Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Biosynthesis of the Pseudomonas polyketide coronafacic acid requires monofunctional and multifunctional polyketide synthase proteins

Vidhya Rangaswamy, Sao Jiralerspong, Ronald Parry, and Carol L. Bender
PNAS December 22, 1998 95 (26) 15469-15474; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.26.15469
Vidhya Rangaswamy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sao Jiralerspong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Parry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol L. Bender
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Salih J. Wakil, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, and approved October 22, 1998 (received for review August 20, 1998)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Coronafacic acid (CFA) is the polyketide component of the phytotoxin coronatine, a virulence factor of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Our current knowledge of polyketide biosynthesis largely is based on the analysis of polyketide synthases (PKSs) in actinomycetes and other Gram-positive bacteria. Consequently, the cloning and characterization of the CFA biosynthetic gene cluster will contribute significantly to our knowledge of polyketide synthesis in Pseudomonas. In this report, we describe two genes in the CFA biosynthetic gene cluster that encode PKSs that are structurally and functionally similar to the multifunctional modular PKSs, which catalyze the synthesis of macrolide antibiotics. The CFA PKS genes were overproduced in Escherichia coli and shown to cross-react with antisera made to a modular PKS involved in erythromycin synthesis. A scheme for CFA biosynthesis is presented that incorporates the activities of all proteins in the CFA PKS. In this report a gene cluster encoding a pseudomonad polyketide has been completely sequenced and the deduced gene functions have been used to develop a biosynthetic scheme.

Polyketides constitute a huge family of structurally diverse natural products including antibiotics, chemotherapeutic compounds, and antiparasitics. The biosynthesis of polyketides is similar to the assembly of fatty acids (1). The latter begins with the condensation of acetyl-CoA (starter unit) and malonyl-CoA (chain extender unit), which is catalyzed by a ketosynthase (KS), resulting in an enzyme-bound β-keto thiolester. The keto group is then fully reduced in three subsequent steps: (i) reduction to a hydroxyl group by a ketoreductase (KR), (ii) dehydration to an unsaturated thiolester by a dehydratase (DH), and (iii) reduction of the unsaturated thiolester to a saturated fatty acid by an enoyl reductase (ER). The intermediates in this process usually are bound to an acyl carrier protein (ACP) in the form of a thiolester, and acyl transferases (ATs) are required for the loading of the starter and extender units. By varying chain length, acyl-CoA substrates, reductive modifications, and stereochemistry, nature has produced a vast diversity of polyketide natural products.

Historically, polyketide synthases (PKSs) have been classified as type I or II systems based on their relatedness to fatty acid synthases (FASs). Type I FASs, which are characteristic of fungi and vertebrates, are multifunctional proteins containing catalytic sites for AT, ACP, KS, KR, DH, and ER activities. Type II FASs, which are characteristic of bacteria and plants, contain each catalytic site on a separate protein unit (1). The first example of a fungal PKS, 6-methyl salicylic acid synthase, most closely resembled the animal type I FAS multifunctional proteins (1), whereas the first bacterial PKS to be studied (coding for an aromatic polyketide produced by Streptomyces) had a type II structure and consisted of multiple proteins (1). Surprisingly, sequence analysis of the PKS for macrolide polyketides produced by actinomycetes revealed the presence of a “type I” organization; however, unlike the fungal PKSs, the bacterial “type I” enzymes are used nonreiteratively. In a macrolide PKS, each domain is dedicated to a distinct step in the biosynthetic reaction sequence, and a group of domains that catalyzes one cycle of condensation and reduction is designated as a module. The most extensively characterized modular PKS in a bacterium is 6-deoxyerythronolide B synthase (DEBS), an enzyme involved in the synthesis of the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin (2). The activities catalyzed by the domains within a modular PKS often are apparent in the structure of the growing polyketide chain; consequently, nucleotide sequencing has become a predictive tool for deducing the biosynthetic route for these compounds. Macrolide polyketides have a fairly reduced structure and often contain structurally related domains (3, 4). In contrast, polyketides synthesized by “type II” PKSs generally result in aromatic polyketides, and biosynthesis is catalyzed by a multienzyme complex in which individual enzymes may be used reiteratively (5, 6).

