Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Geographies of insecure water access and the housing–water nexus in US cities

View ORCID ProfileKatie Meehan, View ORCID ProfileJason R. Jurjevich, View ORCID ProfileNicholas M. J. W. Chun, and View ORCID ProfileJustin Sherrill
PNAS November 17, 2020 117 (46) 28700-28707; first published November 2, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007361117
Katie Meehan
aDepartment of Geography, King’s College London, London WC2B 4BG, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Katie Meehan
  • For correspondence: katie.meehan@kcl.ac.uk
Jason R. Jurjevich
bSchool of Geography, Development and Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0137;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jason R. Jurjevich
Nicholas M. J. W. Chun
bSchool of Geography, Development and Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0137;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicholas M. J. W. Chun
Justin Sherrill
cECONorthwest, Portland, OR 97201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Justin Sherrill
  1. Edited by William A. V. Clark, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, and approved September 21, 2020 (received for review April 20, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & SI

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Households without piped water access in the United States, 2013 to 2017. This hex map depicts the spatial distribution of households without piped water access, with lighter colors indicating areas with higher numbers of unplumbed households. Shaded areas (in orange) indicate that sampling error is large relative to the estimate, due to the relatively small number of unplumbed households. Data source: US Census Bureau.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Plumbing poverty in the top 50 largest US metropolitan areas. Urban areas are plotted by share (percentage) of households without piped water access (y axis) against total number of households without piped water (x axis), adjusted by a log transformation. The dashed horizontal line represents the average share of unplumbed households in the 50 largest metros. Data source: US Census Bureau.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Number of households and people without piped water in 50 largest US metros

    HouseholdsIndividuals
    Metro areaEstimateMOE (±)Share, %MOE (±), %EstimateMOE (±)Share, %MOE (±), %
    San Francisco14,7871,3750.90.127,3953,2890.60.1
    Portland4,8019330.60.110,0642,5730.50.1
    Milwaukee3,3418910.50.18,6732,5550.60.2
    San Antonio3,3706840.50.110,0982,0860.50.1
    Austin3,1307090.40.17,9042,1560.40.1
    Cleveland3,7437580.40.18,8142,2990.40.1
    Los Angeles17,5861,2830.40.044,1594,4270.30.0
    Memphis1,8145080.40.14,1001,2390.30.1
    New Orleans1,8544420.40.13,6619540.30.1
    New York26,9311,8490.40.065,0495,0600.30.0
    Phoenix6,2197990.40.016,3532,1110.40.0
    Seattle5,3899640.40.19,8402,0440.30.1
    Nashville2,3025400.40.14,8521,5020.30.1
    Sacramento2,9525490.40.17,8562,0130.40.1
    Houston8,0561,1410.40.120,2594,0650.30.1
    Boston7,7131,0420.40.014,7502,1090.30.0
    Richmond1,6605510.40.13,2621,2310.30.1
    Riverside4,6917450.40.112,3482,4620.30.1
    Pittsburgh3,5727950.30.17,1911,7120.30.1
    Miami7,1518350.30.018,9362,4980.30.0
    Detroit5,4909300.30.111,5602,2030.30.1
    Providence1,3684150.30.12,9999110.30.1
    Birmingham1,2994590.30.13,0461,2680.30.1
    Buffalo1,5593930.30.12,6418070.20.1
    San Diego2,5024830.30.14,7651,2060.20.1
    Cincinnati1,9075050.30.14,6801,6540.20.1
    San Jose2,2256000.30.15,8812,0360.30.1
    Columbus3,3977730.30.17,9712,5640.30.1
    St. Louis3,3486750.30.17,1101,8060.20.1
    Louisville1,4504000.30.13,2219510.30.1
    Salt Lake City1,8084880.30.13,6671,1910.20.1
    Virginia Beach1,6975180.30.13,9181,4360.20.1
    Atlanta5,7831,0440.30.116,6373,8770.30.1
    Kansas City2,3505780.30.14,7881,2350.20.1
    Oklahoma City1,4974510.30.13,5671,3440.30.1
    Las Vegas2,0955130.30.16,3901,8900.30.1
    Baltimore2,8004790.30.06,0041,2580.20.0
    Dallas-Fort Worth6,6519110.30.016,3952,5230.20.0
    Denver-Boulder3,6127300.30.16,9891,4640.20.0
    Philadelphia6,0569300.30.013,5292,5530.20.0
    Chicago9,1051,1450.30.022,2553,1850.20.0
    Raleigh-Durham1,7524850.30.13,2209590.20.1
    Minneapolis-St. Paul3,5567670.30.17,3012,1770.20.1
    Washington, DC5,3148100.20.014,9102,6970.30.0
    Tampa2,8534820.20.06,4751,2860.20.0
    Charlotte2,1554940.20.15,2681,4080.20.1
    Hartford1,0683560.20.12,5831,0560.20.1
    Jacksonville1,2684260.20.12,9101,0480.20.1
    Indianapolis1,6334250.20.13,5941,1410.20.1
    Orlando1,6074490.20.14,1571,1230.20.0
     Top 50 US metros220,2675,6970.30.0513,99517,5780.30.0
    • Urban areas are ranked (in descending order) according to share of households without piped water. Data source: US Census Bureau.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Characteristics of urban US households without piped water

    All householdsHouseholds without piped water
    People of color39.3% (±0.1%)52.9% (±1.3%)
    Median household income$65,014 (±$180)$33,152 (±$1,412)
    Cost burdened36.2% (±0.1%)48.2% (±1.4%)
    Mobile home2.6% (±0%)5.2% (±0.6%)
    Renter39.8% (±0.1%)61.4% (±1.5%)
    • Percentages include all households (n = 64,435,664) and households without piped water (n = 220,267) in the 50 largest US metropolitan areas. Data source: US Census Bureau.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Results of the plumbing poverty logistic regression model

    BSELowerOdds RatioUpper
    Intercept−7.9290.151
    People of color0.2920.034*1.2531.3391.432
    Household income−0.0030*−1.004−1.003−1.003
    Percent of income spent on housing or rent00.001
    Mobile home0.6340.062*1.6691.8852.129
    Renter0.4740.035*1.51.6061.72
    Gini coefficient (PUMA)0.040.003*1.0351.0411.047
    Index of dissimilarity (PUMA)0.0010.001
    • Negative odds ratios indicate the decline in likelihood for every unit change in the covariate. Nagelkerke value is 2.3%. The asterisk signals that predictors are significant at the 95% confidence level. Data source: US Census Bureau.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Geographies of insecure water access and the housing–water nexus in US cities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Geographies of insecure water access and the housing–water nexus in US cities
Katie Meehan, Jason R. Jurjevich, Nicholas M. J. W. Chun, Justin Sherrill
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2020, 117 (46) 28700-28707; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2007361117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Geographies of insecure water access and the housing–water nexus in US cities
Katie Meehan, Jason R. Jurjevich, Nicholas M. J. W. Chun, Justin Sherrill
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2020, 117 (46) 28700-28707; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2007361117
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 117 (46)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Sustainability Science

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Methods
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490