Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Receptor-mediated activation of a plant Ca2+-permeable ion channel involved in pathogen defense

Sabine Zimmermann, Thorsten Nürnberger, Jean-Marie Frachisse, Wolfgang Wirtz, Jean Guern, Rainer Hedrich, and Dierk Scheel
PNAS March 18, 1997 94 (6) 2751-2755; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.6.2751
Sabine Zimmermann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thorsten Nürnberger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Marie Frachisse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Wirtz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean Guern
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rainer Hedrich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dierk Scheel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Pathogen recognition at the plant cell surface typically results in the initiation of a multicomponent defense response. Transient influx of Ca2+ across the plasma membrane is postulated to be part of the signaling chain leading to pathogen resistance. Patch-clamp analysis of parsley protoplasts revealed a novel Ca2+-permeable, La3+-sensitive plasma membrane ion channel of large conductance (309 pS in 240 mM CaCl2). At an extracellular Ca2+ concentration of 1 mM, which is representative of the plant cell apoplast, unitary channel conductance was determined to be 80 pS. This ion channel (LEAC, for large conductance elicitor-activated ion channel) is reversibly activated upon treatment of parsley protoplasts with an oligopeptide elicitor derived from a cell wall protein of Phytophthora sojae. Structural features of the elicitor found previously to be essential for receptor binding, induction of defense-related gene expression, and phytoalexin formation are identical to those required for activation of LEAC. Thus, receptor-mediated stimulation of this channel appears to be causally involved in the signaling cascade triggering pathogen defense in parsley.

  • patch-clamp
  • peptide elicitor
  • Petroselinum crispum
  • phytoalexins
  • signal transduction

Plants use a large arsenal of defense reactions to resist invading microbial pathogens (1–4). The molecular basis of pathogen recognition at the plant cell surface and of signaling cascades leading to the initiation of plant defense responses, however, is largely unknown. Perception of fungal pathogen-derived signals, referred to as elicitors, is believed to be mediated by specific receptors residing in the plant plasma membrane (5–8). Intracellular signal conversion and transduction include changes in the ion permeability of the plasma membrane, generation of reactive oxygen species, and alterations in the phosphorylation status of various proteins, giving rise to signal-specific responses of the plant (9–12).

The nonhost resistance response of parsley (Petroselinum crispum) leaves to infection with zoospores of the phytopathogenic fungus, P. sojae, has been found to be closely mimicked in parsley cell cultures upon treatment with fungus-derived elicitors (13, 14). An oligopeptide (Pep-13) originating from a cell wall glycoprotein of the fungus induces transcriptional activation of defense-related genes and phytoalexin production in parsley cells and protoplasts (15, 16). Recognition of the elicitor by its receptor, a 91-kDa plasma membrane protein, rapidly stimulates large, transient influxes of Ca2+ and H+ and effluxes of K+ and Cl− (15, 17, 18). Pharmacological studies revealed that this pattern of ion fluxes, and in particular extracellular Ca2+, is necessary for the production of reactive oxygen species (oxidative burst), defense-related gene activation, and phytoalexin production (18). Both omission of Ca2+ from the extracellular medium and inhibitors of animal slow-type Ca2+ channels abolished these plant responses (15, 19). Furthermore, identical structural features of the elicitor were found to be essential for receptor binding and initiation of all plant responses analyzed, indicating a sequence of events that may constitute part of a signaling cascade triggering pathogen defense in plants (15).

Ca2+ channels in the plasma membrane have been suggested to provide a major pathway for Ca2+ influx into higher plant cells (20–22). To identify plasma membrane ion channels that mediate Ca2+ influxes and thereby contribute to elevated levels of cytosolic Ca2+ in elicitor-treated parsley cells (23), we applied the patch-clamp technique to parsley protoplasts. Here we report the electrophysiological identification of a large conductance Ca2+-permeable ion channel, which was specifically activated upon addition of elicitor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Cell Culture/Protoplast Preparation.

Cell suspension cultures of parsley (P. crispum) were maintained as described (24). Parsley protoplasts were isolated from 5-day-old cultured cells (25).

Elicitor Treatment/Inhibitor Studies.

