Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
Brief Report

Optogenetic regulation of embryo implantation in mice using photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9

Tomoka Takao, View ORCID ProfileMoritoshi Sato, and View ORCID ProfileTetsuo Maruyama
  1. aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, 160-8582 Tokyo, Japan;
  2. bDepartment of Regenerative Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 700-8558 Okayama, Japan;
  3. cGraduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 153-8902 Tokyo, Japan

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS November 17, 2020 117 (46) 28579-28581; first published November 2, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2016850117
Tomoka Takao
aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, 160-8582 Tokyo, Japan;
bDepartment of Regenerative Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 700-8558 Okayama, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moritoshi Sato
cGraduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 153-8902 Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Moritoshi Sato
Tetsuo Maruyama
aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, 160-8582 Tokyo, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tetsuo Maruyama
  • For correspondence: tetsuo@keio.jp
  1. Edited by R. Michael Roberts, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, and approved October 8, 2020 (received for review August 16, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Embryo implantation is achieved upon successful interaction between a fertilized egg and receptive endometrium and is mediated by spatiotemporal expression of implantation-associated molecules including leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). Here we demonstrate, in mice, that LIF knockdown via a photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing system and illumination with a light-emitting diode can spatiotemporally disrupt fertility. This system enables dissection of spatiotemporal molecular mechanisms associated with embryo implantation and provides a therapeutic strategy for temporal control of reproductive functions in vivo.

  • photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9
  • optogenetic
  • implantation
  • leukemia inhibitory factor

Embryo implantation is a spatiotemporal event in that it occurs only when the uterus is receptive to blastocyst(s). The limited time span in which the uterus, particularly the uterine endometrium, is receptive is termed “window of implantation” (WOI) that, in mice, is days 4 and 5 (day 1 = vaginal plug) and, in humans, occurs during the midluteal phase (cycle days 20 to 24) (1). In mice, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is expressed spatiotemporally around the periimplantation period in the uterine endometrium, particularly in the glandular epithelium. LIF levels peak on day 4 of pregnancy, and gene knockout mouse models demonstrated that LIF is essential for uterine receptivity and embryo implantation (2⇓–4).

Photoactivatable Cas9 (paCas9) is a new molecular device that was recently developed by Nihongaki et al. (5). In this system, Cas9 nuclease activity can be controlled by a blue light-emitting diode (LED). The paCas9 consists of split Cas9 fragments and LED illumination-inducible dimerization domains termed Magnets (nMag and pMag) (5). The genome editing activity of paCas9 can be switched on and off simply by the presence and absence, respectively, of LED illumination, which can minimize off-target effects associated with stable expression of Cas9. Moreover, the LED paCas9-mediated genome editing system does not have off-target effects that can accompany use of chemical inducing agents such as doxycyline (6) and tamoxifen (7). In this study, we used the CRISPR-paCas9 system to develop a murine fertility regulatory model that enables optogenetic and spatiotemporal regulation of reproductive functions in vivo.

Results

paCas9 Combined with sgLif Inhibits LIF Expression and Embryo Implantation in Mouse Uteri.

To generate an in vivo mouse model with optogenetic regulation of fertility by paCas9, we prepared single guide RNA targeting Lif (sgLif) and designed experiments involving three treatment groups designated Tx-I (single guide RNA control [sgCtrl] + LED), Tx-II (sgLif only), and Tx-III (sgLif + LED; Fig. 1A), because LIF is spatiotemporally up-regulated during the WOI and plays essential roles in newly pregnant female mice (2⇓–4). Female mice were given intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of paCas9 in combination with sgLif or sgCtrl at 2.0 d to 2.5 d postcoitum (dpc) followed by systemic LED illumination on 3.0 dpc to 3.5 dpc. The uteri were excised on 4.5 dpc and subjected to immunofluorescence staining and extraction of protein for immunoblot analysis. LIF was strongly expressed in the Tx-I or Tx-II group, but was dramatically decreased in Tx-III (Fig. 1B). Immunofluorescent staining revealed that LIF was strongly expressed in the endometrial glands and adjacent decidualizing stroma in pregnant uteri in Tx-I or Tx-II, whereas LIF expression was decreased or nearly absent in Tx-III (Fig. 1C). These results indicated that paCas9 with LED illumination successfully disrupted the uterine Lif gene in mice. Next, we collected uteri from mice in the three treatment groups at 7.5 dpc and examined whether Lif disruption affected fertility. Embryo implantation was significantly inhibited in the uteri of mice in Tx-III compared to Tx-I and Tx-II mice (Fig. 1 D and E). Expression of desmin, a marker of decidualization, was also reduced in uteri from Tx-III mice compared to Tx-I and Tx-II mice (Fig. 1F). Collectively, these results demonstrate the validity of our optogenetic method to regulate fertility in a mouse model.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

