Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

A genomic island in Pseudomonas aeruginosa carries the determinants of flagellin glycosylation

Shiwani K. Arora, Mahalaxmi Bangera, Stephen Lory, and Reuben Ramphal
PNAS July 31, 2001 98 (16) 9342-9347; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.161249198
Shiwani K. Arora
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahalaxmi Bangera
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Lory
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reuben Ramphal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by John J. Mekalanos, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and approved June 12, 2001 (received for review May 18, 2001)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Protein glycosylation has been long recognized as an important posttranslational modification process in eukaryotic cells. Glycoproteins, predominantly secreted or surface localized, have also been identified in bacteria. We have identified a cluster of 14 genes, encoding the determinants of the flagellin glycosylation machinery in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAK, which we called the flagellin glycosylation island. Flagellin glycosylation can be detected only in bacteria expressing the a-type flagellin sequence variants, and the survey of 30 P. aeruginosa isolates revealed coinheritance of the a-type flagellin genes with at least one of the flagellin glycosylation island genes. Expression of the b-type flagellin in PAK, an a-type strain carrying the glycosylation island, did not lead to glycosylation of the b-type flagellin of PAO1, suggesting that flagellins expressed by b-type bacteria not only lack the glycosylation island, they cannot serve as substrates for glycosylation. Providing the entire glycosylation island of PAK, including its a-type flagellin in a flagellin mutant of a b-type strain, results in glycosylation of the heterologous flagellin. These results suggest that some or all of the 14 genes on the glycosylation island are the genes that are missing from strain PAO1 to allow glycosylation of an appropriate flagellin. Inactivation of either one of the two flanking genes present on this island abolished flagellin glycosylation. Based on the limited homologies of these gene products with enzymes involved in glycosylation, we propose that the island encodes similar proteins involved in synthesis, activation, or polymerization of sugars that are necessary for flagellin glycosylation.

Protein glycosylation in prokaryotic organisms is a relatively uncommon posttranslation modification process, first described in Archea, where the S layer proteins were shown to contain covalently attached sugars (1). Several bacterial proteins are now known to undergo glycosylation, including potential virulence factors of pathogenic bacteria, such as the pilins of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (2), Neisseria meningitidis (3), and one strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4), an adhesin of Chlamydia (5), a surface-exposed immunodominant protein of two Ehrlichia species (6), and the TiBA adhesin of ETEC (7). Moreover, the subunits of the flagellar filaments in a variety of bacterial species are similarly modified, including P. aeruginosa (8), Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni (9), Treponema pallidum (10), Borrelia burgdorferi (11), Helicobacter felis (12), Caulobacter crescentus (13), and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (14). However, glycosylation is not restricted to proteins found within bacterial surface appendages. A broad range of glycoproteins has been identified in C. jejuni (15) and in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (16), indicating that glycosylation in bacteria may be as common as it is in higher cells.

The genetic basis of glycosylation of selected bacterial proteins has been only recently approached. Glycosylation of meningococcal pilin requires the product of the pglA gene; although related to a number of glycosyltransferases, it is not involved in the biosynthesis of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (3). Similarly, the proteins of the general glycosylation system in C. jejuni (15) encoded by the pglA-G genes are involved in the modification of a number of proteins, including flagellin, and do not participate in the synthesis of LPS, despite their sequence similarity with the enzymes of LPS and capsule biosynthesis. Therefore, glycosylation of bacterial proteins represents a specific modification pathway and is not simply carried out as a secondary activity of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of polysaccharides or glycolipids. Moreover, bacterial glycosylation appears to resemble the analogous process in eukaryotic cells with asparagine, serine, and threonine residues serving as the acceptors for the first sugar on the protein (17, 18).

P. aeruginosa can be classified into two groups (a- and b-types) (19) on the basis of the expression of the flagellin protein of a specific primary amino acid sequence (20). The observed difference in the mobility of the flagellin protein from the strain PAK (a-type) from its predicted size by sequence (21) was assumed to be because of posttranslational modification. This conclusion was subsequently verified by Brimer and Montie (8), who showed that flagellins of the a-type but not b-type are glycosylated. The a-type flagellins showed variability in size as well as considerable sequence diversity in the central region (8). The deduced amino acid sequences predict sizes around 40–41 kDa, but these flagellins, when analyzed by SDS/PAGE, migrate with an apparent size of 45–52 kDa (8). Carbohydrates have been detected on three of four strains examined; however, the fourth strain also showed discrepant migration on SDS/PAGE. In contrast, the amino acid sequences of b-type flagellins show remarkable conservation. Eight b-type flagellin genes showed identical sizes and deduced amino acid sequences, and five strains showed single synonymous nucleotide substitutions (20). The migration of b-type flagellins on SDS gels is consistent with their deduced molecular masses, and glycosyl groups have not been detected on these proteins (8). Therefore, the absence of carbohydrates on the b-type flagellin may be because of the absence of the genetic determinants encoding the glycosylation machinery in these strains and/or because the b-type flagellins lack the amino acid sequences necessary for glycosylation.