Elicitors and inhibitors were applied as stock solutions at concentrations given in the text. Elicitor-stimulated production of furanocoumarin phytoalexins was routinely tested (25) for each protoplast preparation used in patch-clamp experiments. The elicitor-induced oxidative burst and phytoalexin production in cultured parsley cells were quantified as described in ref. 15. Viability of cultured parsley cells was checked 24 hr after addition of inhibitor (11).

Patch-Clamp Experiments.

Patch-clamp experiments with freshly prepared parsley protoplasts were performed using standard protocols (26) and the experimental setup as described (27). Digitized data (VR10, Instrutech, Elmont, NY) were stored on videotape and analyzed using a TL-1 DMA interface and patch-clamp software pclamp 5.5.1 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Unless stated otherwise, the bath solution was 240 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Mes/Tris (pH 5.5) and the pipette solution was 150 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ATP, 10 mM Mes/Tris (pH 6.8). In both solutions osmolality was adjusted to 640 mosmol with d-sorbitol as was done in experiments with reduced extracellular Ca2+ concentrations. Removal of elicitor or inhibitor from the bath solution was achieved by perfusing the recording chamber with 5 ml of fresh bath solution (10-fold chamber volume, flow rate 1–2 ml/min). To assure establishment of whole-cell configuration, the accessibility of the protoplast interior (series resistance, whole-cell capacitance) was regularly checked throughout each experiment. Membrane voltage values were corrected for the liquid junction potential as described (28). Channel activity was quantified as NpO = Σn=1N npn, where pO is the open probability of the single channel, pn is the probability that n channels are open simultaneously, and N is the apparent number of channels. The value of pn was calculated according to ref. 29. NpO was calculated from 60 sec of recording obtained between 5 and 6 min after onset of any treatment. Elicitor-induced increase in large conductance elicitor-activated ion channel (LEAC) activity (NpO) was expressed as the ratio between the activities in the elicited and in the nonelicited state for each individual protoplast analyzed. Mechanosensitive ion channel activity was evoked as described (30).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

To identify plasma membrane ion channels that may contribute to macroscopic Ca2+ influxes observed in elicitor-treated parsley cells (23), we applied the patch-clamp technique to parsley protoplasts. Under asymmetric ionic conditions designed to resolve Ca2+-inward currents, we were able to detect a channel (LEAC) that exhibited openings often lasting for some hundred milliseconds or even seconds (Fig. 1A). The high Ca2+ concentration in the bath solution, corresponding to the ion concentration used during protoplast isolation (25), greatly facilitated resolution of single channels mediating Ca2+-inward currents. In addition, long open times, a limited number of channels that opened simultaneously, and a large current amplitude of this channel enabled us to detect single channel openings in whole-cell configuration (Fig. 1A). The single channel conductance determined in whole-cell configuration and in excised outside–out membrane patches was 309 ± 24 pS and 325 ± 35 pS, respectively (Fig. 1B). Expectedly, the number of active channels in excised membrane patches was much lower than that observed in whole-cell configuration (not shown). The activity of this channel did not significantly depend on the membrane potential within the physiologically relevant voltage range (−30 to −150 mV). Current amplitudes smaller than those mediated by LEAC were detected at higher membrane potentials (see Vm = −110 mV, Fig. 1A), which may either represent different channel activities or sublevels of LEAC (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Activity of a large conductance ion channel in the plasma membrane of parsley protoplasts. (A) Single channel recordings in the whole-cell configuration with the membrane potential (Vm) clamped to −50, −70, −90, and −110 mV. (B) I–V plot of unitary currents from recordings in whole-cell (○, n = 15) and outside–out configuration (▪, n = 6), respectively. Freshly prepared parsley protoplasts were used for patch-clamp analyses under the conditions described in Materials and Methods.

