New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
 Agricultural Sciences
 Anthropology
 Applied Biological Sciences
 Biochemistry
 Biophysics and Computational Biology
 Cell Biology
 Developmental Biology
 Ecology
 Environmental Sciences
 Evolution
 Genetics
 Immunology and Inflammation
 Medical Sciences
 Microbiology
 Neuroscience
 Pharmacology
 Physiology
 Plant Biology
 Population Biology
 Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
 Sustainability Science
 Systems Biology
When genetic distance matters: Measuring genetic differentiation at microsatellite loci in wholegenome scans of recent and incipient mosquito species

Contributed by Fotis C. Kafatos
Abstract
Genetic distance measurements are an important tool to differentiate field populations of disease vectors such as the mosquito vectors of malaria. Here, we have measured the genetic differentiation between Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles gambiae, as well as between proposed emerging species of the latter taxon, in whole genome scans by using 23–25 microsatellite loci. In doing so, we have reviewed and evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of standard parameters of genetic distance, F_{ST}, R_{ST}, (δμ)^{2}, and D. Further, we have introduced new parameters, D′ and D_{K}, which have well defined statistical significance tests and complement the standard parameters to advantage. D′ is a modification of D, whereas D_{K} is a measure of covariance based on Pearson's correlation coefficient. We find that A. gambiae and A. arabiensis are closely related at most autosomal loci but appear to be distantly related on the basis of Xlinked chromosomal loci within the chromosomal Xag inversion. The M and S molecular forms of A. gambiae are practically indistinguishable but differ significantly at two microsatellite loci from the proximal region of the X, outside the Xag inversion. At one of these loci, both M and S molecular forms differ significantly from A. arabiensis, but remarkably, at the other locus, A. arabiensis is indistinguishable from the M molecular form of A. gambiae. These data support the recent proposal of genetically differentiated M and S molecular forms of A. gambiae.
Many major infectious diseases, such as malaria, leishmaniasis, and sleeping sickness, are transmitted by insect vectors. Molecular genetic markers have become powerful tools for elucidating the population biology and evolution of such vectors, topics that are highly relevant to disease transmission in the field (1–4). Genetic variation in vector populations contributes to their susceptibility to infection by the pathogen, their degree of anthropophily, their daily survival and reproductive rates, and the epidemiology of the disease in the human host (5). A case in point is the African mosquito of the Anopheles gambiae (sensu latu) complex (5). These include the most important vector of human malaria, A. gambiae (sensu strictu), as well as closely related species that are significant vectors in specific areas (e.g., Anopheles arabiensis) or are altogether unable to serve as vectors (Anopheles quadriannulatus). Furthermore, even within A. gambiae s.s., cytologically defined chromosomal forms (e.g., Mopti, Savanna, and Bamako) are reproductively isolated in the northern dry areas of West Africa, including Mali and Burkina Faso, and may represent emerging species with different disease transmission characteristics (5, 6). Although many DNA regions have been recently analyzed to examine genetic differentiation within A. gambiae s.s, the only fixed molecular differences found so far that consistently discriminate chromosomal forms are in the Xlinked ribosomal (r)DNA region (1–4, 7). In Mali and Burkina Faso, these markers distinguish Mopti from Savanna and Bamako chromosomal forms; however, when the analysis is extended to additional populations in West Africa, two nonpanmictic units are identified even in the absence of chromosomal differentiation. This observation recently led to the definition of “molecular forms M and S” (1) or “molecular types I and II” (2), on the basis of fixed differences in the intergenic spacer or internal transcribed spacer rDNA regions, respectively. Because the repetitive nature of rDNA raises doubt as to its reliability as a marker of incipient speciation processes, much interest is now focused on possible new evidence of genetic distinctness between the forms/types.
Among molecular genetic markers, highly polymorphic microsatellites have been used extensively for population studies in humans (8), mammals (9), fruit flies (10), and anopheline mosquitoes (11–13). Various statistical models have been proposed for evaluating genetic differentiation (14–17), but additional theoretical and empirical comparisons regarding their efficacy would be helpful. For microsatellites, F_{ST} and D (14) are closely tied to the infinite allele model of mutation (IAM), where each mutation can produce an allele of any size (18). R_{ST} (16) and (δμ)^{2} (15) are related to the stepwisemutation model (SMM), which assumes that each allele mutates to either one of the immediately neighboring alleles with equal probability (19).