The goal of this work was to elucidate the genetic basis for selective glycosylation by strains expressing a-type flagellin. Here, we describe the presence of a genomic island in P. aeruginosa strains expressing a-type flagellin, which was likely acquired by these strains through horizontal gene exchange. Sequence analysis of this island identified genes for several putative enzymes involved in glycosylation, and the role of two of these in flagellin modification was demonstrated after mutagenesis of the respective genes. Furthermore, by constructing strains that express the heterologous flagellins, and introduction of the entire glycosylation island into a b-type strain, we demonstrate that the failure of b-type strains to glycosylate their cognate flagellins is because of two factors: inability of the b-type flagellin to serve as a substrate and the absence of the glycosylation island-encoded genes in the b-type strains.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Cosmids, Plasmids, and Media.

P. aeruginosa strains PAK and PAO1 were used in this study. Escherichia coli strain DH5α was used as the host strain for clonings. The PAKfliC mutant (pilA∷Tcr, fliC∷Gmr) was described previously (22). The antibiotics used were as follows: for E. coli, ampicillin (200 μg/ml), tetracycline (25 μg/ml), and gentamicin (10 μg/ml); for P. aeruginosa, carbenicillin (300 μg/ml), tetracycline (100 μg/ml), and gentamicin (100 μg/ml).

PCR Amplification and Primers.

PCR was used to obtain specific amplification products. Restriction enzyme recognition sites were added at the ends of primers to facilitate subsequent cloning of the PCR products if desired. Primer RER83 (with a HindIII site) was used as the 5′ primer, and primer RER84 (with a SstI site) was used as the 3′ primer to amplify a 2.3-kb segment of DNA carrying an incomplete orfN gene from P. aeruginosa PAK. Primers RER69 (with a HindIII site) and RER70 (with a SstI site) were used for the amplification of the fliC gene from PAO1 DNA, and the product was used to engineer a mutation in this gene and to make the complementing plasmid. The distribution of the orfA gene in P. aeruginosa isolates was analyzed by PCR, by using primers for an internal sequence of orfA. The generation of a 555-bp product was assessed after agarose gel electrophoresis of an aliquot from the PCR.

DNA Sequencing.

Nucleotide sequence of a ≈23-kb DNA segment of P. aeruginosa PAK genome was determined by cosmid walking. The templates used for the sequencing reactions consisted of cosmids pRR194 (23) and cosmid D1, isolated from the same library by colony hybridization by using an orfA-specific DNA probe. Double-stranded sequences were aligned and assembled by using programs in the SEQUENCER software package (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI).

Plasmid and Mutant Strain Constructions.

A 2.3-kb insert, containing the PAK homologue of a gene annotated as rfbC (24) having N-terminal 526 aa missing, was cloned into the HindIII and SstI sites of pBluescript KS(+) to give pBS8384. This plasmid was linearized at the unique EcoRV site present in the PAK homologue of the rfbC gene (orfN), and a gentamicin resistance gene cassette excised from pUC7G was inserted at that site, leading to the construction of pBS8384G. This construct was used to generate a chromosomal mutation in the PAK orfN (rfbC) gene by marker exchange. A 3.2-kb PCR product with EcoRI/XhoI ends containing the orfA gene was first cloned into pBluescript, followed by deletion of 981 bp, which deleted 327 aa from orfA. A chromosomal deletion mutant of orfA was subsequently obtained by allelic exchange in PAK by using the counterselectable sacB marker. Construction of the plasmid pBS6970 with the PAO1 fliC gene was described previously (25). A 1.4-kb EcoRI/BamHI fragment containing the tetracycline resistance cassette was excised from pBSTet and was cloned into the EcoRI/BglII sites in the PAO1 fliC gene on pBS6970. The resulting plasmid pBS6970Tet was used to construct a tetracycline-resistant PAO1fliC mutant. The construct pBSTet was obtained by cloning a filled-in blunt-ended 1.4-kb EcoRI/AvaI fragment containing the tetracycline resistance gene into the SmaI site of pBluescript. Plasmid pDN186970 used for complementation of PAO1fliC was constructed by cloning the 2.5-kb HindIII/SstI fragment from pBS6970 into the broad host range cloning vector pDN18 (26). Plasmid pPT244 (21) containing the PAK fliC gene was used to complement the PAKfliC mutant. The plasmid used for the complementation of the PAK rfbC mutant, pMMB194H, was obtained by cloning an 8-kb HindIII fragment from the cosmid pRR194 (23) into the broad host range cloning vector pMMB67HE (27). This 8-kb HindIII insert contained the complete rfbC homolog and the fliC gene of strain PAK and ORFs L and M (See Fig. 1). Plasmid pSP329Gm10EH, used for the complementation of the PAKorfA mutant, was constructed by cloning a 10-kb EcoRI/HindIII fragment (excised from the cosmid D1) into the EcoRI/HindIII sites of the broad host range cloning vector pSP329Gm. This 10-kb insert carried orfA, a homolog of the E. coli vioA (28), as well as orfs B–J (see Fig. 1). Further addition of the 8-kb HindIII fragment into the unique HindIII site of pSP329Gm10EH gave rise to pSP329Gm10EH8, which harbors the whole cluster of putative glycosylation genes that was entirely absent from the b-type strain PAO1.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Genetic organization of the polymorphic chromosomal region of P. aeruginosa strains PAO1 and PAK involved in the biosynthesis and assembly of flagellar components. Indicated are segments of DNA that are inserted at specific locations within individual genomes, including a large segment of DNA (≈16 kb) containing a cluster of 14 ORFs that are associated with glycosylation of flagellin, present in PAK, and an apparent duplication of the fliS gene. The genome of PAO1 has a ≈6-kb DNA segment containing three genes of unknown function followed by PA1091, a homologue of the rfbC gene that is 35% identical to the PAK orfN.