Reduction of the extracellular concentration of CaCl2 from 240 mM to 5 mM (the minimum concentration at which unitary LEAC currents could be resolved in whole-cell configuration) resulted in both a shift of the reversal potential toward more negative voltages (Δ−34 mV, Fig. 2A) and a decrease in single channel conductance (Fig. 2B). Single channel conductances determined from mean current amplitudes at 240 mM, 50 mM, 10 mM, and 5 mM CaCl2 were 309 pS (n = 15), 245 pS (n = 5), 216 pS (n = 4), and 186 pS (n = 3), respectively. A negative shift of the reversal potential (against a positive shift of the reversal potential for Cl−) indicates a preferential cation permeability of LEAC. Therefore, under our experimental conditions, Ca2+ (influx) and K+ (efflux) rather than Cl− represent major charge carriers of this channel. To explicitly rule out the existence of Cl− efflux, KCl in the pipette solution was substituted by K+-gluconate for which the anion is considered to be incapable of permeating ion channels. Channel amplitude and channel open probability remained unchanged under these conditions, demonstrating that LEAC did not mediate Cl− efflux. The reversal potential of the channel, as determined by linear regression (Fig. 2A), did not correspond to that of one particular cation, suggesting that both Ca2+ and K+ were transported. Under biionic conditions (given that LEAC is impermeable to anions and disregarding alterations of the internal Ca2+ concentration) the relative permeability ratio for Ca2+ to K+ (PCa2+/PK+) at 240 mM extracellular CaCl2 was 0.16 as calculated by the Goldman–Hodgkin–Katz equation (Erev = RT/2F ln 4PCa2+[Ca2+]out/PK+[K+]in) (29). Assuming constant permeability for the K+-outward current, as well as regarding variable Ca2+-inward currents at varying extracellular Ca2+ concentrations, nonlinear fits of both currents revealed increasing PCa2+/PK+ at decreasing extracellular Ca2+ concentrations (not shown). Thus, a reduction of the external Ca2+ concentration toward physiological concentrations would result in an increased Ca2+ permeability of LEAC. In addition, in the physiological range of plant membrane potentials (more negative than the reversal potential of LEAC), currents mediated by LEAC would largely correspond to Ca2+ influx.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Cation permeability of LEAC. (A) I–V plot of unitary currents recorded in whole-cell mode at various extracellular Ca2+ concentrations [240 mM (•), 50 mM (▴), 10 mM (▪), and 5 mM (♦), respectively]. (B) Single channel conductance of LEAC as a function of extracellular Ca2+ concentration. Single channel conductances from A were plotted vs. extracellular Ca2+ concentration. The graph was fitted to Michaelis–Menten kinetics according to γ = γmaxCa2+out/(Kd + Ca2+out) with γ being LEAC conductance. (Inset) Lineweaver–Burk plot of the data shown in B. The broken line may facilitate determination of single channel conductances at lower external Ca2+ concentrations than those tested. (C) Inhibition of LEAC by the Ca2+ channel inhibitor La(NO3)3. Channel activity was recorded in whole-cell mode (Vm = −50 mV) in standard bath solution either in the absence or presence of 1.5 mM La(NO3)3. Arrows indicate time points of addition of inhibitor [La(NO3)3] and removal of inhibitor (wash) by perfusion of the recording chamber.

LEAC unitary conductance was saturated at higher external Ca2+ concentrations (Fig. 2B). A Lineweaver–Burk plot of the Michaelis–Menten kinetics (Fig. 2B Inset) revealed a unitary channel conductance of 80 pS at an extracellular Ca2+ concentration of 1 mM, which is representative of the plant cell apoplast (31). Taken together, an unusually large Ca2+ conductance associated with the particular gating behavior characterize LEAC as a new type of plant Ca2+-permeable ion channel. To our knowledge, there is no report yet on a plant ion channel with comparably large Ca2+ conductance.

LEAC activity could be completely and reversibly inhibited within seconds upon the addition of La(NO3)3 (1.5 mM, n = 5) (Fig. 2C) and GdCl3 (1 mM, n = 6) (not shown), which are inhibitors of a wide range of Ca2+ channels (31, 32). Similar inhibitory effects of both La(NO3)3 and GdCl3 were also observed at concentrations of 125 μM (n = 8) and 50 μM (n = 4), respectively. Both inhibitors also blocked the elicitor-induced production of reactive oxygen species and phytoalexins in parsley cells when added at these concentrations (not shown), whereas viability of parsley cells was not significantly affected by treatment with either inhibitor.