Most of the research on polyketide synthesis in bacteria has focused on compounds synthesized by Streptomyces or other actinomycetes; however, Pseudomonas spp. synthesize a number of polyketides including the phytotoxin coronatine (COR) (7), mupirocin (pseudomonic acid) (8), pyoluteorin (9), and 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (10). The phytotoxin COR consists of two distinct moieties, the polyketide coronafacic acid (CFA) and a cyclopropyl amino acid designated coronamic acid (CMA) (11). COR is produced by several pathovars (pvs.) of Pseudomonas syringae (12), a plant pathogen that causes disease in many commercially important plants worldwide. Although some disease occurs in the absence of COR, the phytotoxin substantially enhances the virulence of P. syringae (12). Although the mode of action of COR is not completely understood, the phytotoxin is thought to function as a molecular mimic of the octadecanoid-signaling pathways of higher plants (13). Unlike many phytotoxins, COR is not broadly antimicrobial; instead, its toxicity is directed primarily at plant hosts.

COR biosynthesis has been intensively studied in P. syringae glycinea PG4180, where the 32-kb COR gene cluster contains two distinct regions encoding the structural genes for CMA and CFA biosynthesis (12) (Fig. 1A). Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that the CMA region contained four genes designated cmaA, cmaB, cmaT, and cmaU, and further analysis indicated that CMA is produced via a thiotemplate mechanism by a modified peptide synthetase (refs. 14 and 15; J. Patel and R.P., unpublished data). A regulatory region controlling CFA and CMA production was identified (Fig. 1A), sequenced, and shown to contain three genes designated corP, corS, and corR (16). The translational products of corP and corR were related to response regulators that function as members of two-component regulatory systems, and corS showed similarity to histidine protein kinases that function as environmental sensors (16).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Functional and physical map of the COR biosynthetic gene cluster. (A) Functional regions are indicated in open rectangles and include: CMA, coronamic acid biosynthetic gene cluster; REG, regulatory region; and CFA, coronafacic acid biosynthetic gene cluster. The COR gene cluster is organized into six transcripts (see horizontal arrows). Enzymes used for constructing the physical map were BamHI and SstI. The nucleotide sequence of the stippled region was deduced in the present study; the shaded region in SstI 4 was sequenced previously (see Results and Discussion). (B) Constructs used for overexpression of cfa6 and cfa7. Arrows show orientation of T7 promoter. B, BamHI; E, EcoRI; H, HindIII; S, SstI. (C) The dotted lines show an expanded view of the CFA gene cluster. Arrows with letter/number combinations indicate the location of Tn5 insertions. 1, cfa1; 2, cfa2; 3, cfa3; 4, cfa4; 5, cfa5; and 9, cfa9. With the exception of CL and CCR, which denote acyl-CoA ligase and crotonyl-CoA reductase, respectively, all other abbreviations are defined in the text.

With the exception of pyoluteorin, where partial sequence analysis has revealed the presence of a type I PKS (17), detailed reports on the organization of polyketide gene clusters in Pseudomonas are lacking. Partial sequencing of the CFA gene cluster and overexpression studies previously indicated that CFA biosynthesis required monofunctional proteins (18–20). However, in the present work, we show that CFA biosynthesis also requires two “type I” PKS modules, with each module comprising a separate protein. These proteins were overproduced in Escherichia coli and shown to be immunologically related to DEBS. A model for the synthesis of CFA is presented that incorporates the activities of all proteins encoded by the CFA gene cluster.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials.

P. s. glycinea strains were cultured routinely on King’s medium B (21) or mannitol-glutamate (MG) medium (22) at 28°C. P. s. glycinea N9 produces both COR and CFA and was derived from the wild-type PG4180 (23). The following COR− CFA− Tn5 mutants of P. s. glycinea were also utilized: A1, A2, A25, A28, B2, B21, E9, D5, and G2 (23–25). E. coli strains were grown under standard conditions (26), and antibiotics were added to media in the following concentrations: 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 25 μg/ml kanamycin, and 25 μg/ml tetracycline. Standard techniques were used for DNA manipulations (26), and constructs were transformed into either E. coli DH5α [Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169] or BL21 (F−ompT rB− mB−). DNA templates for sequencing reactions were purified using Qiagen or Wizard (Promega) columns.

