Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Echolocating bats accumulate information from acoustic snapshots to predict auditory object motion

View ORCID ProfileAngeles Salles, View ORCID ProfileClarice Anna Diebold, and View ORCID ProfileCynthia F. Moss
PNAS November 17, 2020 117 (46) 29229-29238; first published November 2, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011719117
Angeles Salles
aDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Angeles Salles
  • For correspondence: angiesalles@gmail.com
Clarice Anna Diebold
aDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Clarice Anna Diebold
Cynthia F. Moss
aDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cynthia F. Moss
  1. Edited by Ranulfo Romo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, D.F., Mexico, and approved October 1, 2020 (received for review June 8, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Research on visual tracking of moving stimuli has contributed to our understanding of sensory-guided behaviors; however, the processes that support auditory object tracking in natural three-dimensional environments remain largely unknown. This is important, not only to diverse groups of animals, but also to humans that rely on hearing to track objects in their environment. For visually impaired individuals, hearing is paramount for auditory object tracking and navigation, and in recent years, mobility training programs for the blind include instruction on echolocation using tongue clicks. In this work, we provide conclusive demonstration that echolocating bats use predictive strategies to track moving auditory objects, which can inform future comparative work on auditory motion processing.

Abstract

Unlike other predators that use vision as their primary sensory system, bats compute the three-dimensional (3D) position of flying insects from discrete echo snapshots, which raises questions about the strategies they employ to track and intercept erratically moving prey from interrupted sensory information. Here, we devised an ethologically inspired behavioral paradigm to directly test the hypothesis that echolocating bats build internal prediction models from dynamic acoustic stimuli to anticipate the future location of moving auditory targets. We quantified the direction of the bat’s head/sonar beam aim and echolocation call rate as it tracked a target that moved across its sonar field and applied mathematical models to differentiate between nonpredictive and predictive tracking behaviors. We discovered that big brown bats accumulate information across echo sequences to anticipate an auditory target’s future position. Further, when a moving target is hidden from view by an occluder during a portion of its trajectory, the bat continues to track its position using an internal model of the target’s motion path. Our findings also reveal that the bat increases sonar call rate when its prediction of target trajectory is violated by a sudden change in target velocity. This shows that the bat rapidly adapts its sonar behavior to update internal models of auditory target trajectories, which would enable tracking of evasive prey. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the echolocating big brown bat integrates acoustic snapshots over time to build prediction models of a moving auditory target’s trajectory and enable prey capture under conditions of uncertainty.

  • Eptesicus fuscus
  • predictive models
  • biosonar
  • prey tracking
  • auditory localization

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: angiesalles{at}gmail.com.
  • ↵2A.S. and C.A.D. contributed equally to this work.

  • Author contributions: A.S. and C.F.M. designed research; A.S. and C.A.D. performed research; A.S., C.A.D., and C.F.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.S. and C.A.D. analyzed data; and A.S., C.A.D., and C.F.M. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2011719117/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

MATLAB files have been deposited in GitHub at https://github.com/angiesalles/batTargetPrediction.

