Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Postexposure vaccination massively increases the prevalence of γ-herpesvirus-specific CD8+ T cells but confers minimal survival advantage on CD4-deficient mice

Gabrielle T. Belz, Philip G. Stevenson, Maria R. Castrucci, John D. Altman, and Peter C. Doherty
PNAS March 14, 2000 97 (6) 2725-2730; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.040575197
Gabrielle T. Belz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip G. Stevenson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria R. Castrucci
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. Altman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Doherty
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Contributed by Peter C. Doherty

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mice that lack CD4+ T cells remain clinically normal for more than 60 days after respiratory challenge with the murine γ-herpesvirus 68 (γHV-68), then develop symptoms of a progressive wasting disease. The γHV-68-specific CD8+ T cells that persist in these I-Ab−/− mice are unable to prevent continued, but relatively low level, virus replication. Postexposure challenge with recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing γHV-68 lytic cycle epitopes massively increased the magnitude of the γHV-68-specific CD8+ population detectable by staining with tetrameric complexes of MHC class I glycoprotein + peptide, or by interferon-γ production subsequent to in vitro restimulation with peptide. The boosting effect was comparable for γHV-68-infected I-Ab−/− and I-Ab+/+ mice within 7 days of challenge, and took more than 110 days to return to prevaccination levels in the I-Ab+/+ controls. Although the life-span of the I-Ab−/− mice was significantly increased, there was no effect on long-term survival. A further boost with a recombinant influenza A virus failed to improve the situation. Onset of weight loss was associated with a decline in γHV-68-specific CD8+ T cell numbers, though it is not clear whether this was a cause or an effect of the underlying pathology. Even very high levels of virus-specific CD8+ T cells thus provide only transient protection against the uniformly lethal consequences of γHV-68 infection under conditions of CD4+ T cell deficiency.

The murine γ-herpesvirus 68 (γHV-68) is related (1, 2) both to Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and to human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8). These three γHVs are characterized by the establishment of life-long latency in B lymphocytes, subsequent to (at least for γHV-68 and EBV) a transient phase of lytic infection in the oropharynx and respiratory epithelium. Increased levels of γHV replication and tumorigenesis (EBV and HHV-8) are common consequences (3) of AIDS induced by HIV. It is far from clear whether the escape of these persistent γHVs from immune control in AIDS patients is a direct reflection of the compromised CD4+ T cell response (4–6), or is because of the subsequent decline in virus-specific CD8+ T cell numbers.

Mice that lack CD4+ T cells as a consequence of homozygous disruption of the H2-IAb gene (I-Ab−/−) remain healthy for 2–3 mo after respiratory challenge with γHV-68, then develop symptoms of chronic wasting disease (7–9). Unlike the situation for congenic I-Ab+/+ mice, the γHV-68 lytic phase in lung epithelium is never completely controlled. Apparently, both CD4+ and CD8+ effectors are important, with the CD4+ set operating by means of γ-interferon (IFN-γ) production (9) and the CD8+ T cells by perforin/granzyme or Fas/Fas ligand-mediated cytotoxicity (10). Virus-specific CD8+ T cells can still be detected at a level of 3–5% in the lymphoid tissue of clinically compromised I-Ab−/− mice (8), and, unlike the situation for persistent lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection in the absence of CD4+ T cells (11), these lymphocytes are functional in the sense that they can produce IFN-γ after in vitro stimulation with a high dose of the cognate peptide.

Immunizing naive I-Ab+/+ mice by a prime and boost protocol with recombinant vaccinia (vacc) and influenza virus vectors expressing a prominent, lytic phase γHV-68 peptide generated massive numbers of virus-specific CD8+ T cells (12). The greatly enhanced response following γHV-68 challenge of these selectively primed mice controlled virus replication in the respiratory tract but had little effect on the establishment of latency. We ask here whether vaccinating after the establishment of γHV-68 will limit the extent of reactivation to lytic infection in I-Ab−/− mice and thus prevent the late-onset wasting disease. Such an approach of this type might be thought useful for minimizing γHV recrudescence and tumorigenesis in AIDS patients. There are some indications that postexposure boosting with HIV vaccines can improve prognosis (13), but this possibility has not been addressed for the intercurrent infections that often cause mortality in AIDS patients.

Materials and Methods

Mice and Sampling.