DNA Sequencing and Analysis.

Automated DNA sequencing was provided by the Oklahoma State University Recombinant DNA/Protein Resource Facility and the Molecular Genetics Core Facility, University of Texas–Houston Medical School by using standard Applied Biosystems sequencing techniques (Perkin–Elmer). Subclones were constructed in pZerO2.1 (Invitrogen), pBluescript (Stratagene), or pUC19 (27), and the nucleotide sequence was derived by using the T3/T7 or M13 universal/reverse primers. Gaps were filled by generating sequence from internal primers, and contiguous sequences were assembled by using sequencher 3.0 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI). Sequence data were aligned and homology searches were performed by using the blast (28) and fasta (29) programs. Further analyses were conducted by using the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group (uwgcg) and dnastar sequence analysis packages or the BCM Search Launcher at the Baylor College of Medicine.

Protein Analysis.

P. s. glycinea strains were cultured in Hoitink–Sinden medium optimized for COR production (30) at 18°C for 120 h at 250 rpm. Cells were harvested from 1 ml of culture, lysed as described previously (31), and total cellular proteins were separated on SDS/PAGE gels containing 6% polyacrylamide. Separated proteins were electroblotted to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore) and analyzed by Western blotting by using DEBS 2 antisera (32).

Proteins were overproduced in E. coli as described previously (20). Proteins were labeled with [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine, separated on 6% SDS/PAGE gels, blotted, and exposed to x-ray film.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Previous sequencing of the 5′ end of SstI fragment 4 (Fig. 1A) revealed a 230-bp region with relatedness to the eryA genes involved in the synthesis of erythromycin (20). This prompted us to investigate whether there was any antigenic similarity between the proteins involved in CFA biosynthesis and DEBS. Since very large enzymes (>200 kDa) are associated with modular PKSs, we analyzed the cellular proteins of P. s. glycinea N9 (COR+ CFA+) and several COR− CFA− mutants for the presence of large proteins when grown under conditions optimal for COR production. SDS/PAGE analyses of total cellular proteins in N9 revealed two large proteins of approximately 220 and 280 kDa when this strain was grown under conditions that stimulated COR production (Fig. 2A, lane 1). These proteins were not present when cells were grown in rich medium or at 28°C, conditions unfavorable for COR production. Mutant D5, which maps at the 3′ end of the CFA gene cluster in cfa8 (20), produced the 220- and 280-kDa proteins (Fig. 2A, lane 4). However, the CFA− mutants B2 and B21, which mapped within SstI fragment 5, produced only the 280-kDa protein (Fig. 2A, lanes 2 and 3). Mutants E9 and G2, which mapped to cfa5, produced neither protein (Fig. 2A, lanes 5 and 6), presumably because of the polarity of Tn5 on downstream genes. Mutants A1, A2, A25, and A28, which mapped within SstI fragment 6, also failed to synthesize the two large proteins associated with CFA synthesis (data not shown).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Detection of proteins related to DEBS in P. s. glycinea PG4180. (A) Total cellular proteins from the following strains: 1, N9; 2, B2; 3, B21; 4, D5; 5, E9; 6, G2. The migration of molecular size markers (in kDa) is shown on the left. (B) Western blot reactivity of DEBS 2 antisera with proteins shown in A. Arrows on the right indicate the migration of the 200- and 280-kDa proteins that reacted with the DEBS 2 antisera.

