Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Similarity in functional brain connectivity at rest predicts interpersonal closeness in the social network of an entire village

View ORCID ProfileRyan Hyon, View ORCID ProfileYoosik Youm, View ORCID ProfileJunsol Kim, View ORCID ProfileJeanyung Chey, View ORCID ProfileSeyul Kwak, and View ORCID ProfileCarolyn Parkinson
PNAS December 29, 2020 117 (52) 33149-33160; first published December 14, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013606117
Ryan Hyon
aDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryan Hyon
Yoosik Youm
bDepartment of Sociology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yoosik Youm
  • For correspondence: yoosik@yonsei.ac.kr cparkinson@ucla.edu
Junsol Kim
bDepartment of Sociology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Junsol Kim
Jeanyung Chey
cDepartment of Psychology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeanyung Chey
Seyul Kwak
dSeoul Metropolitan Government – Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Seyul Kwak
Carolyn Parkinson
aDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095;
eBrain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Carolyn Parkinson
  • For correspondence: yoosik@yonsei.ac.kr cparkinson@ucla.edu
  1. Edited by Olaf Sporns, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Michael S. Gazzaniga November 13, 2020 (received for review June 30, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

In what ways are we similar to our friends? Here, we characterized the social network of residents of a remote village, a subset of whom contributed personality and neuroimaging data. We demonstrate that similarity in individuals’ resting-state functional connectomes predicts individuals’ proximity in their real-world social network, even when controlling for demographic characteristics and self-reported personality traits. Our results suggest that patterns of functional brain activity during rest encode latent similarities (e.g., in terms of how people think and behave) that are associated with friendship. Taken together, integrating neuroimaging and social network analysis can offer novel insights into how the brain shapes or is shaped by the social networks that it inhabits.

Abstract

People often have the intuition that they are similar to their friends, yet evidence for homophily (being friends with similar others) based on self-reported personality is inconsistent. Functional connectomes—patterns of spontaneous synchronization across the brain—are stable within individuals and predict how people tend to think and behave. Thus, they may capture interindividual variability in latent traits that are particularly similar among friends but that might elude self-report. Here, we examined interpersonal similarity in functional connectivity at rest—that is, in the absence of external stimuli—and tested if functional connectome similarity is associated with proximity in a real-world social network. The social network of a remote village was reconstructed; a subset of residents underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging. Similarity in functional connectomes was positively related to social network proximity, particularly in the default mode network. Controlling for similarities in demographic and personality data (the Big Five personality traits) yielded similar results. Thus, functional connectomes may capture latent interpersonal similarities between friends that are not fully captured by commonly used demographic or personality measures. The localization of these results suggests how friends may be particularly similar to one another. Additionally, geographic proximity moderated the relationship between neural similarity and social network proximity, suggesting that such associations are particularly strong among people who live particularly close to one another. These findings suggest that social connectivity is reflected in signatures of brain functional connectivity, consistent with the common intuition that friends share similarities that go beyond, for example, demographic similarities.

  • social networks
  • homophily
  • fMRI
  • resting state
  • functional connectomes

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: yoosik{at}yonsei.ac.kr or cparkinson{at}ucla.edu.
  • Author contributions: R.H., Y.Y., J.K., J.C., S.K., and C.P. designed research; Y.Y., J.K., J.C., and S.K. performed research; R.H., Y.Y., J.K., and C.P. analyzed data; and R.H., Y.Y., and C.P. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. O.S. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.

  • This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2013606117/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

Anonymized fMRI, social network, and questionnaire data and code used for analyses have been deposited in a GitHub repository (https://github.com/rhhyon/KSHAP-PNAS-2020).