Female C57BL/6J (B6, I-Ab+/+) mice (The Jackson Laboratory), and MHC class II-deficient (I-Ab−/−) mice were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis, TN). The mice were anesthetized with Avertin and infected intranasally (i.n.) with 600 plaque-forming units (pfu) of γHV-68 at 8–12 wk of age (7). Lymphocyte populations were obtained from anesthetized, exsanguinated mice by peritoneal lavage (PEL), bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), or by disruption of the spleen. The lungs were removed, homogenized, and freeze-thawed for virus titration.

Recombinant Viruses Expressing γHV-68 Epitopes.

Oligonucleotides encoding (14) AGPHNDMEI (p56) or NTSINFVKI (p79 plus the NH2-terminal flanking asparagine) were expressed (15, 16) in vaccinia viruses as described (12). Mice were infected i.p. with 3 × 107 pfu of vacc-p56 or vacc-p79, or with a control vaccinia recombinant (vacc-LCMVb) that expresses an H-2Db-restricted LCMV nucleoprotein (NP) peptide (17). The recombinant WSN-p56 influenza virus (12) was generated by reverse genetics (18, 19) and plaque-purified on MDCK cells. Influenza A/WSN with the LCMV NP H-2Ld epitope (WSN-LCMVd) inserted (19) into the neuraminidase stalk was used as an irrelevant control. Mice were infected i.p. with 5 × 105 pfu of WSN-p56 or WSN-LCMVd.

Virus Titration.

An established limiting dilution (LDA) technique (8, 12, 20, 21) utilized congenic (H-2b) embryonic fibroblasts (2214-CRL; American Type Culture Collection) seeded (104/well) overnight into 96-well plates. Dilutions (2- to 3-fold) of lung homogenate in DMEM + 0.1% BSA were added to 16 replicate wells. The monolayer cultures were maintained for 12–13 days in DMEM supplemented with penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), gentamicin (10 μg/ml), glutamine (2 mM), and 2.5% FCS (HyClone), then fixed in methanol, stained with Giemsa, and observed for cytopathic effects. Titers were determined by regression plot of the fraction of wells with no cytopathic effect vs. log10 dilution.

Virus titers in lymphoid tissue were determined similarly, except that dilutions of single cell suspensions were added to the monolayers without disruption, and the cultures were maintained for 17–18 days. This variant of the LDA protocol is considered to measure latency by assaying the extent of reactivation (22) to lytic infection (8, 20, 21).

Flow Cytometry.

Lymphocytes were washed in PBS/BSA (0.1%)/azide (0.01%) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature with tetrameric complexes (14, 23) of phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled H-2Db + p56 (p56Db) or H-2Kb + p56 (p79Kb), then stained on ice with a tricolor-conjugated mAb to CD8α (Caltag, Burlingame, CA). The cells were washed once after a 30-min incubation on ice, and analyzed (24) on a FACScan using cellquest software (Becton Dickinson). The CD8+ set was enriched magnetically (25) from splenic lymphocyte populations by first incubating with mAbs (PharMingen) to I-Ab (M5/114.15.2) and CD4 (GK1.5) mAb, followed by sheep anti-rat Ig and sheep anti-mouse Ig-coated magnetic beads (Dynal, Oslo). Those obtained by PEL or BAL were depleted of macrophages by adherence to plastic.

Pepγ Assay for Peptide-Specific CD8+ T Cells.

The CD8+ T cell populations were cultured for 5 h in RPMI supplemented with penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), glutamine (2 mM), FCS (10%), and 5 μg/ml Brefeldin A (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI), in the presence or absence of 1 μM of the p56 or p79 peptide (8, 14). The cells were then stained with the FITC-conjugated mAb to CD8α (PharMingen), fixed in 1% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.5% saponin, and stained with a PE-conjugated mAb to IFN-γ (PharMingen). The percent CD8+IFN-γ+ without peptide (<0.5%) was subtracted from the percent CD8+IFN-γ+ with peptide to give the percent specific CD8+ T cells.

Results

Postexposure Vaccination of I-Ab+/+ Mice.

