Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

The mortality impacts of current and planned coal-fired power plants in India

Maureen Cropper, Ryna Cui, Sarath Guttikunda, Nate Hultman, Puja Jawahar, View ORCID ProfileYongjoon Park, Xinlu Yao, and View ORCID ProfileXiao-Peng Song
  1. aDepartment of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
  2. bCenter for Global Sustainability, School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
  3. cUrban Emissions Info, Delhi, Goa 403521, India;
  4. dDepartment of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003;
  5. eDepartment of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS February 2, 2021 118 (5) e2017936118; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017936118
Maureen Cropper
aDepartment of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mcropper@umd.edu
Ryna Cui
bCenter for Global Sustainability, School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarath Guttikunda
cUrban Emissions Info, Delhi, Goa 403521, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nate Hultman
bCenter for Global Sustainability, School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Puja Jawahar
cUrban Emissions Info, Delhi, Goa 403521, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yongjoon Park
dDepartment of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, 01003;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yongjoon Park
Xinlu Yao
aDepartment of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiao-Peng Song
eDepartment of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, 79409
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Xiao-Peng Song
  1. Contributed by Maureen Cropper, December 10, 2020 (sent for review August 25, 2020; reviewed by Richard T. Burnett, Andrew L. Goodkind, and Armistead G. Russell)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Under current operating conditions, coal-fired power plants in India generate significant amounts of particulate air pollution. We quantify the impact of plants operating in 2018 and plants in the planning stage as of 2019 on ambient PM2.5 and on premature mortality. The health damages from coal-fired power plants can be avoided by replacing coal-fired power plants with renewable energy sources, which will also reduce GHG emissions. Taxing electricity generated from coal at a rate that reflects the value of health damages would incentivize the adoption of renewable energy. We calculate the magnitude of this tax. We also discuss the health benefits of reducing power plant emissions by implementing India’s emission control laws enacted in 2015 but not yet in force.

Abstract

We examine the health implications of electricity generation from the 2018 stock of coal-fired power plants in India, as well as the health impacts of the expansion in coal-fired generation capacity expected to occur by 2030. We estimate emissions of SO2, NOX, and particulate matter 2.5 μm (PM2.5) for each plant and use a chemical transport model to estimate the impact of power plant emissions on ambient PM2.5. Concentration-response functions from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) are used to project the impacts of changes in PM2.5 on mortality. Current plus planned plants will contribute, on average, 13% of ambient PM2.5 in India. This reflects large absolute contributions to PM2.5 in central India and parts of the Indo-Gangetic plain (up to 20 μg/m3). In the south of India, coal-fired power plants account for 20–25% of ambient PM2.5. We estimate 112,000 deaths are attributable annually to current plus planned coal-fired power plants. Not building planned plants would avoid at least 844,000 premature deaths over the life of these plants. Imposing a tax on electricity that reflects these local health benefits would incentivize the adoption of renewable energy.

  • India
  • air pollution
  • electricity from coal
  • cobenefits of renewables

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: mcropper{at}umd.edu.
  • Author contributions: M.C., R.C., and N.H. designed research; R.C., S.G., P.J., Y.P., X.Y., and X.-P.S. performed research; M.C., S.G., P.J., Y.P., and X.-P.S. analyzed data; and M.C., R.C., and N.H. wrote the paper.

  • Reviewers: R.T.B., Health Canada; A.L.G., University of New Mexico; and A.G.R., Georgia Institute of Technology.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2017936118/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators data have been deposited in the Global Health Data Exchange (https://doi.org/10.6069/KHWH-2703, ref. 33). All study data are included in the article, in openICPSR (https://doi.org/10.3886/E130404V1, ref. 34), and/or SI Appendix.