The standard genetic distance D (14) is an often used and popular parameter for classification and evolutionary studies. It was originally defined as an average value over all loci examined, but it can also be defined at each locus separately. Several variations of D have been used, for example, D_{C} (20), D_{A}, D_{m} (14), D_{SW} (17), and D_{LR} (9). In a bear study (9), D and D_{LR} were comparably satisfactory but failed to resolve the most distantly related pairs of species: when loci have no alleles shared between two populations, D and D_{LR} are not defined or, as has been proposed by Nei (14), take an infinite value that is problematical for any quantitative comparison. As part of our ongoing studies of A. gambiae taxa and populations, here we compare the performance of presently used parameters of genetic distance [e.g., D, F_{ST}, R_{ST}, and (δμ)^{2}], and we introduce and compare new parameters, D′ and D_{K}. By using a battery of four parameters (F_{ST}, R_{ST}, D′, and D_{K}), we identify intriguing differences in genetic distance between A. arabiensis and the M and S molecular forms of A. gambiae, at loci representing different chromosomal regions.
Materials and Methods
Origin of Mosquitoes.
Fieldcollected female mosquitoes were speciesidentified with molecular markers (21). A total of 268 A. gambiae were collected in July 1996 in Mali, West Africa: 95 from Selenkenyi (Sel) and 92 and 81 from Soulouba (Soul) and Kokouna (Kn). Twenty of the 81 A. arabiensis were collected from the same villages in Mali at the same time as A. gambiae (1, 4, and 15 from Sel, Soul, and Kn, respectively). The remaining 61 A. arabiensis mosquitoes were collected from Kilifi, Kenya, in June 1998. A. gambiae mosquitoes from the villages Sel and Soul were also subjected to karyotyping on the basis of polytene chromosome inversions, but because of technical limitations, only 28, 24, and 11 mosquitoes were identified definitively as Mopti, Savanna, and Bamako (6). Use of a PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism marker (7) unambiguously classified the A. gambiae specimens as M or S molecular forms, with an efficiency of 91%. All mosquitoes were genotyped at microsatellite loci by previously described highthroughput methods (22). All 81 available A. arabiensis were used for Figs. 1–3. Because some parameters are sensitive to differences in sample size, we introduced sample weights for F_{ST} and partly for R_{ST} (Table 1) and also used a number of A. gambiae comparable to that of A. arabiensis. The percentages of M and S molecular form A. gambiae were 73/27 in Sel, 7/93 in Soul, and 17/83 in Kn, respectively. Figs. 1A and 2A are based on all A. gambiae from Sel; Figs. 1B, 2B, and 3 are based on all M and Sform mosquitoes from Sel and Soul and an additional individuals 36 from Kn to make the sample sizes comparable.
Statistical Parameters and Significance Tests.
We have introduced D_{K} as a normalized measure of differentiation on the basis of Pearson's correlation coefficient, r, which considers the distribution of alleles in two populations around their respective mean allele frequency (Table 1). Depending on the degree of freedom f, two direct statistical significance tests, P_{t} and P_{f}, can be applied. P_{t} is a modified version of Student's t test, which was originally introduced by Gosset in 1908 (23) to evaluate the difference between two means. However, it can also be used to evaluate the covariance of allele frequencies in two populations around their mean frequencies, which are assumed to be identical. The null hypothesis r = 0 supposes, with regard to population comparisons, that two analyzed populations are independent (23–25). In fact, Student's t test is related to the β function, and t serves only as an intermediate parameter; the parameter actually tested is y = 1 − r^{2} in the specific incomplete β function I_{y} (a, 1/2). A condition imposed originally on the t test is that the degree of freedom f is not large, ≈30–60 (23). However, the polymorphism of microsatellites is large and variable between loci; the degree of freedom f varied from 5 to 79 when comparing A. gambiae and A. arabiensis (see below). We have introduced a necessary modification, defining a not as f/2 but as f/e_{f}, where e_{f} is the integer corresponding to f/10 rounded upwards. For example, e_{f} is 2 for 10 < f ≤ 20. P_{t} is the probability that the null hypothesis holds: two compared populations are certainly independent if P_{t} = 1 and indistinguishable if P_{t} < 0.05.
A different approach and significance estimate of r was proposed by Fisher, in particular to analyze statistical correlation in data with small degrees of freedom (23). The two populations are treated as measures of the same entity, and a complementary error function erfc(x) is used to quantify the deviation (or error) of the two data sets. erfc(x) is based on Fisher's ztransformation, which associates each measured r with a corresponding z. Similar to the t test, we have introduced a modified coefficient e_{f} to extend the range of f even below 10. The significance level P_{f}, at which the null hypothesis (r = 0) holds, is given by erfc(x) (23), which is related to the specific incomplete Γ function P(1/2, x^{2}). It should be noted that the significance tests address the null hypothesis of complete independence in the case of D_{K} (r = 0) and the null hypothesis of identity in the case of D′, F_{ST}, and R_{ST}.
