Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

A conserved repetitive DNA element located in the centromeres of cereal chromosomes

Jiming Jiang, Shuhei Nasuda, Fenggao Dong, Christopher W. Scherrer, Sung-Sick Woo, Rod A. Wing, Bikram S. Gill, and David C. Ward
PNAS November 26, 1996 93 (24) 14210-14213; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.14210
Jiming Jiang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuhei Nasuda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fenggao Dong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher W. Scherrer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sung-Sick Woo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rod A. Wing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bikram S. Gill
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David C. Ward
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Repetitive DNA sequences have been demonstrated to play an important role for centromere function of eukaryotic chromosomes, including those from fission yeast, Drosophila melanogaster, and humans. Here we report on the isolation of a repetitive DNA element located in the centromeric regions of cereal chromosomes. A 745-bp repetitive DNA clone, pSau3A9, was isolated from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). This DNA element is located in the centromeric regions of all sorghum chromosomes, as demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Repetitive DNA sequences homologous to pSau3A9 also are present in the centromeric regions of chromosomes from other cereal species, including rice, maize, wheat, barley, rye, and oats. Probe pSau3A9 also hybridized to the centromeric region of B chromosomes from rye and maize. The repetitive nature and its conservation in distantly related plant species indicate that the pSau3A9 family may be associated with centromere function of cereal chromosomes. The absence of DNA sequences homologous to pSau3A9 in dicot species suggests a faster divergence of centromere-related sequences compared with the telomere-related sequences in plants.

Among the most distinguishing and characteristic landmarks of chromosomes of higher eukaryotes is the location of the centromere. The centromere plays an essential role in the proper segregation of chromosomes during mitosis and meiosis, thus ensuring equal distribution of genetic information to the next generation. The centromeric region of higher eukaryotic chromosomes is structurally specified by the primary constriction at which the sister chromatids associate and a pair of kinetochores to which microtubules of the mitotic and meiotic spindle attach.

The centromeres from budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), known as point centromeres, have been well characterized. The genetic information specifying full centromere function in these species is contained within a 125-bp DNA segment (1). Such centromeres bind to a single microtubule and can move chromosomes of 0.26–3 megabases in size. Extensive studies also have been carried on centromeres from fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), Drosophila melanogaster, and mammalian species. The centromeres from these species are much more complex compared with those from budding yeast. These centromeres, called regional centromeres, encompass kilobases or megabases of DNA and include both unique and repetitive DNA sequences. Several different repetitive DNA elements were identified in the centromeres of fission yeast. It is well established that these repetitive elements are essential for full centromere function (1). Full function of centromeres in Drosophila also requires the presence of satellite DNA (2). The α-satellite DNA, the major DNA component in the centromeric region of human chromosomes, has long been regarded as junk DNA. However, the current evidence indicates that the α-satellite DNA plays an important role in centromere function (3, 4, 5).

Thus far, no plant DNA sequences essential for centromere function have been identified. Alfenito and Birchler (6) reported on the cloning and characterization of a repetitive DNA element located in the centromeric region of maize B chromosomes. Sequence analysis of this repeat shows homology to motifs of the maize knob sequence. The maize knob has a neocentromere function in certain genetic backgrounds. However, this B chromosome-specific repeat is not located in the centromeres of maize A chromosomes and is, therefore, unlikely to be related to centromere function of the A chromosomes. Here we report on the cloning and characterization of a repetitive DNA element conserved in the centromeric region of cereal chromosomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials.

Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone 52A4 was randomly selected from a sorghum BAC library for chimerism analysis (7). This BAC was found to be located in the centromeric region of all sorghum chromosomes. The following lines or varieties of the cereal species were used in both fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and DNA analysis: 607E (sorghum), B73 (maize), DV85 (rice), Chinese Spring (wheat), Chilton (barley), Hancock (rye), and Ogle (oats). Rye and maize lines with B chromosomes were provided by B. Friebe at Kansas State University and S. M. Kaeppler at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, respectively.

Plasmid Cloning and Sequencing.

DNA fragments to be subcloned were isolated by cutting out the agarose containing the fragments and purified using the Geneclean II kit (Bio 101). The fragments then were ligated to a linear pUC18 plasmid. The ligation mixture was used to transform Escherichia coli strain DH5α. White recombinant clones on 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-d-galactoside/isopropyl β-d-thiogalactoside plates were picked and analyzed for the presence of insert DNA using plasmid minipreparation and restriction digestion. Cycle sequencing reactions were performed with an Applied Biosystems AmpliTaq DNA polymerase, an FS Dye Terminator Ready Reactions kit, and a Perkin–Elmer Thermocycler (model 9600). The reaction products were purified with MicroSpin G-50 Columns (Pharmacia Biotech) and analyzed on an Applied Biosystems Automated DNA Sequencer (model 373).

