Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Natural genetic exchange between Haemophilus and Neisseria: Intergeneric transfer of chromosomal genes between major human pathogens

J. Simon Kroll, Kathryn E. Wilks, Jayne L. Farrant, and Paul R. Langford
PNAS October 13, 1998 95 (21) 12381-12385; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.21.12381
J. Simon Kroll
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn E. Wilks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayne L. Farrant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul R. Langford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Maurice S. Fox, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved August 17, 1998 (received for review July 2, 1998)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Members of the bacterial families Haemophilus and Neisseria, important human pathogens that commonly colonize the nasopharynx, are naturally competent for DNA uptake from their environment. In each genus this process is discriminant in favor of its own and against foreign DNA through sequence specificity of DNA receptors. The Haemophilus DNA uptake apparatus binds a 29-bp oligonucleotide domain containing a highly conserved 9-bp core sequence, whereas the neisserial apparatus binds a 10-bp motif. Each motif (“uptake sequence”, US) is highly over-represented in the chromosome of the corresponding genus, particularly concentrated with core sequences in inverted pairs forming gene terminators. Two Haemophilus core USs were unexpectedly found forming the terminator of sodC in Neisseria meningitidis (meningococcus), and sequence analysis strongly suggests that this virulence gene, located next to IS1106, arose through horizontal transfer from Haemophilus. By using USs as search strings in a computer-based analysis of genome sequence, it was established that while USs of the “wrong” genus do not occur commonly in Neisseria or Haemophilus, where they do they are highly likely to flag domains of chromosomal DNA that have been transferred from Haemophilus. Three independent domains of Haemophilus-like DNA were found in the meningococcal chromosome, associated respectively with the virulence gene sodC, the bio gene cluster, and an unidentified orf. This report identifies intergenerically transferred DNA and its source in bacteria, and further identifies transformation with heterologous chromosomal DNA as a way of establishing potentially important chromosomal mosaicism in these pathogenic bacteria.

Haemophilus and Neisseria spp. are among the commonest colonists of the human upper respiratory tract, from which site either species may occasionally invade to cause life-threatening infection in previously healthy people, most usually children. At any time up to 80% of healthy individuals carry Haemophilus influenzae, mainly noncapsulate strains, while non-H. influenzae species such as Haemophilus parainfluenzae are virtually ubiquitous in the nasopharyngeal flora (1). Commensal neisserial species such as Neisseria lactamica are widespread, while 5–40% of healthy individuals of different ages, the proportion at its greatest in late adolescence, are colonized with Neisseria meningitidis (meningococcus).

Many Haemophilus and neisserial species, including H. influenzae/parainfluenzae and N. meningitidis/gonorrhoeae, are naturally competent for transformation, with a capacity to take up fragments of DNA from their environment and integrate them into the chromosome. The process is not indiscriminate: DNA containing a particular uptake sequence (US) is taken up preferentially. In Haemophilus this US is a 29-bp domain 5′-aAAGTGCGGTnRWWWWWnnnnnnRWWWWW (HmUS), flagged by a 9-bp core sequence 5′-AAGTGCGGT (2–4). This sequence, in which lowercase “a” represents an adenine occurring in more than 50% of HmUSs, “n” is any base, “R” is a purine, and “W” is adenine or thymine, is highly over-represented in the genome [expected occurrence of the 9-bp core sequence ≈8 copies/1.8 Mb double-stranded genome, actual occurrence in the completely sequenced H. influenzae strain Rd genome, 1465 copies (4, 5)]. This great excess reflects the role of HmUS as the ligand for surface DNA receptors expressed by competent bacterial cells (6). Its presence is both necessary and sufficient for facilitated uptake of DNA by this route, regardless of the origin of the rest of the DNA with which it is associated (7, 8). Beyond the numerical excess of 9-bp core HmUS sequences in the genome, an analysis of their distribution has revealed that it is skewed in two respects, with significant over-representation in intergenic regions, and in +/− inverted repeat configuration, separated by 6–8 bases (4, 9). Such a chromosomal location gives the resulting stem–loop structure the potential to play a part in transcriptional regulation or termination (10, 11), whereas such a separation in an inverted repeat allows the context in which the core of the HmUS lies on each strand most closely to approximate to the extended consensus [at the best, only a single “S” (C-G) for “W” (T-A) mismatch at position 25 on each strand (4)]. A quite different, 10-bp, sequence, 5′-GCCGTCTGAA (nUS), appears to fulfill the same functions in Neisseria (12, 13) and is similarly highly over-represented in the inverted repeat configuration. Any more extended consensus US domain in Neisseria awaits definition.