SDS/PAGE and Western Blots.

SDS/PAGE and Western blots were used to assess the glycosylation status of P. aeruginosa strains. Poly(vinylidene difluoride) membranes with the transferred proteins were incubated with 1:5,000 dilutions of either anti-FlaA or anti-FlaB polyclonal antibodies followed by detection of alkaline phosphatase activity by color reaction.

Deglycosylation Assay.

Carbohydrates were removed from the glycoproteins by treatment with anhydrous trifluoromethanesulfonic acid by using the Glyco Free Kit (Glyco, Williamsport, PA). Deglycosylation was monitored by increased mobility of the treated proteins during SDS/PAGE compared with the untreated samples.

LPS Analysis.

LPS was prepared as described by Hitchcock and Brown (29), from the wild-type strain PAK, and from strains carrying mutations in the first and last genes of the putative glycosylation island. These preparations were subjected to SDS/PAGE and silver stained for analysis of the banding patterns.

Results

Identification, Sequence Analysis, and Genetic Organization of a Putative Glycosylation Region Linked to the Flagellar Genes of Strain P. aeruginosa PAK.

Using the differential hybridization analysis (30), we identified several clones from a variety of clinical strains that defined novel sequences not present in strain PAO1. End-sequencing of several of these clones revealed that they were located adjacent to the flagellin locus of P. aeruginosa. The presence of unique sequences was verified by analysis of the region upstream from the fliC gene of P. aeruginosa PAK, suggesting that a new determinant was present in this chromosomal location of strain PAK, and perhaps in other P. aeruginosa isolates. The complete nucleotide sequence of the region between flgJ and fliC genes of strain PAK was determined. This 20,978-bp sequence was combined with several previously sequenced regions that contained genes required for the biogenesis of the P. aeruginosa flagellum. The location of various genes within this ca. 25-kbp segment of the PAK chromosome is shown in Fig. 1, along with the corresponding region of the PAO1 genome (www.pseudomonas.com). Most notably, the PAK genome contains a genomic island consisting of a cluster of 13 genes (designated orfA–orfM), which are absent from PAO1, that are located between flagellar structural genes flgL and fliC. The PAK genome also includes a second copy of the fliS gene, as reported previously (31). In contrast, the PAO1 genome has three genes of unknown function (PA1088, PA1089, and PA1090) directly upstream of the fliC gene that are absent in PAK. The 13 genes, in addition to the adjacent gene named orfN, the homologue of the rfbC gene, contain some of the determinants of glycosylation of the flagellin protein (see below), and hereafter it will be referred to as the glycosylation island. These genes were not present at another location on the chromosome. Therefore, in PAK or its ancestral strain, this island was likely placed in the flagellar biosynthetic gene cluster as a consequence of its acquisition from another bacterial genome, resulting in the replacement of a small preexisting DNA segment.

Nucleotide Sequence Accession Number.

The nucleotide sequence of the glycosylation island is part of that in GenBank accession no. AF332547.

Characterization of Chromosomal Mutants of P. aeruginosa orfA and orfN, Present at the Boundaries of the Flagellar Intergenic Region.

