Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

PolyG-DS: An ultrasensitive polyguanine tract–profiling method to detect clonal expansions and trace cell lineage

View ORCID ProfileYuezheng Zhang, View ORCID ProfileBrendan F. Kohrn, Ming Yang, Daniela Nachmanson, T. Rinda Soong, View ORCID ProfileI-Hsiu Lee, Yong Tao, View ORCID ProfileHans Clevers, View ORCID ProfileElizabeth M. Swisher, Teresa A. Brentnall, Lawrence A. Loeb, Scott R. Kennedy, View ORCID ProfileJesse J. Salk, View ORCID ProfileKamila Naxerova, and View ORCID ProfileRosa Ana Risques
  1. aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  2. bCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114;
  3. cDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114;
  4. dDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, WA 98019;
  5. eDivision of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, WA 98019;
  6. fHubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 3584 CT Utrecht, Netherlands;
  7. gDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195;
  8. hDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  9. iDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS August 3, 2021 118 (31) e2023373118; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023373118
Yuezheng Zhang
aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yuezheng Zhang
Brendan F. Kohrn
aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brendan F. Kohrn
Ming Yang
aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Nachmanson
aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Rinda Soong
aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I-Hsiu Lee
bCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114;
cDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for I-Hsiu Lee
Yong Tao
dDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, WA 98019;
eDivision of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, WA 98019;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans Clevers
fHubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 3584 CT Utrecht, Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hans Clevers
Elizabeth M. Swisher
gDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elizabeth M. Swisher
Teresa A. Brentnall
hDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence A. Loeb
aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott R. Kennedy
aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jesse J. Salk
iDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jesse J. Salk
Kamila Naxerova
bCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114;
cDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kamila Naxerova
Rosa Ana Risques
aDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rosa Ana Risques
  • For correspondence: rrisques@uw.edu
  1. Edited by James E. Cleaver, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, and approved May 24, 2021 (received for review November 11, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

The ability to detect precancerous clones and reconstruct cancer evolution is important for early cancer detection and improving prevention and treatment strategies. We present PolyG-DS, a sequencing method that combines the unique properties of polyguanine tracts (PolyGs) for cell lineage tracing with ultrahighaccuracy duplex sequencing (DS). PolyG-DS enables accurate and reproducible PolyG genotyping, providing high sensitivity for the detection of low-frequency alleles in mixed populations. This translates into an improved ability to identify clonal expansions within normal tissue, with potential application to detect cancer progression in preneoplastic diseases such as ulcerative colitis. Because PolyG-DS is driver mutation agnostic, it provides a universal, cost-effective approach for assessing tumor evolution across cancer types.

Abstract

Polyguanine tracts (PolyGs) are short guanine homopolymer repeats that are prone to accumulating mutations when cells divide. This feature makes them especially suitable for cell lineage tracing, which has been exploited to detect and characterize precancerous and cancerous somatic evolution. PolyG genotyping, however, is challenging because of the inherent biochemical difficulties in amplifying and sequencing repetitive regions. To overcome this limitation, we developed PolyG-DS, a next-generation sequencing (NGS) method that combines the error-correction capabilities of duplex sequencing (DS) with enrichment of PolyG loci using CRISPR-Cas9–targeted genomic fragmentation. PolyG-DS markedly reduces technical artifacts by comparing the sequences derived from the complementary strands of each original DNA molecule. We demonstrate that PolyG-DS genotyping is accurate, reproducible, and highly sensitive, enabling the detection of low-frequency alleles (<0.01) in spike-in samples using a panel of only 19 PolyG markers. PolyG-DS replicated prior results based on PolyG fragment length analysis by capillary electrophoresis, and exhibited higher sensitivity for identifying clonal expansions in the nondysplastic colon of patients with ulcerative colitis. We illustrate the utility of this method for resolving the phylogenetic relationship among precancerous lesions in ulcerative colitis and for tracing the metastatic dissemination of ovarian cancer. PolyG-DS enables the study of tumor evolution without prior knowledge of tumor driver mutations and provides a tool to perform cost-effective and easily scalable ultra-accurate NGS-based PolyG genotyping for multiple applications in biology, genetics, and cancer research.