LEAC could be activated by P. sojae-derived elicitors, such as the peptide elicitor Pep-13 (Figs. 3A and 4) and a fungal cell wall preparation (Fig. 4). This activation was solely attributable to an increased channel activity (NpO, ref. 29), since the unitary channel conductance remained virtually unchanged. Conductances were 343 ± 32 pS (n = 4) and 365 ± 45 pS (n = 4) for Pep-13 and the fungal cell wall elicitor, respectively, and 309 ± 24 pS (n = 15) in nonelicited protoplasts (Fig. 3B). Addition of water did not activate LEAC (not shown).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Activation of LEAC by the oligopeptide elicitor Pep-13. (A) Whole-cell recordings of LEAC activity (Vm = −50 mV) under standard conditions before addition (trace 1), 5 min after addition of 100 nM Pep-13 (trace 2), and 5 min after removal of Pep-13 by perfusion (trace 3). Arrows indicate time points of addition of elicitor (trace 1, Elicitor) and start of perfusion (trace 2, Wash). Traces represent recordings of reversible activation by elicitor of LEAC for an individual protoplast (n = 4). Stimulation by elicitor of LEAC activity was 15-fold in this particular experiment. Channel activity was quantified as described in Materials and Methods. (B) I–V plot of unitary currents recorded in whole-cell mode without elicitor (○, taken from Fig. 1B, n = 15), and after addition of 50 μg/ml of the fungal cell wall elicitor (▴, n = 4) or 100 nM Pep-13 (▪, n = 4), respectively.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Increase in LEAC open probability (NpO) induced by fungal cell wall elicitor (n = 6), Pep-13 (n = 10), and structural derivatives of Pep-13 (n = 6, Pep-13A/12; n = 8, Pep-13/A2; n = 7, Pep-10, respectively). NpO was calculated from 60 s of recording obtained between 5 and 6 min after addition of elicitor as described in Materials and Methods and normalized to background activity recorded before addition of elicitor. Note the logarithmic scale used to plot increase in LEAC open probability. Data obtained from nonresponsive parsley protoplasts (□, see text for explanation) are included. Mean values ± SD, excluding those for nonresponsive protoplasts, are given. Elicitor concentrations used in patch-clamp experiments were 50 μg/ml fungal cell wall elicitor, 100 nM (Pep-13, Pep-13/A12), and 1 μM (Pep-13/A2, Pep-10), respectively. Amino acid sequences of Pep-13 and its structural derivatives are given in one-letter code. Underlined boldface letters represent alanine substitution sites within Pep-13.

A heterogeneous ligand sensitivity of LEAC was observed because only 70% of the protoplasts analyzed were elicitor-responsive, a situation comparable to the abscisic acid-mediated activation of Ca2+ and K+ permeable channels in Vicia faba guard cells (33). In addition, relatively large variations of LEAC elicitor responsiveness in individual protoplasts (ranging for example from 2- to 45-fold for Pep-13) were observed, which is typical for single-cell analyses with cells from a nonsynchronously growing cell culture (see SD values in Fig. 4). Both findings, however, may as well reflect differences in the physiological fitness of individual protoplasts caused by protoplast preparation.

Activation of LEAC by either elicitor could be observed only in whole-cell configuration but not in membrane patches in outside–out configuration (not shown, n = 7). This, as well as a delay in channel activation of 2–5 min with respect to addition of elicitor, suggests that the elicitor did not activate LEAC directly but through components mediating signal transfer between the elicitor receptor and the ion channel. Removal of the elicitor from the bath solution resulted in a decline of channel activity, indicating that LEAC activation is reversible (Fig. 3A).

As summarized in Fig. 4, LEAC could be efficiently activated by those elicitors that were previously shown to strongly induce macroscopic Ca2+ influx and phytoalexin production in parsley cells (15). A structural derivative of Pep-13, in which the tyrosine residue at position 12 was replaced by alanine (Pep-13/A12), retained its capacity to efficiently stimulate all three responses. In contrast, another single amino acid exchange within Pep-13 (tryptophan by alanine at position 2, Pep-13/A2) rendered this analog largely inactive with respect to LEAC activation, corresponding to observed losses of stimulation of Ca2+ uptake and phytoalexin formation (15), even when this derivative was applied at 10-fold higher concentrations than Pep-13. Similarly, deletion of one C-terminal and two N-terminal amino acid residues from Pep-13 (Pep-10) completely abolished both the ability of this derivative to stimulate LEAC and phytoalexin production. Since identical structural characteristics of the elicitor were also found to be responsible for specific interaction of Pep-13 with its receptor (15), our findings provide strong evidence that LEAC activation by fungal elicitor is a receptor-mediated process. Furthermore, stimulation with the same signal specificity of a multifacetted plant defense response comprising ion fluxes, oxidative burst, ethylene biosynthesis, activation of defense-related genes, and phytoalexin formation (15) indicates that LEAC constitutes a key element of the signal transduction chain initiating pathogen defense in parsley. This is further substantiated by the fact that Ca2+ channel inhibitors, which efficiently inhibit LEAC, block elicitor-induced oxidative burst and phytoalexin production as well.