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text

References

  1. ↵
    1. Government of India, Ministry of Power
    , “Growth of Electricity Sector in India from 1947-2019” (New Delhi, 2019).
  2. ↵
    1. R. Y. Cui et al
    ., Quantifying operational lifetimes for coal power plants under the Paris goals. Nat. Commun. 10, 4759 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. H. Dong et al
    ., Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis. Appl. Energy 144, 165–174 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. S. Rao et al
    ., A multi-model assessment of the co-benefits of climate mitigation for global air quality. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 124013 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. J. West et al
    ., Cobenefits of global and domestic greenhouse gas emissions for air quality and human health. Lancet 389, S23 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. S. Chowdhury,
    2. S. Dey,
    3. K. R. Smith
    , Ambient PM2.5 exposure and expected premature mortality to 2100 in India under climate change scenarios. Nat. Commun. 9, 318 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. A. Markandya et al
    ., Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris agreement: A modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e126–e133 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. N. Scovronick et al
    ., The impact of human health co-benefits on evaluations of global climate policy. Nat. Commun. 10, 2095 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. S. N. Koplitz,
    2. D. J. Jacob,
    3. M. P. Sulprizio,
    4. L. Myllyvirta,
    5. C. Reid
    , Burden of disease from rising coal-fired power plant emissions in Southeast Asia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 1467–1476 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. D. Tong et al
    ., Targeted emission reductions from global super-polluting power plant units. Nat. Sustain. 1, 59–68 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. W. Peng et al
    ., Managing China’s coal power plants to address multiple environmental objectives. Nat. Sustain. 1, 693–701 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. H. Guo et al
    ., Source contributions and potential reductions to health effects of particulate matter in India. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 15219–15229 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. S. K. Guttikunda,
    2. P. Jawahar
    , Atmospheric emissions and pollution from the coal-fired thermal power plants in India. Atmos. Environ. 92, 449–460 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. C. J. L. Murray et al
    ., Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019; A systematic analysis for the Global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 396, 1223–1249 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. GBD MAPS Working Group
    , “Burden of disease attributable to major air pollution sources in India” (Special Report 21, Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA, 2018).
  16. ↵
    1. C. A. Pope, 3rd,
    2. M. Cropper,
    3. J. Coggins,
    4. A. Cohen
    , Health benefits of air pollution abatement policy: Role of the shape of the concentration-response function. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 65, 516–522 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Population Reference Bureau
    , India-Population Mid-2035. https://www.prb.org/international/geography/india/. Accessed 12 July 2020.
  18. ↵
    1. D. T. Jamison et al., Eds
    1. M. L. Cropper et al
    ., “Costs and benefits of installing flue-gas desulfurization units at coal-fired power plants in India” in Disease Control Priorities: Injury Prevention And Environmental Health, D. T. Jamison et al., Eds. (World Bank, Washington, DC, 3rd Ed., 2017), pp. 239–248.
  19. ↵
    1. F. P. Perera
    , Multiple threats to child health from fossil fuel combustion: Impacts of air pollution and climate change. Environ. Health Perspect. 125, 141–148 (2017).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. P. J. Landrigan et al
    ., The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 391, 462–512 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. S. Brockmeyer,
    2. A. D’Angiulli
    , How air pollution alters brain development: The role of neuroinflammation. Transl. Neurosci. 7, 24–30 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. L. Calderón-Garcidueñas et al
    ., Exposure to severe urban air pollution influences cognitive outcomes, brain volume and systemic inflammation in clinically healthy children. Brain Cogn. 77, 345–355 (2011).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. E. Suades-González,
    2. M. Gascon,
    3. M. Guxens,
    4. J. Sunyer
    , Air pollution and neuropsychological development: A review of the latest evidence. Endocrinology 156, 3473–3482 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. T. Chang,
    2. J. Graff Zivin,
    3. T. Gross,
    4. M. Neidell
    , The effect of pollution on worker productivity: Evidence from call-center workers in China. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 11, 151–172 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. J. Hansen-Lewis
    , Does Air Pollution Lower Productivity? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing. Mimeo (Brown University, 2018).
  26. ↵
    1. J. Burney,
    2. V. Ramanathan
    , Recent climate and air pollution impacts on Indian agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 16319–16324 (2014).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. CSTEP
    , “Benefit cost analysis of emission standards for coal-based thermal power plants in India” (Bangalore, India, 2018).
  28. ↵
    1. International Energy Agency
    , India 2020 – Energy policy review (International Energy Agency, Paris, 2020).
  29. ↵
    1. D. Tong et al
    ., Dynamic projection of anthropogenic emissions in China: Methodology and 2015-2050 emission pathways under a range of socioeconomic, climate policy, and pollution control scenarios. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 5729–5757 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. E. Somanathan,
    2. B. Chakravarty
    , Social Costs of Power from Coal and Renewables in India (Mimeo, 2018).
  31. ↵
    1. S. Bhattacharya,
    2. A. Alberini,
    3. M. L. Cropper
    , The value of mortality risk reductions in Delhi, India. J. Risk Uncertain. 34, 21–47 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. L. A. Robinson et al
    ., Reference Case Guidelines for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Global Health and Development (Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 2019).
  33. ↵
    1. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network
    , Global burden of disease study 2019 (GBD 2019) particulate matter risk curves. Global Health Data Exchange. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/global-burden-disease-study-2019-gbd-2019-particulate-matter-risk-curves. Deposited 8 January 2021.
  34. ↵
    1. M. Cropper et al.
    , The mortality impacts of current and planned coal-fired power plants in India. openICPSR. https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/130404/version/V1/view. Deposited 12 January 2021.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The mortality impacts of current and planned coal-fired power plants in India
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The mortality impacts of current and planned coal-fired power plants in India
Maureen Cropper, Ryna Cui, Sarath Guttikunda, Nate Hultman, Puja Jawahar, Yongjoon Park, Xinlu Yao, Xiao-Peng Song
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2021, 118 (5) e2017936118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2017936118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The mortality impacts of current and planned coal-fired power plants in India
Maureen Cropper, Ryna Cui, Sarath Guttikunda, Nate Hultman, Puja Jawahar, Yongjoon Park, Xinlu Yao, Xiao-Peng Song
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2021, 118 (5) e2017936118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2017936118
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 118 (5)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490