  • cancer evolution
  • preneoplastic
  • phylogenetic reconstruction
  • carcinogenic fields
  • somatic evolution

Footnotes

  • ↵1Present address: Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.

  • ↵2Present address: Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

  • ↵3Present address: TwinStrand Biosciences, Seattle, WA 98121.

  • ↵4To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: rrisques{at}uw.edu.
  • Author contributions: Y.Z. and R.A.R. designed research; Y.Z. and D.N. performed research; B.F.K., M.Y., D.N., H.C., E.M.S., T.A.B., L.A.L., S.R.K., J.J.S., and K.N. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Y.Z., B.F.K., T.R.S., I.-H.L., Y.T., K.N., and R.A.R. analyzed data; and Y.Z. and R.A.R. wrote the paper.

  • Competing interest statement: S.R.K., L.A.L., and R.A.R. are consultants and equity holders at TwinStrand Biosciences Inc. J.J.S. is an employee and equity holder at TwinStrand Biosciences Inc. S.R.K., L.A.L., R.A.R., D.N., and J.J.S. are named inventors on patents owned by the University of Washington and licensed to TwinStrand Biosciences Inc. R.A.R. is an equity holder at NanoString Technologies Inc.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2023373118/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability

Sequencing reads data have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (PRJNA674403). All other study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text