Mice that had been infected i.n. 1 mo previously with 600 pfu of γHV-68 were given 3 × 107 pfu of vacc-p56, vacc-p79, or vacc-LCMVb i.p. and assayed 7 days later (12). This challenge with vaccinia recombinants expressing either the p56 or p79 γHV-68 peptides greatly increased the prevalence of CD8+ T cells specific for the cognate tetramer in splenic lymphocyte populations (Fig. 1 A and E), while the values for the alternate peptide (Fig. 1 B and D) were comparable to those detected in γHV-68-infected mice injected with the control vacc-LCMVb (Fig. 1 C and F). Enhanced frequencies were seen for the p56Db+ and p79Kb+ CD8+ sets in both the PEL and spleen, with broadly comparable values being recorded from both tetramer staining and the Pepγ assay (Table 1). The prevalence was higher in the PEL, presumably reflecting that the peritoneal cavity is the site of inflammatory pathology following i.p. infection (Table 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Virus-specific CD8+ T cells in spleen populations from γHV-68-infected I-Ab+/+ mice challenged with recombinant vaccinia viruses. The B6 mice were challenged i.p. with 3 × 107 pfu of the vacc-p56, vacc-p79, or vacc-LCMVb recombinants 1 mo after i.n. infection with 600 pfu of γHV-68. Spleen populations were enriched for the CD8+ set and stained with the p56Db (A–C) and p79Kb (D and E) tetramers. The results are for a representative animal from each group, with the percent values in the quadrants being for the total lymphocyte population. Cumulated data from three comparable experiments are presented in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

γHV-68-specific CD8+ T cells in the peritoneal cavity and spleen 7 days after i.p. challenge of HV-68-infected mice with recombinant vaccinia viruses

This single, high-dose challenge with the vacc-p56, vacc-p79, or vacc-LCMVb recombinants had no deleterious effect. All the mice remained clinically normal for at least 140 days (Fig. 2). The remarkable feature, when compared with the situation for pathogens that are readily eliminated, like the influenza A viruses (26), is that the p56- and p79-specific CD8+ T cell numbers in spleen remained at high levels for at least 70 days, and did not return to the relatively low frequencies detected normally in I-Ab+/+ mice persistently infected with γHV-68 (8, 14) for more than 100 days (Fig. 2). We have not yet developed an approach that allows the in vivo measurement of γHV-68 reactivation from latency in normal mice, but it does seem likely that there is continuing restimulation with these lytic-phase epitopes.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Persistence of p56- and p79-specific CD8+ T cells in boosted, γHV-68-infected I-Ab+/+ mice. The mice were infected i.n. with γHV-68 1 mo prior to i.p. challenge with the recombinant vaccinia viruses, as detailed in the Fig. 1 legend. Each data point shows the mean ± SE for three individuals. The titers of latent γHV-68 in the spleen were minimal for all groups.

Boosting γHV-68-Specific CD8+ T Cells in the I-Ab−/− Mice.

Challenging the γHV-68-infected, CD4+ T cell-deficient I-Ab−/− mice with vacc-p56 and vacc-p79 also led to substantial, prolonged increases in prevalence for the p56Db- and p79Kb-specific sets (Fig. 3). As with the response to γHV-68 alone (8, 14), this expansion of virus-specific CD8+ T cells induced by a single, large dose of a recombinant vaccinia virus (Fig. 3) seemed to be independent of CD4+ T help for both the initial clonal burst and for the maintenance of high-frequency p56Db- or p79Kb-reactive populations through at least the subsequent 60 days. Exposure to these vaccinia viruses did not compromise the γHV-68-infected I-Ab−/− mice in any obvious way, and they remained healthy for at least an additional month.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

The γHV-68-specific CD8+ T cell responses following secondary challenge of persistently infected I-Ab−/− mice. The mice were infected with γHV-68, then challenged with the vacc-p56, vaccp79, and vacc-LCMVb recombinants, as described in the Fig. 1 legend. The results are given as mean ± SE for virus-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleens of three mice. Those sampled on day 63 after vaccinia (day 91 after γHV-68) were clinically affected and provide some of the virus titer results presented in Table 2.