LED illumination inhibits LIF expression and embryo implantation in uteri of mice treated with paCas9 combined with sgLif. (A) Experimental protocol for paCas9-induced Lif deletion. Treatment groups are designated Tx-I (sgCtrl + LED), Tx-II (sgLif only), or Tx-III (sgLif + LED). Hx, hysterectomy. (B) Immunoblot analysis of LIF expression and TUBA as an internal control in 4.5-dpc uteri treated as indicated. (C) (Upper) H&E and (Middle and Lower) immunofluorescence staining images of LIF (green) and DAPI (blue) in 4.5-dpc uteri from mice treated as indicated in A (Scale bars, 1.0 mm [Upper] and 200 µm [Lower].) (D) Macroscopic appearance of representative 7.5-dpc uteri from mice treated as indicated. (E) Number of implantation sites in 7.5-dpc uteri in the indicated treatment groups. Implantation number and the mean ± SEM from the independent experiments are indicated by dots and horizontal lines, respectively. *P < 0.0001. (F) Immunofluorescence of desmin (green) and DAPI (blue) in 7.5-dpc uteri treated as indicated (Scale bars, 1.0 mm.)

Administration of Recombinant LIF Protein Rescues Blocking of Implantation Induced by paCas9-Mediated sgLif Knockdown Activated by LED Exposure.

To confirm the bona fide on-target effect of paCas9 and sgLif for embryo implantation, we examined whether blockade of implantation by light-inducible Lif knockdown can be rescued by supplementation with recombinant LIF protein (recLIF) (Fig. 2A), since LIF acts as a secretory protein to support embryo implantation. Mice were subjected to the same treatment as those in the Tx-III group, but were given either phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or a transvaginal injection of recLIF (105 U/10 µL) into the uterus prior to LED illumination at 3.5 dpc. The treated uteri collected at 7.5 dpc showed a significant increase in the number of implantation sites for mice supplemented with recLIF compared to those that received PBS (Fig. 2 B and C). The LIF-dependent blockade of implantation together with reversal of these effects by LIF supplementation demonstrates the specificity and validity of our system.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Attenuation of LED-induced paCas9 and sgLif-mediated blockade of embryo implantation by administration of recombinant LIF protein (recLIF). (A) Protocol for rescue experiments with Tx-III treated mice supplemented with recLIF. (B) Macroscopic appearance of representative 7.5-dpc uteri treated as per the Tx-III with or without recLIF supplementation. (C) Number of implantation sites in 7.5-dpc uteri shown in B. Implantation number and the mean ± SEM from the independent experiments are shown by dots and horizontal lines, respectively. *P = 0.032.

Discussion

This is a demonstration of optogenetic genome editing using photoactivatable Cas9 in living mice and an application of this system for regulation of mouse embryo implantation. The advantages of this system are 1) rapid and spatiotemporal control of Cas9 activity by LED illumination, 2) minimization of off-target effects through pinpoint activation of Cas9, 3) targeting of spatiotemporal reproductive events such as embryo implantation, 4) low invasiveness of LED and avoidance of negative effects associated with chemical agents to induce expression, and 5) simple genome editing procedures involving i.p. injection and LED illumination. The combined advantages of this method contribute to a valuable research tool for revealing and dissecting spatiotemporal molecular mechanisms that will allow elucidation of the spatiotemporal role of implantation-associated molecule(s). In addition to the impact on basic research, demonstration of optogenetic regulation of embryo implantation will provide insights into the development of optogenetic treatment(s) for infertility and contraception.