References

  1. ↵
    1. P. C. Nowell
    , The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 194, 23–28 (1976).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. The ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium
    , Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. N. McGranahan,
    2. C. Swanton
    , Clonal heterogeneity and tumor evolution: Past, present, and the future. Cell 168, 613–628 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. M. Gerstung et al., PCAWG Evolution & Heterogeneity Working Group, and PCAWG Consortium
    , The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers. Nature 578, 122–128 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. K. Curtius,
    2. N. A. Wright,
    3. T. A. Graham
    , An evolutionary perspective on field cancerization. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 19–32 (2018).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. M. W. Fittall,
    2. P. Van Loo
    , Translating insights into tumor evolution to clinical practice: Promises and challenges. Genome Med. 11, 20 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. R. A. Risques,
    2. S. R. Kennedy
    , Aging and the rise of somatic cancer-associated mutations in normal tissues. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007108 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. S. R. Kennedy,
    2. Y. Zhang,
    3. R. A. Risques
    , Cancer-associated mutations but no cancer: Insights into the early steps of carcinogenesis and implications for early cancer detection. Trends Cancer 5, 531–540 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. J. Vijg,
    2. X. Dong
    , Pathogenic mechanisms of somatic mutation and genome mosaicism in aging. Cell 182, 12–23 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. J. C. Boyer et al
    ., Sequence dependent instability of mononucleotide microsatellites in cultured mismatch repair proficient and deficient mammalian cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 707–713 (2002).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. H. Ellegren
    , Microsatellites: Simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 435–445 (2004).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. J. L. Weber,
    2. C. Wong
    , Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 1123–1128 (1993).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. J. C. Whittaker et al
    ., Likelihood-based estimation of microsatellite mutation rates. Genetics 164, 781–787 (2003).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. S. J. Salipante,
    2. M. S. Horwitz
    , Phylogenetic fate mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 5448–5453 (2006).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. K. Naxerova et al
    ., Hypermutable DNA chronicles the evolution of human colon cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, E1889–E1898 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. K. Naxerova et al
    ., Origins of lymphatic and distant metastases in human colorectal cancer. Science 357, 55–60 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. J. G. Reiter et al
    ., Lymph node metastases develop through a wider evolutionary bottleneck than distant metastases. Nat. Genet. 52, 692–700 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. J. J. Salk et al
    ., Clonal expansions and short telomeres are associated with neoplasia in early-onset, but not late-onset, ulcerative colitis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 19, 2593–2602 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. J. J. Salk et al
    ., Clonal expansions in ulcerative colitis identify patients with neoplasia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 20871–20876 (2009).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. S. J. Salipante,
    2. A. Kas,
    3. E. McMonagle,
    4. M. S. Horwitz
    , Phylogenetic analysis of developmental and postnatal mouse cell lineages. Evol. Dev. 12, 84–94 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. S. J. Salipante,
    2. J. M. Thompson,
    3. M. S. Horwitz
    , Phylogenetic fate mapping: Theoretical and experimental studies applied to the development of mouse fibroblasts. Genetics 178, 967–977 (2008).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. K. D. Carlson et al
    ., MIPSTR: A method for multiplex genotyping of germline and somatic STR variation across many individuals. Genome Res. 25, 750–761 (2015).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. A. Guilmatre,
    2. G. Highnam,
    3. C. Borel,
    4. D. Mittelman,
    5. A. J. Sharp
    , Rapid multiplexed genotyping of simple tandem repeats using capture and high-throughput sequencing. Hum. Mutat. 34, 1304–1311 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. M. Gymrek,
    2. D. Golan,
    3. S. Rosset,
    4. Y. Erlich
    , lobSTR: A short tandem repeat profiler for personal genomes. Genome Res. 22, 1154–1162 (2012).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. G. Shin et al
    ., CRISPR-Cas9-targeted fragmentation and selective sequencing enable massively parallel microsatellite analysis. Nat. Commun. 8, 14291 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. D. Nachmanson et al
    ., Targeted genome fragmentation with CRISPR/Cas9 enables fast and efficient enrichment of small genomic regions and ultra-accurate sequencing with low DNA input (CRISPR-DS). Genome Res. 28, 1589–1599 (2018).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. J. J. Salk,
    2. M. W. Schmitt,
    3. L. A. Loeb
    , Enhancing the accuracy of next-generation sequencing for detecting rare and subclonal mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 269–285 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. S. R. Kennedy et al
    ., Detecting ultralow-frequency mutations by duplex sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2586–2606 (2014). Correction in: Nat. Protoc. 9, 2903 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. M. Johnson et al
    ., NCBI BLAST: A better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W5–W9 (2008).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. M. Gymrek
    , A genomic view of short tandem repeats. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 44, 9–16 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. A.-M. Baker et al
    ., Evolutionary history of human colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Gut 68, 985–995 (2019).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. K. T. Baker,
    2. J. J. Salk,
    3. T. A. Brentnall,
    4. R. A. Risques
    , Precancer in ulcerative colitis: The role of the field effect and its clinical implications. Carcinogenesis 39, 11–20 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. C.-H. R. Choi,
    2. I. A. Bakir,
    3. A. L. Hart,
    4. T. A. Graham
    , Clonal evolution of colorectal cancer in IBD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14, 218–229 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. S. Olafsson et al
    ., Somatic evolution in non-neoplastic IBD-affected colon. Cell 182, 672–684.e11 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. K. Nanki et al
