Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Advances in apoptosis research

Marcus E. Peter, Armin E. Heufelder, and Michael O. Hengartner
PNAS November 25, 1997 94 (24) 12736-12737; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.24.12736
Marcus E. Peter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Armin E. Heufelder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael O. Hengartner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Apoptosis, also called programmed cell death, has attracted great attention in recent years. After its discovery by Carl Vogt in 1842, apoptosis research was dormant for more than a century. Its rediscovery in the second half of this century, and the coining of the term apoptosis in 1972 by Kerr, Wyllie, and Currie, ignited an unparalleled interest in this field of science. The number of publications related to apoptosis has been growing exponentially every year ever since. This is mainly due to three major advances, two of which have been made recently and one that is currently seen. First, studies with the small nematode Caenorhabditis elegans have identified a number of apoptosis regulating genes—the first evidence that cell death is an active process under genetic control. Many of these genes have mammalian homologs that, like their worm counterparts, seem to regulate mammalian apoptosis. Second, elucidation of the signal transduction pathways of apoptosis has lead especially to the identification of specific death signaling molecules such as a new family of cysteine proteases, the caspases. Third, it has now become clear that many diseases are characterized by dysregulation of apoptotic programs. Many of these programs involve a family of receptors and their ligands, the death receptor/ligand family. The hope now is to interfere with apoptosis regulation in these systems and to develop new therapeutic concepts.

The first of three recent breakthroughs in apoptosis research comes from the genetic study of genes that control apoptotic cell death in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. In the worm three genes—ced-3, ced-4, and ced-9—are directly involved in controlling the execution of apoptosis during development (1). Both ced-3 and ced-4 are killer genes, required for the cell to die, whereas ced-9 is a survival gene required to protect C. elegans cells that should survive from inappropriately activating the death program. Interestingly, homologs of these genes also function to control apoptosis in mammals: ced-3 encodes a protease homologous to the mammalian caspase family. CED-3 activity is negatively regulated by CED-9, which is structurally and functionally homologous to Bcl-2, a mammalian protein that has been shown to inhibit many forms of apoptosis, and other Bcl-2 family members such as Bcl-xL. To exert its function, CED-9 requires the presence of CED-4, another apoptosis-promoting factor, which acts as a physical bridge between CED-9 and CED-3 and is essential for the processing of proCED-3 (an inactive zymogen) into the catalytically active death enzyme. Apaf-1, a recently identified CED-4 homolog, is similarly required for the processing of caspase-3 in mammalian cells (2). The conservation in both sequence and function between nematode and mammalian cell death genes indicates that apoptosis is of ancient evolutionary origin, and it suggests that worms and humans use similar conserved mechanisms to get rid of cells.

A large number of additional genes have also been identified in C. elegans that affect other aspects of apoptotic death. Many of these genes, such as ced-1, -2, -5, -6, -7, and -10, act distally of the central apoptotic machinery in the cell. These genes are required for efficient recognition and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by their neighbors. Some genes, such as ces-1 and ces-2, function only in a small number of cells and affect the decision of individual cells to activate the death program. These genes might be involved in cell type-specific “private” signal transduction pathways or regulatory cascades that affect the cell death pathway. The ces-2 gene has recently been shown to encode a homolog of the human oncogene Hlf (hepatic leukemia factor) (3). Interestingly, both CES-2 and Hlf function as cell type-specific negative regulators of cell survival, suggesting that not only the central killing machinery but also the inputs into this machinery have remained conserved through evolution.

