Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

In situ magnetic identification of giant, needle-shaped magnetofossils in Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum sediments

View ORCID ProfileCourtney L. Wagner, View ORCID ProfileRamon Egli, View ORCID ProfileIoan Lascu, View ORCID ProfilePeter C. Lippert, View ORCID ProfileKenneth J. T. Livi, and View ORCID ProfileHelen B. Sears
  1. aDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112;
  2. bDivision of Data, Methods and Models, Central Institute of Meteorology and Geodynamics, 1190 Vienna, Austria;
  3. cDepartment of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560;
  4. dGlobal Change and Sustainability Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112;
  5. eMaterials Characterization and Processing Center, Department of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218;
  6. fDepartment of Geology, Colby College, Waterville, ME 04901

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS February 9, 2021 118 (6) e2018169118; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018169118
Courtney L. Wagner
aDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Courtney L. Wagner
  • For correspondence: courtney.wagner@utah.edu
Ramon Egli
bDivision of Data, Methods and Models, Central Institute of Meteorology and Geodynamics, 1190 Vienna, Austria;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ramon Egli
Ioan Lascu
cDepartment of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ioan Lascu
Peter C. Lippert
aDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112;
dGlobal Change and Sustainability Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter C. Lippert
Kenneth J. T. Livi
eMaterials Characterization and Processing Center, Department of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kenneth J. T. Livi
Helen B. Sears
fDepartment of Geology, Colby College, Waterville, ME 04901
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Helen B. Sears
  1. Edited by Lisa Tauxe, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved November 24, 2020 (received for review August 27, 2020)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Giant magnetofossils are the preserved remains of iron-biomineralizing organisms that have so far been identified only in sediments deposited during ancient greenhouse climates. Giant magnetofossils have no modern analog, but their association with abrupt global warming events links them to environmental disturbances. Thus, giant magnetofossils may encode information about nutrient availability and water stratification in ancient aquatic environments. Identification of giant magnetofossils has previously required destructive extraction techniques. We show that giant, needle-shaped magnetofossils have distinct magnetic signatures. Our results provide a nondestructive method for identifying giant magnetofossil assemblages in bulk sediments, which will help test their significance with respect to environmental change.

Abstract

Near-shore marine sediments deposited during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum at Wilson Lake, NJ, contain abundant conventional and giant magnetofossils. We find that giant, needle-shaped magnetofossils from Wilson Lake produce distinct magnetic signatures in low-noise, high-resolution first-order reversal curve (FORC) measurements. These magnetic measurements on bulk sediment samples identify the presence of giant, needle-shaped magnetofossils. Our results are supported by micromagnetic simulations of giant needle morphologies measured from transmission electron micrographs of magnetic extracts from Wilson Lake sediments. These simulations underscore the single-domain characteristics and the large magnetic coercivity associated with the extreme crystal elongation of giant needles. Giant magnetofossils have so far only been identified in sediments deposited during global hyperthermal events and therefore may serve as magnetic biomarkers of environmental disturbances. Our results show that FORC measurements are a nondestructive method for identifying giant magnetofossil assemblages in bulk sediments, which will help test their ecology and significance with respect to environmental change.

  • magnetofossils
  • magnetotactic bacteria
  • first-order reversal curves
  • micromagnetic modeling
  • biogenic needles

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: courtney.wagner{at}utah.edu.
  • Author contributions: C.L.W. designed research; C.L.W., R.E., I.L., P.C.L., K.J.T.L., and H.B.S. performed research; C.L.W., R.E., I.L., P.C.L., and K.J.T.L. analyzed data; C.L.W., P.C.L., and K.J.T.L. provided TEM interpretations; R.E. provided FORC interpretations; I.L. provided micromagnetic interpretations; and C.L.W., R.E., I.L., and P.C.L. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2018169118/-/DCSupplemental.

Data Availability.

AVI, FRC, and PDF data have been deposited in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13182848). All other study data are included in the article and supporting information.