Because the genomic island in strain PAK is linked to the flagellin gene, which is glycosylated in this a-type strain, we examined the role of the gene products encoded within this island in flagellin glycosylation. Mutations in two genes located at the 5′ end and at the 3′ end of the island, respectively, were engineered by making a deletion in the orfA gene and by insertion of the gentamicin resistance cassette in orfN. Each of these mutations abolished the ability of P. aeruginosa PAK to glycosylate flagellin as determined by its faster migration, compared with the wild-type (Fig. 2 A and B). The mobility of the flagellin in the mutants was consistent with the predicted size of the protein from the sequence of the fliC gene. This suggested that the genes in this unique region were involved in flagellin glycosylation. To further confirm that the faster migration of the flagellins of orfA and orfN mutants was because of lack of glycosylation, the wild-type PAK flagellin was chemically deglycosylated by using trifluoromethanesulfonic acid. Treatment with this reagent chemically removes N- and O-linked glycosyl moieties from proteins. After trifluoromethanesulfonic acid treatment, the PAK flagellin migrated faster with the electrophoretic mobility of the nonglycosylated flagellin from the orfA mutant (Fig. 2C). The defect in flagellin glycosylation in these mutants was complemented when the mutated genes were provided on plasmids (Fig. 2). Examination of these mutants on motility agar indicated that the mutations had no effect on motility as measured by the zone of migration compared with the wild-type strain (data not shown). Furthermore, because orfA and orfN mutants produced functional flagella, these mutations did not exert polar effects on genes specifying flagellum assembly components. Because a number of the genes in the island shared similarities to genes involved in LPS biosynthesis in some organisms, a preparation of LPS from the two mutants was examined for structural changes based on the patterns of migration, following SDS/PAGE. No defect in LPS structure could be detected by silver staining of these preparations (data not shown).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

(A) Glycosylation status of the flagellin protein from PAKorfN mutant and the complemented strains assessed by Western blots. The wild-type PAK flagellin migrates as a diffuse band indicating glycosylation of flagellin (lane 2). The flagellin from the PAKorfN mutant migrates much faster, suggesting loss of glycosylation (lane 3). Introduction of the complete orfN gene on a plasmid (pMMB194H) complements the glycosylation defect of the PAKorfN mutant (lane 5), whereas the vector control (pMMB66) remains nonglycosylated (lane 4). Size markers (lane 1) are in kDa. (B) Glycosylation status of the flagellins from PAKorfA mutant and the complemented strains assessed by Western blots. The wild-type PAK flagellin migrates as a diffuse band indicating glycosylation of flagellin (lane 2). The flagellin from the PAKorfA mutant migrates faster than the wild-type flagellin, suggesting loss of glycosylation (lane 3). Introduction of the complete orfA gene on a plasmid (pSP329Gm10EH) restores flagellin glycosylation in the PAKorfA mutant (lane 5) but not in mutants carrying the vector control (pSP329Gm) (lane 4). Lane 1 contains the size markers. (C) Effect of chemical deglycosylation on flagellin mobility during SDS/PAGE. Lane 1, PAK flagellin; lane 2, deglycosylated PAK flagellin; lane 3, PAKorfA mutant flagellin; lane 4, PAO1 flagellin; lane 5, deglycosylated PAO1 flagellin; lane 6, horseradish peroxidase; lane 7, deglycosylated horseradish peroxidase; and lane 8, molecular mass markers in kDa.

Coinheritance of the Glycosylation Island with a-Type Flagellins.

Using antiflagellin antibody, we assembled a set of 15 flagellar a-type and 15 flagellar b-type isolates of P. aeruginosa. They represent independent clinical isolates from blood, urine, and cystic fibrosis sputum, as well as a limited number of common laboratory strains. These strains were examined blindly for the presence of the orfA gene by PCR. There was an absolute concordance between the expression of a-type flagellin and the presence of this gene, and all b-type strains lacked orfA. The absence of orfA in b-type strains was verified by Southern blot analysis (data not shown). This finding suggests that the strains of P. aeruginosa that glycosylate their flagellin evolved from a common ancestor that carried an a-type fliC gene and acquired the genes encoding the glycosylation machinery very early. A more extensive survey of the various P. aeruginosa isolates showed that the a-type strains are more common, regardless of the source of the bacteria. In our collection of 437 independent isolates, a-type strains represented 65% of blood isolates, 74% nonmucoid and 80% mucoid isolates from cystic fibrosis patients, and 69% of environmental isolates.

Only a-Type Flagellins Are Substrates for Glycosylation.