    ., Somatic inflammatory gene mutations in human ulcerative colitis epithelium. Nature 577, 254–259 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. N. Kakiuchi et al
    ., Frequent mutations that converge on the NFKBIZ pathway in ulcerative colitis. Nature 577, 260–265 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. R. R. Sokal,
    2. C. D. Michener
    , A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 38, 1409–1438 (1958).
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. F. Blokzijl et al
    ., Tissue-specific mutation accumulation in human adult stem cells during life. Nature 538, 260–264 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. T. R. Soong,
    2. B. E. Howitt,
    3. N. Horowitz,
    4. M. R. Nucci,
    5. C. P. Crum
    , The fallopian tube, “precursor escape” and narrowing the knowledge gap to the origins of high-grade serous carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 152, 426–433 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. A. McPherson et al
    ., Divergent modes of clonal spread and intraperitoneal mixing in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet. 48, 758–767 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. A. A. Ahmed et al
    ., Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. J. Pathol. 221, 49–56 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network
    , Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 474, 609–615 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. R. Vang et al
    ., Molecular alterations of TP53 are a defining feature of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A rereview of cases lacking TP53 mutations in the cancer genome atlas ovarian study. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 35, 48–55 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. E. Kuhn et al
    ., TP53 mutations in serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and concurrent pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma—Evidence supporting the clonal relationship of the two lesions. J. Pathol. 226, 421–426 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. M. A. Eckert et al
    ., Genomics of ovarian cancer progression reveals diverse metastatic trajectories including intraepithelial metastasis to the fallopian tube. Cancer Discov. 6, 1342–1351 (2016).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. S. I. Labidi-Galy et al
    ., High grade serous ovarian carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube. Nat. Commun. 8, 1093 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. W. Zhou et al
    ., Use of somatic mutations to quantify random contributions to mouse development. BMC Genomics 14, 39 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. I. Martincorena
    , Somatic mutation and clonal expansions in human tissues. Genome Med. 11, 35 (2019).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. X. Gui et al
    ., Histological and molecular diversity and heterogeneity of precancerous lesions associated with inflammatory bowel diseases. J. Clin. Pathol. 73, 391–402 (2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. K. Hewitt et al
    ., The evolution of our understanding of the biology of cancer is the key to avoiding overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 29, 2463–2474 (2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. S. Srivastava et al
    ., Cancer overdiagnosis: A biological challenge and clinical dilemma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 349–358 (2019).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. G. Caravagna et al
    ., Subclonal reconstruction of tumors by using machine learning and population genetics. Nat. Genet. 52, 898–907 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. M. W. Schmitt et al
    ., Sequencing small genomic targets with high efficiency and extreme accuracy. Nat. Methods 12, 423–425 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. H. Li
    , Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv [Preprint] (2013). https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997. Accessed 25 July 2016.
  55. ↵
    1. E. Paradis,
    2. J. Claude,
    3. K. Strimmer
    , APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. K. P. Schliep
    , phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PolyG-DS: An ultrasensitive polyguanine tract–profiling method to detect clonal expansions and trace cell lineage
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
PolyG-DS: An ultrasensitive polyguanine tract–profiling method to detect clonal expansions and trace cell lineage
Yuezheng Zhang, Brendan F. Kohrn, Ming Yang, Daniela Nachmanson, T. Rinda Soong, I-Hsiu Lee, Yong Tao, Hans Clevers, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Teresa A. Brentnall, Lawrence A. Loeb, Scott R. Kennedy, Jesse J. Salk, Kamila Naxerova, Rosa Ana Risques
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2021, 118 (31) e2023373118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023373118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
PolyG-DS: An ultrasensitive polyguanine tract–profiling method to detect clonal expansions and trace cell lineage
Yuezheng Zhang, Brendan F. Kohrn, Ming Yang, Daniela Nachmanson, T. Rinda Soong, I-Hsiu Lee, Yong Tao, Hans Clevers, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Teresa A. Brentnall, Lawrence A. Loeb, Scott R. Kennedy, Jesse J. Salk, Kamila Naxerova, Rosa Ana Risques
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2021, 118 (31) e2023373118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023373118
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Genetics
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 118 (31)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Glacier.
Tipping point of central-western Greenland Ice Sheet
A study suggests that the central-western Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS) is approaching a critical transition and will undergo significantly enhanced melting in the near future.
Image credit: Pixabay/mariohagen.
T3-treated clownfish with two white bars.
How clownfish gain their stripes
A study explores how white bar formation in clownfish may be tied to differential recruitment in and adjustment to different sea anemone species.
Image credit: Pauline Salis.
Kordofan watermelon.
Origin of domesticated watermelons
Genetic analyses reveal that the Sudanese Kordofan melon is the closest relative and may be a precursor of domesticated watermelons.
Image credit: Shan Wu.
Tall trees in a misty forest.
Opinion: We need biosphere stewardship to protect carbon sinks, build resilience
Intact ecosystems have a big role in sequestering carbon. Hence, safeguarding the biosphere from further degradation is an existential challenge for humanity.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kritskiy-ua.
Throngs of people press close together on a busy sidewalk.
Journal Club: Algorithm suggests a sidewalk-space redesign for safer walkways
A study of 10 cities informed an algorithm that could help planners choose which sidewalks to expand for walking or biking, while minimizing traffic disruptions.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Aleksandr Ozerov.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.