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text

References

  1. ↵
    1. F. A. McInerney,
    2. S. L. Wing
    , The Paleocene-eocene thermal maximum: A perturbation of carbon cycle, climate, and biosphere with implications for the future. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 39, 489–516 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. R. E. Zeebe,
    2. A. Ridgwell,
    3. J. C. Zachos
    , Anthropogenic carbon release rate unprecedented during the past 66 million years. Nat. Geosci. 9, 325–329 (2016).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. B. H. Murphy,
    2. K. A. Farley,
    3. J. C. Zachos
    , An extraterrestrial 3He-based timescale for the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM) from Walvis Ridge, IODP Site 1266. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 5098–5108 (2010).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. J. C. Zachos et al
    ., Rapid acidification of the ocean during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum. Science 308, 1611–1615 (2005).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. P. Stassen,
    2. E. Thomas,
    3. R. P. Speijer
    , Integrated stratigraphy of the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum in the New Jersey Coastal Plain: Toward understanding the effects of global warming in a shelf environment. Paleoceanography 27, 1–17 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. L. Chang et al
    ., Coupled microbial bloom and oxygenation decline recorded by magnetofossils during the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Nat. Commun. 9, 4007 (2018).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. R. E. Kopp et al
    ., An Appalachian Amazon? Magnetofossil evidence for the development of a tropical river-like system in the mid-Atlantic United States during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum. Paleoceanography 24, PA4211 (2009).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. J. M. Self-Trail et al
    ., Shallow marine response to global climate change during the Paleocene-eocene thermal maximum, Salisbury embayment, USA. Paleoceanography 32, 710–728 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. A. Sluijs,
    2. H. Brinkhuis
    , A dynamic climate and ecosystem state during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum: Inferences from dinoflagellate cyst assemblages at the New Jersey Shelf. Biogeosciences 6, 5163–5215 (2009).
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. L. Lanci,
    2. D. V. Kent,
    3. K. G. Miller
    , Detection of Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic sequence boundaries on the Atlantic coastal plain using core log integration of magnetic susceptibility and natural gamma ray measurements at Ancora, New Jersey. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1–12 (2002).
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. L. Chang et al
    ., Giant magnetofossils and hyperthermal events. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 351–352, 258–269 (2012).
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. R. E. Kopp et al
    ., Magnetofossil spike during the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum: Ferromagnetic resonance, rock magnetic, and electron microscopy evidence from Ancora, New Jersey, United States. Paleoceanography 22, 1–7 (2007).
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. P. C. Lippert,
    2. J. C. Zachos
    , A biogenic origin for anomalous fine-grained magnetic material at the Paleocone-Eocene boundary at Wilson Lake, New Jersey. Paleoceanography 22, PA4104 (2007).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. D. Schumann et al
    ., Gigantism in unique biogenic magnetite at the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 17648–17653 (2008).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. D. V. Kent et al
    ., A case for a comet impact trigger for the Paleocene/Eocene thermal maximum and carbon isotope excursion. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 211, 13–26 (2003).
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. D. V. Kent,
    2. L. Lanci,
    3. H. Wang,
    4. J. D. Wright
    , Enhanced magnetization of the Marlboro Clay as a product of soil pyrogenesis at the Paleocene–Eocene boundary? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 473, 303–312 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. W. Lin,
    2. Y. Wang,
    3. Y. Gorby,
    4. K. Nealson,
    5. Y. Pan
    , Integrating niche-based process and spatial process in biogeography of magnetotactic bacteria. Sci. Rep. 3, 1643 (2013).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. H. Wang,
    2. J. Wang,
    3. Y. C. Chen-Wiegart,
    4. D. V. Kent
    , Quantified abundance of magnetofossils at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary from synchrotron-based transmission X-ray microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 12598–12603 (2015).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. L. Chang,
    2. R. J. Harrison,
    3. T. A. Berndt