The standard genetic distance D was defined by Nei (14) as the negative logarithm of the genetic identity I, which also reflects allele frequencies; I ranges from 1 when the two populations have identical allelic frequencies to zero when they share no alleles. In this paper, we introduce a modified D′ based on the same linear transformation we have used for D_{K}, (I + 1)/2 (Table 1). Several indirect statistical significance tests have been proposed for D, and we adopt the χ^{2} test for allele frequency differences at each locus (14, 26). P_{d} is the probability that the null hypothesis (D′ = 0) holds: if P_{d} = 1, the observed and expected (e.g., the two compared) populations are certainly the same.
On the basis of IAM and the statistical significance tests, the effective migration rate Nm can be estimated from the values of D′ and D_{K} (Table 1). When these values are high, Nm becomes much smaller than 1, indicating that no gene flow is occurring between the populations.
The wellknown parameter F_{ST} defined by Wright (14) and elaborated by Nei (14) measures the degree of genetic differentiation between two populations by using allele frequencies; Goldstein's (δμ)^{2} (15) is the square of the difference between mean allele sizes, and Slatkin's R_{ST} (16) focuses on the variance of allele sizes rather than frequencies (Table 1). A direct statistical significance test for F_{ST} is the contingency χ^{2} test (27, 28), which includes the value of F_{ST} and n (which for microsatellites is the number of total alleles in both populations). P_{s} is the probability that the null hypothesis (F_{ST} = 0) holds: if P_{s} = 1, the two populations are certainly the same. A statistical significance test of (δμ)^{2} is not available. For R_{ST}, the estimated value of Nm is used as an indirect test (16); in this study, Nm ≤ 0.5 is taken to indicate that no statistically significant gene flow occurs between the two populations, whereas Nm ≥ 3 indicates that the two compared populations are indistinguishable.
Results and Discussions
Statistical Parameters.
Genetic differentiation of populations on the basis of microsatellites is often measured by using one of four standard parameters, D, F_{ST}, R_{ST}, and (δμ)^{2}. It is difficult to select a single adequate measure of differentiation (8, 9) because of uncertainly concerning the underlying mutation processes (IAM and SMM). Furthermore, it can be argued a priori as well as empirically from the literature that different parameters have different drawbacks. In a human evolution study, two parameters based on SMM, R_{ST}, and (δμ)^{2}, gave results very different from those recognized from other genetic evidence (8). Although the SMM is often considered more appropriate for microsatellite loci, it appears that their mutational patterns can be often irregular (29); in a honeybee study, IAM produced a better overall fit than SMM (30). As recommended (11, 16), it is prudent to measure differentiation with parameters based on both models. A priori, the least satisfactory parameter is (δμ)^{2}, because it is based on the differences between means, ignoring the allele distribution in the data sets, and has no defined statistical significance test. R_{ST} focuses on the variance of allele sizes and, if the distribution is not normal, R_{ST} can minimize inappropriately the differences between quite disparate populations that happen to approach the same mean size; the value of R_{ST} will then approach zero.
F_{ST} is based on the analysis of variance of allele frequencies. An advantage of F_{ST} is that it can be weighed to take sample size differences into account. We have introduced a similar partial weighing for R_{ST} to accommodate data from samples of different size (Table 1). A human evolution study (8) concluded that F_{ST} is the best parameter when compared with R_{ST}, (δμ)^{2}, and D_{SW}. A disadvantage of F_{ST} might be uncertainty concerning the statistical significance tests, of which four have been used over several decades (27, 28, 31–33). In mosquito studies, the contingency χ^{2} test is commonly used with the degree of freedom fixed to 1 when comparing two populations.
The standard genetic distance D is based on the analysis of covariance of allele frequencies. It and several proposed variants can fail to resolve distant relationships if loci have no shared alleles. To address this problem and further limitations of these measures (see Materials and Methods), we have introduced a linear transformation of D, D′ (Table 1), which has a defined value (−ln 0.5 = 0.693) when no alleles are shared. A χ^{2} test of allele frequencies can evaluate the similarity of two populations and serve as an indirect test for D′. It uses the actual degree of freedom to define the statistical significance levels (Table 1) and, in this respect, represents an improvement over the contingency χ^{2} test used for F_{ST}.
