The mortality impacts of current and planned coal-fired power plants in India
- aDepartment of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
- bCenter for Global Sustainability, School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
- cUrban Emissions Info, Delhi, Goa 403521, India;
- dDepartment of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003;
- eDepartment of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409
See allHide authors and affiliations
Contributed by Maureen Cropper, December 10, 2020 (sent for review August 25, 2020; reviewed by Richard T. Burnett, Andrew L. Goodkind, and Armistead G. Russell)

Significance
Under current operating conditions, coal-fired power plants in India generate significant amounts of particulate air pollution. We quantify the impact of plants operating in 2018 and plants in the planning stage as of 2019 on ambient PM2.5 and on premature mortality. The health damages from coal-fired power plants can be avoided by replacing coal-fired power plants with renewable energy sources, which will also reduce GHG emissions. Taxing electricity generated from coal at a rate that reflects the value of health damages would incentivize the adoption of renewable energy. We calculate the magnitude of this tax. We also discuss the health benefits of reducing power plant emissions by implementing India’s emission control laws enacted in 2015 but not yet in force.
Abstract
We examine the health implications of electricity generation from the 2018 stock of coal-fired power plants in India, as well as the health impacts of the expansion in coal-fired generation capacity expected to occur by 2030. We estimate emissions of SO2, NOX, and particulate matter 2.5 μm (PM2.5) for each plant and use a chemical transport model to estimate the impact of power plant emissions on ambient PM2.5. Concentration-response functions from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) are used to project the impacts of changes in PM2.5 on mortality. Current plus planned plants will contribute, on average, 13% of ambient PM2.5 in India. This reflects large absolute contributions to PM2.5 in central India and parts of the Indo-Gangetic plain (up to 20 μg/m3). In the south of India, coal-fired power plants account for 20–25% of ambient PM2.5. We estimate 112,000 deaths are attributable annually to current plus planned coal-fired power plants. Not building planned plants would avoid at least 844,000 premature deaths over the life of these plants. Imposing a tax on electricity that reflects these local health benefits would incentivize the adoption of renewable energy.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: mcropper{at}umd.edu.
Author contributions: M.C., R.C., and N.H. designed research; R.C., S.G., P.J., Y.P., X.Y., and X.-P.S. performed research; M.C., S.G., P.J., Y.P., and X.-P.S. analyzed data; and M.C., R.C., and N.H. wrote the paper.
Reviewers: R.T.B., Health Canada; A.L.G., University of New Mexico; and A.G.R., Georgia Institute of Technology.
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2017936118/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability.
GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators data have been deposited in the Global Health Data Exchange (https://doi.org/10.6069/KHWH-2703, ref. 33). All study data are included in the article, in openICPSR (https://doi.org/10.3886/E130404V1, ref. 34), and/or SI Appendix.
Published under the PNAS license.
References
- ↵
- Government of India, Ministry of Power
- ↵
- R. Y. Cui et al
- ↵
- H. Dong et al
- ↵
- S. Rao et al
- ↵
- J. West et al
- ↵
- S. Chowdhury,
- S. Dey,
- K. R. Smith
- ↵
- ↵
- N. Scovronick et al
- ↵
- S. N. Koplitz,
- D. J. Jacob,
- M. P. Sulprizio,
- L. Myllyvirta,
- C. Reid
- ↵
- D. Tong et al
- ↵
- W. Peng et al
- ↵
- H. Guo et al
- ↵
- S. K. Guttikunda,
- P. Jawahar
- ↵
- C. J. L. Murray et al
- ↵
- GBD MAPS Working Group
- ↵
- C. A. Pope, 3rd,
- M. Cropper,
- J. Coggins,
- A. Cohen
- ↵
- Population Reference Bureau
- ↵
- D. T. Jamison et al., Eds
- M. L. Cropper et al
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- S. Brockmeyer,
- A. D’Angiulli
- ↵
- ↵
- E. Suades-González,
- M. Gascon,
- M. Guxens,
- J. Sunyer
- ↵
- T. Chang,
- J. Graff Zivin,
- T. Gross,
- M. Neidell
- ↵
- J. Hansen-Lewis
- ↵
- J. Burney,
- V. Ramanathan
- ↵
- CSTEP
- ↵
- International Energy Agency
- ↵
- D. Tong et al
- ↵
- E. Somanathan,
- B. Chakravarty
- ↵
- ↵
- L. A. Robinson et al
- ↵
- Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network
- ↵
- M. Cropper et al.
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Purchase access
Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.
Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.
Citation Manager Formats
Article Classifications
- Social Sciences
- Sustainability Science