Within Neisseria and Haemophilus, US-mediated recombination is a plausible mechanism underlying the exchange of chromosomal gene segments that is now recognized to have occurred widely between related species. In the colonizing setting organisms are exposed to DNA bearing the appropriate US from lysed related, commensal, strains. In such circumstances natural competence, facilitating uptake of this cognate DNA, can explain the observed mosaicism of chromosomal genes, with phenotypic consequences ranging from the comparatively trivial (alteration in electrophoretic mobility, though not function, of central metabolic enzymes) to the profound (modification of structure of immunodominant antigens such as the meningococcal major porin) (14–22). Until now there has been no suggestion that a US-mediated mechanism might lead to natural movement of DNA between unrelated organisms. Here we identify the donor and recipient of natural intergeneric chromosomal gene transfer events that have occurred between Haemophilus and Neisseria, with potentially far-reaching implications for understanding the evolution of virulence of these major pathogens.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In experiments to investigate the role of periplasmic [Cu,Zn]-cofactored superoxide dismutase (SodC) in the virulence of N. meningitidis (23), a 3,572-bp chromosomal ClaI fragment containing sodC and flanking genes was cloned as pJSK205 from the virulent serogroup B strain MC58 and sequenced (Fig. 1; GenBank accession no. AJ001313). Upstream of sodC, on the same strand, lies an ORF deduced, by the high similarity of its translated product to the protein in Escherichia coli, to encode MutY, an adenine glycosylase involved in DNA mismatch repair (24). Downstream of sodC, from position 2313, lie elements from the meningococcal insertion sequence IS1106, including a partial copy of the DR2 element and the gene encoding the transposase (25). On the sodC strand, at positions 2,270–2,301 between the TAA stop codon (at position 2,250) and the start of IS1106 sequence (Fig. 1), a 32-nt segment of DNA has the potential to form a hairpin loop structure followed by a run of thymidine residues, characteristic of a rho-independent terminator. Surprisingly, its sequence is that typically found downstream of genes in H. influenzae, containing inverted repeats of the core HmUS separated by 8 nt such that on each strand the sequence makes the best possible fit (28/29) to the HmUS consensus (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Shown is the 3,572-bp ClaI DNA insert of pJSK205. mutY and sodC are indicated by arrows, and the hatched rectangle indicates the region with homology to IS1106. Coordinates mark start/stop codons and the beginning of IS1106 homology, and correspond to those in GenBank accession no. AJ001313. The expansion below shows the sequence in intergenic region 3′ to sodC, with the inverted repeat highlighted. The sodC TAA stop codon and the first three bases of the region homologous to IS1106 are underlined.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Shown is the sequence of both strands of domain of pJSK205 between coordinates 2,270 and 2,301 (the region of the inverted repeat 3′ to sodC). Consensus HmUS is aligned with each strand [a, adenine in >50% HmUSs; n, any nucleotide; R, purine (A/G); W, weak (A/T)]. Matches are indicated by ∗.

sodC encodes a determinant of virulence widely distributed in Gram-negative commensals and pathogens of mucosal surfaces (26–29) including a comprehensive range of Haemophilus species (30, 31). The immediate provenance of the gene sequence under present consideration is, however, indubitably meningococcal, sodC with the associated HmUS being present both in another example of the same serogroup B strain sequenced independently [in the TIGR meningococcal genome sequencing project (accessed at http://www.tigr.org)] and in the serogroup A strain Z2491 [in data released by the Sanger Centre meningococcal genome sequencing project (accessed at http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/N_meningitidis)].

