David Crowder and Gengping Zhu explain how to predict the spread of the Asian giant hornet.
New Research In
Physical Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Edited by Joan E. Strassmann, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, and approved October 2, 2020 (received for review July 6, 2020)
Significance
The canonical explanation for the evolution of altruism (“kin selection”)—which was mathematically derived in the 1960s by W. D. Hamilton—emphasizes the importance of genetic relatedness. Over the past three decades, numerous authors claim to have discovered alternative explanations. We systematically analyze the models substantiating these claims and reveal that in every model the interacting individuals are genetically related and that the authors have therefore unwittingly rediscovered Hamilton’s insight.
Abstract
The genetic evolution of altruism (i.e., a behavior resulting in a net reduction of the survival and/or reproduction of an actor to benefit a recipient) once perplexed biologists because it seemed paradoxical in a Darwinian world. More than half a century ago, W. D. Hamilton explained that when interacting individuals are genetically related, alleles for altruism can be favored by selection because they are carried by individuals more likely to interact with other individuals carrying the alleles for altruism than random individuals in the population (“kin selection”). In recent decades, a substantial number of supposedly alternative pathways to altruism have been published, leading to controversies surrounding explanations for the evolution of altruism. Here, we systematically review the 200 most impactful papers published on the evolution of altruism and identify 43 evolutionary models in which altruism evolves and where the authors attribute the evolution of altruism to a pathway other than kin selection and/or deny the role of relatedness. An analysis of these models reveals that in every case the life cycle assumptions entail local reproduction and local interactions, thereby leading to interacting individuals being genetically related. Thus, contrary to the authors’ claims, Hamilton’s relatedness drives the evolution to altruism in their models. The fact that several decades of investigating the evolution to altruism have resulted in the systematic and unwitting rediscovery of the same mechanism is testament to the fundamental importance of positive relatedness between actor and recipient for explaining the evolution of altruism.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: Laurent.Keller{at}unil.ch.
Author contributions: T.K., L.K., and L.L. designed research; T.K. and L.L. analyzed data; and T.K., L.K., and L.L. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2013596117/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability.
All study data are included in this article and SI Appendix.
Published under the PNAS license.
References
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.
Purchase access
You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
The evolution of altruism and the serial rediscovery of the role of relatedness
Sign up for Article Alerts
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Evolution
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
If we don’t clarify terms, we risk hampering the field, confusing the public, and possibly losing a technology that may help solve some of the world’s most intractable problems.
Image credit: Stephanie Gamez (University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA).
A small fossil reptile related to dinosaurs and pterosaurs suggests a miniaturized origin for some of the largest animals to live on Earth.
Image credit: Alex Boersma (artist).
A 1.4-million-year-old handaxe made from hippopotamus bone expands the known technological repertoire of early human ancestors.
Image credit: Berhane Asfaw.
Ancestors of domestic cats may have existed in a commensal but not yet domesticated relationship with Neolithic farmers.
Image credit: Michał Wojenka and Magdalena Krajcarz.