A mechanosensitive ion channel activity in the parsley plasma membrane was evoked upon suction, which exhibited very similar gating behavior, single channel conductance (320 ± 24 pS in 240 mM CaCl2), and sensitivity toward La(NO3)3 and GdCl3 as LEAC (not shown). However, whether LEAC and the mechanosensitive ion channel are identical or represent distinct channels remains to be elucidated. Stretch-operated channels have been identified on the plasma membrane of several plants and found to be not highly selective for Ca2+, but also allow K+ to permeate (30, 31). Complex behaviors of adaptation and linkage have been ascribed to these channels, which suggest multiple pathways of regulation, e.g., in mediating the plant response to pathogen infection (31, 34). Furthermore, a mechanically activated oxidative burst, which may be mediated by stretch-sensitive channels has been reported from plant cells (35).

LEAC, the first plant plasma membrane ion channel shown to be activated by a phytopathogen-derived signal, is very likely to contribute to the elicitor-induced macroscopic ion fluxes observed in parsley (15, 18). Long open times of LEAC, its cation permeability, a large unitary Ca2+ conductance at physiological extracellular Ca2+ concentrations, and the elicitor inducibility of LEAC may account for the significant increase in cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration (23) in elicitor-treated parsley cells. Alternatively, membrane depolarization by Ca2+ influx through LEAC could activate Ca2+ and/or voltage-dependent anion channels as well as outward-rectifying K+ channels (36). Since similar macroscopic ion fluxes have been detected in other plants upon elicitor treatment (10, 37–41), the existence of functional homologs of LEAC in these species can be anticipated. A Ca2+-permeable ion channel with similar unitary conductance and gating behavior was found to reside in the plasma membrane of tobacco protoplasts (unpublished results). However, activation of this channel by fungal elicitor remains to be analyzed.

Activation of LEAC by a fungal elicitor exemplifies the hypothesis that the plasma membrane of higher plants harbors a number of Ca2+-permeable ion channels, of which a major part are quiescent but can be rapidly recruited for Ca2+-dependent signal transduction. Complementary to the functional analysis of plant disease resistance genes and of plant mutants impaired in pathogen defense, structural analysis of signal transduction intermediates, such as plant ion channels, will substantially broaden our knowledge on the organization of signaling cascades involved in plant pathogen defense.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Drs. H. Barbier-Brygoo, J. L. Dangl, W. Knogge, I. E. Somssich, and S. Thomine for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank the Max-Planck-Society for substantial support. This work was supported by Grants Sche 235/3-1 and Sche 235/3-2 to D.S. and He 1640/1-3 to R.H. from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, by Grant CHRX-CT93-0168 from the European Community Human Capital and Mobility Program to D.S., and by a grant from the European Community Biotech Program to J.G. J.-M.F. received an Alexander-von Humboldt-Stiftung postdoctoral fellowship.

Footnotes

    • ↵ S.Z. and T.N. contributed equally to this work.

    • ↵ Present address: Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, K.-Liebknecht-Strasse 25, D-14476 Golm, Germany.

    • ↵ To whom reprint requests should be addressed.

