Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Neurotrophic immunophilin ligands stimulate structural and functional recovery in neurodegenerative animal models

Joseph P. Steiner, Gregory S. Hamilton, Douglas T. Ross, Heather L. Valentine, Hongzhi Guo, Maureen A. Connolly, Shi Liang, Cynthia Ramsey, Jia-He J. Li, Wei Huang, Pamela Howorth, Rajat Soni, Michael Fuller, Hans Sauer, Alison C. Nowotnik, and Peter D. Suzdak
PNAS March 4, 1997 94 (5) 2019-2024; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.5.2019
Joseph P. Steiner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory S. Hamilton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas T. Ross
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather L. Valentine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongzhi Guo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maureen A. Connolly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shi Liang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cynthia Ramsey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jia-He J. Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei Huang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pamela Howorth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rajat Soni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Fuller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans Sauer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison C. Nowotnik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter D. Suzdak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Although immunosuppressant immunophilin ligands promote neurite outgrowth in vitro, their neurotrophic activities are clearly independent of their immunosuppressive activity. In the present report, a novel nonimmunosuppressive immunophilin ligand, GPI-1046 (3-(3-pyridyl)-1-propyl (2S)-1-(3,3-dimethyl-1,2-dioxopentyl)-2-pyrrolidinecarboxylate) is described. In vitro, GPI-1046 bound to FK506 binding protein-12 and elicited neurite outgrowth from sensory neuronal cultures with picomolar potency with maximal effects comparable to nerve growth factor. In vivo, GPI-1046 stimulated the regeneration of lesioned sciatic nerve axons and myelin levels. In the central nervous system, GPI-1046 promoted protection and/or sprouting of serotonin-containing nerve fibers in somatosensory cortex following parachloroamphetamine treatment. GPI-1046 also induced regenerative sprouting from spared nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons following 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine toxicity in mice or 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) toxicity in rats. The rotational abnormality in 6-OHDA treated rats was alleviated by GPI-1046. These neurotrophic actions in multiple models suggest therapeutic utility for GPI-1046 in neurodegenerative diseases.

  • calcineurin
  • cyclosporin A
  • cyclophilin
  • FK506
  • dopamine

The immunosuppressant actions of drugs such as cyclosporin A and FK506 result from binding to receptor proteins, designated immunophilins, cyclophilin for cyclosporin A, and FK506 binding protein (FKBP) for FK506 (1). The drug-immunophilin complex binds to the calcium-activated phosphatase calcineurin, inhibiting its activity and resulting in accumulation of phosphorylated calcineurin substrates (2). One of these substrates, NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells), can enter the nucleus to stimulate interleukin 2 formation only in the nonphosphorylated state, so that drug treatment prevents its transcription factor activity, leading to immunosuppression (1, 3). Immunophilins also possess peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase or rotamase activity, which facilitates protein folding and which is inhibited by immunosuppressant drug binding (2, 4–6). Inhibition of rotamase activity is not required for immunosuppression, because numerous drugs can bind to immunophilins and inhibit rotamase activity, but are not immunosuppressant because the drug-immunophilin complex fails to bind to calcineurin (3, 7).

The immunophilins are 10- to 50-fold more abundant in the nervous system than in immune tissues, and FKBP-12 is highly enriched in peripheral nerves (8, 9). Lesions of the facial or sciatic nerve lead to pronounced enhancement of mRNA levels of FKBP-12 in the facial and lumbar nuclei, respectively, and parallel an augmentation of growth-associated protein of 43 kDa (GAP-43) mRNA (9). Based on the association of GAP-43 with neurite extension, we evaluated the effects of immunosuppressant drugs upon neuronal outgrowth and observed potent augmentation of neurite extension from both cultured PC-12 cells and rat sensory ganglia explants (10). Low doses of FK506 in vivo were subsequently shown to augment physical regrowth and functional recovery of damaged sciatic nerves (11, 12).