The second breakthrough is related to the discovery of a family of receptors that can specifically trigger apoptosis. These receptors belong to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily and are characterized by the presence of extracellular cysteine-rich domains. Intracellularly, however, these members contain an area of weak homology required to transduce a cell death signal which was termed the death domain (DD). With the discovery of genuine death receptors the importance of apoptosis induction became most obvious. Members of this new family include CD95 (APO-1/Fas), TNF-R1, DR3 (TRAMP/wsl-1/APO-3/LARD/AIR), and DR4/TRAIL-R1/APO-2 (for review see ref. 4). The DD couples the death receptors to the apoptosis-inducing machinery. A number of signaling molecules carry a DD that directly binds to these receptors. These molecules include FADD/MORT1, TRADD, RIP, RAIDD/CRADD, and MADD. Only some of them, however, have been detected as part of an in vivo complex with their receptors formed in a ligand-dependent fashion. FADD was found to be part of the CD95 death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), and TRADD was found associated with TNF-R1 upon binding of TNFα. DD-containing molecules are specialized adapter molecules coupling to the apoptosis executioners, which are in many instances members of the caspase family of proteases. The best-characterized member of these receptor-binding caspases is caspase-8/FLICE/MACH/Mch5. Caspase-8 is recruited to the CD95 DISC by the adaptor FADD. At its N terminus, FADD contains a death effector domain (DED), a motif that was also found in two copies at the N terminus of caspase-8. Caspase-8 is activated by binding to the DISC (5). The active subunits p10/p18 are released into the cytoplasm, likely cleaving various death substrates that still need to be identified.

The elucidation of the apoptosis pathway in C. elegans has been helpful to better understand apoptosis signaling pathways in higher eukaryotes. Key components of the apoptosis machinery seem to be conserved between humans and nematodes. However, neither an apoptosis-inducing receptor nor coupling adaptor molecules have yet been identified in C. elegans (Fig. 1). In human cells, at least 10 caspases are expressed, all of which contain regions homologous to the C. elegans CED-3. Recent data indicate that some of these caspases, such as caspase-8, act upstream of the human CED-9 homolog Bcl-2/Bcl-xL, whereas others, such as caspase-3, seem to be located downstream of Bcl-2/Bcl-xL in the pathway. The latter caspases may require a protein similar to the nematode CED-4 protein for their activation—e.g., the recently identified Apaf-1 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

C. elegans apoptosis-regulating genes and their human homologs.

The third reason why apoptosis research has experienced such a rapid development relates to its biological relevance. Apoptosis is the physiological way for nucleated cells to die. Apoptosis takes care of unwanted, injured, or virus-infected cells. Autoreactive T and B cells, millions of which are produced by the immune system every day, are also eliminated by apoptosis. Recently, dysregulation (“too much or too little”) of apoptosis has emerged as a new concept to explain important features in the development of several as yet poorly understood diseases (Table 1). Unregulated excessive apoptosis may be the cause of various degenerative and autoimmune diseases that are characterized by an excessive loss of normal or protective cells, such as in multiple sclerosis, type-I diabetes mellitus, Hashimoto thyroiditis (6), Sjögren syndrome, and certain cancers such as melanoma (7). Conversely, an inappropriately low rate of apoptosis may promote survival and accumulation of abnormal cells that can give rise to tumor formation and prolonged autoimmune stimulation such as in cancers and Graves disease. Remarkably, even within the same organ such as the thyroid gland, entirely different states of disease may be initiated depending upon the rate at which apoptosis continues to proceed. For instance, in the atrophic variant of immunogenic hypothyroidism (Hashimoto thyroiditis), infiltrating immune effector cells may trigger apoptosis in target cells within thyroid follicles by means of the CD95/CD95L system (6). Moreover, upon exposure to interleukin-1, thyroid follicular cells also appear to use the CD95/CD95L system to transmit the apoptotic signal onto their neighboring cells. By contrast, in the autoimmune hyperthyroidism of Graves disease, intrathyroidal fibroblasts have been identified to act as potent inhibitors of the apoptotic machinery of intrathyroidal B lymphocytes, thereby enhancing their life span, differentiation, and immunoglobulin secretion within the diseased gland. In studies of the mechanisms of fibroblast-mediated suppression of lymphocyte apoptosis, coculture experiments with intrathyroidal fibroblasts and B cells have revealed that both fibroblast-derived soluble factors and direct cell contact most effectively inhibit apoptosis in intrathyroidal B cells (8). It seems likely that pro- and anti-apoptotic factors determine either susceptibility or resistance to apoptosis, and, consequently, play a crucial role in the evolution, propagation, and chronicity of degenerative, cancerous, and autoimmune conditions. Thus, precise identification of the distinct errors in the complex apoptotic machinery holds great promise for elucidating the pathogenesis of various important diseases and for devising more specific and effective treatments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Apoptosis in disease

Footnotes

    • ↵† To whom reprint requests should be addressed. e-mail: M.Peter{at}dkfz-heidelberg.de.