SodC protein sequences from N. meningitidis, H. influenzae (GenBank accession no. M84012), and E. coli (GenBank accession no. X97766) were compared all-against-all by using the interactive system for sequence matching and data analysis, Data Analysis and Retrieval With Indexed Nucleotide/peptide sequences (darwin) (32, 33), accessed via electronic mail (cbrg{at}inf.ethz.ch). The meningococcal and H. influenzae protein sequences showed striking similarity (87% identity). The darwin program phylotree was used to put the differences between peptide sequences on a quantitative graphical basis. In the resulting unrooted dendrograms (Fig. 3), pairwise relationships are displayed according to the principle that the length of the branch path joining two peptide sequences is in proportion to their degree of homology, calculated as the PAM distance [percentage accepted mutations) separating two sequences (32, 33)]. Short PAM distances thus signify close similarity of sequence; long distances denote correspondingly divergent sequence. This treatment demonstrates that the meningococcal and Haemophilus SodC sequences are much more similar to, and by inference closely related to, each other than either is to the E. coli sequence. adk, asd, ftsZ, and fur, chosen as examples of genes encoding central metabolic functions that have been identified in the same three bacterial species, were subjected to the same comparative analysis. In contrast to the SodC result, there was no obvious skew in the quantitatively displayed relationships (Fig. 3). In each case the Haemophilus and E. coli protein sequences were somewhat more closely similar to each other than either was to meningococcal sequence, reflecting the result of 16S rRNA sequence comparison (ref. 34; Fig. 3). Taken together, these data indicate that the meningococcal sodC gene is anomalous, with characteristics suggesting it has arisen through horizontal transfer from Haemophilus.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

(A) Phylograms based on protein sequence comparisons, computed with the darwin program phylotree of Gonnet et al. (32) accessed by e-mail (cbrg{at}inf.ethz.ch). In each case H represents H. influenzae (Hi), N = N. meningitidis (Nm), and E = E. coli (Ec). In the unrooted dendrograms, branch path length joining two peptide sequences (indicated) is in proportion to their degree of homology, calculated as the PAM (percentage accepted mutations) distance separating two sequences. Proteins (bacterial species, GenBank accession nos.) are represented as follows: Adk (Nm, L36469; Hi, X57315; Ec, X03038); Asd (Nm, Z14063; Hi, U32747; Ec, V00262); FtsZ (Nm, U43329; Hi, U32794; Ec, AE000119); Fur (Nm, L19777; Hi, U32704; Ec, X02589); MutY (Nm, this work; Hi, U32760; Ec, X52391); SodC (Nm, AJ001313; Hi, M84012; Ec, X97766); and BioF (Nm, Sanger sequence; Hi, U32830; Ec, AE000180). (B) Radial phylogram based on 16S RNA sequences, constructed from output of the computer program subtree of Maidak et al. (34) accessed at http://rdp.life.uiuc.edu. Branch lengths are in arbitrary units.

Identification of the meningococcal homologue of mutY upstream of sodC provided an opportunity to assess the chromosomal extent of this unexpected sequence similarity between the meningococcal and Haemophilus loci. All-against-all comparison of the translated protein sequence with MutY from E. coli (GenBank accession no. X52391) and H. influenzae (GenBank accession no. U32760) gave the expected, unskewed, result, quite unlike the SodC relationship (Fig. 3). The GC-content of mutY (55.8%) was typical of a neisserial gene (meningococcal GC-content 51%) in contrast to 43.5% in the case of sodC (more Haemophilus like; GC-content, 38.2%), and toward the 3′ end of the mutY coding sequence three copies of the nUS are found. MutY has sequence characteristics typical of a neisserial gene: it does not have the anomalous Haemophilus-like character of sodC.

N. gonorrheoae, unlike N. meningitidis, appears on experimental grounds to lack sodC (23). The expanding Oklahoma database of contigs from the genome of N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 (accessed over the Internet at http://www.genome. ou.edu) was interrogated with meningococcal sodC and mutY sequences. As anticipated, there was no match to sodC, but a gene almost identical to meningococcal mutY (94% DNA identity: typical for neisserial genes present in both species) was present. Downstream of gonococcal mutY, a sequence identical to the meningococcal sequence in pJSK205 continued for a further 328 bp, leading up to a point of abrupt divergence corresponding to position 1,610 in the meningococcal sequence, 81 bp upstream of sodC. Beyond this point on the gonococcal contig, instead of sodC, there is a converging gene with extremely high similarity to the meningococcal gene pspA (N. J. Simpson and B. G. Spratt, GenBank accession no. AF030941, 1997).