FISH.

Detailed protocols for chromosome preparation, probe labeling, in situ hybridization, and signal detection were described previously (8). Slides were examined using an Olympus BX60 fluorescence microscope. Gray scale images were obtained using a SenSys CCD camera (Photometrics) and then pseudo-colored and merged using IPLab spectrum software.

Southern Blotting.

Genomic DNA was isolated from young leaf tissue using a hexadecyltrimethylamonium bromide method (9). DNA samples were digested with restriction enzymes and blotted to Hybond N+ (Amersham) membrane. Prehybridization and hybridization were done at 65°C in 5× SSC, 0.1% N-lauroylsarcosine, 0.02% SDS, 0.02% denatured salmon sperm DNA, and 1% Blocking Reagent (Boehringer Mannheim). After hybridization, the membranes were washed at different stringencies by controlling the concentrations of SSC, and then the membranes were exposed to x-ray films.

RESULTS

During an attempt to cytologically map random BAC clones from sorghum, we found that BAC 52A4 hybridized to the centromeric region of all 20 sorghum chromosomes. Under the same hybridization stringency (50% formamide in 2× SSC at 37°C), this clone hybridized strongly to the centromeres of all maize chromosomes. At a lower stringency (30% formamide in 2× SSC at 37°C), 52A4 also hybridized with different signal intensities to the centromeres of chromosomes from different cereal species, including rice, wheat, barley, rye, and oats. However, it did not hybridize to any specific chromosomal regions of the several dicot species analyzed, including Vicia faba, tomato, tobacco, soybean, and Arabidopsis thaliana.

The BAC clone 52A4 was digested with various restriction enzymes. A blot with digested DNA was hybridized to genomic DNA from wheat, maize, and rice. Several fragments were hybridized to DNA from all three species. A Sau3AI fragment (Fig. 1) was subcloned in plasmid pUC18. When this subclone, pSau3A9, was analyzed by in situ hybridization to chromosomes of various cereal species, the result was identical as when 52A4 was used as the probe. The subclone hybridized with different signal intensities to centromeric regions of chromosomes from all of the cereal species analyzed (Fig. 2). In several species, some chromosomes showed stronger signals than others. For example, about one-half of the chromosomes in sorghum line “607E” had relatively large and strong FISH sites at the centromere. In “Chilton” barley, at least one pair of chromosomes consistently showed weaker signals than the other chromosomes. In the oats line “Ogle,” about 14 chromosomes had very weak signals in the centromeric region. However, wheat and rye chromosomes had a relatively uniform signal intensity. At present, it is not known whether such differences in the intensity of FISH signals is species-specific or genotype-specific. FISH signals were detected in the centromeres of rye B chromosomes with pSau3A9 as a probe. The signal intensities in rye B chromosomes are similar to those on A chromosomes (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5). Similarly, pSau3A9 also hybridized to the centromeric regions of maize B chromosomes (data not shown). No specific FISH signals were detected when pSau3A9 was hybridized to chromosomes from the several dicot species analyzed (data not shown). This result was also confirmed by Southern blot hybridization analysis by probing the pSau3A9 subclone to a restriction enzyme digested DNA from cereal and several dicot species (Fig. 3).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

DNA of sorghum BAC clone 52A4 was digested with restriction enzymes DraI (lane 1), SalI (lane 2), Sau3AI (lane 3), AccI (lane 4), and HindIII (lane 5). The same blot was probed with genomic DNA from wheat, maize, and rice, respectively. A 745 Sau3AI fragment (arrow) hybridized to the genomic DNA from all the three species. This fragment was subcloned as plasmid pSau3A9.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

FISH analysis using pSau3A9 as a probe: 1, sorghum; 2, rice; 3, wheat; 4, barley; 5, rye, 14 A and 2 B (arrows) chromosomes have similar FISH signals at centromeres; 6, maize; 7, oat.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Genomic DNA from sorghum (lane 1), maize (lane 2), wheat (lane 3), rice (lane 4), A. thaliana (lane 5), tobacco (lane 6), tomato (lane 7), and soybean (lane 8) was digested with SalI and probed with pSau3A9. Strong hybridization signals were detected in the four cereal species, and very weak or no signals were detected in the four dicot species.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Nucleotide sequence of pSau3A9.

Clone pSau3A9 was sequenced (Fig. 4). No significant homologies were found with any sequences in the EMBL/GenBank data base. The clone contains 745-bp sequences with 44% GC and 56% AT. Sequence analysis did not reveal any special characteristics that often are associated with repetitive DNA families, such as internal short repeats, inverted repeats, and palindromes.

