Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Network motifs involving both competition and facilitation predict biodiversity in alpine plant communities

View ORCID ProfileGianalberto Losapio, View ORCID ProfileChristian Schöb, Phillip P. A. Staniczenko, View ORCID ProfileFrancesco Carrara, Gian Marco Palamara, View ORCID ProfileConsuelo M. De Moraes, View ORCID ProfileMark C. Mescher, View ORCID ProfileRob W. Brooker, Bradley J. Butterfield, Ragan M. Callaway, View ORCID ProfileLohengrin A. Cavieres, View ORCID ProfileZaal Kikvidze, View ORCID ProfileChristopher J. Lortie, Richard Michalet, View ORCID ProfileFrancisco I. Pugnaire, and View ORCID ProfileJordi Bascompte
  1. aDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8006, Switzerland;
  2. bDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  3. cBrooklyn College, City University of New York, New York, NY 11210;
  4. dDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8093, Switzerland;
  5. eDepartment of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, 8600, Switzerland;
  6. fEcological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, United Kingdom;
  7. gDepartment of Biological Sciences and Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011;
  8. hDivision of Biological Sciences and the Institute on Ecosystems, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812;
  9. iDepartamento de Botánica, Universidad de Concepción and Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversiad, Concepción, 56-41-2204704, Chile;
  10. jInstitute of Ecology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, 0162, Georgia;
  11. kDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, M3J 1P3, ON Canada;
  12. lThe National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93101;
  13. mUMR Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, 33615 France;
  14. nEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas , Almería, 04120 Spain;
  15. oDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057 Switzerland

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS February 9, 2021 118 (6) e2005759118; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005759118
Gianalberto Losapio
aDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8006, Switzerland;
bDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gianalberto Losapio
  • For correspondence: losapiog@stanford.edu christian.schoeb@usys.ethz.ch
Christian Schöb
aDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8006, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christian Schöb
  • For correspondence: losapiog@stanford.edu christian.schoeb@usys.ethz.ch
Phillip P. A. Staniczenko
cBrooklyn College, City University of New York, New York, NY 11210;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Carrara
dDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8093, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Francesco Carrara
Gian Marco Palamara
eDepartment of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, 8600, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Consuelo M. De Moraes
aDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8006, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Consuelo M. De Moraes
Mark C. Mescher
aDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8006, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark C. Mescher
Rob W. Brooker
fEcological Sciences, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rob W. Brooker
Bradley J. Butterfield
gDepartment of Biological Sciences and Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ragan M. Callaway
hDivision of Biological Sciences and the Institute on Ecosystems, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lohengrin A. Cavieres
iDepartamento de Botánica, Universidad de Concepción and Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversiad, Concepción, 56-41-2204704, Chile;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lohengrin A. Cavieres
Zaal Kikvidze
jInstitute of Ecology, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, 0162, Georgia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zaal Kikvidze
Christopher J. Lortie
kDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, M3J 1P3, ON Canada;
lThe National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93101;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christopher J. Lortie
Richard Michalet
mUMR Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, 33615 France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francisco I. Pugnaire
nEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas , Almería, 04120 Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Francisco I. Pugnaire
Jordi Bascompte
oDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057 Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jordi Bascompte
  1. Edited by Nils Chr. Stenseth, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and approved December 30, 2020 (received for review March 26, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Biodiversity is driven by complex associations among species, but ecologists often look only at competitive or facilitative interactions either independently or only for few species at a time. Using a large dataset of mountain ecosystems encompassing more than 2,000 species across the globe, we analyze the prevalence and importance of both positive and negative associations among plants. Our findings indicate that facilitation and competition between plant species must be studied together in order to explain biodiversity change.

Abstract

Biological diversity depends on multiple, cooccurring ecological interactions. However, most studies focus on one interaction type at a time, leaving community ecologists unsure of how positive and negative associations among species combine to influence biodiversity patterns. Using surveys of plant populations in alpine communities worldwide, we explore patterns of positive and negative associations among triads of species (modules) and their relationship to local biodiversity. Three modules, each incorporating both positive and negative associations, were overrepresented, thus acting as "network motifs." Furthermore, the overrepresentation of these network motifs is positively linked to species diversity globally. A theoretical model illustrates that these network motifs, based on competition between facilitated species or facilitation between inferior competitors, increase local persistence. Our findings suggest that the interplay of competition and facilitation is crucial for maintaining biodiversity.