These data together strongly suggest that Neisseria has acquired sodC through the horizontal transfer of at least 0.7 kb of DNA and that the likely source was an Haemophilus species, one of the common commensal organisms sharing the same mucosal ecological niche. The juxtaposition of sodC with IS1106 sequence in the independent meningococcal genomes examined, and the absence of both in the gonococcal chromosome, suggests the possibility that the transposable element may have played a part in the acquisition of this DNA or, alternatively, that it facilitated a subsequent deletion amongst those apparently involved, alongside rearrangements, in the evolution of gonococcus from its neisserial ancestor.

Availability of sequence data from the near complete Sanger meningococcal sequencing project provided the chance to assess a minimum frequency for the 9-bp core HmUS in a meningococcal genome and look for further possible examples of DNA transfer. The complete E. coli genome sequence was selected as a control sequence for the same analysis. Searching both strands of all meningococcal contigs published up to March 6, 1998 (2.174 Mb of the ≈2.3-Mb genome), revealed 17 different 9/9 matches, and a further 4 which at that point contained a single ambiguous nucleotide. In 2 Mb of double-stranded DNA the expected result would be around 16 examples (2 × 2,000,000/49), so it is reasonable to conclude that even when the whole genome sequence is completed there will be no significant excess representation of this sequence. A similar search of the complete 4.6-Mb E. coli genome yielded 9 matches. On examining the chromosomal context of each of these core HmUSs in the meningococcal genome, another example of the full 29-bp HmUS was found. No such extended HmUS matches occur in the substantially larger E. coli genome. The likelihood of this sequence occurring even once by chance is approximately 1 in 4 × 109 (1 in a 1,000 in 2 Mb of double-stranded sequence) and inspection of the new meningococcal locus identified in this way strongly suggests that this example has not arisen through chance, but rather also through an Haemophilus-to-Neisseria DNA transfer event.

The new HmUS lies in a locus tentatively identified by its sequence similarity to entries in GenBank as bioF, encoding 7-keto-8-aminopelargonic acid synthetase, an enzyme in the biotin synthesis pathway (35). The meningococcal locus has strikingly similar sequence (near 90% identity) to a corresponding locus in the H. influenzae strain Rd genome over a continuous 2.5-kb span encompassing two of the putative Haemophilus bio genes and a further unidentified ORF (HI1552) (Fig. 4). In this case, in contrast to the example of sodC, the same high degree of identity, complete with HmUS, was found to DNA in the Oklahoma database of gonococcal sequence. The putative neisserial bioF homologue has an unusually low GC-content for the genus (44.3%) whereas the whole 2.5-kb domain is flanked by stretches of extreme AT-richness (70% and 80%, respectively). Because it is scarcely credible that both of these sequencing projects might have been contaminated with the same Haemophilus clone, the conclusion must be that both neisserial genomes contain a putative bio locus anomalously similar to that in Haemophilus. An all-against-all comparison of translated bioF protein sequence from N. meningitidis, H. influenzae (GenBank accession no. U32830) and E. coli (GenBank accession no. AE000180) showed the same highly skewed pattern seen with SodC (Fig. 3). The conclusion seems inescapable that at this locus too the neisserial chromosome (in this case both N. meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae) contains DNA bearing the distinctive signature of originating from Haemophilus. This finding supports the hypothesis that transfer may have occurred early in neisserial history, before the divergence of N. meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae. Interestingly, the short peptide domain encoded by the HmUS would not appear to be crucial for BioF activity, as it is not present in the corresponding E. coli sequence (Fig. 5). The provocative conclusion is that its presence in the Haemophilus and neisserial genomes reflects an importance beyond its coding capacity as a signal for DNA uptake or recombination.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Graphical comparison of DNA sequences at the bio locus of H. influenzae (x-axis) and putative bio locus of N. meningitidis from Sanger contig 316 (y-axis). Points plotted represent minimum 80% sequence identity over a 30-nt moving window. Positions of known genes shown in relation to the Haemophilus sequence.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5

DNA sequence alignment of H. influenzae/N. meningitidis bioF with E. coli bioF in the region of the HmUS (underlined; arrow indicates consensus sequence on noncoding strand). Coding strands and their translations are shown: Haemophilus/Neisseria (identical to each other) above, E. coli below. Separation of the sequences represents divergence where Haemophilus/Neisseria contains the HmUS.