The increase in p56Db-specific CD8+ T cell frequency in the γHV-68-infected I-Ab−/− mice was associated with a decrease (relative to the vacc-LCMVb control) in the extent of virus latency in the spleen, but the effect was small and the titers of lytic virus in the lung were not significantly modified (Table 2). The greater numbers of p79Kb-specific cells did not lead to any improvement in the control of persistent, active γHV-68 infection in these I-Ab−/− mice. Though the challenge with vacc-p56 (but not vacc-p79) was associated with a significant increase in survival time (Fig. 4), the virus titration studies (Table 2) were not pursued further because all mice eventually succumbed to the γHV-68-induced wasting disease.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

γHV-68 titers in persistently infected I-Ab−/− mice given recombinant vaccinia viruses 63 days previously

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

Survival profiles for γHV-68-infected I-Ab−/− mice boosted with recombinant vaccinia viruses. The I-Ab−/− mice were infected i.n. with γHV-68 and boosted with the recombinant vaccinia viruses, as described in the Fig. 1 legend. The survival profiles were then determined for groups of 20 mice, with any animals that were severely affected being terminated. Vaccinia virus infection alone did not cause any mortality in I-Ab−/− mice, and the pattern of illness in the vacc-LCMVb group was indistinguishable from that for other controls given γHV-68 alone (data not shown). The mice given vacc-p56 lived significantly longer (P = 0.0003 by logrank test) than those injected with vacc-p79 or vacc-LCMVb.

Virus isolates were cloned from the persistently infected, boosted I-Ab−/− mice to determine whether the continued, high prevalence of γHV-68-specific CD8+ T cells had selected for escape mutants (Table 3). Normal B6 mice were infected i.n. with at least 15 isolates from each of the vacc-LCMVb, vacc-p56, and vacc-p79 groups, and individual BAL samples were assayed 13 days later for the presence of CD8+p56Db+ and CD8+p79Kb+ lymphocytes. No significant differences were found for the γHV-68 isolates recovered from persistently infected I-Ab−/− mice that had been challenged i.p. with vacc-LCMVb, vacc-p56, or vacc-p79 (Table 3). Thus, though the six I-Ab−/− mice sampled from each group all showed some degree of clinical impairment, there was no indication that the development of symptoms reflected the emergence of viral variants that were no longer recognized by the CD8+ effectors.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Capacity of reisolated virus to generate a γHV-68-specific CD8+ T cell response

Disease Status and γHV-68-Specific CD8+ T Cell Numbers.

We then asked whether the limited protection conferred by postexposure vaccination of γHV-68-infected I-Ab−/− mice (Fig. 4) could be enhanced by i.p. boosting with both vacc-p56 and vacc-p79, followed by i.p. challenge with WSN-p56 (Table 4). However, unlike the situation described previously for vacc-p56-primed mice that had not yet encountered γHV-68 (12), the further stimulation with WSN-p56 had no additional effect on virus-specific CD8+ T cell numbers (compare Fig. 3 and Table 4) and the mice still developed severe symptoms. Evidence of clinical impairment was associated with a slight, but consistent increase in virus-titers, and a fall in the prevalence of the CD8+p56Db+ set to the levels found in γHV-68-infected I-Ab−/− mice that had not been boosted (see footnote to Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Comparison of apparently normal and clinically compromised γHV-68-infected I-Ab−/− mice that had been boosted with vacc-p79, vacc-p56, and WSN-p56

Discussion

The I-Ab−/− mice lack both CD4+ T cells and a high-quality, class-switched antibody response (27). The fact that persistently infected I-Ab+/+ mice remain clinically normal following in vivo mAb depletion of the CD4+ and CD8+ subsets is considered to reflect protection mediated by circulating antibody (28). The same experiment with convalescent Ig−/− μMT mice led to increased γHV-68 latency in the spleen, greater evidence of replicative infection in the respiratory tract, and 30% mortality within 21 days of commencing the mAb treatment (9). A prominent site of γHV-68 latency in the μMT mice is the macrophage (21).

Persistently infected μMT mice seem to remain relatively normal (20, 29), whereas the I-Ab−/− mice eventually die (7). The presence of B lymphocytes means that the pool of latently infected cells will be larger in the I-Ab−/− mice, which also lack IFN-γ-producing CD4+ effectors (9, 30, 31). The CD8+ T cells have the capacity to secrete IFN-γ (14), but either the amount made is insufficient or their targeting to MHC class I glycoprotein + peptide does not allow them to fulfill the same role as the MHC class II-restricted CD4+ subset. Recent experiments with a different viral model have shown that cytokine production by the CD8+ set is transient, and ceases rapidly after dissociation between the T cell receptor and the targeted MHC class I glycoprotein (32). At the time that the I-Ab−/− mice are wasting, there are still significant numbers (at least 3–5% of the CD8+ set) of virus-specific, IFN-γ competent T cells in the lymphoid tissue (8). The idea that the total amount of IFN-γ produced may be important could explain why the massive expansion of the virus-specific CD8+ population mice induced by the vacc-p56 recombinant in the γHV-68-infected led to some increase in survival time.

