Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

The changing geography of social mobility in the United States

Dylan Shane Connor and View ORCID ProfileMichael Storper
PNAS December 1, 2020 117 (48) 30309-30317; first published November 16, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010222117
Dylan Shane Connor
aSchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dsconnor@asu.edu
Michael Storper
bLuskin School of Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095;
cDepartment of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Storper
  1. Edited by Susan Hanson, Clark University, Worcester, MA, and approved October 13, 2020 (received for review May 20, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Intergenerational social mobility in the United States has declined over the last century, sparking a national debate about how to improve equality of opportunity. By analyzing data spanning the 20th century, we demonstrate strong temporal patterns operating across regions. Some areas of the United States have witnessed significant declines in social mobility, while others have had persistent low levels all along. Thus, the contemporary national picture is shaped by both powerful forces of change that reduce intergenerational mobility in some regions and deeply entrenched long-term forces generating persistence in others. It follows that improving social mobility will be challenging, as policy would need to respond to both forces and do so according to their varying mixture across different regions.

Abstract

New evidence shows that intergenerational social mobility—the rate at which children born into poverty climb the income ladder—varies considerably across the United States. Is this current geography of opportunity something new or does it reflect a continuation of long-term trends? We answer this question by constructing data on the levels and determinants of social mobility across American regions over the 20th century. We find that the changing geography of opportunity-generating economic activity restructures the landscape of intergenerational mobility, but factors associated with specific regional structures of interpersonal and racial inequality that have “deep roots” generate persistence. This is evident in the sharp decline in social mobility in the Midwest as economic activity has shifted away from it and the consistently low levels of opportunity in the South even as economic activity has shifted toward it. We conclude that the long-term geography of social mobility can be understood through the deep roots and changing economic fortunes of places.

  • intergenerational mobility
  • geography
  • inequality
  • race
  • economic history

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: dsconnor{at}asu.edu.
  • Author contributions: D.S.C. and M.S. designed research; D.S.C. and M.S. performed research; D.S.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; D.S.C. analyzed data; and D.S.C. and M.S. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2010222117/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

Geographical estimates of intergenerational mobility data and replication files have been deposited in the repository of the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), available at https://doi.org/10.3886/E125701V1.