Recently, we observed that nonimmunosuppressant as well as immunosuppressive immunophilin ligands are extremely potent in augmenting neurite outgrowth in sensory ganglia and PC-12 cells and enhancing morphologic and functional recovery in rats with damaged sciatic nerves (J.P.S., M.A.C., H.L.V., G.S.H., T. M. Dawson, L. Hester, & S. H. Snyder, unpublished work). Based on these observations, we synthesized a series of nonimmunosuppressive ligands of FKBP-12 and now report that one of these, 3-(3-pyridyl)-1-propyl (2S)-1-(3,3-dimethyl-1,2-dioxopentyl)-2-pyrrolidinedinecarboxylate (GPI-1046), is neurotrophic in multiple neuronal systems and efficacious in promoting both morphologic and functional recovery in rodent models of peripheral nerve injury and neurodegenerative disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In Vitro Studies.

Rotamase activity of FKBP-12 was assayed as described by Kofron (13), using the peptide N-succinyl Ala-Leu-Pro-Phe p-nitroanilide (Bachem) as substrate. Dorsal root ganglia were dissected from embryonic chick, gestation day E8–E10, and explants of sensory neurons were cultured as described (J.P.S., M.A.C., H.L.V., G.S.H., T. M. Dawson, L. Hester, and S. H. Snyder, unpublished work). Neurite outgrowth was assessed from photomicrographs of each explant culture and all processes whose length exceeded the explant’s diameter were counted.

In Vivo Studies.

The sciatic nerve of adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (n = 6 per group) was lesioned. Rats received s.c. injections of GPI-1046 at 3 or 10 mg/kg in Intralipid vehicle (Clintec Nutrition, Deerfield, IL), and were processed to quantitate axonal caliber, cross-sectional area and myelin as described (J.P.S., et al., unpublished work). Serotonin neurons of adult male Sprague–Dawley rats were lesioned with 10 mg/kg parachloroamphetamine (PCA; ref. 15). Animals (n = 6 per group) were treated with GPI-1046 at 40 mg/kg s.c. daily for 3 days before PCA treatment, and daily for 2 subsequent weeks. The density of serotonin-immunoreactive fibers in the somatosensory cortex of sham, lesioned and lesioned/GPI-1046-treated animals was quantitated. Rodent models of Parkinson disease were produced by damaging the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. Male CD1 mice (20–25 g) received five daily i.p. injections of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP, 30 mg/kg) in saline vehicle. Two different GPI-1046 dosing paradigms were used, a “concurrent” paradigm of daily s.c. GPI-1046 dosing 30 min before each MPTP injection and on each of 5 subsequent days, and a delayed “post-MPTP” paradigm of 5-day s.c. GPI-1046 treatment beginning 4 days after cessation of MPTP treatment (n = 10 animals per group). The animals were sacrificed 18 days after initiation of MPTP treatment. Male Sprague–Dawley rats (250–275 g) received unilateral 2.0-μl stereotaxic injections of 10 μg/ml 6-hydroxy dopamine (6-OHDA) in 0.04% ascorbic acid into the substantia nigra. The efficacy of GPI-1046 was examined in three studies. In the first study, GPI-1046 (10 mg/kg s.c.) was first given 1 hr after 6-OHDA, whereas rats in the second and third studies received their first GPI-1046 injections 7 days or 28 days after 6-OHDA treatment, respectively, in n = 8 animals per group. The GPI-1046 treatments continued for 5 days, and the animals were sacrificed 14 days after their final GPI-1046 injection. For each 6-OHDA experiment, 8 animals per treatment group were used for examination of rotation induced by s.c. administration of amphetamine (3 mg/kg) 2 weeks after the last GPI-1046 injection, just before sacrifice. Rotations were counted manually over a 1-hr period following drug administration. Striatal dopamine and metabolites were quantitated by electrochemical detection using a Hewlett–Packard model 1100 HPLC system. The density of striatal fibers and nigral neurons was determined using tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) immunohistochemistry. Blinded analysis of TH fiber density in the central striatum was performed at ×630 and the percentage of striatal fields covered by TH-positive processes and terminals was calculated using an image-analysis program (simple, Compix, Pittsburgh, PA). The total number and density of TH-positive nigral neurons were determined at ×250. All comparisons were evaluated using Student’s t test.

RESULTS

Design and Synthesis of GPI-1046.