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text

References

  1. ↵
    1. M. McPherson,
    2. L. Smith-Lovin,
    3. J. M. Cook
    , Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. D. C. Feiler,
    2. A. M. Kleinbaum
    , Popularity, similarity, and the network extraversion bias. Psychol. Sci. 26, 593–603 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. M. Selfhout,
    2. J. Denissen,
    3. S. Branje,
    4. W. Meeus
    , In the eye of the beholder: Perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96, 1152–1165 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. O. Miranda-Dominguez et al
    ., Connectotyping: Model based fingerprinting of the functional connectome. PLoS One 9, e111048 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. E. S. Finn et al
    ., Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1664–1671 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. D. E. Meskaldji et al
    ., Prediction of long-term memory scores in MCI based on resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage Clin. 12, 785–795 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. R. E. Beaty et al
    ., Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 1087–1092 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. M. D. Rosenberg et al
    ., A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 165–171 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. M. D. Rosenberg,
    2. W. T. Hsu,
    3. D. Scheinost,
    4. R. Todd Constable,
    5. M. M. Chun
    , Connectome-based models predict separable components of attention in novel individuals. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 30, 160–173 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. L. Christov-Moore,
    2. N. Reggente,
    3. P. K. Douglas,
    4. J. D. Feusner,
    5. M. Iacoboni
    , Predicting empathy from resting state brain connectivity: A multivariate approach. Front. Integr. Nuerosci. 14, 3 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. J. Dubois,
    2. P. Galdi,
    3. Y. Han,
    4. L. K. Paul,
    5. R. Adolphs
    , Resting-state functional brain connectivity best predicts the personality dimension of openness to experience. Personal. Neurosci. 1, e6 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. J. M. Lahnakoski et al
    ., Synchronous brain activity across individuals underlies shared psychological perspectives. Neuroimage 100, 316–324 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. J. F. Cantlon,
    2. R. Li
    , Neural activity during natural viewing of Sesame Street statistically predicts test scores in early childhood. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001462 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Y. Yeshurun et al
    ., Same story, different story: The neural representation of interpretive frameworks. Psychol. Sci. 28, 307–319 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. C. Parkinson,
    2. A. M. Kleinbaum,
    3. T. Wheatley
    , Similar neural responses predict friendship. Nat. Commun. 9, 332 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. R. Hyon,
    2. A. M. Kleinbaum,
    3. C. Parkinson
    , Social network proximity predicts similar trajectories of psychological states: Evidence from multi-voxel spatiotemporal dynamics. Neuroimage 216, 116492 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. E. B. Falk,
    2. D. S. Bassett
    , Brain and social networks: Fundamental building blocks of human experience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 674–690 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. M. Moussaïd,
    2. H. Brighton,
    3. W. Gaissmaier
    , The amplification of risk in experimental diffusion chains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 5631–5636 (2015).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. M. Moussaïd,
    2. S. M. Herzog,
    3. J. E. Kämmer,
    4. R. Hertwig
    , Reach and speed of judgment propagation in the laboratory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 4117–4122 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. N. A. Christakis,
    2. J. H. Fowler
    , The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 370–379 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. J. H. Fowler,
    2. N. A. Christakis
    , Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 5334–5338 (2010).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. N. A. Christakis,
    2. J. H. Fowler
    , The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2249–2258 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. J. N. Rosenquist,
    2. J. H. Fowler,
    3. N. A. Christakis
    , Social network determinants of depression. Mol. Psychiatry 16, 273–281 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. J. T. Cacioppo,
    2. J. H. Fowler,
    3. N. A. Christakis
    , Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97, 977–991 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. M. W. Cole,
    2. T. Yarkoni,
    3. G. Repovš,
    4. A. Anticevic,
    5. T. S. Braver
    , Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence. J. Neurosci. 32, 8988–8999 (2012).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. J. H. Fowler,
    2. N. A. Christakis
    , Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 338, 23–26 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. O. P. John,
    2. R. W. Robins,
    3. L. A. Pervin
    1. O. P. John,
    2. L. P. Naumann,
    3. C. J. Soto
    , “Paradigm shift to the integrative big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues” in Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, O. P. John, R. W. Robins, L. A. Pervin, Eds. (Guilford Press, 2008), pp. 114–158.
  28. ↵
    1. S. V Paunonen
    , Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 411–424 (2003).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Y. Youm et al
    ., Social network properties and self-rated health in later life: Comparisons from the Korean social life, health, and aging project and the national social life, health and aging project. BMC Geriatr. 14, 102 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. J.-M. Lee et al
    ., The Korean social life, health and aging project-health examination cohort. Epidemiol. Health 36, e2014003 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. J. D. Power et al
    ., Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72, 665–678 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. G. Chen,
    2. P. A. Taylor,
    3. Y. W. Shin,
    4. R. C. Reynolds,
    5. R. W. Cox
    , Untangling the relatedness among correlations, Part II: Inter-subject correlation group analysis through linear mixed-effects modeling. Neuroimage 147, 825–840 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. L. Nahemow,
    2. M. P. Lawton
    , Similarity and propinquity in friendship formation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32, 205–213 (1975).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. J. Mossong et al
    ., Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases. PLoS Med. 5, e74 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. A. Stopczynski,
    2. A. ‘S.’ Pentland,
    3. S. Lehmann
    , How physical proximity shapes complex social networks. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–10 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. C. Horien,
    2. X. Shen,
    3. D. Scheinost,
    4. R. T. Constable
    , The individual functional connectome is unique and stable over months to years. Neuroimage 189, 676–687 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. W. Liu,
    2. N. Kohn,
    3. G. Fernández
    , Intersubject similarity of personality is associated with intersubject similarity of brain connectivity patterns. Neuroimage 186, 56–69 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. C. J. Vaidya,
    2. E. M. Gordon
    , Phenotypic variability in resting-state functional connectivity: Current status. Brain Connect. 3, 99–120 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. A. Otti et al