To examine whether the glycosylation defect in b-type flagellins is solely because of the absence of the genes of the glycosylation island, we introduced the fliC gene of a b-type P. aeruginosa (PAO1) into a fliC mutant of an a-type strain (PAK). Conversely, the normally glycosylated PAK flagellin was introduced into the fliC mutant of PAO1. Each strain expressed the heterologous flagellin, and the motility defect of each fliC mutant was complemented (data not shown). However, Western immunoblot analysis of fliC mutants carrying the flagellin gene of the opposite type showed that neither strain was capable of glycosylating heterologous flagellin (Fig. 3). This result was consistent with the interpretation that the b-type flagellin was lacking in the appropriate glycosylation sites, as even the a-type strain did not glycosylate the b-type flagellin. Furthermore, these findings suggested that the b-type cells did not possess other genes that were capable of substituting for the products of the genes in the glycosylation island of the a-type strains.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Flagellin specificity of the glycosylation apparatus. Lane 2, wild-type strain PAK (a-type); lane 3, PAKfliC mutant; lane 4, PAKfliC mutant carrying a plasmid pPT244 expressing the a-type flagellin; lane 5, PAK flagellin mutant carrying a plasmid pDN186970 expressing the b-type flagellin; lane 6, wild-type strain PAO1 (b-type); lane 7, PAO1fliC mutant; lane 8, PAO1fliC mutant carrying a plasmid pDN186970 expressing the b-type flagellin; lane 9, PAO1fliC mutant carrying a plasmid pPT244 expressing the a-type flagellin; and lane 10, wild-type strain PAK (a-type). Size markers, in kDa, are in lane 1.

The PAK Glycosylation Island Contains the Genetic Elements Missing from Strain PAO1.

The observation that a large DNA element had been inserted into the genes of the flagellar regulon of PAK and other a-type strains suggested that this element conferred glycosylation on these strains and that it may contain all of the essential glycosylation functions that were missing from the b-type strain PAO1. To test this hypothesis, the region of the PAK chromosome containing the entire glycosylation island and the PAK flagellin gene was reconstructed, and it was introduced into a fliC mutant of PAO1. The recombinant plasmid pSP329Gm10EH8, carrying the glycosylation island genes as an 18-kb insert, was capable of complementing the motility defect of the fliC PAO1. Moreover, in this background, the heterologous flagellin is glycosylated (Fig. 4). Therefore, this segment of DNA contains the missing glycosylation functions of PAO1, which are very likely absent in all b-type strains.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4

The glycosylation island contains all of the missing requirements for flagellin glycosylation in the b-type strain PAO1. Lanes 1 and 7 contain molecular size markers. Lane 2, wild-type strain PAK; lane 3, PAO1 flagellin mutant carrying the vector (pMMB66); lane 4, PAO1 flagellin mutant carrying the plasmid pMMB194H containing incomplete glycosylation island and the a-type flagellin; lane 5, PAO1 flagellin mutant carrying the vector control (pSP329Gm); lane 6, PAO1 flagellin mutant carrying the plasmid pSP329Gm10EH8 containing the complete glycosylation island along with the a-type flagellin gene.

Annotation of the PAK-Specific Glycosylation Island.

The annotation of the region between flgL and fliC is summarized in Table 1 (24, 28, 32–38). The island contains 14 ORFs (orfs). Two of these (orfI and orfK) encode products of no known function, and these are designated as hypothetical unknown genes. OrfH and orfL had low level of homology with nodulation protein NoeI of Sinorhizobium fredii and methyltransferase of N. meningitidis, respectively (37). A group of genes within the island is similar to genes encoding proteins that function in various biosynthetic pathways. These include orfB, orfC, and orfD, which encode homologues of carriers or modifiers of acyl groups. More relevant to the function of the glycosylation island is the presence of genes that encode products with similarities to enzymes that are involved in the biosynthesis or modification of polysaccharides. These include the product of orfA, a homologue of nucleotide–sugar aminotransferase; orfE, encoding an acetyltransferase (potentially involved in modification of sugars or serine), and orfJ, a sugar–cytidine transferase similar to the enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of the core portion of the Gram-negative LPS. Finally, orfN, present in both PAK and PAO1, specifies a homologue of glycosyltransferase, with a significant similarity to the enzymes involved in the addition of sugars to the O-side chains of LPS (27) or formation of polysaccharides by Enterococcus faecalis (39).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Similarities of P. aeruginosa PAK ORFs to proteins in the databases

Discussion

P. aeruginosa expresses a large number of virulence factors, including the organelles of motility and attachment, which are specified by genes of the flagellar biosynthetic locus (40). The regulatory network that controls the coordinate expression of proteins necessary for the formation of the flagellum expression of the flagellum by this organism appears to be significantly different from that observed for the well studied Enterobacteriaceae (41). Furthermore, unlike in the Enteric bacteria, the flagellin subunit of one of the two variants of P. aeruginosa flagellins (the a-type) undergoes posttranslational modification by covalent attachment of glycosyl moieties to one or several sites within the polypeptide.