Previous work by Schreiber (1) established that FK506 comprises two distinct binding domains. One portion of the molecule binds at the prolyl isomerase active site of FKBP-12. The remainder of the FK506 molecule forms part of the calcineurin-binding domain of the FK506/FKBP-12 complex, and has been termed the “effector” domain. Compounds capable of binding to the enzymatic active site of FKBP-12 but lacking an effector domain would be expected to function as nonimmunosuppressive FKBP-12 ligands. Using the principles of structure-based drug design, we synthesized a number of potent, selective small molecule inhibitors of FKBP-12 that are devoid of immunosuppressive activity but possess potent neurotrophic activity in vitro and in vivo. GPI-1046 is typical of this new class of small molecule neurotrophic drugs.

GPI-1046 Stimulates Neurite Outgrowth from Sensory Ganglia.

In the absence of exogenously added growth factors, GPI-1046 is extremely potent in augmenting neurite outgrowth in chicken sensory ganglia, with significant enhancement evident with as little as 1 pM concentration (Fig. 1). Maximal stimulation at 1–10 nM elicits outgrowth comparable to that observed with maximal concentrations of nerve growth factor. Fifty percent of maximal stimulation is evident at 58 pM.

Scheme I
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

GPI-1046 elicits neurite outgrowth in chicken sensory neuronal cultures. Increasing concentrations of GPI-1046 were added to sensory neuronal cultures, and neurite outgrowth (number of neurites whose length is larger than the diameter of the explant) at 48 hr posttreatment was quantitated.

GPI-1046 Is Nonimmunosuppressive.

GPI-1046 was designed as a nonimmunosuppressive ligand of the immunophilin FKBP-12, and we tested its ability to act as an immunomodulator in T cell proliferation assays. GPI-1046 lacks immunosuppressive effects in concanavalin A-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes. At concentrations of up to 10 μM, GPI-1046 fails to inhibit cellular [3H]thymidine incorporation, while FK506 and cyclosporin A in low nanomolar concentrations are inhibitory (data not shown). GPI-1046 (10 μM) also does not inhibit the phosphatase activity of purified calcineurin-FKBP-12 assayed with phosphorylated microtubule-associated protein (MAP-2, data not shown). Therefore, GPI-1046 is an FKBP-12 ligand with no immunosuppressive effects.

GPI-1046 Stimulates Recovery Following Sciatic Nerve Crush.

FK506 (refs. 11 and 12; J.P.S., et al., unpublished work) and a nonimmunosuppressant immunophilin ligand (J.P.S., et al., unpublished work) augment recovery of damaged sciatic nerves. GPI-1046 also displays this activity when administered at 3 or 10 mg/kg s.c. daily beginning on the day of nerve crush until sacrifice 18 days later (Table 1). GPI-1046 treatment markedly augments both the diameter and cross-sectional area of the recovering nerve fibers, though at the 18-day time point recovery is not complete. Effects of GPI-1046 on myelin levels are even more striking, with 7- to 8-fold higher levels in drug-treated than vehicle-treated animals. In the vehicle-treated animals, microscopic myelin sheaths are not evident, whereas substantial myelin layering is seen in injured nerves after GPI-1046 treatment.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

GPI-1046 augments regrowth of damaged sciatic and central serotonin neurons

GPI-1046 Augments Serotonin Fiber Recovery Following Lesions with PCA.

PCA produces marked destruction of central serotonin neurons (14). Rats received GPI-1046 for 3 days, at which time PCA was administered, followed by GPI-1046 for an additional 14 days when the animals were sacrificed. In rats treated with PCA, forebrain serotonin immunoreactivity is markedly reduced (Table 1). PCA-treated animals receiving GPI-1046 display double the density of serotonin positive neuronal fibers in the somatosensory cortex.

GPI-1046 Stimulates Recovery of the Nigrostriatal Dopamine System in Mouse Models of Parkinson Disease.