  • biodiversity change
  • community ecology
  • ecological networks
  • mountain ecosystems
  • plant interaction networks

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: losapiog{at}stanford.edu or christian.schoeb{at}usys.ethz.ch.
  • Author contributions: G.L., C.S., P.P.A.S., and J.B. designed research; G.L. performed research; C.S., P.P.A.S., F.C., G.M.P., C.M.D.M., M.C.M., R.W.B., B.J.B., R.M.C., L.A.C., Z.K., C.J.L., R.M., F.I.P., and J.B. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; G.L. analyzed data; and G.L. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • See online for related content such as Commentaries.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2005759118/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

All study data are included in the article and/or supporting information.

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. C. Rahbek et al
    ., Humboldt’s enigma: What causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity? Science 365, 1108–1113 (2019).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. L. Tedersoo,
    2. M. Bahram,
    3. M. Zobel
    , How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology. Science 367, eaba1223 (2020).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. J. M. Levine,
    2. J. Bascompte,
    3. P. B. Adler,
    4. S. Allesina
    , Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nature 546, 56–64 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. J. M. Alexander,
    2. J. M. Diez,
    3. J. M. Levine
    , Novel competitors shape species’ responses to climate change. Nature 525, 515–518 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. M. M. Mayfield,
    2. D. B. Stouffer
    , Higher-order interactions capture unexplained complexity in diverse communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0062 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. R. M. May,
    2. W. J. Leonard
    , Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29, 243–253 (1975).
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. J. Grilli,
    2. G. Barabás,
    3. M. J. Michalska-Smith,
    4. S. Allesina
    , Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models. Nature 548, 210–213 (2017).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. R. M. Callaway et al
    ., Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417, 844–848 (2002).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. J. F. Bruno,
    2. J. J. Stachowicz,
    3. M. D. Bertness
    , Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 119–125 (2003).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. L. A. Cavieres et al
    ., Facilitative plant interactions and climate simultaneously drive alpine plant diversity. Ecol. Lett. 17, 193–202 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. R. A. Laird,
    2. B. S. Schamp
    , Competitive intransitivity promotes species coexistence. Am. Nat. 168, 182–193 (2006).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. R. M. Callaway
    , Positive Interactions and Interdependence in Plant Communities (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007).
  13. 13.↵
    1. S. Kéfi et al
    ., More than a meal… integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs. Ecol. Lett. 15, 291–300 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Z. Kikvidze et al
    ., The effects of foundation species on community assembly: A global study on alpine cushion plant communities. Ecology 96, 2064–2069 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. F. I. Pugnaire
    , Positive Plant Interactions and Community Dynamics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010).
  16. 16.↵
    1. R. M. Callaway,
    2. L. R. Walker
    , Competition and facilitation: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78, 1956–1965 (1997).
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. P. Choler,
    2. R. Michalet,
    3. R. M. Callaway
    , Facilitation and competition on gradients in alpine plant communities. Ecology 82, 3295–3308 (2001).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. C. Schöb,
    2. C. Armas,
    3. F. I. Pugnaire
    , Direct and indirect interactions co-determine species composition in nurse plant systems. Oikos 122, 1371–1379 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. A. Melfo,
    2. R. M. Callaway,
    3. L. D. Llambí
    , Interactions between nurse plants and parasitic beneficiaries: A theoretical approach to indirect facilitation. J. Theor. Biol. 494, 110238 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. G. Losapio,
    2. A. Montesinos-Navarro,
    3. H. Saiz
    , Perspectives for ecological networks in plant ecology. Plant Ecol. Divers. 12, 87–102 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. H. Saiz,
    2. J. Gómez-Gardeñes,
    3. J. P. Borda,
    4. F. T. Maestre
    , The structure of plant spatial association networks is linked to plant diversity in global drylands. J. Ecol. 106, 1443–1453 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. D. B. Stouffer,
    2. J. Bascompte
    , Understanding food-web persistence from local to global scales. Ecol. Lett. 13, 154–161 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. D. J. Harris
    , Inferring species interactions from co-occurrence data with Markov networks. Ecology 97, 3308–3314 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. P. A. Abrams
    , On classifying interactions between populations. Oecologia 73, 272–281 (1987).
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. J. T. Wootton
    , The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 443–466 (1994).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    1. F. G. Blanchet,
    2. K. Cazelles,
    3. D. Gravel
    , Co-occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1050–1063 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    1. C. Schöb,
    2. B. J. Butterfield,
    3. F. I. Pugnaire
    , Foundation species influence trait-based community assembly. New Phytol. 196, 824–834 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. A. Gelman,
    2. Y. S. Su
    , “arm: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models” in R package version 1.10-1 (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2018).
  29. 29.↵
    1. R. Milo et al
    ., Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 824–827 (2002).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. J. Bascompte,
    2. C. J. Melián
    , Simple trophic modules for complex food webs. Ecology 86, 2868–2873 (2005).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    1. C. J. Melián,
    2. J. Bascompte,
    3. P. Jordano,
    4. V. Krivan
    , Diversity in a complex ecological network with two interaction types. Oikos 118, 122–130 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. 32.↵
    1. D. B. Stouffer,
    2. J. Camacho,
    3. W. Jiang,
    4. L. A. N. Amaral
    , Evidence for the existence of a robust pattern of prey selection in food webs. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274, 1931–1940 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. O. Godoy,
    2. D. B. Stouffer,
    3. N. J. B. Kraft,
    4. J. M. Levine
    , Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences. Ecology 98, 1193–1200 (2017).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. K. L. Metlen,
    2. E. T. Aschehoug,
    3. R. M. Callaway
    , Competitive outcomes between two exotic invaders are modified by direct and indirect effects of a native conifer. Oikos 122, 632–640 (2013).
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    1. D. Salazar,
    2. R. J. Marquis
    , Herbivore pressure increases toward the equator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 12616–12620 (2012).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. G. Losapio et al
    ., Plant interactions shape pollination networks via nonadditive effects. Ecology 100, e02619 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. C. Lortie
    , Global Plant Species Diversity on and off Cushion Plants (Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity, 2018), doi:10.5063/F1RJ4GNM.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. 38.↵
    1. R. J. Hijmans,
    2. S. E. Cameron,
    3. J. L. Parra,
    4. P. G. Jones,
    5. A. Jarvis
    , Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Clim. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 39.↵
    1. G. Csardi,
    2. T. Nepusz
    , The igraph software package for complex network research. Int. J. Comp. Syst., 1695 (2006).
  40. 40.↵
    1. A. Gelman,
    2. F. Tuerlincks
    , Type S error rates for classical and Bayesian single and multiple comparison procedures. Comput. Stat. 15, 373–390 (2000).
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    1. J. Oksanen et al.
    , vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.5-4 (2018). https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan/. Accessed 16 December 2020.
  42. 42.↵
    1. C. F. Dormann,
    2. J. Fründ,
    3. N. Blüthgen,
    4. B. Gruber
    , Indices, graphs and null models: Analyzing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecol. J. 2, 7–24 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. D. Bates,
    2. M. Mächler,
    3. B. Bolker,
    4. S. Walker
    , Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. R. V. Lenth
    , Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. J. Stat. Softw. 69, 1–33 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. K. Soetaert,
    2. T. Petzoldt,
    3. R. Setzer
    , Solving differential equations in R: Package desolve. J. Stat. Softw. 3, 1–25 (2010).
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    1. S. N. Wood,
    2. Y. Goude,
    3. S. Shaw
    , Generalized additive models for large data sets. J. R. Stat. Soc. C 64, 139–155 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    1. R Core Team
    , R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.6.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2019).