    ., I know the pain you feel-how the human brain’s default mode predicts our resonance to another’s suffering. Neuroscience 169, 143–148 (2010).
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. M. Rossignac-Milon,
    2. N. Bolger,
    3. K. S. Zee,
    4. E. J. Boothby,
    5. E. T. Higgins
    , Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. (2020).
  41. ↵
    1. G. Pagnoni
    , Dynamical properties of BOLD activity from the ventral posteromedial cortex associated with meditation and attentional skills. J. Neurosci. 32, 5242–5249 (2012).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. C. L. Apicella,
    2. F. W. Marlowe,
    3. J. H. Fowler,
    4. N. A. Christakis
    , Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481, 497–501 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. J.-P. Onnela,
    2. S. Arbesman,
    3. M. C. González,
    4. A.-L. Barabási,
    5. N. A. Christakis
    , Geographic constraints on social network groups. PLoS One 6, e16939 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. D. Liben-Nowell,
    2. J. Novak,
    3. R. Kumar,
    4. P. Raghavan,
    5. A. Tomkins
    , Geographic routing in social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 11623–11628 (2005).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. R. Lambiotte et al
    ., Geographical dispersal of mobile communication networks. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 387, 5317–5325 (2008).
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. C. R. Berger,
    2. R. J. Calabrese
    , Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Hum. Commun. Res. 1, 99–112 (1975).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. T. L. Huston
    1. G. L. Clore,
    2. D. A. Byrne
    , “A reinforcement-affect model of attraction” in Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction, T. L. Huston, Ed. (Academic Press, 1974), pp. 143–165.
  48. ↵
    1. E. Redcay,
    2. L. Schilbach
    , Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 495–505 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. D. Bolis,
    2. J. Balsters,
    3. N. Wenderoth,
    4. C. Becchio,
    5. L. Schilbach
    , Beyond autism: Introducing the dialectical misattunement hypothesis and a Bayesian account of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 50, 355–372 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. J. M. Lahnakoski,
    2. P. A. G. Forbes,
    3. C. McCall,
    4. L. Schilbach
    , Unobtrusive tracking of interpersonal orienting and distance predicts the subjective quality of social interactions. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 191815 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. R. B. Cialdini,
    2. N. J. Goldstein
    , Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 591–621 (2004).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. S. Braten
    1. F. B. M. de Waal
    , “The ‘Russian Doll’ model of empathy and imitation” in On Being Moved: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy, S. Braten, Ed. (John Benjamins, 2007), pp. 49–69.
  53. ↵
    1. C. Cattuto et al
    ., Dynamics of person-to-person interactions from distributed RFID sensor networks. PLoS One 5, e11596 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. A. P. Mackey,
    2. A. T. Miller Singley,
    3. S. A. Bunge
    , Intensive reasoning training alters patterns of brain connectivity at rest. J. Neurosci. 33, 4796–4803 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. C. B. McNabb et al
    ., No evidence for a relationship between social closeness and similarity in resting-state functional brain connectivity in schoolchildren. Sci. Rep. 10, 10710 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. E. S. Finn et al
    ., Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity? Neuroimage 160, 140–151 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. M. B. O’Donnell,
    2. J. B. Bayer,
    3. C. N. Cascio,
    4. E. B. Falk
    , Neural bases of recommendations differ according to social network structure. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12, 61–69 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. R. Schmälzle et al
    ., Brain connectivity dynamics during social interaction reflect social network structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 5153–5158 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. G. J. Stephens,
    2. L. J. Silbert,
    3. U. Hasson
    , Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 14425–14430 (2010).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. L. Schilbach
    , Towards a second-person neuropsychiatry. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 20150081 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. M. F. Green et al
    ., Social disconnection in schizophrenia and the general community. Schizophr. Bull. 44, 242–249 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. W. T. Joo,
    2. S. Kwak,
    3. Y. Youm,
    4. J. Chey
    , Brain functional connectivity difference in the complete network of an entire village: The role of social network size and embeddedness. Sci. Rep. 7, 4465 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    1. S. Y. Kim et al
    ., Standardization and validation of Big five inventory-Korean version (BFI-K) in elders. Korean J. Biol. Psychiatry 17, 15–25 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. G. Csárdi,
    2. T. Nepusz
    , The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Syst. Complex Systems, 1695 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. E. W. Dijkstra
    , A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math. 1, 269–271 (1959).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    1. J. Han et al
    ., A normative study of the mini-mental state examination for dementia screening (MMSE-DS) and its short form (SMMSE-DS) in the Korean elderly. J. Korean Geriatr. Psychiatry 14, 27–37 (2010).
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. J. Chey
    , Elderly Memory Disorder Scale (Hakjisa, Seoul, 2007).
  68. ↵
    1. J. C. Morris
    , The clinical dementia rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43, 2412–2414 (1993).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. N. A. Christakis,
    2. J. H. Fowler
    , Social contagion theory: Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Stat. Med. 32, 556–577 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. O. Esteban et al
    ., fMRIPrep: A robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nat. Methods 16, 111–116 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. F. Pedregosa et al
    ., Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. A. Krishnan,
    2. L. J. Williams,
    3. A. R. McIntosh,
    4. H. Abdi
    , Partial least squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: A tutorial and review. Neuroimage 56, 455–475 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. A. R. McIntosh,
    2. B. Mišić
    , Multivariate statistical analyses for neuroimaging data. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 499–525 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. T. Mehmood,
    2. K. H. Liland,
    3. L. Snipen,
    4. S. Sæbø
    , A review of variable selection methods in Partial Least Squares Regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 118, 62–69 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. ↵
    1. A. Kuznetsova,
    2. P. B. Brockhoff,
    3. R. H. B. Christensen
    , lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    1. D. Bates,
    2. M. Mächler,
    3. B. M. Bolker,
    4. S. C. Walker
    , Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. L. S. Aiken,
    2. S. G. West
    , Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (SAGE Publications Inc., 1991).
  78. ↵
    1. J. Cohen,
    2. P. Cohen,
    3. S. G. West,
    4. L. S. Aiken
    , Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, ed. 3, 2003).