The antigenic relatedness of the 220- and 280-kDa proteins to DEBS was investigated in immunoblotting experiments using DEBS 2 antisera. The 220- and 280-kDa proteins in N9 and D5 (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and 4) and the 280-kDa protein in B2 and B21 (Fig. 2B, lanes 2 and 3) showed immunoreactivity to the DEBS 2 antisera. There was no reactivity with similar-sized proteins in E9, G2 (Fig. 2B, lanes 5 and 6), A1, A2, A25, or A28 (data not shown). These observations suggested that both the 220- and 280-kDa proteins are modular PKSs encoded by DNA largely present in SstI fragments 5 and 6, respectively. Although the exact location of the start site was unknown, we reasoned that the 280-kDa protein was encoded by DNA in SstI fragment 6. This hypothesis was tested by subcloning a 12-kb HindIII/EcoRI fragment encompassing SstI fragment 6 into pBluescript SK(+) and KS(−) to form pCfa6A and pCfa6I, respectively (Fig. 1B). When induced with isopropyl β-d-thiogalactoside, E. coli BL21(pCfa6A) cells contained a 280-kDa protein (Fig. 3, lane 2), which was absent from BL21 cells containing pCfa6I (Fig. 3, lane 3) and BL21[pBluescript SK(+)] (Fig. 3, lane 1). In a parallel experiment, the 6.0-kb SstI/BamHI fragment containing SstI fragment 5 was subcloned in pBluescript SK(+) and KS(−) to form pCfa7A and pCfa7I, respectively (Fig. 1B). After induction, E. coli BL21(pCfa7A) cells contained a 220-kDa protein (Fig. 3, lane 4), which was absent from BL21(pCfa7I) cells (data not shown) and from BL21 containing the other constructs used in this experiment (Fig. 3, lanes 1–3). These results confirmed that pCfa6A and pCfa7A contained ORFs encoding the 280- and 220-kDa proteins, respectively.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Overexpression of cfa6 and cfa7. Proteins were labeled with [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine as described in Experimental Procedures. Constructs were transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) and overexpressed from the T7 promoter. Lanes: 1, BL21[pBluescript SK(+)]; 2, BL21(pCfa6A); 3, BL21(pCfa6I); and 4, BL21(pCfa7A). Molecular size markers (in kDa) are shown on the left; the migration of Cfa6 and Cfa7 is indicated on the right.

The 14.2-kb region beginning at the BamHI site separating fragments 6 and 7 and extending to the end of SstI fragment 5 (see shaded region, Fig. 1A) was sequenced, and the deduced organization of this region is shown in Fig. 1C. The most notable feature was the presence of two large ORFs designated cfa6 (8.0 kb) and cfa7 (6.2 kb). Each ORF had a potential ribosome binding site 9–12 bp upstream of the translational start site. The authenticity of the ORFs was validated by codon preference analysis with the UWGCG program codonpreference and a Pseudomonas codon usage table. The predicted size of the translational products of cfa6 and cfa7 were 284 and 221 kDa, respectively. Sequence analysis using the blastx and fastembl programs revealed a high degree of similarity to DEBS, and each gene contained one PKS module. The spatial location of the AT, ACP, KS, AT, DH, ER, KR, and ACP domains in Cfa6 and the KS, AT, DH, KR, ACP, and thioesterase (TE) domains in Cfa7 are shown in Fig. 1C. The catalytic sites in the ACP, DH, KS, and KR domains of Cfa6 and Cfa7 were closely related to those previously identified in the DEBS and rapamycin synthase modules (3, 33). The ER domain in Cfa6 was closely related to the ER domain in module 4 of DEBS 2, whereas Cfa7 contained a TE domain at the C terminus that retained the active site residues conserved in the TE domain of DEBS 3 (2). The N-terminal AT and ACP domains of Cfa6 resembled the analogous loading domain of DEBS 1, module 1. The internal AT domain in Cfa6 contained a motif related to that in AT domains which incorporate propionate (34); however, it is likely that this domain is involved in the introduction of butyrate, and a similar observation has been reported for the niddamycin PKS (4). The AT domain in Cfa7 is similar to that observed in ATs which incorporate acetate (34).