Although extended HmUS sequences in the meningococcal genome appear to identify DNA that originated in Haemophilus, for Haemophilus-to-Neisseria DNA transfer to occur through an US-mediated process there needs to be an nUS sequence in the locus involved. The 10-bp nUS was accordingly used to search both strands of the H. influenzae Rd genome sequence. Four matches were found (the expected number to occur by chance in two strands of a 1.8-Mb genome) and the regions so identified were used to search the neisserial databases as before. Three regions found no significant match, but the fourth region, containing an nUS at position 1,120,756 in the Haemophilus genome, lay within the ORF of HI1055, encoding an unidentified 514-aa protein, which was an extremely close match (93% DNA sequence identity) to a corresponding neisserial ORF, found as in the case of bioF in both meningococcus and gonococcus. The GC-content of HI1055 is 35.9%, which is as expected for an Haemophilus gene, but anomalously low for a neisserial gene. Again there was an extended domain of close similarity in the Haemophilus and neisserial sequences, in this case 86% DNA sequence identity over 3.4 kb, separated by about a kilobase from a further domain of high similarity. In the meningococcal chromosome, at one end of the domain and extending out of it into a region no longer closely similar to Rd, was the gene lldA. This encodes a protein verified experimentally to be l-lactate dehydrogenase and previously recognized to lie in the meningococcal chromosome next to DNA with similarity to HI1053, which is two genes along from HI1055 in the H. influenzae chromosome (36). The presence of this 3.4-kb domain in each neisserial species, containing in the case of N. meningitidis part of a previously identified gene, again confirms that the match was not the trivial result of contamination of a neisserial library with a Haemophilus clone, but rather that the Neisseria and Haemophilus genomes truly contain very highly similar DNA at this location. The low GC-content of the Haemophilus gene argues an origin (or long-standing residence) in that genus, whereas the presence of the nUS indicates a basis for uptake of DNA from this locus by Neisseria. Intriguingly, the region in the neisserial sequence contains both two perfect (10/10) nUSs and one near-perfect (26/29) extended HmUS (gAAGcGCGGTCAAAAATCACAAAGTTTTc; lowercase letters represents divergence from HmUS consensus); the (T-to-C) mutation in the core (underlined) HmUS sequence is not seen in the corresponding position in the H. influenzae chromosome.

CONCLUSIONS

Although natural interspecies exchange of DNA is recognized to have occurred within both Neisseria and Haemophilus, intergeneric transfer has until now only been mooted as a hypothetical possibility, though one with obvious major implications for the evolution of virulence of either species. Only the most tenuous evidence has until now been found for such a process. Thompson et al. (37) found a highly degenerate version of the Haemophilus insertion element IS1016 in meningococcus, eliciting speculation that there might have been exchange of DNA between the genera. Read and Farley (38) reported that a copy of a 21-bp extragenic element present in multiple copies in the Haemophilus chromosome was also found in relation to a meningococcal gene, and commented on the possibility that this might represent horizontal gene exchange between these distantly related bacteria. Nizet et al. (39) have described an unusually virulent noncapsulate clinical isolate of H. influenzae that has acquired cryptic characteristics from an unknown source by transformation. Martin et al. (40) have reported the presence in Haemophilus of a pathogenicity island of tryptophanase genes with enterobacteriaceal sequence characteristics flanked by HmUSs and have suggested that this may have arisen by horizontal transfer from an unidentified donor. Other pathogenicity islands are widely described in other bacterial species (41), though the origin of the DNA in question is generally obscure. In the present work, however, the donor and recipient species of natural intergeneric chromosomal gene transfer events have been identified. Following an appreciation of the anomalous, Haemophilus-like nature of meningococcal sodC, a prospective search for species-specific DNA uptake motifs in the “wrong” genus (HmUS in Neisseria, and nUS in Haemophilus) has successfully identified three unrelated chromosomal loci at which transfer of between 0.7 and 3.4 kb DNA appears to have occurred, anomalies in GC-content in the respective chromosomes strongly suggesting that in these cases the events were in the Haemophilus-to-Neisseria direction. The search strategy used, seeking perfect consensus USs, is a highly parsimonious one, necessarily adopted because of limitations in our computing power. The pressure to maintain the consensus US in either species relates to its species-specific importance in DNA uptake and is relaxed outside this context, so that for example HmUSs might be expected to degrade more quickly in the neisserial genome than in Haemophilus. The 26/29 match to the HmUS sequence seen in relation to the neisserial homologue of HI1055 is an example of such a degraded motif. Many more examples are likely to emerge with the eventual completion of the meningococcal genome, when it will be interesting to establish the true extent of chromosomal mosaicism with sufficient computing power to search for US sequences with mismatches as well as to compare the whole genomes without a preliminary US screen.