MPTP destroys dopamine neurons following oxidation by monoamine oxidase B to 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion (MPP+), which is avidly accumulated by the dopamine transporter, and then destroys the neurons by oxidative free radical mechanisms (15). MPTP reduces the density of TH-positive striatal axonal processes by about 77% (Fig. 2A). GPI-1046 administered at 4 mg/kg in the concurrent dosing paradigm more than doubles the number of spared striatal TH-positive processes compared with MPTP/vehicle controls. Maximal protective effects in this model are evident at GPI-1046 doses of 20 mg/kg, which elicits a 4- to 5-fold increased density of striatal TH-positive fibers and a similar magnitude increase in the density of striatal fibers positive for dopamine transporter immunohistochemistry (data not shown). As the transporter is localized to membranes of dopaminergic fibers, the observed striatal reinnervation reflects an increase in the number of dopaminergic axonal processes and terminals and not a nonspecific up-regulation of TH levels. Additionally, the depletion of dopamine and its metabolites following MPTP treatment is substantially prevented by GPI-1046 administration (data not shown).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

GPI-1046 protects against loss of striatal TH and promotes regeneration of striatal dopaminergic markers in MPTP-treated mice. (A) Dose dependency of GPI-1046-mediated recovery of striatal TH innervation density in the concurrent MPTP-GPI-1046 model. Quantitative analysis of striatal TH levels was as described. At all dose levels, TH innervation density was significantly greater than MPTP/vehicle-treated cases alone (Student’s t test, P < 0.001). (B) The dose-dependent recovery of TH+ labeled punctae is evident in the striata of MPTP-lesioned mice treated after an 8-day delay with s.c. GPI-1046 at 4, 10, 20, or 40 mg/kg. Quantitation of the post-MPTP-administered GPI-1046 in regeneration of striatal TH innervation density is depicted graphically. At all dose levels, TH innervation density was significantly greater than MPTP treated cases alone (Student’s t test, P < 0.001).

To more faithfully model human Parkinson disease, we examined effects of GPI-1046 when administered in the post-MPTP paradigm, where GPI-1046 is not administered until maximal destruction of dopamine neurons has taken place. In this paradigm, GPI-1046 treatment greatly enhances striatal innervation density with significant augmentation evident at 4 mg/kg (Fig. 2B). Maximal effects are evident at 20 mg/kg with striatal innervation densities 2- to 3-fold higher than untreated MPTP/vehicle controls. Striatal reinnervation in GPI-1046-treated animals is characterized by many clusters or small branches of processes emerging from the sparse network of spared nigrostriatal fibers, suggestive of terminal and collateral sprouting.

GPI-1046 Stimulates Morphological, Biochemical, and Functional Recovery of the Rat Nigrostriatal System Following 6-OHDA Lesions.

6-OHDA is accumulated by dopamine neurons and oxidized to quinone, and it elicits neuronal destruction (16, 17). Intranigral 6-OHDA produces 90–95% depletion of TH immunoreactive fiber density in the striatum (Fig. 3). GPI-1046 treatment elicits a pronounced increase in striatal TH-positive fiber density of comparable magnitude when given 1 hr, 1 week, or 1 month following the lesion (Table 2). The density of striatal TH-positive fibers in GPI-1046-treated rats is 2.5–3.5 times greater than in 6-OHDA/vehicle-treated controls (Fig. 3).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

GPI-1046 increases striatal TH+ innervation density after intranigral 6-OHDA injection. The dense pattern of TH+ punctae and processes that characterize the normal caudate putamen is evident in the caudate putamen contralateral to the 6-OHDA injection (Left). Extensive loss of TH+ punctae is evident in the striatum ipsilateral to the 6-OHDA injection (Center), but a sparse network of TH+ fibers are spared (Right). In cases treated with daily GPI-1046 (10 mg/kg, s.c.) for 5 days beginning 1 week after the 6-OHDA injection, an increase in the density of TH+ labeled fibers is evident together with an increase in the number of TH+ varicosities. Veh, vehicle.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

GPI-1046 enhances regrowth of 6-OHDA lesioned striatal dopamine neurons

Rats with unilateral 6-OHDA lesions of the substantia nigra rotate ipsilateral to the lesion when treated with amphetamine (18). The pronounced rotation observed with amphetamine in 6-OHDA-treated animals is significantly diminished in rats receiving 10 mg/kg GPI-1046 1 week following the 6-OHDA lesions (Table 3). In these animals, drug treatment restores striatal dopamine to ≈30% of control levels. The dramatic abolition of the functional deficit fits with abundant evidence that only about a third of normal dopamine innervation is required for physiologic motor activity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