Complementation analysis and primer extension experiments previously demonstrated that the CFA region was organized as a single 19-kb transcriptional unit (35). The 5′ end of the transcript contained six discrete ORFs including cfl and cfa1–5 (18, 19) (Fig. 1C). The translational products of cfl and cfa5 showed relatedness to enzymes that activate carboxylic acids by adenylation (acyl-CoA ligases) (18, 19). The protein products of cfa1, cfa2, and cfa3 showed similarity to ACP, DH, and KS, respectively (19). The function of cfa4 could not be predicted from database searches. Interestingly, the following genes were coupled translationally: cfa2-cfa3, cfa3-cfa4, and cfa4-cfa5, ensuring equimolar production of the resulting gene products (19).

In the present study, we show that SstI fragments 5 and 6 contain two large ORFs, cfa6 and cfa7, and that the translational products show strong similarity to DEBS. Cfa6 contains all domains required for extension of the polyketide by butyrate followed by complete reduction, whereas Cfa7 contained the domains needed for extension of the polyketide by acetate followed by reduction and dehydration. Two remaining ORFs in the CFA cluster mapped downstream of cfa7 (Fig. 1C). The translational product of cfa8 showed similarity to crotonyl-CoA reductases from Streptomyces spp. (20). Crotonyl-CoA reductase catalyzes one step in the conversion of acetoacetyl-CoA to butyryl-CoA, and the latter product, as ethylmalonyl-CoA, is used as a four-carbon extender unit in polyketide synthesis (36). A ccr gene is also part of the biosynthetic gene cluster encoding the polyketide tylosin (36), and the overexpression of ccr in Saccharopolyspora erythraea has been utilized to produce novel derivatives of erythromycin (37). The recruitment of a ccr gene into the CFA gene cluster may reflect the requirement of butyryl-CoA as a precursor for CFA synthesis. It is also important to note that cfa7 and cfa8 are coupled translationally (20). The protein product of cfa9 showed relatedness to TEs involved in the synthesis of gramicidin, tyrocidine, and tylosin (20). Analysis of a cfa9 mutant indicated that this gene is dispensable for CFA and COR production but may increase the release of enzyme-bound products from the COR pathway (20).

Precursor feeding studies with 13C-labeled substrates demonstrated that CFA is a novel polyketide synthesized from C-2 and C-3 of pyruvate, three acetate units, and one butyrate unit (7). Further studies indicated that the pyruvate used for CFA biosynthesis is converted to α-ketoglutarate before incorporation into CFA (38). Since C-1 of pyruvate is not incorporated into CFA, C-1 of α-ketoglutarate must be lost at some stage in CFA biosynthesis. The most reasonable way for this loss to occur would be by decarboxylation of α-ketoglutarate before it is incorporated into CFA. Precedent for this transformation is provided by the occurrence of a thiamine-dependent α-ketoglutarate decarboxylase in the Gram-positive bacterium Leuconostoc oenos (39). The decarboxylation of α-ketoglutarate produces succinic semialdehyde, which presumably would need to be converted into a CoA ester before it could be used as the starter unit for polyketide assembly. The isolation of 2-[1-oxo-2-cyclopenten-2-ylmethyl]butanoic acid (CPE) from the fermentation broth of COR producers has been reported (40). This suggests that a cyclopentenone ring may be formed early in the biosynthetic pathway leading to CFA. These considerations allow the formulation of a working hypothesis for the role of most of the genes present in the CFA gene cluster (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Hypothetical scheme for the biosynthesis of CFA.

The hypothetical pathway begins with conversion of succinic semialdehyde into its CoA ester. This process might require one of the two ligase genes (Cfl or Cfa5) located in the CFA gene cluster or it might utilize a gene that maps outside of the COR biosynthetic region. Cfa1 (ACP), Cfa3 (KS), and Cfa4 then are postulated to create enzyme-bound 2-carboxy-3-hydroxycyclopentanone, which subsequently is dehydrated by Cfa2 (DH) to give enzyme-bound 2-carboxy-2-cyclopentenone (CPC). Cfa4 is assigned the role of a cyclase by default since none of the ORFs in the Cfl-Cfa5 region exhibits a cyclase signature motif. A noteworthy feature of this portion of the pathway is that the ACP, KS, and DH would be used nonreiteratively, in contrast to proteins involved in the type II bacterial PKSs and FASs. Furthermore, these proteins would catalyze the potential synthesis of a unique starter, possibly CPC. This sequence of events is reminiscent of the synthesis of norsoloronic acid, in which hexanoate is utilized as a starter unit (41).