We have introduced a new parameter D_{K} (Table 1 and Materials and Methods) that uses Pearson's correlation coefficient r, a wellestablished measure of correlation in statistics. D_{K} is based on the analysis of covariance of the deviations of allele frequencies around the mean frequency. Importantly, its statistical significance can be tested directly in a robust manner by two mathematically distinct tests of significance. As is true for F_{ST} and R_{ST}, D′ and D_{K} can also be used to determine the effective migration rate Nm between populations, permitting the detection of gene flow.
Analysis of Mosquito Microsatellite Data with Four Parameters.
We have studied genetic differentiation between A. gambiae and A. arabiensis field populations on the basis of a systematic wholegenome scan. Microsatellite data were collected from 23 different chromosomal loci (25 for A. gambiae alone) across the genome (Figs. 1 and 2). This and a larger analysis, to be reported elsewhere, extending to the more distantly related species Anopheles merus and Anopheles melas (34), showed that the two most commonly used parameters for mosquito studies (11–13), F_{ST} and R_{ST}, can lead to significantly different results at several loci. After extensive trials of multiple parameters, we came to recommend the use of a panel of four parameters, also including D′ and D_{K}, for the analysis of population biology and evolution by using microsatellites. Additional parameters gave no significant advantage. For example, (δμ)^{2} failed in our study by showing an unreasonably wide range of values (across 8 orders of magnitude). Software was developed to calculate all of the parameters mentioned in this paper, as well as to support additional useful calculations, for example, observed and expected heterozygosity, Wright's F_{IS} and F_{IT} (14), etc. This software is available on our web site (http://www.emblheidelberg.de/ExternalInfo/kafatos/publications/PROG/).
The allele distributions in these collections of A. gambiae and A. arabiensis are plotted in Fig. 1A, and the genetic differentiation values at each locus are shown in the bar graph of Fig. 2A. For a visual display of statistical significance, the bars are colored: red, yellow and green indicate loci where the two compared populations are significantly different, marginal in terms of similarity or clearly similar (indistinguishable), respectively.
It is worth noting from Fig. 1 that, at many loci, the allele frequencies follow decidedly not normal distributions, which in some cases are bimodal; this is especially true for A. arabiensis, even for mosquito collections from the same region (data not shown). In many cases, visual comparison of the allele distributions can serve as a commonsense test for the efficacy of the four parameters in detecting obvious differences in allele distribution in the two species. Thus, four of the five sexlinked loci, H503, H53, H711w, and E614, have clearly disparate allele distributions (Fig. 1A), and all are scored as statistically different in the two species by both D_{K} and D′ (Fig. 2A). In contrast, only one of these loci, H711w, is scored as significantly different by both R_{ST} and F_{ST}. At two other loci with very high polymorphism, H503 and E614, R_{ST} and F_{ST} give exactly opposite results. Evidently, at these four loci of the Xchromosome, the use of multiple parameters, and D_{K} and D′ in particular, is highly advantageous for detecting clear differences.
Interspecies differences are less prominent among the 18 autosomal loci (Fig. 2A). Only five of these show differences that are validated as statistically significant by two or more parameters. In one of these loci (H135), all four parameters indicate a statistically significant difference; in three loci (H197, H187, and H817), two parameters indicate a significant and two a marginal difference, and in the fifth locus (H525), three parameters detect a clear difference, but R_{ST} indicates identity. It may be relevant that in H525, 29 of 81 A. arabiensis gave null alleles; these alleles were evidently mutated in a primer sequence and suggest that this locus may indeed be differentiated in the two species.
It is interesting to see how concordant are the three parameters that are based on the same mutation model, IAM (Fig. 2A). D_{K} and D′ are nonconcordant at only four loci (three marginal/indistinguishable, and one marginal/different). In contrast, D′ and D_{K} are each nonconcordant with F_{ST} at seven loci, at two of which F_{ST} gives opposite results (significantly different/indistinguishable). Failure of F_{ST} to detect clear differences often occurs when allele numbers are either very large (H503, H187) or quite small (H53). However, at E614, despite the large number of alleles, F_{ST} is able to detect a clear disparity between the species. The availability of two independent statistical tests for D_{K} proved valuable: both P_{t} and P_{f} show the same results for 10 < f < 40. Fisher's P_{f} should be used for f ≤ 10 and also appears more suitable for f ≥ 40.