GPI-1046 reverses rotational motor abnormalities in 6-OHDA lesioned rats

DISCUSSION

One of the most striking features of the neurotrophic actions of immunophilin ligands is their extraordinary potency. Previously we reported picomolar neurotrophic effects of FK506 in PC-12 cells and sensory neuronal cultures (ref. 10; J.P.S., et al., unpublished work). GPI-1046 produces significant enhancement of neurite outgrowth in sensory ganglia at 1 pM, with 50% of maximal stimulation at 58 pM. By contrast, its Ki for inhibiting the rotamase activity of FKBP-12 is ≈7.5 nM. Thus, the neurotrophic potency is about 100 times greater than the drug’s apparent affinity for FKBP-12. FK506 is also more potent in stimulating neurite outgrowth than in binding to FKBP-12 and inhibiting its rotamase activity (ref. 10; J.P.S., et al., unpublished work). Conceivably, the “receptor” immunophilin in chicken sensory ganglia is a different form of FKBP than FKBP-12 and has higher affinity for these drugs. Alternatively, the drugs may concentrate within the ganglia.

Previous studies demonstrated that the immunosuppressive immunophilin ligand FK506 stimulates functional as well as morphologic recovery following sciatic nerve damage (refs. 11 and 12; J.P.S., et al., unpublished work). GPI-1046 stimulated regrowth of axons in the injured sciatic nerve and markedly enhanced their myelination, suggesting that multiple sclerosis may be a potential therapeutic target for GPI-1046.

GPI-1046 stimulated striatal reinnervation by dopamine fibers in models of Parkinson disease produced by MPTP in mice and 6-OHDA in rats. Consistent morphological recovery in these models was accompanied by biochemical recovery of dopamine levels and, in the rat 6-OHDA model, a dramatic recovery from motor abnormalities, suggesting therapeutic utility in Parkinson disease.

GPI-1046-mediated recovery of striatal dopaminergic markers in the concurrent MPTP dosing model is greater than that previously reported for agents that do not directly interfere with either conversion of MPTP to MPP+, or uptake of MPP+ into dopaminergic terminals (19). Unlike numerous compounds with demonstrated neuroprotective action in mouse MPTP models, GPI-1046 does not interfere with MPTP neurotoxicity by known mechanisms such as monoamine oxidase B inhibition, dopamine uptake inhibition, or excitatory amino acid antagonism (J.P.S., G.S.H., D.T.R., H.L.V., M.A.C., and P.D.S., unpublished observations). Recovery of striatal dopaminergic markers occurred even when GPI-1046 administration was delayed longer than 1 week after MPTP treatment onset, after the reported peak of nigral neuronal death (20, 21). Thus, the increased striatal innervation reflects sprouting of processes from residual axons and not the protection of nigral cell bodies. Regeneration of striatal dopaminergic markers in the post-MPTP dosing regimen with GPI-1046 was greater than that reported for epidermal growth factor (22, 23), nerve growth factor (24), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (25), and gangliosides or their synthetic derivatives (19, 26, 27). Unlike polypeptide neurotrophic factors, which must be administered intracranially to elicit an effect, GPI-1046 induced significant dose-dependent striatal dopaminergic reinnervation in MPTP-treated mice following systemic s.c. administration. GPI-1046 stimulated dopaminergic axonal sprouting in the striatum when given as long as 1 month after 6-OHDA lesion. To our knowledge, no other trophic agent has been reported to be effective in such a model. In contrast, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, the most efficacious polypeptide neurotrophic factor in the dopamine system studied to date, failed to stimulate striatal sprouting of residual dopaminergic axons in monkeys when administered 90 days following MPTP (28).

GPI-1046 also stimulated serotonin neuronal recovery following destruction by PCA (Table 1). Thus, unlike peptidic neurotrophic factors that display distinct neurotrophic activities in overlapping but limited central nervous system neuronal populations, immunophilin ligands are neurotrophic for diverse neural systems, including PC-12 cells and sensory ganglia in vitro. In intact animals, the drugs stimulate regrowth of damaged facial (data not shown) and sciatic nerves, and brain dopamine and serotonin neurons.

Unlike many other neurotrophic polypeptides, immunophilin ligands do not induce aberrant sprouting of neuronal processes when administered to normal animals. In normal rats and mice, we have carefully examined sciatic and facial nerves as well as numerous areas of the brain and spinal cord and failed to observe any suggestions of abnormal sprouting (data not shown). By contrast, nerve growth factor elicits sprouting of normal sensory neurons associated with hyperalgesia (29).