The continued (but relatively low level) reactivation to lytic infection in the I-Ab−/− mice presumably results in the cumulative development of virus-induced cytopathology, leading to the progressive dysfunction of one or more key organs. The partial control by CD8+ CTL is clearly enhanced by increasing the availability of these effectors, but the numbers eventually fall and a threshold is reached where the extent of irreversible damage ensures the development of symptoms. The mice do not obviously die from pneumonitis or from the thickening of the large arteries that has been described for IFN-γ receptor−/− mice given a large dose of γHV-68 by the i.p. route (31), though they can develop such vascular lesions. Despite the fact that γHV-68 has been shown to replicate in a variety of anatomical sites, including the adrenals (7), the nature of the underlying pathology is not clearly understood.

Much has been written about the possible role of persisting antigen in the long-term maintenance of virus-specific CD8+ T cells (33–35). Previous comparison of γHV-68-infected I-Ab+/+ and I-Ab−/− mice established that the higher virus load in the I-Ab−/− group was indeed associated with the continued presence of more CD8+ p56Db-specific T cells in the lymphoid tissue, with this population still constituting 3–4% of the total CD8+ pool (8). It is indeed remarkable that postexposure challenge of either the I-Ab+/+ or I-Ab−/− mice with a vacc-p56 or vacc-p79 recombinant can increase the prevalence of the respective virus-specific CD8+ set to >10% in the very long term. These vaccinia recombinants tend to cause a fairly limited infectious process, which is generally controlled within 5–7 days (36).

The perturbation in virus-specific CD8+ T cell numbers caused by giving a single dose of a recombinant vaccinia virus to persistently infected mice reinforces earlier impressions that epitope expression in cells infected with γHV-68 is in some sense suboptimal (37). Perhaps IFN-γ acts to enhance antigenicity (38), though the protective effect of IFN-γ is still apparent in mice depleted of CD8+ T cells (9). The HVs are known to use a variety of strategies to interfere with peptide presentation by MHC class I glycoproteins (39, 40), but nothing is yet known about γHV-68 in this regard.

The recruitment of CD8+ T cells may also be modified by the viral M3 protein, which has been shown recently to have chemokine binding properties (41). It is likely that these large complex viruses have evolved a spectrum of mechanisms that allow persistence in the face of a continuing host response (42, 43), many of which have yet to be defined. The present analysis shows that the lethal consequences of removing one key element of immunity is not readily reversed by enhancing another.

Acknowledgments

We thank Joe Miller for technical help and Vicki Henderson for assistance with the manuscript. These experiments were supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI29579 and CA21765, and The American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities. G.T.B. is a C.J. Martin Fellow of the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Fellowship regkey 977 309).

Footnotes

    • ↵¶ To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: peter.doherty{at}stjude.org.

    • Article published online before print: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.040575197.

    • Article and publication date are at www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.040575197

    Abbreviations

    γHV-68,
    γ-herpesvirus 68;
    BAL,
    bronchoalveolar lavage;
    EBV,
    Epstein–Barr virus;
    HHV-8,
    human herpesvirus 8;
    IFN-γ,
    γ-interferon;
    i.n.,
    intranasal;
    LCMV,
    lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus;
    NP,
    nucleoprotein;
    PEL,
    peritoneal exudate lymphocytes;
    vacc,
    recombinant vaccinia virus;
    pfu,
    plaque-forming unit;
    LDA,
    limiting dilution assay;
    PE,
    phycoerythrin
    • Accepted December 27, 1999.
    • Copyright © 2000, The National Academy of Sciences
    View Abstract

