a sensory modality. We studied this integration in echolocating bats, the masters of active acoustic sensing. By presenting them with targets whose acoustic dimensions were incoherent, we managed to induce misperception, which caused the bats to repeatedly try to fly through a wall even though they detected it with their echolocation. We demonstrate that certain relations between the dimensions must hold to allow accurate perception. Nevertheless, adult bats can learn new relations rapidly. Notably, no misperception was observed in pups, confirming that these relations are not innate.
Abstract
Coherent perception relies on integrating multiple dimensions of a sensory modality, for example, color and shape in vision. We reveal how different acoustic dimensions, specifically echo intensity and sonar aperture (or width), are important for correct perception by echolocating bats. We flew bats down a corridor blocked by objects with different intensity–aperture combinations. To our surprise, bats crashed straight into large (aperture) walls with weak echo intensity as if they did not exist. The echolocation behavior of the bats indicated that they did detect the wall, suggesting that crashing was not a result of limited sensory sensitivity, but of a perceptual deficit. We systematically manipulated intensity and aperture by changing the materials and width of different reflectors, and we conclude that a coherent echo-based percept is created only when these two acoustic dimensions have certain relations which are typical for objects in nature (e.g., large and intense or small and weak reflectors). Nevertheless, we show that these preferred relations are not innate. We show that young pups are not constrained to these relations and that new intensity–aperture associations can also be learned by adult bats.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: yossiyovel{at}gmail.com.
Author contributions: S.D. and Y.Y. designed research; S.D., G.S., A.B., A.G., and Y.Y. performed research; S.D. analyzed data; and S.D. and Y.Y. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2005009117/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability.
The data, methods, and code are available in the main text and SI Appendix.
Published under the PNAS license.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- D. Raposo,
- J. P. Sheppard,
- P. R. Schrater,
- A. K. Churchland
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- C. R. Fetsch,
- A. H. Turner,
- G. C. DeAngelis,
- D. E. Angelaki
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- N. Abudarham,
- G. Yovel
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- N. Ulanovsky,
- C. F. Moss
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- J.-E. Grunwald,
- S. Schörnich,
- L. Wiegrebe
- 14.↵
- J. A. Simmons et al
- 15.↵
- R. G. Busnel
- G. Neuweiler,
- F. P. Möhres,
- 16.↵
- B. Falk,
- T. Williams,
- M. Aytekin,
- C. F. Moss
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- R. Simon,
- M. W. Holderied,
- C. U. Koch,
- O. Von Helversen
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- H. S. Seddeq
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- M. Heinrich,
- A. Warmbold,
- S. Hoffmann,
- U. Firzlaff,
- L. Wiegrebe
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- U. Goiti,
- P. Vecin,
- I. Garin,
- M. Saloña,
- J. R. Aihartza
- 30.↵
- J. Eklöf
- 31.↵
- R. A. Holland,
- D. A. Waters,
- J. M. V. Rayner
- 32.↵
- 33.↵
- G. Neuweiler
- 34.↵
- G. Neuweiler
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- H. R. Goerlitz,
- M. Hübner,
- L. Wiegrebe
- 39.↵
- D. Genzel,
- L. Wiegrebe
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- D. A. Waters,
- C. Vollrath
- 42.↵
- C. A. Summers
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- Y. Yovel,
- B. Falk,
- C. F. Moss,
- N. Ulanovsky
- 45.↵
- M. K. Obrist,
- M. B. Fenton,
- J. L. Eger,
- P. A. Schlegel
- 46.↵
- A. W. Roe,
- H. D. Lu,
- C. P. Hung
- 47.↵
- M. Shadlen,
- T. Carney
- 48.↵
- L. Kaufman,
- J. H. Kaufman
- 49.↵
- C. Chubb,
- G. Sperling,
- J. A. Solomon
- 50.↵
- G. Buckingham,
- M. A. Goodale
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- C. Rowe
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- S. Greif,
- S. Zsebok,
- D. Schmieder,
- B. M. Siemers
- 58.↵
- 59.↵
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Purchase access
Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.
Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Neuroscience