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Network motifs involving both competition and facilitation predict biodiversity in alpine plant communities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Network motifs involving both competition and facilitation predict biodiversity in alpine plant communities
Gianalberto Losapio, Christian Schöb, Phillip P. A. Staniczenko, Francesco Carrara, Gian Marco Palamara, Consuelo M. De Moraes, Mark C. Mescher, Rob W. Brooker, Bradley J. Butterfield, Ragan M. Callaway, Lohengrin A. Cavieres, Zaal Kikvidze, Christopher J. Lortie, Richard Michalet, Francisco I. Pugnaire, Jordi Bascompte
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2021, 118 (6) e2005759118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005759118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Network motifs involving both competition and facilitation predict biodiversity in alpine plant communities
Gianalberto Losapio, Christian Schöb, Phillip P. A. Staniczenko, Francesco Carrara, Gian Marco Palamara, Consuelo M. De Moraes, Mark C. Mescher, Rob W. Brooker, Bradley J. Butterfield, Ragan M. Callaway, Lohengrin A. Cavieres, Zaal Kikvidze, Christopher J. Lortie, Richard Michalet, Francisco I. Pugnaire, Jordi Bascompte
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2021, 118 (6) e2005759118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005759118
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Ecology

See related content:

  • Biodiversity and community structure
    - Feb 19, 2021
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 118 (6)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490