In this report, we have identified a unique genomic island that is present in P. aeruginosa PAK and very likely in all strains expressing a-type flagellin. The proteins encoded within this island are capable of glycosylating exclusively a-type flagellins. Furthermore, the comparison of the genes within this region of the P. aeruginosa chromosome indicates that it is highly polymorphic. In addition to the presence of the glycosylation island in PAK (and the absence of three genes from the corresponding site), the region contains several genes that are poorly conserved. Specifically, flgL, fliC, fleL, fliD, fliS, and the 3′part of fleP share only modest levels of sequence similarity between PAK and PAO1, even though they encode proteins that almost certainly play the same role in flagellar biosynthesis (Fig. 1). The comparison of the sequences of this region suggests that horizontal gene transfer to the flagellar a-type strains, such as PAK used in this study, and b-type strains (which includes PAO1) may be responsible for the observed sequence variability. The most likely mechanism of genetic exchange appears to be the acquisition of distinct a- or b-type cassettes followed by incorporation of these cassettes into the genome by reciprocal recombination. Based on the comparison of the highly conserved genes between PAK and PAO1, the most likely sites of recombination can be mapped in the coding sequence of fleP and flgJ, which flank this highly polymorphic segment of the bacterial chromosome (Fig. 1). The last 31 nucleotides of the fleP gene in PAK and the downstream sequences containing fleQ and fleSR are identical. The precise site of recombination within flgJ is more difficult to determine. The sequences of the flgK genes in PAK and PAO1 share 86% sequence identity, with two segments corresponding to the first 250 nucleotides of the coding sequence and the middle portion of 212 being nearly identical, which would provide significant regions of homology for recombination following acquisition of DNA from a heterologous strain. Because the %(G + C) content of the island is 63.3%, which is not significantly different from the overall base composition of the genome of strains PAO1 (66%) (42), the origin of the island is possibly another Pseudomonas or a bacterium of a comparable GC-rich DNA.

The proteins encoded within the glycosylation island in strain PAK do not show identity to other bacterial proteins, yet a number of them share significant similarities to enzymes involved in the synthesis, activation, or polymerization of sugars. Interestingly, the only gene encoding a fliC-linked glycosyltransferase (orfN) is present in both PAK and PAO1. However, the level of identity between the two proteins is only 37%. It is conceivable that the synthesis and attachment of the complete sugar moiety on an a-type flagellin polypeptide proceeds through a pathway that includes not only enzymes within the glycosylation island but additional products such as OrfN, and enzymes encoded at different locations within the chromosome.

There is increasing evidence that glycosylation of surface appendages is fairly common among different Gram-negative bacterial species. These include addition of various sugars to pili expressed by a wide range of bacteria (2, 4, 43, 44) and to flagellins of A. tumefaciens (14), H. felis and possibly Helicobacter pylori (12), P. aeruginosa (4), and Clostridium tyrobutyricum (45). Furthermore, a homologue of orfN, a putative glycosyltransferase gene, is present in a symbiont of Riftia, immediately adjacent to its fliC gene (46). The precise role of glycosylation in flagellar function is unclear at this time. Because the subunits are not modified in P. aeruginosa expressing the b-type flagellin, and the bacteria are motile by standard motility assay, glycosylation is very likely not necessary for the motility function when assayed under laboratory conditions. However, the strong association of the glycosylation with certain pathogenic strains of P. aeruginosa suggests that there may be certain functions for glycosylation in vivo. For example, P. aeruginosa may use a different mechanism to move in mucosal tissues from those that are manifested by swarming behavior in soft agar.

Although the location of the glycosylation island within the flagellar locus suggests that flagellin is the primary substrate for this modification process, we cannot exclude the possibility that other proteins in P. aeruginosa may be also glycosylated and that other accessory genes provide substrates for this pathway.

A comprehensive analysis of the different proteins that are modified through the activities of the glycosylation island-encoded enzymes may provide new insights into the biologic function of these proteins. Moreover, the glycosylation of proteins by pathogenic microorganisms may endow these with new effector functions or aid in the evasion of host defense, which may be an important component of disease-causing capabilities of a number of bacterial pathogens.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Public Health Service Grant AI 45014 (to R.R.).

Footnotes

    • ↵‡ To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: RAMPHR{at}medmac.ufl.edu.

    • This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

    • Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession no. AF332547).