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Efstathiou S,
      2. Ho Y M,
      3. Hall S,
      4. Styles C J,
      5. Scott S D,
      6. Gompels U A
      (1990) J Gen Virol 71:1365–1372, pmid:2161903.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. Virgin H W,
      2. Latreille P,
      3. Wamsley P,
      4. Hallsworth K,
      5. Weck K E,
      6. Dal C A,
      7. Speck S H
      (1997) J Virol 71:5894–5904, pmid:9223479.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Mueller N
      (1999) J Acquired Immune Defic Syndr 21, Suppl. 1:S5–S10, pmid:10430211.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Haynes B F,
      2. Pantaleo G,
      3. Fauci A S
      (1996) Science 271:324–328, pmid:8553066.
      OpenUrlAbstract
      1. Jassoy C,
      2. Walker B D
      (1997) Springer Semin Immunopathol 18:341–354, pmid:9089953.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Rosenberg E S,
      2. Billingsley J M,
      3. Caliendo A M,
      4. Boswell S L,
      5. Sax P E,
      6. Kalams S A,
      7. Walker B D
      (1997) Science 278:1447–1450, pmid:9367954.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Cardin R D,
      2. Brooks J W,
      3. Sarawar S R,
      4. Doherty P C
      (1996) J Exp Med 184:863–871, pmid:9064346.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Stevenson P G,
      2. Belz G T,
      3. Altman J D,
      4. Doherty P C
      (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15565–15570, pmid:9861009.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Christensen J P,
      2. Cardin R D,
      3. Branum K C,
      4. Doherty P C
      (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5135–5140, pmid:10220431.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Doherty P C,
      2. Topham D J,
      3. Tripp R A,
      4. Cardin R D,
      5. Brooks J W,
      6. Stevenson P G
      (1997) Immunol Rev 159:105–117, pmid:9416506.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Zajac A J,
      2. Blattman J N,
      3. Murali-Krishna K,
      4. Sourdive D J,
      5. Suresh M,
      6. Altman J D,
      7. Ahmed R
      (1998) J Exp Med 188:2205–2213, pmid:9858507.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Stevenson P G,
      2. Belz G T,
      3. Castrucci M R,
      4. Altman J D,
      5. Doherty P C
      (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9281–9286, pmid:10430934.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Balter M
      (1999) Science 286:1470–1471, pmid:10610544.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      1. Stevenson P G,
      2. Belz G T,
      3. Altman J D,
      4. Doherty P C
      (1999) Eur J Immunol 29:1059–1067, pmid:10229071.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Restifo N P,
      2. Bacik I,
      3. Irvine K R,
      4. Yewdell J W,
      5. McCabe B J,
      6. Anderson R W,
      7. Eisenlohr L C,
      8. Rosenberg S A,
      9. Bennink J R
      (1995) J Immunol 154:4414–4422, pmid:7722298.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    15. ↵
      1. Mackett M,
      2. Smith G L,
      3. Moss B
      (1984) J Virol 49:857–864, pmid:6321770.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    16. ↵
      1. Yanagi Y,
      2. Tishon A,
      3. Lewicki H,
      4. Cubitt B A,
      5. Oldstone M B
      (1992) J Virol 66:2527–2531, pmid:1372370.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Enami M,
      2. Luytjes W,
      3. Krystal M,
      4. Palese P
      (1990) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:3802–3805, pmid:2339122.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Castrucci M R,
      2. Hou S,
      3. Doherty P C,
      4. Kawaoka Y
      (1994) J Virol 68:3486–3490, pmid:7514676.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Weck K E,
      2. Barkon M L,
      3. Yoo L I,
      4. Speck S H,
      5. Virgin H W
      (1996) J Virol 70:6775–6780, pmid:8794315.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. ↵
      1. Weck K E,
      2. Kim S S,
      3. Virgin H I,
      4. Speck S H
      (1999) J Virol 73:3273–3283, pmid:10074181.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. Sunil-Chandra N P,
      2. Efstathiou S,
      3. Nash A A
      (1992) J Gen Virol 73:3275–3279, pmid:1469366.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      1. Altman J D,
      2. Moss P A H,
      3. Goulder P J R,
      4. Barouch D H,
      5. McHeyzer-Williams M G,
      6. Bell J I,
      7. McMichael A J,
      8. Davis M M
      (1996) Science 274:94–96, pmid:8810254.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      1. Tripp R A,
      2. Hou S,
      3. Doherty P C
      (1995) J Immunol 154:5870–5875, pmid:7538535.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    24. ↵
      1. Hou S,
      2. Hyland L,
      3. Ryan K W,
      4. Portner A,
      5. Doherty P C
      (1994) Nature (London) 369:652–654, pmid:7516039.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Flynn K J,
      2. Riberdy J M,
      3. Christensen J P,
      4. Altman J D,
      5. Doherty P C
      (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8597–8602, pmid:10411921.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Stevenson P G,
      2. Doherty P C
      (1999) J Virol 73:1075–1079, pmid:9882308.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Stevenson P G,
      2. Cardin R D,
      3. Christensen J P,
      4. Doherty P C