    , Micromagnetic simulation of magnetofossils with realistic size and shape distributions: Linking magnetic proxies with nanoscale observations and implications for magnetofossil identification. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 527, 115790 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. H. Wang,
    2. D. V. Kent,
    3. M. J. Jackson
    , Evidence for abundant isolated magnetic nanoparticles at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 425–430 (2013).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. R. Egli
    , Characterization of individual rock magnetic components by analysis of remanence curves, 1. Unmixing natural sediments. Stud. Geophys. Geod. 48, 391–446 (2004).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. R. Egli
    , Characterization of individual rock magnetic components by analysis of remanence curves. 3. Bacterial magnetite and natural processes in lakes. Phys. Chem. Earth 29, 869–884 (2004).
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. A. Abrajevitch,
    2. K. Kodama
    , Biochemical vs. detrital mechanism of remanence acquisition in marine carbonates: A lesson from the K-T boundary interval. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 286, 269–277 (2009).
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. P. Ludwig et al
    ., Characterization of primary and secondary magnetite in marine sediment by combining chemical and magnetic unmixing techniques. Global Planet. Change 110, 321–339 (2013).
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. D. Heslop,
    2. A. P. Roberts,
    3. L. Chang
    , Characterizing magnetofossils from first-order reversal curve (FORC) central ridge signatures. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 2170–2179 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. A. P. P. Chen et al
    ., Magnetic properties of uncultivated magnetotactic bacteria and their contribution to a stratified estuary iron cycle. Nat. Commun. 5, 4797 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. C. R. Pike,
    2. A. P. Roberts,
    3. K. L. Verosub
    , Characterizing interactions in fine magnetic particle systems using first order reversal curves. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 6660–6667 (1999).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. A. P. Roberts,
    2. C. R. Pike,
    3. K. L. Verosub
    , First-order reversal curve diagrams: A new tool for characterizing the magnetic properties of natural samples. J. Geophys. Res.105, 28461–28475 (2000).
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. R. Egli,
    2. M. Winklhofer
    , Recent developments on processing and interpretation aspects of first-order reversal curves (FORC). Sci. Notes Kazan Univ. Nat. Sci. Ser. 156, 14–53 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. A. J. Newell
    , A high-precision model of first-order reversal curve (FORC) functions for single-domain ferromagnets with uniaxial anisotropy. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 6, Q05010 (2005).
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. R. Egli,
    2. A. P. Chen,
    3. M. Winklhofer,
    4. K. P. Kodama,
    5. C.-S. Horng
    , Detection of noninteracting single domain particles using first-order reversal curve diagrams. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 11, 1525–2027 (2010).
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. R. K. Dumas,
    2. C. P. Li,
    3. I. V. Roshchin,
    4. I. K. Schuller,
    5. K. Liu
    , Magnetic fingerprints of sub-100 nm Fe dots. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 75, 1–5 (2007).
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. A. P. Roberts,
    2. L. Chang,
    3. D. Heslop,
    4. F. Florindo,
    5. J. C. Larrasoaña
    , Searching for single domain magnetite in the “pseudo-single- domain” sedimentary haystack: Implications of biogenic magnetite preservation for sediment magnetism and relative paleointensity determinations. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B08104 (2012).
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. T. A. Berndt,
    2. L. Chang,
    3. S. Wang,
    4. S. Badejo
    , Time-asymmetric FORC diagrams: A new protocol for visualizing thermal fluctuations and distinguishing magnetic mineral mixtures. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19, 3056–3070 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. A. P. Roberts et al
    ., Characterization of hematite (α-Fe2O3), goethite (α-FeOOH), greigite (Fe3S4), and pyrrhotite (Fe7S8) using first-order reversal curve diagrams. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B12S35 (2006).
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. E. C. Stoner,
    2. E. P. Wohlfarth
    , A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 240, 599–642 (1948).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    1. A. Aharoni
    , Angular dependence of nucleation by curling in a prolate spheroid. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1281–1287 (1997).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. I. S. Jacobs,
    2. C. P. Bean
    , An approach to elongated fine-particle magnetics. Phys. Rev. 100, 1060–1067 (1955).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. R. F. Butler,
    2. S. K. Banerjee