    Abbreviation

    LPS,
    lipopolysaccharide
    • Received May 18, 2001.
    • Copyright © 2001, The National Academy of Sciences

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Lechner J,
      2. Wieland F
      (1989) Annu Rev Biochem 58:173–194, pmid:2673008.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      1. Stimson E,
      2. Makepeace K,
      3. Dell A,
      4. Morris H R,
      5. Payne G,
      6. Saunders J R
      (1995) Mol Microbiol 17:1201–1214, pmid:8594338.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Parge H E,
      2. Forest K T,
      3. Hickey M J,
      4. Christensen D A,
      5. Getzoff E D,
      6. Tainer J A
      (1995) Nature (London) 378:32–38, pmid:7477282.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Castric P
      (1995) Microbiology 141:1247–1254, pmid:7773418.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    5. ↵
      1. Kuo C,
      2. Takahashi N,
      3. Swanson A F,
      4. Ozeki Y,
      5. Hakomori S
      (1996) J Clin Invest 98:2813–2818, pmid:8981929.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. McBride J W,
      2. Yu X J,
      3. Walker D H
      (2000) Infect Immun 68:13–18, pmid:10603362.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. Lindenthal C,
      2. Elsinghorst E A
      (1999) Infect Immun 67:4084–4091, pmid:10417177.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Brimer C D,
      2. Montie T C
      (1998) J Bacteriol 178:3209–3217.
      OpenUrl
    9. ↵
      1. Doig P,
      2. Kinsella N,
      3. Guerry P,
      4. Trust T J
      (1996) Mol Microbiol 19:379–387, pmid:8825782.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Wyss C
      (1998) Infect Immun 66:5751–5754, pmid:9826350.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Ge Y,
      2. Li C,
      3. Corum L,
      4. Slaughter C A,
      5. Charon N W
      (1998) J Bacteriol 180:2418–2425, pmid:9573194.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Josenhans C,
      2. Ferrero R L,
      3. Labigne A,
      4. Suerbaum S
      (1999) Mol Microbiol 33:350–362, pmid:10411751.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. LeClerc G,
      2. Wang S P,
      3. Ely B
      (1998) J Bacteriol 180:5010–5019, pmid:9748431.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      1. Deakin W J,
      2. Parker V E,
      3. Wright E L,
      4. Ashcroft K J,
      5. Loake G J,
      6. Shaw C H
      (1999) Microbiology 145:1397–1407, pmid:10411267.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Syzmanski C M,
      2. Yao R,
      3. Ewing C P,
      4. Trust T J,
      5. Guerry P
      (1999) Mol Microbiol 32:1022–1030, pmid:10361304.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Romain F,
      2. Horn C,
      3. Pescher P,
      4. Abdelkader N,
      5. Riviere M,
      6. Puzo G,
      7. Barzu O,
      8. Marchal G
      (1999) Infect Immun 67:5567–5572, pmid:10531201.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Brockl G,
      2. Behr M,
      3. Fabry S,
      4. Hensel R,
      5. Kaulewitz H,
      6. Biendl E,
      7. Konig H
      (1991) Eur J Biochem 199:147–152, pmid:1712296.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Reinhold B B,
      2. Hauer C R,
      3. Plummer T H,
      4. Reinhold V N
      (1995) J Biol Chem 270:13197–13203, pmid:7768917.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Lanyi B
      (1970) Acta Microbiol Acad Sci Hung 17:35–48, pmid:4990318.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Spangenberg C,
      2. Heuer T,
      3. Burger C,
      4. Tummler B
      (1996) FEBS Lett 396:213–217, pmid:8914989.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Totten P A,
      2. Lory S
      (1990) J Bacteriol 172:7188–7199, pmid:2123866.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      1. Simpson D A,
      2. Ramphal R,
      3. Lory S
      (1992) Infect Immun 60:3771–3779, pmid:1323536.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      1. Arora S K,
      2. Ritchings B W,
      3. Almira E C,
      4. Lory S,
      5. Ramphal R
      (1996) Infect Immun 64:2130–2136, pmid:8675317.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. ↵
      1. Guo D,
      2. Bowden M G,
      3. Pershad R,
      4. Kaplan H B
      (1996) J Bacteriol 178:1631–1639, pmid:8626291.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    25. ↵
      1. Fleiszig S M J,
      2. Arora S K,
      3. Van R,
      4. Ramphal R
      (2001) Infect Immun 69:4931–4937, pmid:11447170.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Nunn D,
      2. Bergman S,
      3. Lory S
      (1990) J Bacteriol 172:2911–2919, pmid:1971619.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Furste J P,
      2. Pansegrau W,
      3. Frank R,
      4. Blocker H,
      5. Scholz P,
      6. Bagdasarian M,
      7. Lanka E
      (1986) Gene 48:119–131, pmid:3549457.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Marolda C L,
      2. Valvano M A
      (1993) J Bacteriol 175:148–158, pmid:7677991.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      1. Hitchcock P J,
      2. Brown T M
      (1983) J Bacteriol 154:269–277, pmid:6187729.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      1. Liang X,
      2. Pham Q T,
      3. Olson M V,
      4. Lory S
      (2001) J Bacteriol 183:843–853, pmid:11208781.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    31. ↵
      1. Arora S K,
      2. Dasgupta N,
      3. Lory S,
      4. Ramphal R
      (2000) Infect Immun 68:1474–1479, pmid:10678962.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    32. ↵
      1. Parkhill J,
      2. Wren B W,
      3. Mungall K,
      4. Ketley J M,
      5. Churcher C,
      6. Basham D,
      7. Chillingworth T,
      8. Davies R M,
      9. Feltwell T,