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Similarity in functional brain connectivity at rest predicts interpersonal closeness in the social network of an entire village
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Similarity in functional brain connectivity at rest predicts interpersonal closeness in the social network of an entire village
Ryan Hyon, Yoosik Youm, Junsol Kim, Jeanyung Chey, Seyul Kwak, Carolyn Parkinson
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2020, 117 (52) 33149-33160; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2013606117

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Similarity in functional brain connectivity at rest predicts interpersonal closeness in the social network of an entire village
Ryan Hyon, Yoosik Youm, Junsol Kim, Jeanyung Chey, Seyul Kwak, Carolyn Parkinson
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2020, 117 (52) 33149-33160; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2013606117
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 117 (52)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Biological Sciences
  • Neuroscience

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Scientist looking at an electronic tablet
Opinion: Standardizing gene product nomenclature—a call to action
Biomedical communities and journals need to standardize nomenclature of gene products to enhance accuracy in scientific and public communication.
Image credit: Shutterstock/greenbutterfly.
One red and one yellow modeled protein structures
Journal Club: Study reveals evolutionary origins of fold-switching protein
Shapeshifting designs could have wide-ranging pharmaceutical and biomedical applications in coming years.
Image credit: Acacia Dishman/Medical College of Wisconsin.
White and blue bird
Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490