The mere presence of HmUSs flagging more extensive Haemophilus-like DNA in Neisseria does not inform on the mechanism by which DNA transfer took place. The best circumstantial evidence supporting transformation comes from the example associated with HI1055, where the presence of the nUS in the Haemophilus chromosome provides a molecular basis for facilitated uptake of this DNA into Neisseria.

The virulence of either Neisseria or Haemophilus may have been, or may in the future be, modified by US-mediated intergeneric exchange. That the three examples here appear to have been in the Haemophilus-to-Neisseria direction may simply reflect the ubiquity of Haemophilus species, and inferentially of Haemophilus DNA, in the meningococcal environment. The alarming possibility of the reverse process is suggested by the phenomenon of Brazilian purpuric fever.

Although both N. meningitidis and H. influenzae may invade the bloodstream from the site of colonization in the nasopharynx to cause life-threatening infection, the clinical features of the diseases they cause are very different. N. meningitidis is one of the most important causes all over the world of community-acquired septicaemia and meningitis. The hallmarks of meningococcal infection at its fulminant worst are the result of widespread endothelial damage, with capillary leak, hemorrhage, shock, multi-organ failure, and a mortality near 50%. In contrast H. influenzae only very rarely causes such a syndrome of septic shock, but capsule serotype b strains in particular (≈2% of Haemophilus colonists) are an important cause of meningitis in children.

An outbreak of infection with many clinical features of meningococcal sepsis, with 70% mortality, occurred in children at several locations in the São Paulo province of Brazil just over a decade ago (42). Investigations established that the condition termed Brazilian purpuric fever, rather than being caused by meningococcus, was the result of septicaemia with a clone of H. influenzae biogroup aegyptius that had inexplicably acquired a highly virulent “meningococcal” phenotype. The organism had never before been known to cause anything more serious than conjunctivitis. The prospect of a major epidemic in a crowded developing world setting provoked considerable concern at the time of its description, although this has largely dissipated with the nonemergence of such a catastrophe. However the possibility that US-mediated transformation of commensal Haemophilus strains with neisserial genes conferred a clone with the phenotype of rapidly fatal invasive infection with septic shock must be recognized, and complacency would seem entirely inappropriate.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr Michael Coulthart (Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Ottawa, Canada) for his help with DNA sequencing. We gratefully acknowledge the practice of sequencing centers who release data into the public domain in timely fashion, without whom this work would not have been possible. Meningococcal sequence data were produced by (i) the Neisseria meningitidis Sequencing Group at the Sanger Centre and can be obtained from http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/N_meningitidis, and (ii) the Institute for Genomic Research (ftp://ftp.tigr.org/pub/data/n_meningitidis). Gonococcal sequence data came from the Gonococcal Genome Sequencing Project (supported by U.S. Public Health Service/National Institutes of Health Grant AI38399) at ftp://ftp.genome.ou.edu/pub/gono. This work is supported by the Meningitis Research Foundation.

Footnotes

    • ↵* To whom reprint requests should be addressed. e-mail: s.kroll{at}ic.ac.uk.

    • This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the Proceedings Office.

    • Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession no. AJ001313).