Two biologically important conclusions emerge from this analysis: that the X chromosome shows substantially greater disparities between A. gambiae and A. arabiensis than do the autosomes and, in particular, that all three microsatellite loci that map to the Xag inversion of the X chromosome show large differences in allele frequency distribution. In fact, two additional A. gambiae microsatellite loci within this inversion, H145 and H36, could not be amplified in any of the 81 A. arabiensis (data not shown), reinforcing the conclusion of substantial molecular differences between the two species in this larger inversion. The inversion is present in A. gambiae but absent in A. arabiensis. These data are consistent with the observation that the effective migration rate (and estimated gene flow) Nm between A. gambiae and A. arabiensis is lower on the X as compared with the autosomes (12); they lend support to the notion of Coluzzi and coworkers that fixed inversion polymorphisms that discriminate between species of the A. gambiae complex are ancient and associated with local genetic divergence (5, 35).
It is thought that A. gambiae s.s. actually encompasses two or more emerging species, and we examined whether these taxa show different microsatellite profiles. The Mopti, Savanna, and Bamako chromosomal forms can be distinguished by their patterns of chromosomal inversions in the northern drier areas of West Africa (5, 6), but in the more humid southern coastal areas, the Forest chromosomal form is prevalent, and fixed differentiation at the rDNA locus, outside the Xag inversion, is a more robust indicator of two nonpanmictic molecular forms, M and S (1). Molecular typing of our samples yielded 77 M and 94 S individuals of A. gambiae, which were compared directly (Figs. 1B and 2B).
Interestingly, the M and S molecular forms were largely indistinguishable by microsatellites across the genome, except at the base of the X, outside the Xag inversion, where the two forms were unambiguously different according to all four parameters, at both H678 and E614 (cytogenetic divisions 5D and 6, respectively). At H678, most M mosquitoes have short alleles, and S have long alleles, whereas the opposite is true at E614 (Fig. 1B). The rDNA molecular marker distinguishing the M and S forms lies in the same region around cytogenetic division 6 (F. H. Collins, personal communication). Differentiation of the M and S forms on the basis of the tandemly repetitive rDNA locus alone could be ascribed to concerted evolution (1, 2), but the additional observation of clear differences at two nearby microsatellite loci provides strong evidence that the M and S forms are indeed genetically differentiated. Thus, our results to date lend strong support to the concept of emergent M and S taxa of A. gambiae s.s., which are of major taxonomic significance for studying the hypothesized incipient speciation process for which A. gambiae is a uniquely favorable model. Our results provide microsatellite tools to distinguish these forms, at least in Mali. In a preliminary analysis, we have obtained and genotyped 28 and 24 mosquitoes that were karyotyped as Mopti and Savanna, respectively. The results revealed that Mopti differs from Savanna at these two loci in the same way that M differs from S (data not shown); this is not surprising, as all Mopti are M and all Savanna are S in Mali (1).
A remarkable observation came from separate comparisons of M and S forms of A. gambiae with A. arabiensis (Fig. 3). Like the original pooled sample of A. gambiae (Fig. 2A), Mform mosquitoes are clearly different from A. arabiensis within the Xag inversion and at locus E614 but resemble A. arabiensis at locus H678. In sharp contrast, Sform mosquitoes are very clearly different from A. arabiensis in locus H678 as well. This observation raises the interesting possibility of introgression between A. gambiae (M) and A. arabiensis in cytogenetic division 5, where H678 maps. More extensive studies will be necessary to follow up this possibility, as well as to explore further the apparent mosaicism of the autosomes with respect to localized A. gambiae/A. arabiensis differences (36).
Field studies of genetic differentiation within vector populations can yield important information relating to evolution and population biology. Such studies are fundamentally important for understanding the epidemiology of malaria in Africa, where A. gambiae is, overall, the most important vector of the disease. Our work points out the advantages of a systematic wholegenome scan with a larger number of microsatellite loci for detecting chromosomally localized genetic differentiation in field populations. It is notable that this systematic study has detected two genetic differences at microsatellite loci, despite the failure of several previous attempts to find molecular markers specific for the M and S molecular forms in regions different from the rDNA locus (1–4, 7). Systematic genotyping is greatly facilitated by highthroughput methods (22). We have found it is important to subject the data to analysis with multiple parameters of genetic differentiation, including those that correspond to different mutational models. We have offered the modified D′ parameter and the new normalized parameter D_{K} to complement the parameters F_{ST} and R_{ST}, which are most commonly used in this field. The diversity of allele profiles at different loci, including nonnormal allele distributions with very high and low levels of polymorphism, have highlighted some problems encountered with individual parameters. We strongly suggest that all four parameters be used, together with appropriate statistical tests, at least until an extensive body of studies further clarifies the relative merits and limitations of the different parameters.
