Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Commentary

Hawks, Doves, and mongooses

View ORCID ProfileMichael L. Wilson
  1. aDepartment of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455;
  2. bDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108;
  3. cInstitute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS December 1, 2020 117 (48) 30012-30013; first published November 13, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021188117
Michael L. Wilson
aDepartment of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455;
bDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108;
cInstitute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael L. Wilson
  • For correspondence: wilso198@umn.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In 1795, philosopher Immanuel Kant proposed rules to promote perpetual peace among nations (1). He first required that all nations be republics, because when “the consent of the subjects is required to determine whether there shall be war or not, nothing is more natural than that they should weigh the matter well, before undertaking such a bad business” ref. 1, p. 122. In contrast, a despotic ruler “does not lose a whit by the war, while he goes on enjoying the delights of his table or sport, or of his pleasure palaces and gala days. He can therefore decide on war for the most trifling reasons, as if it were a kind of pleasure party” ref. 1, p. 123. In a PNAS paper that marries evolutionary game theory with tests of data from a long-term study of banded mongooses (Fig. 1), Johnstone et al. (2) confirm Kant’s insight that destructive intergroup fighting becomes more likely when leaders have more to gain, or less to lose, from fighting than do their followers.

Fig. 1.

Banded mongooses from the study population at Queen Elizabeth Park, Uganda. The adult is wearing a radio collar. Image credit: Becky Sun (photographer).

For this study, Johnstone et al. (2) adapt the classic Hawk−Dove model for intergroup contests, examining the range of conditions favoring aggressive (“Hawk”) and peaceful (“Dove”) strategies. The Hawk−Dove model has yielded numerous insights into the evolution of animal conflict since Maynard Smith and Price’s 1973 paper (3), which sought to explain why animal contests are frequently less destructive than we might expect: snakes wrestle with rivals, rather than using their fangs, and stags lock antlers rather than stabbing with their prongs. They found that a peaceful mutant …

↵1Email: wilso198{at}umn.edu.

View Full Text

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. M. Campbell Smith
    1. I. Kant
    , Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Essay, trans. M. Campbell Smith (George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London, UK, 1903 [1795]).
  2. 2.↵
    1. R. A. Johnstone,
    2. M. A. Cant,
    3. D. Cram,
    4. F. J. Thompson
    , Exploitative leaders incite intergroup warfare in a social mammal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 29759–29766 (2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. J. Maynard Smith,
    2. G. Price
    , The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246, 15–18 (1973).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. R. W. Wrangham
    , Evolution of coalitionary killing. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 110, 1–30 (1999).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. J. L. Sanderson,
    2. J. Wang,
    3. E. I. K. Vitikainen,
    4. M. A. Cant,
    5. H. J. Nichols
    , Banded mongooses avoid inbreeding when mating with members of the same natal group. Mol. Ecol. 24, 3738–3751 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. A. F. Russell,
    2. P. N. M. Brotherton,
    3. G. M. McIlrath,
    4. L. L. Sharpe,
    5. T. H. Clutton-Brock
    , Breeding success in cooperative meerkats: Effects of helper number and maternal state. Behav. Ecol. 14, 486–492 (2003).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. D. I. Rubenstein,
    2. R. W. Wrangham
    1. D. I. Rubenstein
    , “Ecology and sociality in horses and zebras” in Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals, D. I. Rubenstein, R. W. Wrangham, Eds. (Princeton University Press, 1986), pp. 282–302.
  8. 8.↵
    1. D. I. Rubenstein,
    2. R. W. Wrangham
    1. R. W. Wrangham,
    2. D. I. Rubenstein
    , “Social evolution in birds and mammals” in Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals, D. I. Rubenstein, R. W. Wrangham, Eds. (Princeton University Press, 1986), pp. 452–470.
  9. 9.↵
    1. S. Gavrilets,
    2. L. Fortunato
    , A solution to the collective action problem in between-group conflict with within-group inequality. Nat. Commun. 5, 3526 (2014).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. J. M. Williams,
    2. G. W. Oehlert,
    3. J. V. Carlis,
    4. A. E. Pusey
    , Why do male chimpanzees defend a group range? Anim. Behav. 68, 523–532 (2004).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. D. P. Watts,
    2. J. C. Mitani
    , Boundary patrols and intergroup encounters in wild chimpanzees. Behaviour 138, 299–327 (2001).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. M. L. Wilson,
    2. S. M. Kahlenberg,
    3. M. T. Wells,
    4. R. W. Wrangham
    , Ecological and social factors affect the occurrence and outcomes of intergroup encounters in chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 83, 277–291 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    1. J. Grinnell,
    2. C. Packer,
    3. A. E. Pusey
    , Cooperation in male lions: Kinship, reciprocity, or mutualism? Anim. Behav. 49, 95–105 (1995).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. R. Heinsohn,
    2. C. Packer
    , Complex cooperative strategies in group-territorial African lions. Science 269, 1260–1262 (1995).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. A. Gat
    , War in Human Civilization (Oxford University Press, 2008).
  16. 16.↵
    1. L. Glowacki,
    2. R. W. Wrangham
    , The role of rewards in motivating participation in simple warfare. Hum. Nat. 24, 444–460 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. H. Hegre,
    2. M. Bernhard,
    3. J. Teorell
    , Civil society and the democratic peace. J. Conflict Resolut. 64, 32–62 (2020).
    OpenUrl

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hawks, Doves, and mongooses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Hawks, Doves, and mongooses
Michael L. Wilson
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2020, 117 (48) 30012-30013; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021188117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Hawks, Doves, and mongooses
Michael L. Wilson
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2020, 117 (48) 30012-30013; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021188117
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Evolution

See related content:

  • Exploitative leaders incite intergroup warfare in a social mammal
    - Nov 09, 2020
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 117 (48)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490