    ABBREVIATION

    US,
    uptake sequence
    • Received July 2, 1998.
    • Copyright © 1998, The National Academy of Sciences

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Kilian M
      (1976) J Gen Microbiol 93:9–62, pmid:772168.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. Danner D B,
      2. Deich R A,
      3. Sisco K L,
      4. Smith H O
      (1980) Gene 11:311–318, pmid:6260577.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Goodgal S H,
      2. Mitchell M
      (1984) J Bacteriol 157:785–788, pmid:6365892.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Smith H O,
      2. Tomb J F,
      3. Dougherty B A,
      4. Fleischmann R D,
      5. Venter J C
      (1995) Science 269:538–540, pmid:7542802.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      1. Fleischmann R D,
      2. Adams M D,
      3. White O,
      4. Clayton R A,
      5. Kirkness E F,
      6. Kerlavage A R,
      7. Bult C J,
      8. Tomb J F,
      9. Dougherty B A,
      10. Merrick J M,
      11. et al.
      (1995) Science 269:496–512, pmid:7542800.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Deich R A,
      2. Smith H O
      (1980) Mol Gen Genet 177:369–374, pmid:6966371.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Sisco K L,
      2. Smith H O
      (1979) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:972–976, pmid:311478.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Danner D B,
      2. Smith H O,
      3. Narang S A
      (1982) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2393–2397, pmid:6285382.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Goodgal S H,
      2. Mitchell M A
      (1990) J Bacteriol 172:5924–5928, pmid:2170331.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Tomb J F,
      2. El-Hajj H,
      3. Smith H O
      (1991) Gene 104:1–10, pmid:1916268.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Kroll J S,
      2. Loynds B M,
      3. Langford P R
      (1992) Gene 114:151–152, pmid:1587479.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Mathis L S,
      2. Scocca J J
      (1982) J Gen Microbiol 128:1159–1161, pmid:6809888.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Elkins C,
      2. Thomas C E,
      3. Seifert H S,
      4. Sparling P F
      (1991) J Bacteriol 173:3911–3913, pmid:1904861.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      1. Bowler L D,
      2. Zhang Q Y,
      3. Riou J Y,
      4. Spratt B G
      (1994) J Bacteriol 176:333–337, pmid:8288526.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Feil E,
      2. Carpenter G,
      3. Spratt B G
      (1995) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:10535–10539, pmid:7479835.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Feil E,
      2. Zhou J,
      3. Maynard-Smith J,
      4. Spratt B G
      (1996) J Mol Evol 43:631–640, pmid:8995060.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Kroll J S,
      2. Moxon E R
      (1990) J Bacteriol 172:1374–1379, pmid:2137816.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Kroll J S,
      2. Moxon E R,
      3. Loynds B M
      (1994) J Infect Dis 169:676–679, pmid:8158050.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Lujan R,
      2. Zhang Q Y,
      3. Saez-Nieto J A,
      4. Jones D M,
      5. Spratt B G
      (1991) Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:300–304, pmid:2024965.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Spratt B G,
      2. Bowler L D,
      3. Zhang Q Y,
      4. Zhou J,
      5. Smith J M
      (1992) J Mol Evol 34:115–125, pmid:1556747.
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Vazquez J A,
      2. Berron S,
      3. O’Rourke M,
      4. Carpenter G,
      5. Feil E,
      6. Smith N H,
      7. Spratt B G
      (1995) Mol Microbiol 15:1001–1007, pmid:7623657.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Zhou J,
      2. Bowler L D,
      3. Spratt B G
      (1997) Mol Microbiol 23:799–812, pmid:9157250.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Wilks K E,
      2. Dunn K L R,
      3. Farrant J L,
      4. Reddin K M,
      5. Gorringe A R,
      6. Langford P R,
      7. Kroll J S
      (1998) Infect Immun 66:213–217, pmid:9423860.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      1. Michaels M L,
      2. Pham L,
      3. Nghiem Y,
      4. Cruz C,
      5. Miller J H
      (1990) Nucleic Acids Res 18:3841–3845, pmid:2197596.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Knight A I,
      2. Ni H,
      3. Cartwright K A V,
      4. McFadden J J
      (1992) Mol Microbiol 6:1565–1573, pmid:1320728.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Kroll J S,
      2. Langford P R,
      3. Wilks K E,
      4. Keil A D
      (1995) Microbiology 141:2271–2279, pmid:7496539.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Imlay K R C,
      2. Imlay J A
      (1996) J Bacteriol 178:4807–4813, pmid:8759842.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Langford P R,
      2. Loynds B M,
      3. Kroll J S
      (1996) Infect Immun 64:5035–5041, pmid:8945543.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Farrant J L,
      2. Sansone A,
      3. Canvin J R,
      4. Pallen M J,
      5. Langford P R,