    , Theoretical single-domain grain size range in magnetite and titanomagnetite. J. Geophys. Res. 80, 4049 (1975).
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. A. R. Muxworthy,
    2. W. Williams
    , Critical single-domain/multidomain grain sizes in noninteracting and interacting elongated magnetite particles: Implications for magnetosomes. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B12S12 (2006).
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. A. J. Newell
    , Transition to superparamagnetism in chains of magnetosome crystals. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 10, Q11Z08 (2009).
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. R. B. Frankel
    , Magnetic guidance of organisms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 13, 85–103 (1984).
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. A. P. Roberts et al
    ., Resolving the origin of pseudo-single domain magnetic behavior. J. Geophys. Res., 9534–9558 (2017).
  44. ↵
    1. R. Egli,
    2. W. Lowrie
    , Anhysteretic remanent magnetization of fine magnetic particles. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2209 (2002).
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. A. R. Muxworthy,
    2. M. E. Evans,
    3. S. J. Scourfield,
    4. J. G. King
    , Paleointensity results from the late-archaean Modipe Gabbro of Botswana. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 2198–2205 (2013).
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. L. Chang et al
    ., Widespread occurrence of silicate-hosted magnetic mineral inclusions in marine sediments and their contribution to paleomagnetic recording. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 8415–8431 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. T. A. Berndt,
    2. L. Chang,
    3. Z. Pei
    , Mind the gap: Towards a biogenic magnetite palaeoenvironmental proxy through an extensive finite-element micromagnetic simulation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 532, 116010 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. R. Egli
    , Theoretical aspects of dipolar interactions and their appearance in first-order reversal curves of thermally activated single-domain particles. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B12S17 (2006).
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. L. Néel
    , Théorie du traînage magnétique des ferromagnétiques en grains fins avec application aux terres cuites. Ann. Geophys. 5, 99–136 (1949).
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. L. Nagy et al
    ., Stability of equidimensional pseudo-single-domain magnetite over billion-year timescales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 10356–10360 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. R. Egli
    , VARIFORC: An optimized protocol for calculating non-regular first-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams. Global Planet. Change 110, 302–320 (2013).
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. B. M. Moskowitz,
    2. R. B. Frankel,
    3. D. A. Bazylinski,
    4. H. W. Jannasch,
    5. D. R. Lovley
    , A comparison of magnetite particles produced anaerobically by magnetotactic and dissimilatory iron‐reducing bacteria. Geophys. Res. Lett. 16, 665–668 (1989).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. C. E. Geiss,
    2. R. Egli,
    3. C. W. Zanner
    , Direct estimates of pedogenic magnetite as a tool to reconstruct past climates from buried soils. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B11102 (2008).
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. C. R. Pike,
    2. A. P. Roberts,
    3. K. L. Verosub
    , First-order reversal curve diagrams and thermal relaxation effects in magnetic particles. Geophys. J. Int. 145, 721–730 (2001).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    1. P. Ó Conbhuí et al
    ., Merrill: Micromagnetic earth related robust interpreted language laboratory. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19, 1080–1106 (2018).
    OpenUrl

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In situ magnetic identification of giant, needle-shaped magnetofossils in Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum sediments
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In situ magnetic identification of giant, needle-shaped magnetofossils in Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum sediments
Courtney L. Wagner, Ramon Egli, Ioan Lascu, Peter C. Lippert, Kenneth J. T. Livi, Helen B. Sears
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2021, 118 (6) e2018169118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2018169118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
In situ magnetic identification of giant, needle-shaped magnetofossils in Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum sediments
Courtney L. Wagner, Ramon Egli, Ioan Lascu, Peter C. Lippert, Kenneth J. T. Livi, Helen B. Sears
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2021, 118 (6) e2018169118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2018169118
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 118 (6)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490