    • Klaus Hahlbrock, Max Planck Institute for Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany

    ABBREVIATION

    LEAC,
    large conductance elicitor-activated ion channel
    • Received November 15, 1996.
    • Accepted December 26, 1996.
    • Copyright © 1997, The National Academy of Sciences of the USA

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Godiard L,
      2. Grant M R,
      3. Dietrich R A,
      4. Kiedrowski S,
      5. Dangl J L
      (1994) Curr Opin Genet Dev 4:662–671, pmid:7849505.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Dixon R A,
      2. Harrison M J,
      3. Lamb C J
      (1994) Annu Rev Phytopathol 32:479–501.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Kombrink E,
      2. Somssich I E
      (1995) Adv Plant Pathol 21:1–34.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    2. ↵
      1. Baron C,
      2. Zambryski P C
      (1995) Annu Rev Genet 29:107–129, pmid:8825470.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Boller T,
      2. Meins F Jr
      1. Ebel J,
      2. Scheel D
      (1992) in Genes Involved in Plant Defense, eds Boller T, Meins F Jr(Springer, Wien, Germany), pp 184–205.
      1. Atkinson M M
      (1993) Adv Plant Pathol 10:35–64.
      OpenUrl
      1. Ebel J,
      2. Cosio E G
      (1994) Int Rev Cytol 148:1–36.
      OpenUrl
    4. ↵
      1. Boller T
      (1995) Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46:189–214.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    5. ↵
      1. Dietrich A,
      2. Mayer J A,
      3. Hahlbrock K
      (1990) J Biol Chem 265:6360–6368, pmid:2318857.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Mathieu Y,
      2. Kurkdjian A,
      3. Xia H,
      4. Guern J,
      5. Koller A,
      6. Spiro M D,
      7. Albersheim P,
      8. Darvill A
      (1991) Plant J 1:333–343.
      OpenUrl
    7. ↵
      1. Renelt A,
      2. Colling C,
      3. Hahlbrock K,
      4. Nürnberger T,
      5. Parker J E,
      6. Sacks W R,
      7. Scheel D
      (1993) J Exp Bot 44:257–268.
      OpenUrl
    8. ↵
      1. Suzuki K,
      2. Shinshi H
      (1995) Plant Cell 7:639–647, pmid:12242379.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Jahnen W,
      2. Hahlbrock K
      (1988) Planta 173:197–204.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    10. ↵
      1. Schmelzer E,
      2. Krüger-Lebus S,
      3. Hahlbrock K
      (1989) Plant Cell 1:993–1001, pmid:12359883.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Nürnberger T,
      2. Nennstiel D,
      3. Jabs T,
      4. Sacks W R,
      5. Hahlbrock K,
      6. Scheel D
      (1994) Cell 79:449–460, pmid:7954811.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Sacks W R,
      2. Nürnberger T,
      3. Hahlbrock K,
      4. Scheel D
      (1995) Mol Gen Genet 246:45–55, pmid:7823912.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Nürnberger T,
      2. Nennstiel D,
      3. Hahlbrock H,
      4. Scheel D
      (1995) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2338–2342, pmid:7892267.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      1. Hahlbrock K,
      2. Scheel D,
      3. Logemann E,
      4. Nürnberger T,
      5. Parniske M,
      6. Reinold S,
      7. Sacks W R,
      8. Schmelzer E
      (1995) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:4150–4157, pmid:7753777.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Nürnberger T,
      2. Colling C,
      3. Hahlbrock K,
      4. Jabs T,
      5. Renelt A,
      6. Sacks W R,
      7. Scheel D
      (1994) Biochem Soc Symp 60:173–182, pmid:7639778.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Hetherington M A,
      2. Graziana A,
      3. Mazars C,
      4. Thuleau P,
      5. Ranjeva R
      (1992) Philos Trans R Soc London 338:91–106.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Assmann S M
      (1993) Annu Rev Cell Biol 9:345–375, pmid:8280465.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Ward M M,
      2. Pei Z-M,
      3. Schroeder J I
      (1995) Plant Cell 7:833–844, pmid:12242389.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Nester E W,
      2. Verma D P S
      1. Sacks W R,
      2. Ferreira P,
      3. Hahlbrock K,
      4. Jabs T,
      5. Nürnberger T,
      6. Renelt A,
      7. Scheel D
      (1993) in Advances in Molecular Genetics of Plant-Microbe Interactions, eds Nester E W, Verma D P S(Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), pp 485–495.
    19. ↵
      1. Kombrink E,
      2. Hahlbrock K
      (1986) Plant Physiol 81:216–221.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. ↵
      1. Dangl J L,
      2. Hauffe K D,
      3. Lipphardt S,
      4. Hahlbrock K,
      5. Scheel D
      (1987) EMBO J 6:2551–2556, pmid:16453792.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Sakmann B,
      2. Neher E
      1. Hedrich R
      (1995) in Single-Channel Recording, eds Sakmann B, Neher E(Plenum, New York), pp 277–305.
    22. ↵
      1. Zimmermann S,
      2. Thomine S,