DISCUSSION

Constitutive heterochromatin is often located at the centromeric regions of plant chromosomes as demonstrated by pachytene chromosome analysis and C-banding analysis in many plant species. Repetitive DNA sequences are the major components of the centromeric heterochromatin. Repetitive DNA elements, located mainly or exclusively in the centromeric region, have been cloned from various plant species (10, 11, 12, 13, 14). However, all of the reported elements are species- or genome-specific. Some of them are not present on all of the chromosomes in the same species or in species with related genomes. Clone pSau3A9 is the first centromeric repetitive DNA element conserved in distantly related plant species. Rice, maize, and the Triticeae species, including wheat, barley and rye, diverged from a common ancestor about 60 to 100 million years ago (15, 16). No repetitive DNA elements, except the telomeric DNA sequences, have been reported to be conserved among all of these species. The high conservation of the Sau3A9 sequence among cereal species suggests that this element may play a role in centromeric function.

Thus far, the telomeric DNA sequence, first isolated from A. thaliana (17), is the only reported repetitive DNA element conserved among both monocot and dicot species. The lack of conservation of the Sau3A9 sequence in dicot species is not surprising. The α-satellite DNA family is present on centromeric regions of chromosomes of all primates (18, 19) but absent in other mammalian species. Budding and fission yeasts have completely different centromeric DNA sequences. Therefore, it is well documented that the DNA sequences related to centromere function are not conserved to the same degree as the telomeric DNA sequences. Even the α-satellite itself has been modified significantly during primate evolution. The α-satellite from New and Old World primates share only 64% sequence identity (19). The present work indicates that the Sau3A9 family also has been modified during the divergence of cereal species. Based on the signal intensities of FISH using pSau3A9 as a probe under the same stringency, the homology between Sau3A9 and its related sequences in maize is higher than those between Sau3A9 and its related sequences in other cereal species. The order of such homology is sorghum/maize > sorghum/wheat > sorghum/oats > sorghum/rice.

The α-satellite in primates and the minor satellite in mouse (18, 20) are the only repetitive DNA elements that were demonstrated to be related to centromeric function. However, the centromeric region of fission yeast chromosomes contains several classes of repetitive DNA sequences (21, 22, 23, 24, 25). At least four different repetitive DNA elements seem to be responsible for full centromere function (1). At present, it is not known whether repetitive DNA elements different from Sau3A9 are present in the cereal genomes. This question could be answered by molecular analysis of BAC clone 52A4 and other large insert genomic DNA clones isolated using pSau3A9.

Clone pSau3A9 can be possibly applied in a number of related research projects. Sequences homologous to Sau3A9 can be isolated from other cereal species. Comparison of such sequences may provide useful information about the evolution of cereal species. The immediate application of the Sau3A9 sequence is to locate the centromeres on the genetic maps of the cereal species either by directly mapping this sequence or by isolating and mapping the adjacent unique sequences of Sau3A9. Probe pSau3A9 can be used to analyze the structure and molecular organization of plant centromeres. Cloning and characterization of centromeres of plant chromosomes is a prerequisite for constructing plant artificial chromosomes. Such artificial chromosomes may be the ultimate vector for functional analysis of large complex plant genes. Plant artificial chromosomes will also provide a vehicle to move complex genes among different plant species in the future.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported in part by start-up funds from the Graduate School (101-0503) and the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (150–2689), University of Wisconsin-Madison (to J.J.).

Footnotes

    • ↵ To whom reprint requests should be addressed. e-mail: jjiang1{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.

    • Koichiro Tsunewaki, Fukui Prefectural University, Fukui, Japan

    • The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Abbreviations: BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization.

      Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank data base (accession no. BankIt 65869 U68165U68165).