      6. Wallis T S,
      7. Dougan G,
      8. Kroll J S
      (1997) Mol Microbiol 25:785–796, pmid:9379906.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Kroll J S,
      2. Langford P R,
      3. Loynds B M
      (1991) J Bacteriol 173:7449–7457, pmid:1938942.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. Langford P R,
      2. Loynds B M,
      3. Kroll J S
      (1992) J Gen Microbiol 138:517–522, pmid:1593263.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      1. Gonnet G H,
      2. Cohen M A,
      3. Benner S A
      (1992) Science 256:1443–1445, pmid:1604319.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      1. Suhai S
      1. Gonnet G H
      (1994) in Computational Methods in Genome Research, ed Suhai S(Plenum, New York), pp 153–161.
    24. ↵
      1. Maidak B L,
      2. Olsen G J,
      3. Larsen N,
      4. Overbeek R,
      5. McCaughey M J,
      6. Woese C R
      (1997) Nucleic Acids Res 25:109–111, pmid:9016515.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    25. ↵
      1. Otsuka A J,
      2. Buoncristiani M R,
      3. Howard P K,
      4. Flamm J,
      5. Johnson O
      (1988) J Biol Chem 263:19577–19585, pmid:3058702.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Erwin A L,
      2. Gotschlich E C
      (1996) J Bacteriol 178:4807–4813, pmid:8759842.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Thompson S A,
      2. Wang L L,
      3. Sparling P F
      (1993) Mol Microbiol 9:85–96, pmid:8412674.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Read T D,
      2. Farley M M
      (1997) Mol Microbiol 23:627–628, pmid:9044295.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    29. ↵
      1. Nizet V,
      2. Colina K F,
      3. Almquist J R,
      4. Rubens C E,
      5. Smith A L
      (1996) J Infect Dis 173:180–186, pmid:8537657.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      1. Martin K,
      2. Morlin G,
      3. Smith A,
      4. Nordyke A,
      5. Eisenstark A,
      6. Golomb M
      (1998) J Bacteriol 180:107–118, pmid:9422600.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    31. ↵
      1. Hacker J,
      2. Blum-Oehler G,
      3. Muhldorfer I,
      4. Tschape H
      (1997) Mol Microbiol 23:1089–1097, pmid:9106201.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Brenner D J,
      2. Mayer L W,
      3. Carlone G M,
      4. Harrison L H,
      5. Bibb W F,
      6. Brandileone M C,
      7. Sottnek F O,
      8. Irino K,
      9. Reeves M W,
      10. Swenson J M,
      11. et al.
      (1988) J Clin Microbiol 26:1524–1534, pmid:3262623.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Natural genetic exchange between Haemophilus and Neisseria: Intergeneric transfer of chromosomal genes between major human pathogens
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    Citation Tools
    Natural genetic exchange between Haemophilus and Neisseria: Intergeneric transfer of chromosomal genes between major human pathogens
    J. Simon Kroll, Kathryn E. Wilks, Jayne L. Farrant, Paul R. Langford
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 1998, 95 (21) 12381-12385; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12381

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Natural genetic exchange between Haemophilus and Neisseria: Intergeneric transfer of chromosomal genes between major human pathogens
    J. Simon Kroll, Kathryn E. Wilks, Jayne L. Farrant, Paul R. Langford
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 1998, 95 (21) 12381-12385; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12381
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (49)
    Current Issue

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
      • CONCLUSIONS
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • ABBREVIATION
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Modulating the body's networks could become mainstream therapy for many health issues. Image credit: The Feinstein Institutes for Medicine Research.
    Core Concept: The rise of bioelectric medicine sparks interest among researchers, patients, and industry
    Modulating the body's networks could become mainstream therapy for many health issues.
    Image credit: The Feinstein Institutes for Medicine Research.
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans. Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Human heart evolved for endurance
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans.
    Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation. Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Viscoelastic fluids and wildfire prevention
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation.
    Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate. Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    Climate change and desert bird collapse
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate.
    Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He. Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.
    Featured QnAs
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He
    Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Teaching Resources
    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490