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text

References

  1. ↵
    1. R. Abramitzky,
    2. L. P. Boustan,
    3. E. Jácome,
    4. S. Pérez
    , Intergenerational Mobility of Immigrants in the US over Two Centuries (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019).
  2. ↵
    1. R. Chetty et al
    ., The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940. Science 356, 398–406 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. J. Long,
    2. J. Ferrie
    , Intergenerational occupational mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850 Reply. Am. Econ. Rev. 103, 2041–2049 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. X. Song et al
    ., Long-term decline in intergenerational mobility in the United States since the 1850s. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 251–258 (2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. E. Beller,
    2. M. Hout
    , Intergenerational social mobility: The United States in comparative perspective. Future Child. 16, 19–36 (2006).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. P. M. Blau,
    2. O. D. Duncan
    , The American Occupational Structure (Wiley, New York, 1967).
  7. ↵
    1. R. Erikson,
    2. J. H. Goldthorpe
    , The constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies (Oxford University Press, 1992).
  8. ↵
    1. M. Hout
    , More Universalism, less structural mobility: The American occupational structure in the 1980s. Am. J. Sociol. 93, 1358 (1988).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. G. Clark
    , The Son also Rises: Surnames and the History of Social Mobility (Princeton University Press, 2014).
  10. ↵
    1. J. J. Heckman
    , Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science 312, 1900–1902 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. R. Gallagher,
    2. R. Kaestner,
    3. J. Persky
    , The geography of family differences and intergenerational mobility. J. Econ. Geogr. 19, 589–618 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. R. D. Mare
    , Educational homogamy in two gilded ages: Evidence from inter-generational social mobility data. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 663, 117–139 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. F. T. Pfeffer
    , Multigenerational approaches to social mobility. A multifaceted research agenda. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 35, 1–12 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. A. E. Raftery,
    2. M. Hout
    , Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921-75. Sociol. Educ. 66, 41–62 (1993).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. C. Goldin,
    2. L. Katz
    , The Race Between Education and Technology (Harvard University Press, 2009).
  16. ↵
    1. R. Chetty,
    2. N. Hendren,
    3. P. Kline,
    4. E. Saez
    , Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Q. J. Econ. 129, 1553–1623 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. R. Chetty,
    2. N. Hendren,
    3. L. F. Katz
    , The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 106, 855–902 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. R. Chetty,
    2. N. Hendren
    , The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility I: Childhood exposure effects. Q. J. Econ. 133, 1107–1162 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. J. Rothwell,
    2. D. S. Massey
    , Geographic effects on intergenerational income mobility. Econ. Geogr. 91, 83–106 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. R. J. Sampson
    , Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect (University of Chicago Press, 2012).
  21. ↵
    1. R. J. Sampson
    , Neighbourhood effects and beyond: Explaining the paradoxes of inequality in the changing American metropolis. Urban Stud., 0042098018795363 (2018).
  22. ↵
    1. R. Manduca,
    2. R. J. Sampson
    , Punishing and toxic neighborhood environments independently predict the intergenerational social mobility of black and white children. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 7772–7777 (2019).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. F. Torche
    , Analyses of intergenerational mobility: An interdisciplinary review. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 657, 37–62 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. D. S. Connor
    , Class background, reception context, and intergenerational mobility: A record linkage and surname analysis of the children of Irish immigrants. Int. Migr. Rev. 54, 4–34 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. R. M. Hauser
    , Context and consex: A cautionary tale. Am. J. Sociol. 75, 645–664 (1970).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. T. Berger
    , Places of persistence: Slavery and the geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. Demography 55, 1547–1565 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. T. Berger,
    2. P. Engzell
    , American geography of opportunity reveals European origins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 6045–6050 (2019).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. E. Derenoncourt
    , Can You Move to Opportunity? Evidence from the Great Migration (Mimeo., Harvard University, 2018).
  29. ↵
    1. R. D. Putnam
    , Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis (Simon and Schuster, 2016).
  30. ↵
    1. A. Rodríguez-Pose,
    2. V. von Berlepsch
    , When migrants rule: The legacy of mass migration on economic development in the United States. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 104, 628–651 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. H. R. Tan
    , Three lessons for labor economics from history. http://hdl.handle.net/2144/39305. Accessed 7 February 2020.
  32. ↵
    1. J. Trounstine
    , Segregation and inequality in public goods. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 60, 709–725 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. S. Leyk, et al
    ., Two centuries of settlement and urban development in the United States. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba2937 (2020).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. M. Storper
    , Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development (Princeton University Press, 2013).
  35. ↵
    1. A. Portes,
    2. M. Zhou
    , The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 530, 74–96 (1993).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. H. Tan
    , “A different land of opportunity: The Geography of intergenerational mobility in the early 20th-century US” (Boston University Working Paper, 2018).
  37. ↵
    1. R. Chetty,
    2. N. Hendren
    , The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility II: County-level estimates. Q. J. Econ. 133, 1163–1228 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. J. J. Heckman,
    2. G. Karapakula
    , Intergenerational and Intragenerational Externalities of the Perry Preschool Project (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019).
  39. ↵
    1. T. Berger,
    2. P. Engzell
    , Intergenerational mobility in the fourth industrial revolution. SocArXiv:doi:10.31235/osf.io/zcax3 (11 February 2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. D. S. Connor,
    2. M. P. Gutmann,
    3. A. R. Cunningham,
    4. K. K. Clement,
    5. S. Leyk
    , How entrenched is the spatial structure of inequality in cities? Evidence from the integration of census and housing data for Denver from 1940 to 2016. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 110, 1022–1039 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. M. Hout,
    2. T. A. DiPrete
    , What we have learned: RC28’s contributions to knowledge about social stratification. Res. Soc. Stratification Mobility 24, 1–20 (2006).
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. F. Torche
    , Intergenerational mobility and equality of opportunity. Arch. Eur. Sociol. 56, 343–371 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. N. Rivers,
    2. R. Wright,
    3. M. Ellis
    , The great recession and the migration redistribution of blacks and whites in the US South. Growth Change 46, 611–630 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. R. Wright,
    2. M. Ellis
    , Where science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduates move: Human capital, employment patterns, and interstate migration in the United States. Popul. Space Place 25, e2224 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. L. Boustan
    , Competition in the Promised Land: Black Migrants in Northern Cities and Labor Markets (Princeton University Press, 2016).
  46. ↵
    1. D. Conley
    , Being Black, Living in the Red: Race, Wealth, and Social Policy in America (Univ of California Press, 2010).
  47. ↵
    1. J. Feigenbaum
    , Intergenerational Mobility during the Great Depression. Working Paper (2015).
  48. ↵
    1. R. Abramitzky,
    2. L. P. Boustan,
    3. D. Connor
    , “Leaving the enclave: Historical evidence on immigrant mobility from the industrial removal office” (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, 2020).
  49. ↵
    1. R. Abramitzky,
    2. L. Boustan,
    3. E. Jacome,
    4. S. Perez
    , Intergenerational Mobility of Immigrants over Two Centuries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (2019).
  50. ↵
    1. S. Ruggles,
    2. K. Genadek,
    3. R. Goeken,
    4. J. Grover,
    5. M. Sobek
    , Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 7.0 (University of Minnesota, 2017) [Machine-readable database].
  51. ↵
    1. W. J. Collins,
    2. M. Wanamaker
    , Up from slavery? African American Intergenerational Economic Mobility Since 1880. NBER Working Paper Series (2017).
  52. ↵
    1. R. Abramitzky,
    2. L. P. Boustan,
    3. K. Eriksson
    , Europe’s tired, poor, huddled masses: Self-selection and economic outcomes in the age of mass migration. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 1832–1856 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. R. Abramitzky,
    2. L. P. Boustan,
    3. K. Eriksson
    , A nation of immigrants: Assimilation and economic outcomes in the age of mass migration. J. Polit. Econ. 122, 467–506 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. M. Bailey,
    2. C. Cole,
    3. M. Henderson,
    4. C. Massey
    , How Well Do Automated Methods Perform in Historical Samples? Evidence from New Ground Truth (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017).
  55. ↵
    1. S. Ruggles,
    2. C. Fitch,
    3. E. Roberts
    , Historical Census Record Linkage. Minnesota Population Center Working Paper No. 2017-3 (2017).
  56. ↵
    1. P. D. Allison
    , Fixed Effects Regression Models (SAGE publications, 2009).

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The changing geography of social mobility in the United States
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The changing geography of social mobility in the United States
Dylan Shane Connor, Michael Storper
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2020, 117 (48) 30309-30317; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2010222117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The changing geography of social mobility in the United States
Dylan Shane Connor, Michael Storper
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2020, 117 (48) 30309-30317; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2010222117
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 117 (48)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Scientist looking at an electronic tablet
Opinion: Standardizing gene product nomenclature—a call to action
Biomedical communities and journals need to standardize nomenclature of gene products to enhance accuracy in scientific and public communication.
Image credit: Shutterstock/greenbutterfly.
One red and one yellow modeled protein structures
Journal Club: Study reveals evolutionary origins of fold-switching protein
Shapeshifting designs could have wide-ranging pharmaceutical and biomedical applications in coming years.
Image credit: Acacia Dishman/Medical College of Wisconsin.
White and blue bird
Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490