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text

References

  1. ↵
    1. Visioneers
    , The Science of SonarVision (2019). https://visioneers.org/what-we-do/the-science-of-sonarvision/. Accessed 4 May 2020.
  2. ↵
    1. L. Thaler,
    2. X. Zhang,
    3. M. Antoniou,
    4. D. C. Kish,
    5. D. Cowie
    , The flexible action system: Click-based echolocation may replace certain visual functionality for adaptive walking. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 46, 21–35 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. D. R. Griffin
    , Listening in the Dark: The Acoustic Orientation of Bats and Men (Yale University Press, 1958).
  4. ↵
    1. J. A. Simmons,
    2. M. B. Fenton,
    3. M. J. O’Farrell
    , Echolocation and pursuit of prey by bats. Science 203, 16–21 (1979).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. C. F. Moss,
    2. A. Surlykke
    , Probing the natural scene by echolocation Front. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 33 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. K. Ghose,
    2. C. F. Moss
    , Steering by hearing: A bat’s acoustic gaze is linked to its flight motor output by a delayed, adaptive linear law. J. Neurosci. 26, 1704–1710 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. C. F. Moss,
    2. C. Chiu,
    3. A. Surlykke
    , Adaptive vocal behavior drives perception by echolocation in bats. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 645–652 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. A. Surlykke,
    2. C. F. Moss
    , Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 2419–2429 (2000).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. K. Ghose,
    2. C. F. Moss
    , The sonar beam pattern of a flying bat as it tracks tethered insects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1120–1131 (2003).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. K. Ghose,
    2. T. Horiuchi,
    3. P.S. Krishnaprasad,
    4. C.F. Moss
    , Echolocating bats use a nearly time-optimal strategy to intercept prey. PLoS Biol. 4, e108 (2006).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. P. E. Nachtigall,
    2. P.W.B. Moore
    1. K. A. Campbell,
    2. R. A. Suthers
    , “Predictive tracking of horizontally moving targets by the fishing bat, Noctilio leporinus” in Animal Sonar, P. E. Nachtigall, P.W.B. Moore, Eds. (NATO ASI Science [Series A: Life Sciences], Springer, Boston, MA, 1988), Vol. 156, pp. 501–506.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. H. R. Erwin
    , Algorithms for sonar tracking in biomimetic robotics. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.98.6694&rep=rep1&type=pdf (2001). Accessed 21 October 2020.
  13. ↵
    1. E. Fujioka,
    2. I. Aihara,
    3. M. Sumiya,
    4. K. Aihara,
    5. S. Hiryu
    , Echolocating bats use future-target information for optimal foraging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 4848–4852 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. F. A. Webster,
    2. O. G. Brazier
    , “Experimental studies on target detection, evaluation and interception by echolocating bats,” Tech. Rep. AMRL TR 67-192, (Aerospace Medical Research Labs, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 1965).
  15. ↵
    1. W. M. Masters,
    2. A. J. M. Moffat,
    3. J. A. Simmons
    , Sonar tracking of horizontally moving targets by the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus. Sci. New Ser. 228, 1331–1333 (1985).
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. H. M. Ter Hofstede,
    2. J. M. Ratcliffe
    , Evolutionary escalation: The bat-moth arms race J. Exp. Biol. 219, 1589–1602 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. M. Mischiati et al
    ., Internal models direct dragonfly interception steering. Nature 517, 333–338 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. R. M. Olberg,
    2. A. H. Worthington,
    3. K. R. Venator
    , Prey pursuit and interception in dragonflies. J. Comp. Physiol. A 186, 155–162 (2000).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. B. S. Lanchester,
    2. R. F. Mark
    , Pursuit and prediction in the tracking of moving food by a teleost fish (Acanthaluteres spilomelanurus). J. Exp. Biol. 63, 627–645 (1975).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. D. M. Shaffer,
    2. S. M. Krauchunas,
    3. M. Eddy,
    4. M. K. McBeath
    , How dogs navigate to catch frisbees. Am. Psychol. Soc. 15, 437–441 (2004).
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. M. K. McBeath,
    2. D. M. Shaffer,
    3. M. K. Kaiser
    , How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science 268, 569–573 (1995).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. N. B. Kothari,
    2. M. J. Wohlgemuth,
    3. K. Hulgard,
    4. A. Surlykke,
    5. C. F. Moss
    , Timing matters: Sonar call groups facilitate target localization in bats. Front. Physiol. 5, 168 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. D. B. Webster,
    2. A. N. Popper,
    3. R. R. Fay
    1. R. R. Hoy
    , “The evolution of hearing in insects as an adaptation to predation from bats” in The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing, D. B. Webster, A. N. Popper, R. R. Fay, Eds. (Springer, New York, NY, 1992), pp. 115–129.
  24. ↵
    1. D. D. Yager
    , Structure, development, and evolution of insect auditory systems. Microsc. Res. Tech. 47, 380–400 (1999).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. L. A. Miller,
    2. A. Surlykke
    , How some insects detect and avoid being eaten by bats: Tactics and countertactics of prey and predator. Bioscience 51, 570–581 (2001).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. T. G. Forrest,
    2. H. E. Farris,
    3. R. R. Hoy
    , Ultrasound acoustic startle response in scarab beetles. J. Exp. Biol. 198, 2593–2598 (1995).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. D. D. Yager,
    2. H. G. Spangler
    , Behavioral response to ultrasound by the tiger beetle Cicindela marutha dow combines aerodynamic changes and sound production. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 649–659 (1997).
    OpenUrlAbstract
  28. ↵
    1. K. D. Roeder,
    2. A. E. Treat
    , An acoustic sense in some hawkmoths (Choerocampinae). J. Insect Physiol. 16, 1069–1086 (1970).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. C. Chiu,
    2. P. V. Reddy,
    3. W. Xian,
    4. P. S. Krishnaprasad,
    5. C. F. Moss
    , Effects of competitive prey capture on flight behavior and sonar beam pattern in paired big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 3348–3356 (2010).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. B. Falk,
    2. L. Jakobsen,
    3. A. Surlykke,
    4. C. F. Moss
    , Bats coordinate sonar and flight behavior as they forage in open and cluttered environments. J. Exp. Biol. 217, 4356–4364 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. M. J. Wohlgemuth,
    2. C. F. Moss
    , Midbrain auditory selectivity to natural sounds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 2508–2513 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. G. M. Hope,
    2. K. P. Bhatnagar
    , Electrical response of bat retina to spectral stimulation: Comparison of four microhiropteran species. Experientia 35, 1189–1191 (1979).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. T. L. Hedrick
    , Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspir. Biomim. 3, 034001 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Echolocating bats accumulate information from acoustic snapshots to predict auditory object motion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Echolocating bats accumulate information from acoustic snapshots to predict auditory object motion
Angeles Salles, Clarice Anna Diebold, Cynthia F. Moss
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2020, 117 (46) 29229-29238; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2011719117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Echolocating bats accumulate information from acoustic snapshots to predict auditory object motion
Angeles Salles, Clarice Anna Diebold, Cynthia F. Moss
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 2020, 117 (46) 29229-29238; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2011719117
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 117 (46)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490