The next stage in the pathway could proceed in one of two ways. The first would involve the release of free CPC from Cfa1 (ACP) with the aid of Cfa9 (TE), followed by conversion of CPC to its CoA ester using Cfl or Cfa5. The CoA ester of CPC then could be loaded onto Cfa6, which possesses a loading domain similar to that found at the beginning of DEBS 1. Alternatively, CPC could be transferred directly from Cfa1 to Cfa6. Cfa6 contains all of the domains required for the extension of CPC by a butyrate unit followed by complete reduction at the β-keto ester position to give enzyme-bound CPE. The presence of trace amounts of CPE in the fermentation broth of P. s. glycinea could be explained by the release of CPE from Cfa6 by the TE encoded by cfa9. Transfer of enzyme-bound CPE from Cfa6 to Cfa7 would allow completion of CFA biosynthesis. Cfa7 possesses all domains required for the extension of CPE by malonate followed by reduction and dehydration of the β-keto ester; it also contains a C-terminal TE domain to unload free CFA. Cfa7 does not contain a region that can be assigned a cyclase function. The presence of enone functionality in CPE suggests that the formation of the six-membered ring of CFA probably occurs via a Michael addition rather than an aldol condensation. This, in turn, suggests that the KR and DH domains of Cfa7 may operate after the cyclization since the β-keto ester would be the preferred substrate for the Michael addition. The final stage in COR biosynthesis would involve the formation of an amide bond between CFA and CMA. It seems likely that this process is catalyzed by Cfl or Cfa5.

In summary, we have described an example of a polyketide biosynthetic pathway that requires both monofunctional and multifunctional PKS proteins and have presented a model for CFA and COR biosynthesis that correlates well with the enzymatic activities implied by sequence analysis. More detailed investigations of CFA biosynthesis using precursor incorporation experiments and assays of overproduced proteins are underway.

Acknowledgments

We kindly thank H. von Döhren for providing antisera to DEBS 2 and M. Ullrich for assistance with the immunoblotting experiments. C.B. acknowledges support from the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station and National Science Foundation Grants MCB-9603618 and MCB-9807774. R.P. acknowledges grant support from the National Science Foundation (MCB-9807774) and the Robert A. Welch Foundation (C-729).

Footnotes

    • ↵† V.R. and S.J. contributed equally to this paper, and both should be regarded as senior authors.

    • ↵§ To whom reprint requests should be addressed: e-mail: parry{at}ruf.rice.edu or cbender{at}okway.okstate.edu.

    • This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the Proceedings Office.

    • Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession no. AF098795).

    ABBREVIATIONS

    ACP,
    acyl carrier protein;
    AT,
    acyl transferase;
    CFA,
    coronafacic acid;
    CMA,
    coronamic acid;
    COR,
    coronatine;
    CPC,
    2-carboxy-2-cyclopentenone;
    CPE,
    2-[1-oxo-2-cyclopenten-2-ylmethyl]butanoic acid;
    DEBS,
    6-deoxyerythronolide B synthase;
    DH,
    dehydratase;
    ER,
    enoylreductase;
    FAS,
    fatty acid synthase;
    KR,
    ketoreductase;
    KS,
    ketosynthase;
    PKS,
    polyketide synthase;
    TE,
    thioesterase
    • Received August 20, 1998.
    • Copyright © 1998, The National Academy of Sciences