    • This paper is a summary of a session presented at the third annual German–American Frontiers of Science symposium, held June 20–22, 1997 at the Kardinal Wendel Haus in Munich, Germany.

    • The Frontiers of Science symposia is the latest in the series “From the Academy,” which is presented occasionally to highlight work of the Academy, including the science underlying reports of the National Research Council.

    • Copyright © 1997, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA
    View Abstract

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Hengartner M O
      (1996) Curr Opin Genet Dev 6:34–38, pmid:8791487.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Zou H,
      2. Henzel W J,
      3. Lutschg A,
      4. Wang X
      (1997) Cell 90:405–413, pmid:9267021.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Metzstein M M,
      2. Hengartner M O,
      3. Tsung N,
      4. Ellis R E,
      5. Horvitz H R
      (1996) Nature (London) 382:545–547, pmid:8700229.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Kumar S
      1. Peter M E,
      2. Scaffidi C,
      3. Medema J P,
      4. Kischkel F C,
      5. Krammer P H
      (1997) in Apoptosis: Biology, Mechanisms and Role in Disease, ed Kumar S(Springer, Heidelberg) , in press.
    5. ↵
      1. Medema J P,
      2. Scaffidi C,
      3. Kischkel F C,
      4. Shevchenko A,
      5. Mann M,
      6. Krammer P H,
      7. Peter M E
      (1997) EMBO J 16:2794–2804, pmid:9184224.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Giordano C,
      2. Stassi G,
      3. De Maria R,
      4. Todaro M,
      5. Richiusa P,
      6. Papoff G,
      7. Ruberti G,
      8. Bagnasco M,
      9. Testi R,
      10. Galluzzo A
      (1997) Science 275:960–963, pmid:9020075.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Hahne M,
      2. Rimoldi D,
      3. Schroter M,
      4. Romero P,
      5. Schreier M,
      6. French L E,
      7. Schneider P,
      8. Bornand T,
      9. Fontana A,
      10. Lienard D,
      11. Cerottini J,
      12. Tschopp J
      (1996) Science 274:1363–1366, pmid:8910274.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      Bichlmair, A. M., Wenzel, B. E., Scriba, P. C. & Heufelder, A. E. (1995) Thyroid 5, Suppl. 1, 390.
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Advances in apoptosis research
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Advances in apoptosis research
    Marcus E. Peter, Armin E. Heufelder, Michael O. Hengartner
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 1997, 94 (24) 12736-12737; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.24.12736

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Advances in apoptosis research
    Marcus E. Peter, Armin E. Heufelder, Michael O. Hengartner
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nov 1997, 94 (24) 12736-12737; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.24.12736
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Table of Contents

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
    Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
    Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
    Scientist looking at an electronic tablet
    Opinion: Standardizing gene product nomenclature—a call to action
    Biomedical communities and journals need to standardize nomenclature of gene products to enhance accuracy in scientific and public communication.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/greenbutterfly.
    One red and one yellow modeled protein structures
    Journal Club: Study reveals evolutionary origins of fold-switching protein
    Shapeshifting designs could have wide-ranging pharmaceutical and biomedical applications in coming years.
    Image credit: Acacia Dishman/Medical College of Wisconsin.
    White and blue bird
    Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
    Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
    Listen
    Past PodcastsSubscribe
    Goats standing in a pin
    Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
    CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
    Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science
    • Teaching Resources

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Librarians
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490