Reply to Barkai: Implications of the Konso bone handaxe
- aThe University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan;
- bRift Valley Research Service, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;
- cCenter for Northeast Asian Studies, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8576, Japan;
- dAssociation for Conservation of Culture Hawassa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia;
- eFrench Center for Ethiopian Studies, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
See allHide authors and affiliations

We welcome Ran Barkai’s thoughts (1) on the symbolic significance of the Konso bone handaxe that we recently reported (2). First, we agree that African Homo erectus at 1.4 Mya may have been considerably sophisticated in their cognitive capacities, including potential symbolic perception and behavior. Indeed, the technological context of the find suggests a higher level of cognition than previously thought, a point we further discuss below. Next, we note that, although bone marrow was exploited, fragmented fresh bones at processing sites are covered with soft tissue. One experimental work (3) reports that presence of periosteum precludes efficient controlled percussion, and another reports that weathered bone …
↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: gsuwa{at}um.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
References
- 1.↵
- R. Barkai
- 2.↵
- K. Sano et al.
- 3.↵
- S. J. Walker
- 4.↵
- R. Backwell,
- F. d’Errico
- 5.↵
- Y. Beyene,
- B. Asfaw,
- K. Sano,
- G. Suwa
- 6.↵
- K. Zutovski,
- R. Barkai
- 7.↵
- T. Wynn,
- J. Gowlett
- 8.↵
- M. Kohn,
- S. Mithen
- 9.↵
- E. E. Hecht et al.
- 10.↵
- T. Wynn,
- F. L. Coolidge
- 11.↵
- D. Stout,
- E. E. Hecht
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Purchase access
Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.
Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.
Citation Manager Formats
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Anthropology
This article has a Letter. Please see:
- Relationship between Letter and Reply - October 27, 2020