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Hopwood D A,
      2. Sherman D H
      (1990) Annu Rev Genet 24:37–66, pmid:2088174.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Donadio S,
      2. Katz L
      (1992) Gene 111:51–60, pmid:1547954.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Aparicio J F,
      2. Molnár I,
      3. Schwecke T,
      4. König A,
      5. Haydock S F,
      6. Khaw L E,
      7. Staunton J,
      8. Leadlay P F
      (1996) Gene 169:9–16, pmid:8635756.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Kakavas S J,
      2. Katz L,
      3. Stassi D
      (1997) J Bacteriol 179:7515–7522, pmid:9393718.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Hopwood D A
      (1997) Chem Rev 97:2465–2497, pmid:11851466.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. McDaniel R,
      2. Ebert-Khosla S,
      3. Hopwood D A,
      4. Khosla C
      (1993) Science 262:1546–1550, pmid:8248802.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Parry R J,
      2. Mhaskar S V,
      3. Lin M-T,
      4. Walker A E,
      5. Mafoti R
      (1994) Can J Chem 72:86–99.
      OpenUrl
    8. ↵
      1. Feline T C,
      2. Jones R B,
      3. Mellows G,
      4. Phillips L
      (1977) J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:309–318.
      OpenUrl
    9. ↵
      1. Cuppels D A,
      2. Howell C R,
      3. Stipanovic R D,
      4. Stoessl A,
      5. Stothers J B
      (1986) Z Naturforsch 41:532–536.
      OpenUrl
    10. ↵
      1. Shanahan P,
      2. Glennon J D,
      3. Crowley J J,
      4. Donnelly D F,
      5. O’Gara F
      (1993) Anal Chim Acta 272:271–277.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    11. ↵
      1. Ichihara A,
      2. Shiraishi K,
      3. Sato H,
      4. Sakamura S,
      5. Nishiyama K,
      6. Sakai R,
      7. Furusaki A,
      8. Matsumoto T
      (1977) J Am Chem Soc 99:636–637.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    12. ↵
      1. Bender C L,
      2. Palmer D,
      3. Peñaloza-Vázquez A,
      4. Rangaswamy V,
      5. Ullrich M
      (1996) Arch Microbiol 166:71–75.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    13. ↵
      1. Weiler E W,
      2. Kutchan T M,
      3. Gorba T,
      4. Brodschelm W,
      5. Niesel U,
      6. Bublitz F
      (1994) FEBS Lett 345:9–13, pmid:8194607.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Budde I P,
      2. Rohde B H,
      3. Bender C L,
      4. Ullrich M S
      (1998) J Bacteriol 180:1360–1367, pmid:9515901.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Ullrich M,
      2. Bender C L
      (1994) J Bacteriol 176:7574–7586, pmid:8002582.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      1. Ullrich M,
      2. Peñaloza-Vázquez A,
      3. Bailey A M,
      4. Bender C L
      (1995) J Bacteriol 177:6160–6169, pmid:7592381.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Nowak-Thompson B,
      2. Gould S J,
      3. Loper J E
      (1997) Gene 204:17–24, pmid:9434161.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Liyanage H,
      2. Penfold C,
      3. Turner J,
      4. Bender C L
      (1995) Gene 153:17–23, pmid:7883180.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Penfold C N,
      2. Bender C L,
      3. Turner J G
      (1996) Gene 183:167–173, pmid:8996103.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Rangaswamy V,
      2. Mitchell R,
      3. Ullrich M,
      4. Bender C L
      (1998) J Bacteriol 180:3330–3338, pmid:9642184.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. King E O,
      2. Ward M K,
      3. Raney D E
      (1954) J Lab Clin Med 44:301–307, pmid:13184240.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Keane P J,
      2. Kerr A,
      3. New P B
      (1970) Aust J Biol Sci 23:585–595.
      OpenUrl
    23. ↵
      1. Ullrich M,
      2. Guenzi A C,
      3. Mitchell R E,
      4. Bender C L
      (1994) Appl Environ Microbiol 60:2890–2897, pmid:16349356.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Bender C L,
      2. Liyanage H,
      3. Palmer D,
      4. Ullrich M,
      5. Young S,
      6. Mitchell R
      (1993) Gene 133:31–38, pmid:8224892.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Young S A,
      2. Park S K,
      3. Rodgers C,
      4. Mitchell R E,
      5. Bender C L
      (1992) J Bacteriol 174:1837–1843, pmid:1548231.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    25. ↵
      1. Sambrook J,
      2. Fritsch E F,
      3. Maniatis T
      (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY), 2nd Ed..
    26. ↵
      1. Norrander J,
      2. Kempe T,
      3. Messing J
      (1983) Gene 26:101–106, pmid:6323249.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Altschul S F,
      2. Gish W,
      3. Miller W,
      4. Myers E W,
      5. Lipman D J
      (1990) J Mol Biol 215:403–410, pmid:2231712.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Pearson W R,
      2. Lipman D J