      (1999) J Gen Virol 80:477–483, pmid:10073710.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    28. ↵
      1. Usherwood E J,
      2. Stewart J P,
      3. Robertson K,
      4. Allen D J,
      5. Nash A A
      (1996) J Gen Virol 77:2819–2825, pmid:8922476.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      1. Dutia B M,
      2. Clarke C J,
      3. Allen D J,
      4. Nash A A
      (1997) J Virol 71:4278–4283, pmid:9151815.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      1. Weck K E,
      2. Dal Canto A J,
      3. Gould J D,
      4. O'Guin A K,
      5. Roth K A,
      6. Saffitz J E,
      7. Speck S H,
      8. Virgin H W
      (1997) Nat Med 3:1346–1353, pmid:9396604.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Slifka M K,
      2. Rodriguez F,
      3. Whitton J L
      (1999) Nature (London) 401:76–79, pmid:10485708.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    32. ↵
      1. Zinkernagel R M,
      2. Bachmann M F,
      3. Kundig T M,
      4. Oehen S,
      5. Pirchet H,
      6. Hengartner H
      (1996) Annu Rev Immunol 14:333–367, pmid:8717518.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Doherty P C,
      2. Topham D J,
      3. Tripp R A
      (1996) Immunol Rev 150:23–44, pmid:8782700.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Ahmed R,
      2. Gray D
      (1996) Science 272:54–60, pmid:8600537.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    34. ↵
      1. Rolph M S,
      2. Ramshaw I A
      (1997) Curr Opin Immunol 9:517–524, pmid:9287173.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Stevenson P G,
      2. Doherty P C
      (1998) J Virol 72:943–949, pmid:9444986.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    36. ↵
      1. Hengel H,
      2. Esslinger C,
      3. Pool J,
      4. Goulmy E,
      5. Koszinowski U H
      (1995) J Gen Virol 76:2987–2997, pmid:8847504.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    37. ↵
      1. Johnson D C,
      2. Hill A B
      (1998) Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 232:149–177, pmid:9557398.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    38. ↵
      1. Ploegh H L
      (1998) Science 280:248–253, pmid:9535648.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Parry C M,
      2. Simas J P,
      3. Smith V P,
      4. Stewart C A,
      5. Minson A C,
      6. Efstathiou S,
      7. Alcami A
      (2000) J Exp Med 191:573–578, pmid:10662803.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    40. ↵
      1. Spriggs M K
      (1996) Annu Rev Immunol 14:101–130, pmid:8717509.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    41. ↵
      1. Strockbine L D,
      2. Cohen J I,
      3. Farrah T,
      4. Lyman S D,
      5. Wagener F,
      6. DuBose R F,
      7. Armitage R J,
      8. Spriggs M K
      (1998) J Virol 75:4015–4021.
      OpenUrl
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Postexposure vaccination massively increases the prevalence of γ-herpesvirus-specific CD8+ T cells but confers minimal survival advantage on CD4-deficient mice
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Postexposure vaccination massively increases the prevalence of γ-herpesvirus-specific CD8+ T cells but confers minimal survival advantage on CD4-deficient mice
    Gabrielle T. Belz, Philip G. Stevenson, Maria R. Castrucci, John D. Altman, Peter C. Doherty
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2000, 97 (6) 2725-2730; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.040575197

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Postexposure vaccination massively increases the prevalence of γ-herpesvirus-specific CD8+ T cells but confers minimal survival advantage on CD4-deficient mice
    Gabrielle T. Belz, Philip G. Stevenson, Maria R. Castrucci, John D. Altman, Peter C. Doherty
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2000, 97 (6) 2725-2730; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.040575197
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 97 (6)
    Table of Contents

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Materials and Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • Abbreviations
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
    Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
    Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
    Scientist looking at an electronic tablet
    Opinion: Standardizing gene product nomenclature—a call to action
    Biomedical communities and journals need to standardize nomenclature of gene products to enhance accuracy in scientific and public communication.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/greenbutterfly.
    One red and one yellow modeled protein structures
    Journal Club: Study reveals evolutionary origins of fold-switching protein
    Shapeshifting designs could have wide-ranging pharmaceutical and biomedical applications in coming years.
    Image credit: Acacia Dishman/Medical College of Wisconsin.
    White and blue bird
    Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
    Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
    Listen
    Past PodcastsSubscribe
    Goats standing in a pin
    Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
    CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
    Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science
    • Teaching Resources

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Librarians
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490