GPI-1046 displays excellent bioavailability, readily crosses the blood–brain barrier, and is active following oral administration (J.P.S., G.S.H., D.T.R., H.L.V., M.A.C., and P.D.S., unpublished work), whereas the clinical application of peptidic growth factors is hampered by limited bioavailability. Accordingly, GPI-1046 and related agents may find therapeutic application in various neurodegenerative disorders.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Solomon H. Snyder for his many helpful comments and fruitful discussions during the course of these studies.

Footnotes

    • ↵ To whom reprint requests should be addressed.

    • Solomon Snyder, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

    ABBREVIATIONS

    GPI-1046,
    3-(3-pyridyl)-1-propyl (2S)-1-(3,3-dimethyl-1,2-dioxopentyl)-2-pyrrolidinecarboxylate;
    MPTP,
    1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine;
    6-OHDA,
    6-hydroxy dopamine;
    TH,
    tyrosine hydroxylase;
    PCA,
    parachloroamphetamine;
    FKBP,
    FK506 binding protein;
    GAP-43,
    growth-associated protein of 43 kDa
    • Received December 1, 1996.
    • Accepted December 23, 1996.
    • Copyright © 1997, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Schreiber S L
      (1991) Science 253:283–287.
      OpenUrl
    2. ↵
      1. Liu J,
      2. Farmer J D,
      3. Lane W S,
      4. Friedman J,
      5. Weissman I,
      6. Schreiber S L
      (1991) Cell 66:807–815, pmid:1715244.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Bierer B E,
      2. Somers P K,
      3. Wandless T J,
      4. Burakoff S J,
      5. Schreiber S L
      (1990) Science 250:556–559, pmid:1700475.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      1. Siekierka J J,
      2. Hung S H Y,
      3. Poe M,
      4. Lin C S,
      5. Sigal N H
      (1989) Nature (London) 341:755–757, pmid:2477714.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Harding M W,
      2. Galat A,
      3. Uehling D E,
      4. Schreiber S L
      (1989) Nature (London) 341:758–760, pmid:2477715.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Fischer G,
      2. Wittmann-Liebold B,
      3. Lang K,
      4. Kiefhaber T,
      5. Schmid F X
      (1989) Nature (London) 340:351–352, pmid:2666859.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Dumont F J,
      2. Staruch M J,
      3. Koprak S L,
      4. Siekierka J J,
      5. Lin C S,
      6. Harrison R,
      7. Sewell T,
      8. Kindt V M,
      9. Beattie T R,
      10. Wyvratt M,
      11. Sigal N
      (1992) J Exp Med 176:751–760, pmid:1380976.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Steiner J P,
      2. Dawson T M,
      3. Fotuhi M,
      4. Glatt C E,
      5. Snowman A M,
      6. Cohen N,
      7. Snyder S H
      (1992) Nature (London) 358:584–587, pmid:1380130.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Lyons W E,
      2. Steiner J P,
      3. Snyder S H,
      4. Dawson T M
      (1995) J Neurosci 15:2985–2994, pmid:7536825.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    9. ↵
      1. Lyons W E,
      2. George E B,
      3. Dawson T M,
      4. Steiner J P,
      5. Snyder S H
      (1994) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3191–3195, pmid:7512727.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Gold B G,
      2. Storm-Dickerson T,
      3. Austin D R
      (1994) Restorative Neurol Neurosci 6:287–296.
      OpenUrl
    11. ↵
      1. Gold B G,
      2. Katoh K,
      3. Storm-Dickerson T
      (1995) J Neurosci 15:7509–7516, pmid:7472502.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    12. ↵
      1. Kofron J L,
      2. Kuzmic P,
      3. Kishore V,
      4. Colon-Bonilla E,
      5. Rich D H
      (1991) Biochemistry 30:6127–6134, pmid:2059621.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Mamounas L A,
      2. Blue M E,
      3. Siuciak J A,
      4. Altar C A
      (1995) J Neurosci 15:7929–7939, pmid:8613731.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    14. ↵
      1. Gerlach M,
      2. Riederer P,
      3. Przuntek H,
      4. Youdin M B H
      (1991) Eur J Pharmacol 208:273–286, pmid:1815982.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Sachs C,
      2. Jonsson G
      (1975) Biochem Pharmacol 24:1–8, pmid:1092302.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Jonsson G
      (1980) Annu Rev Neurosci 3:169–187, pmid:6106449.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Ungerstedt U,
      2. Arburthnott G W
      (1970) Brain Res 24:485–493, pmid:5494536.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Schneider J S,
      2. Yuwiler A
      (1989) Exp Neurol 105:177–183, pmid:2568945.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Tatton W G,