      (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:2444–2448, pmid:3162770.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      1. Palmer D A,
      2. Bender C L
      (1993) Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1619–1626, pmid:16348941.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      1. Peñaloza-Vázquez A,
      2. Rangaswamy V,
      3. Bailey A M,
      4. Bender C L
      (1996) Mol Plant–Microbe Interact 9:637–641, pmid:8810079.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Caffrey P,
      2. Bevitt D J,
      3. Staunton J,
      4. Leadlay P F
      (1992) FEBS Lett 304:225–228, pmid:1618327.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Bevitt D J,
      2. Cortes J,
      3. Haydock S F,
      4. Leadlay P F
      (1992) Eur J Biochem 204:39–49, pmid:1740151.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Haydock S F,
      2. Aparacio J F,
      3. Molnár I,
      4. Schwecke T,
      5. Khaw L E,
      6. König A,
      7. Marsden A F A,
      8. Galloway I S,
      9. Staunton J,
      10. Leadlay P F
      (1995) FEBS Lett 374:246–248, pmid:7589545.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Liyanage H,
      2. Palmer D A,
      3. Ullrich M,
      4. Bender C L
      (1995) Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3843–3848, pmid:8526495.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. ↵
      1. Gandecha A R,
      2. Large S L,
      3. Cundliffe E
      (1997) Gene 184:197–203, pmid:9031628.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Stassi D L,
      2. Kakavas S J,
      3. Reynolds K A,
      4. Gunawardana G,
      5. Swanson S,
      6. Zeidner D,
      7. Jackson M,
      8. Liu H,
      9. Buko A,
      10. Katz L
      (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:7305–7309, pmid:9636144.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    37. ↵
      1. Parry R J,
      2. Jiralerspong S,
      3. Mhaskar S,
      4. Alemany L,
      5. Willcott R
      (1996) J Am Chem Soc 118:703–704.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    38. ↵
      1. Kapol R,
      2. Radler F
      (1990) J Gen Microbiol 136:1497–1499.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Mitchell R E,
      2. Young H,
      3. Liddell M J
      (1995) Tetrahedron Lett 36:3237–3240.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    40. ↵
      1. Minto R E,
      2. Townsend C A
      (1997) Chem Rev 97:2537–2555, pmid:11851470.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Biosynthesis of the Pseudomonas polyketide coronafacic acid requires monofunctional and multifunctional polyketide synthase proteins
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    Citation Tools
    Biosynthesis of the Pseudomonas polyketide coronafacic acid requires monofunctional and multifunctional polyketide synthase proteins
    Vidhya Rangaswamy, Sao Jiralerspong, Ronald Parry, Carol L. Bender
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 1998, 95 (26) 15469-15474; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15469

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Biosynthesis of the Pseudomonas polyketide coronafacic acid requires monofunctional and multifunctional polyketide synthase proteins
    Vidhya Rangaswamy, Sao Jiralerspong, Ronald Parry, Carol L. Bender
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 1998, 95 (26) 15469-15474; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15469
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (49)
    Current Issue

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
      • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • ABBREVIATIONS
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Modulating the body's networks could become mainstream therapy for many health issues. Image credit: The Feinstein Institutes for Medicine Research.
    Core Concept: The rise of bioelectric medicine sparks interest among researchers, patients, and industry
    Modulating the body's networks could become mainstream therapy for many health issues.
    Image credit: The Feinstein Institutes for Medicine Research.
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans. Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Human heart evolved for endurance
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans.
    Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation. Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Viscoelastic fluids and wildfire prevention
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation.
    Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate. Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    Climate change and desert bird collapse
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate.
    Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He. Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.
    Featured QnAs
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He
    Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Teaching Resources
    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490