    • Received July 15, 1996.
    • Accepted September 16, 1996.
    • Copyright © 1996, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Clarke L
      (1990) Trends Genet 6:150–154, pmid:2195725.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Murphy T D,
      2. Karpen G H
      (1995) Cell 82:599–609, pmid:7664339.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Haaf T,
      2. Warburton P E,
      3. Willard H F
      (1992) Cell 70:681–696, pmid:1505032.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Tyler-Smith C,
      2. Oakey R,
      3. Larin Z,
      4. Fisher R B,
      5. Crocker M,
      6. Affara N A,
      7. Ferguson-Smith M A,
      8. Muenke M,
      9. Zuffardi O,
      10. Jobling M A
      (1993) Nat Genet 5:368–375, pmid:8298645.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Larin Z,
      2. Fricker M D,
      3. Tyler-Smith C
      (1994) Hum Mol Genet 3:689–695, pmid:8081354.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Alfenito M R,
      2. Birchler J A
      (1993) Genetics 135:589–597, pmid:8244015.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    7. ↵
      1. Woo S-S,
      2. Jiang J,
      3. Gill B S,
      4. Paterson A H,
      5. Wing R A
      (1994) Nucleic Acids Res 22:4922–4931, pmid:7800481.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      Jiang, J., Hulbert, S. H., Gill, B. S. & Ward, D. C. (1996) Mol. Gen. Genet. in press.
    9. ↵
      1. Gill K S,
      2. Lubbers E L,
      3. Gill B S,
      4. Raupp W J,
      5. Cox T S
      (1991) Genome 34:362–374.
      OpenUrl
    10. ↵
      1. Martinez-Zapater J M,
      2. Estalle M A,
      3. Somerville C R
      (1986) Mol Gen Genet 204:417–423.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    11. ↵
      1. Ganal M W,
      2. Lapitan N L V,
      3. Tanksley S D
      (1988) Mol Gen Genet 213:262–268.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    12. ↵
      1. Iwabuchi M,
      2. Itoh K,
      3. Shimamoto K
      (1991) Theor Appl Genet 81:349–355.
      OpenUrl
    13. ↵
      1. Calasso I,
      2. Schmidt T,
      3. Pignone D,
      4. Heslop-Harrison J S
      (1995) Theor Appl Genet 91:928–935.
      OpenUrl
    14. ↵
      1. Kamm A,
      2. Galasso I,
      3. Schmidt T,
      4. Heslop-Harrison J S
      (1995) Plant Mol Biol 27:853–862, pmid:7766876.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Martin W,
      2. Gierl A,
      3. Saedler H
      (1989) Nature (London) 339:46–48.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    16. ↵
      1. Wolfe K H,
      2. Gouy M,
      3. Yang Y-W,
      4. Sharp P M,
      5. Li W-H
      (1989) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6201–6205, pmid:2762323.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Richards E J,
      2. Ausubel F M
      (1988) Cell 53:127–136, pmid:3349525.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Willard H F
      (1990) Trends Genet 6:410–416, pmid:2087784.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Alves G,
      2. Seuánez H N,
      3. Fanning T
      (1994) Chromosoma 103:262–267, pmid:7988287.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Wong A K C,
      2. Rattner J B
      (1988) Nucleic Acids Res 16:11645–11661, pmid:3211746.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. Clarke L,
      2. Amstutz H,
      3. Fishel B,
      4. Carbon J
      (1986) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:8253–8257, pmid:3464952.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      1. Nakaseko Y,
      2. Adachi Y,
      3. Funahashi S,
      4. Niwa O,
      5. Yanagida M
      (1986) EMBO J 5:1011–1021, pmid:15957216.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Nakaseko Y,
      2. Kinoshita N,
      3. Yanagida M
      (1987) Nucleic Acids Res 15:4705–4715, pmid:3601654.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. ↵
      1. Fishel B,
      2. Amstutz H,
      3. Baum M,
      4. Carbon J,
      5. Clarke L
      (1988) Mol Cell Biol 8:754–763, pmid:2832735.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    25. ↵
      1. Chikashige Y,
      2. Kinoshita N,
      3. Nakaseko Y,
      4. Matsumoto T,
      5. Murakami S,
      6. Niwa O,
      7. Yanagida M
      (1989) Cell 57:739–751, pmid:2541922.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    View Abstract
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    A conserved repetitive DNA element located in the centromeres of cereal chromosomes
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    Citation Tools
    A conserved repetitive DNA element located in the centromeres of cereal chromosomes
    Jiming Jiang, Shuhei Nasuda, Fenggao Dong, Christopher W. Scherrer, Sung-Sick Woo, Rod A. Wing, Bikram S. Gill, David C. Ward
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 1996, 93 (24) 14210-14213; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.14210

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    A conserved repetitive DNA element located in the centromeres of cereal chromosomes
    Jiming Jiang, Shuhei Nasuda, Fenggao Dong, Christopher W. Scherrer, Sung-Sick Woo, Rod A. Wing, Bikram S. Gill, David C. Ward
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 1996, 93 (24) 14210-14213; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.14210
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (50)
    Current Issue

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • MATERIALS AND METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • DISCUSSION
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    News Feature: Getting the world’s fastest cat to breed with speed
    Cheetahs once rarely reproduced in captivity. Today, cubs are born every year in zoos. Breeding programs have turned their luck around—but they aren’t done yet.
    Image credit: Mehgan Murphy/Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute.
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans. Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Human heart evolved for endurance
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans.
    Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation. Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Viscoelastic fluids and wildfire prevention
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation.
    Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate. Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    Climate change and desert bird collapse
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate.
    Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He. Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.
    Featured QnAs
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He
    Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Teaching Resources
    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490