Acknowledgments
R.W. is grateful to S. Sherwood for her help in writing the early versions and to Y. Yuan, Y. Li, and R. Saffrich for helpful suggestions on statistics and C programming. We are grateful to C. Mbogo for kindly providing mosquitoes, G. Lanzaro for an earlier collaboration that supported the collection of mosquitoes, A. della Torre for a very helpful review, and M. Coluzzi, J. Powell, C. Taylor, and members of the Kafatos laboratory for comments. In situ hybridizations of the two microsatellites H678 and E614 were performed by C. Blass and E. Kokoza, respectively. This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 544/B2/C1) (D.T. and F.C.K.), by National Institutes of Health Grant R01A43053 (L.Z.), and by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (F.C.K.).
Footnotes

↵§ To whom reprint requests should be addressed. Email: dandekar{at}emblheidelberg.de or kafatos{at}emblheidelberg.de.
Abbreviations
 IAM,
 infinite allele model of mutation;
 SMM,
 stepwise mutation model;
 rDNA,
 ribosomal DNA
 Accepted January 2, 2001.
 Copyright © 2001, The National Academy of Sciences
References
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 Lanzaro G C,
 Touré Y T,
 Carnahan J,
 Zheng L,
 Dolo G,
 Traore S,
 Petrarca V,
 Vernick K D,
 Taylor C E
 ↵
 ↵
 Nei M
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 Kimura M,
 Ohta T
 ↵
 Kimura M,
 Ohta T
 ↵
 ↵
 Scott J A,
 Brogdon W G,
 Collins F H
 ↵
 ↵
 Press W H,
 Teukolsky S A,
 Vetterling W T,
 Flannery B P

 Bronstein I N,
 Semendjajew K A,
 Musiol G,
 Muehlig H
 ↵
 Sokal R R,
 Rohlf F J
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵
 ↵

 Weir B S
 ↵
 Raymond M,
 Rousset F
 ↵
 Wang R
 ↵
 ↵
 Caccone A,
 Min G S,
 Powell J R
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
More Articles of This Classification
Biological Sciences
Evolution
Related Content
 No related articles found.
Cited by...
 Spatiotemporal dynamics of gene flow and hybrid fitness between the M and S forms of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae
 Ecological Zones Rather Than Molecular Forms Predict Genetic Differentiation in the Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. in Ghana
 Reduced Recombination Rate and Genetic Differentiation Between the M and S Forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s.
 GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN THE BAMAKO AND SAVANNA CHROMOSOMAL FORMS OF ANOPHELES GAMBIAE AS INDICATED BY AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS
 MICROSATELLITE AND MITOCHONDRIAL GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION OF ANOPHELES ARABIENSIS (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) FROM WESTERN KENYA, THE GREAT RIFT VALLEY, AND COASTAL KENYA
 DIFFERENTIAL INTROGRESSION OF CHROMSOMAL REGIONS BETWEEN ANOPHELES GAMBIAE AND AN. ARABIENSIS
 SexLinked Differentiation Between Incipient Species of Anopheles gambiae
 Gene Flow Between Chromosomal Forms of the Malaria Vector Anopheles funestus in Cameroon, Central Africa, and Its Relevance in Malaria Fighting
 Multilevel Analyses of Genetic Differentiation in Anopheles gambiae s.s. Reveal Patterns of Gene Flow Important for MalariaFighting Mosquito Projects
 Transfer and Origin of Adaptations through Natural Hybridization: Were Anderson and Stebbins Right?
 LocusSpecific Genetic Differentiation at Rw Among WarfarinResistant Rat (Rattus norvegicus) Populations
 FREQUENCY OF MULTIPLE INSEMINATIONS IN FIELDCOLLECTED ANOPHELES GAMBIAE FEMALES REVEALED BY DNA ANALYSIS OF TRANSFERRED SPERM
 The Genome Sequence of the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles gambiae
 Speciation Within Anopheles gambiae the Glass Is Half Full
 Genetic Differentiation in the African Malaria Vector, Anopheles gambiae s.s., and the Problem of Taxonomic Status
 A Comparative Genomic Analysis of Two Distant Diptera, the Fruit Fly, Drosophila melanogaster, and the Malaria Mosquito, Anopheles gambiae