Methods

Reagents.

Antibodies used in this study include rat polyclonal anti-LIF (BioLegend, Inc.), mouse monoclonal anti-desmin (DAKO), rabbit polyclonal anti-α-Tubulin (TUBA) (Abcam), Alexa Fluor 488-labeled donkey anti-rabbit IgG and donkey anti-rat IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG Ab (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-rat IgG (Vector Laboratories, Inc.). The recLIF was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific.

paCas9 Plasmid and Single Guide RNA.

The paCas9 vector was modified from the paCas9-2 vector (5) through connection of pMag and modified nMag genes by a P2A sequence. CRISPR direct software (8) was used to design two different sgLif sequences: 5′-gga​gcc​gtt​tcc​caa​caa​cg-3′ and 5′-gca​gag​gaa​cgc​cct​cga​tc-3′. The sgCtrl sequence was 5′-ggg​aaa​cct​tgt​ttt​aca​ttc​a-3′.

Mouse Model.

All experiments using Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice were performed in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Keio University School of Medicine (approval nos. 16066-1 and 160660-2). After mating, paCas9 (60 μg) plasmids together with two sgLifs (30 μg each) or sgCtrl (60 μg) were injected intraperitoneally with in vivo-jetPEI reagent in a total volume of 1 mL (Polyplus transfection SA) at 2 dpc to 2.5 dpc. The entire body of the mouse was illuminated with an LED light source (470 ± 20 nm, 1.5 W/m2, CCS Inc.).

Immunofluorescent Staining.

Uterine tissue samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized. After blocking, tissue sections were incubated with primary antibodies followed by incubation with secondary antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Immunoblotting.

Uterine protein extract samples were separated on a sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, which was incubated with primary antibodies. After incubation with secondary antibodies, signals were detected using ImmunoStar LD (Wako).

Statistics.

Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 and determined using two-tailed and unpaired Welch’s t tests or one-way ANOVA analysis of variance with Tukey’s post hoc test.

Data Availability.

All study data are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JSPS KAKENHI) 19K18705 (T.T.), 16H05474 (T.M.), and 20H03826 (T.M.).

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: tetsuo{at}keio.jp.
  • Author contributions: T.T. and T.M. designed research; T.T. performed research; M.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; T.T. and T.M. analyzed data; and T.T. and T.M. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

References

  1. ↵
    1. J. Cha,
    2. X. Sun,
    3. S. K. Dey
    , Mechanisms of implantation: Strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat. Med. 18, 1754–1767 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. C. L. Stewart et al
    ., Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor. Nature 359, 76–79 (1992).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. J. R. Chen et al
    ., Leukemia inhibitory factor can substitute for nidatory estrogen and is essential to inducing a receptive uterus for implantation but is not essential for subsequent embryogenesis. Endocrinology 141, 4365–4372 (2000).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. S. J. Kimber
    , Leukaemia inhibitory factor in implantation and uterine biology. Reproduction 130, 131–145 (2005).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Y. Nihongaki,
    2. F. Kawano,
    3. T. Nakajima,
    4. M. Sato
    , Photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9 for optogenetic genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 755–760 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. L. E. Dow et al
    ., Inducible in vivo genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 390–394 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. L. Vallier,
    2. M. Alexander,
    3. R. Pedersen
    , Conditional gene expression in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 25, 1490–1497 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Y. Naito,
    2. K. Hino,
    3. H. Bono,
    4. K. Ui-Tei
    , CRISPRdirect: Software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites. Bioinformatics 31, 1120–1123 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optogenetic regulation of embryo implantation in mice using photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Optogenetic regulation of embryo implantation in mice using photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9
Tomoka Takao, Moritoshi Sato, Tetsuo Maruyama
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2020, 117 (46) 28579-28581; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016850117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Optogenetic regulation of embryo implantation in mice using photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9
Tomoka Takao, Moritoshi Sato, Tetsuo Maruyama
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2020, 117 (46) 28579-28581; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016850117
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Medical Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 117 (46)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Methods
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490