      10. Holroyd S,
      11. et al.
      (2000) Nature (London) 403:665–668, pmid:10688204.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Kalman S,
      2. Mitchell W,
      3. Marathe R,
      4. Lammel C,
      5. Fan J,
      6. Olinger L,
      7. Grimwood J,
      8. Davis R W,
      9. Stephens R S
      (1999) Nat Genet 21:385–389, pmid:10192388.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Kunst F,
      2. Ogasawara N,
      3. Moszer I,
      4. Albertini A M,
      5. Alloni G,
      6. Azevedo V,
      7. Bertero M G,
      8. Bessieres P,
      9. Bolotin A,
      10. Borchert S,
      11. et al.
      (1997) Nature (London) 390:249–256, pmid:9384377.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Luneberg E,
      2. Zetzmann N,
      3. Alber D,
      4. Knirel Y A,
      5. Kooistra O,
      6. Zahringer U,
      7. Frosch M
      (2000) Int J Med Microbiol 290:37–49, pmid:11043980.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Pazzani C,
      2. Rosenow C,
      3. Boulnois G J,
      4. Bronner D,
      5. Jann K,
      6. Roberts I S
      (1993) J Bacteriol 175:5978–5983, pmid:8397187.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    37. ↵
      1. Parkhill J,
      2. Achtman M,
      3. James K D,
      4. Bentley S D,
      5. Churcher C,
      6. Klee S R,
      7. Morelli G,
      8. Basham D,
      9. Brown D,
      10. Chillingworth T,
      11. et al.
      (2000) Nature (London) 404:502–506, pmid:10761919.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    38. ↵
      1. Eaton R W
      (1996) J Bacteriol 178:1351–1362, pmid:8631713.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Xu Y,
      2. Murray B E,
      3. Weinstock G M
      (1998) Infect Immun 66:4313–4323, pmid:9712783.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    40. ↵
      1. Ramphal R,
      2. Arora S K,
      3. Ritchings B W
      (1996) Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:S170–S174, pmid:8876537.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    41. ↵
      1. Macnab R M
      (1999) J Bacteriol 181:7149–7153, pmid:10572114.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    42. ↵
      1. Stover C K,
      2. Pham X Q,
      3. Erwin A L,
      4. Mizoguchi S D,
      5. Warrener P,
      6. Hickey M J,
      7. Brinkman F S,
      8. Hufnagle W O,
      9. Kowalik D J,
      10. Lagrou M,
      11. et al.
      (2000) Nature (London) 406:959–964, pmid:10984043.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    43. ↵
      1. Tomoeda M,
      2. Inuzuka M,
      3. Date T
      (1975) Prog Biophys Mol Biol 30:23–56, pmid:1101296.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    44. ↵
      1. Gubish E R,
      2. Chen K C S,
      3. Buchanan T M
      (1982) Infect Immun 37:189–194, pmid:6125476.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    45. ↵
      1. Arnold F,
      2. Bedouet L,
      3. Batina P,
      4. Robreau G,
      5. Talbot F,
      6. Lecher P,
      7. Malcoste R
      (1998) Microbiol Immunol 42:23–31, pmid:9525776.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    46. ↵
      1. Millikan D S,
      2. Felbeck H,
      3. Stein J L
      (1999) Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3129–3133, pmid:10388713.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    View Abstract
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    A genomic island in Pseudomonas aeruginosa carries the determinants of flagellin glycosylation
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    Citation Tools
    A genomic island in Pseudomonas aeruginosa carries the determinants of flagellin glycosylation
    Shiwani K. Arora, Mahalaxmi Bangera, Stephen Lory, Reuben Ramphal
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2001, 98 (16) 9342-9347; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.161249198

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    A genomic island in Pseudomonas aeruginosa carries the determinants of flagellin glycosylation
    Shiwani K. Arora, Mahalaxmi Bangera, Stephen Lory, Reuben Ramphal
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2001, 98 (16) 9342-9347; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.161249198
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (50)
    Current Issue

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Materials and Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • Abbreviation
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    News Feature: Getting the world’s fastest cat to breed with speed
    Cheetahs once rarely reproduced in captivity. Today, cubs are born every year in zoos. Breeding programs have turned their luck around—but they aren’t done yet.
    Image credit: Mehgan Murphy/Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute.
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans. Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Human heart evolved for endurance
    Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans.
    Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation. Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Viscoelastic fluids and wildfire prevention
    Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation.
    Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate. Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    Climate change and desert bird collapse
    Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate.
    Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He. Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.
    Featured QnAs
    QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He
    Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Teaching Resources
    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490