      2. Greenwood C E
      (1991) J Neurosci Res 30:666–672, pmid:1686284.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Muthane U,
      2. Ramsay K A,
      3. Jiang H,
      4. Jackson-Lewis V,
      5. Donaldson D,
      6. Fernando S,
      7. Ferreira M,
      8. Przedborski S
      (1994) Exp Neurol 126:195–204, pmid:7925820.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Hadjiconstantinou M,
      2. Fitkin J G,
      3. Dalia A,
      4. Neff N H
      (1991) J Neurochem 57:479–482, pmid:1677029.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Schneider J S,
      2. DiStefano L
      (1995) Brain Res 674:260–264, pmid:7796105.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Garcia E,
      2. Rios C,
      3. Sotelo J
      (1992) Neurochem Res 17:979–982, pmid:1508308.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Tomac A,
      2. Lindquist E,
      3. Lin L-F H,
      4. Ogren S O,
      5. Young D,
      6. Hoffer J,
      7. Olson L
      (1995) Nature (London) 373:335, pmid:7830766.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Hadjiconstantinou M,
      2. Neff N H
      (1990) Exp J Pharmacol 181:137–139.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    26. ↵
      1. Schneider J S,
      2. DiStefano L
      (1994) Neurology 44:748–750, pmid:8164837.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Gash D M,
      2. Zhang Z,
      3. Ovadia A,
      4. Cass W A,
      5. Yi A,
      6. Simmerman L,
      7. Russell D,
      8. Martin D,
      9. Lapchak P A,
      10. Collins F,
      11. Hoffer B J,
      12. Gerhardt G A
      (1996) Nature (London) 380:252–255, pmid:8637574.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Woolf C J,
      2. Ma Q P,
      3. Allchorne A,
      4. Poole S
      (1996) J Neurosci 16:2716–2723, pmid:8786447.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Neurotrophic immunophilin ligands stimulate structural and functional recovery in neurodegenerative animal models
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    Citation Tools
    Neurotrophic immunophilin ligands stimulate structural and functional recovery in neurodegenerative animal models
    Joseph P. Steiner, Gregory S. Hamilton, Douglas T. Ross, Heather L. Valentine, Hongzhi Guo, Maureen A. Connolly, Shi Liang, Cynthia Ramsey, Jia-He J. Li, Wei Huang, Pamela Howorth, Rajat Soni, Michael Fuller, Hans Sauer, Alison C. Nowotnik, Peter D. Suzdak
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 1997, 94 (5) 2019-2024; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.2019

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Neurotrophic immunophilin ligands stimulate structural and functional recovery in neurodegenerative animal models
    Joseph P. Steiner, Gregory S. Hamilton, Douglas T. Ross, Heather L. Valentine, Hongzhi Guo, Maureen A. Connolly, Shi Liang, Cynthia Ramsey, Jia-He J. Li, Wei Huang, Pamela Howorth, Rajat Soni, Michael Fuller, Hans Sauer, Alison C. Nowotnik, Peter D. Suzdak
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 1997, 94 (5) 2019-2024; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.5.2019
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (50)
    Current Issue

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • MATERIALS AND METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • DISCUSSION
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • ABBREVIATIONS
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    News Feature: Getting the world’s fastest cat to breed with speed
    Cheetahs once rarely reproduced in captivity. Today, cubs are born every year in zoos. Breeding programs have turned their luck around—but they aren’t done yet.
    Image credit: Mehgan Murphy/Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute.
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans. Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Human heart evolved for endurance
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans.
    Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation. Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Viscoelastic fluids and wildfire prevention
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation.
    Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate. Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    Climate change and desert bird collapse
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate.
    Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He. Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.
    Featured QnAs
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He
    Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Teaching Resources
    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490