      3. Guern J,
      4. Barbier-Brygoo H
      (1994) Plant J 6:707–716.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    23. ↵
      1. Neher E
      (1992) Methods Enzymol 207:123–131, pmid:1528115.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Hille B
      (1992) Ionic Channels of Excitable Membrane (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA).
    25. ↵
      1. Cosgrove D,
      2. Hedrich R
      (1991) Planta 186:143–153, pmid:11538499.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Bush D S
      (1995) Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46:95–122.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    27. ↵
      1. Klüsener B,
      2. Boheim G,
      3. Liss H,
      4. Engelberth J,
      5. Weiler E W
      (1995) EMBO J 14:2708–2714, pmid:7796799.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Schroeder J I,
      2. Hagiwara S
      (1990) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9305–9309, pmid:2174559.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      1. Pickard B G,
      2. Ding J P
      (1993) Aust J Plant Physiol 20:439–459, pmid:11537969.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Yahraus T,
      2. Chandra S,
      3. Legendre L,
      4. Low P S
      (1995) Plant Physiol 109:1259–1266, pmid:12228667.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    31. ↵
      1. Guggino W B
      1. Hedrich R
      (1994) in Current Topics on Membranes, ed Guggino W B(Academic, San Diego), pp 1–34.
    32. ↵
      1. Atkinson M M,
      2. Keppler L D,
      3. Orlandi E W,
      4. Baker C J,
      5. Mischke C F
      (1990) Plant Physiol 92:215–221.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Blein J-P,
      2. Milat M-L,
      3. Ricci P
      (1991) Plant Physiol 95:486–491.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Wei Z M,
      2. Laby R J,
      3. Zumoff C H,
      4. Bauer D W,
      5. He S Y,
      6. Collmer A,
      7. Beer S V
      (1992) Science 257:85–88, pmid:1621099.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Bach M,
      2. Schnitzler J-P,
      3. Seitz H U
      (1993) Plant Physiol 103:407–412, pmid:12231948.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    33. ↵
      1. Viard M-P,
      2. Martin F,
      3. Pugin A,
      4. Ricci P,
      5. Blein J-P
      (1994) Plant Physiol 104:1245–1249, pmid:12232163.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Receptor-mediated activation of a plant Ca2+-permeable ion channel involved in pathogen defense
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    Citation Tools
    Receptor-mediated activation of a plant Ca2+-permeable ion channel involved in pathogen defense
    Sabine Zimmermann, Thorsten Nürnberger, Jean-Marie Frachisse, Wolfgang Wirtz, Jean Guern, Rainer Hedrich, Dierk Scheel
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 1997, 94 (6) 2751-2755; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2751

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Receptor-mediated activation of a plant Ca2+-permeable ion channel involved in pathogen defense
    Sabine Zimmermann, Thorsten Nürnberger, Jean-Marie Frachisse, Wolfgang Wirtz, Jean Guern, Rainer Hedrich, Dierk Scheel
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 1997, 94 (6) 2751-2755; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2751
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (49)
    Current Issue

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • MATERIALS AND METHODS
      • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • ABBREVIATION
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Modulating the body's networks could become mainstream therapy for many health issues. Image credit: The Feinstein Institutes for Medicine Research.
    Core Concept: The rise of bioelectric medicine sparks interest among researchers, patients, and industry
    Modulating the body's networks could become mainstream therapy for many health issues.
    Image credit: The Feinstein Institutes for Medicine Research.
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans. Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Human heart evolved for endurance
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans.
    Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation. Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Viscoelastic fluids and wildfire prevention
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation.
    Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate. Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    Climate change and desert bird collapse
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate.
    Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He. Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.
    Featured QnAs
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He
    Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Teaching Resources
    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490