Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Mechanisms of pain

Cheryl L. Stucky, Michael S. Gold, and Xu Zhang
PNAS October 9, 2001 98 (21) 11845-11846; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211373398
Cheryl L. Stucky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Gold
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xu Zhang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Persistent or chronic pain is the primary reason people seek medical care, yet current therapies are either inadequate for certain types of pain or cause intolerable side effects. Recently, pain neurobiologists have identified a number of cellular and molecular processes that lead to the initiation and maintenance of pain. Understanding these underlying mechanisms has given significant promise for the development of more effective, more specific pain therapies in the near future.

Persistent Pain Is a Major Public Health Problem Today

Over one-third of the world's population suffers from persistent or recurrent pain, costing the American public alone approximately $100 billion each year in health care, compensation, and litigation (1). Chronic pain is associated with conditions such as back injury, migraine headaches, arthritis, herpes zoster, diabetic neuropathy, temporomandibular joint syndrome, and cancer. Many of the currently available pain therapies are either inadequate or cause uncomfortable to deleterious side effects. Chronic pain results not just from the physical insult but also from a combination of physical, emotional, psychological, and social abnormalities. Because many pains persist after an insult is healed, the ongoing pain rather than the injury underlies the patient's disability. Untreated pain may become self-perpetuating because pain has immunosuppressive effects that leave patients susceptible to subsequent diseases. It is now clear that if we can effectively treat the pain despite the underlying cause, it will be possible for patients to regain normal functioning. The key to more successful pain treatment is to understand the mechanisms that generate and maintain chronic pain.

Why Is Pain a New Frontier of Science?

The onset of the 21st century is an incredibly exciting time in pain biology. Information from recent studies in basic pain research is virtually exploding and has revealed numerous novel targets for the advent of new pain therapies. Major advances have occurred at levels spanning from molecular studies that have identified transduction proteins in nociceptors to cortical imaging studies which reveal how pain is experienced on a cognitive level (2, 3). Two key lines of discovery have been (i) molecular/cellular transduction mechanisms and (ii) neuronal plasticity.

Molecular/Cellular Mechanisms

Elegant molecular genetic studies conducted in the past few years have now enabled us to identify specific molecules that are involved in the processes of pain transduction. A giant step forward came with the identification of proteins called vanilloid receptors, which allow us to detect noxious heat (4, 5). The VR1 protein is a heat transducer because it converts thermal energy into an electrical signal (action potentials) that is sent to the central nervous system, enabling us to detect a stimulus as painfully hot. Without the VR1 receptor, one does not effectively detect noxious heat, particularly in the setting of inflammation (6, 18). Recently, basic pain researchers have identified a number of transduction molecules that will clearly be key targets in developing pioneering pain therapies (7).

Neuronal Plasticity

Plasticity is a term used to refer to changes that occur in the established nervous system. Changes in neuronal structure; connections between neurons; and alterations in the quantity and properties of neurotransmitters, receptors, and ion channels can ultimately result in increased functional activity of neurons in the pain pathway. Conversely, plasticity can decrease the body's own pain inhibitory systems, resulting ultimately in increased pain. Injury, inflammation, and disease can all cause neuronal plasticity and increased pain by means of increased excitatory or decreased inhibitory mechanisms. Plasticity can result in short-term changes that last minutes to hours, or long-term changes which may be permanent.

Why Focus on the Primary Afferent Neuron?

Pain transduction and perception is extensive and complex, involving fundamental biological events at multiple levels of the nervous system (Fig. 1). Our Frontiers of Science session was not intended to be a comprehensive review of the latest findings at all levels of the pain pathway. Instead, we focused on the place where sensation of pain is initiated, the primary afferent nociceptor. Nociceptors are a subpopulation of primary sensory neurons that are activated by “noxious” stimuli, i.e., stimuli that can produce tissue damage. Compelling evidence suggests that plasticity in nociceptors contributes substantially to the increased pain one feels in the presence of injury. Plasticity in nociceptors is critical for both the development and maintenance of plasticity in the central nervous system (2). That many receptors and ion channels recently identified are found specifically in nociceptors makes these proteins very good targets for eliminating pain without inducing side effects. Finally, the accessibility of the peripheral nervous system makes nociceptors a logical target for the development of novel therapeutic interventions.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Painful stimuli such as intense heat activate the peripheral terminals of nociceptors. Action potentials are transmitted along the afferent axons to the spinal cord. The central terminals of IB4-negative unmyelinated nociceptors synapse in lamina I and outer lamina II, whereas IB4-positive unmyelinated nociceptors terminate in inner lamina II. By means of chemical transmission, nociceptors activate spinal neurons that send axons across the spinal cord and up fiber tracts and terminate in the medulla, midbrain, and thalamus. Thalamic neurons project to regions of the cortex including the somatosensory cortex.

Do Specific Types of Nociceptors Mediate Different Types of Pain?

Nociceptors are extremely heterogeneous, differing in the neurotransmitters they contain, the receptors and ion channels they express, their speed of conduction, their response properties to noxious stimuli, and their capacity to be sensitized during inflammation, injury, and disease. Significant progress toward alleviating pain will occur if we are able to achieve the following goals: (i) determine the function of these different subpopulations of nociceptors, (ii) determine whether specific subpopulations mediate distinct types of pain, and (iii) identify what cellular and molecular targets are altered on specific populations of nociceptors during different types of pain. Ultimately, these aims will allow the development of novel pain therapies that target specific mechanisms on identified populations of nociceptors.

Nociceptors can be divided into two general types. A-fiber nociceptors have lightly myelinated axons, conduct action potentials rapidly, and have medium- to large-diameter cell bodies. A-fibers mediate the fast, pricking quality of pain. C-fibers have unmyelinated axons, conduct action potentials slowly, and have small-diameter cell bodies. C-fibers mediate the slower, burning quality of pain. C-fibers comprise around 70% of all nociceptors. Two classes of C-fibers have been identified. One class contains a variety of neuropeptides, including substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide, and expresses trkA receptors, the high-affinity receptor for nerve growth factor (8). These neurons project to the outermost region of the spinal dorsal horn (lamina I and outer lamina II) and terminate largely on spinal neurons that project to higher-order pain centers in the brain (Fig. 1). The other class contains few neuropeptides but expresses a surface carbohydrate group that selectively binds to a plant lectin called isolectin B4 (IB4). This subpopulation of neurons is supported by glial-derived neurotrophic factor during early postnatal development (9, 10). The IB4-binding neurons project to a different region of the spinal dorsal horn (inner lamina II) that contains primarily local spinal interneurons. Important questions are whether these two types of nociceptors have different functional responses to painful stimuli and whether they have distinct roles in specific types of pain.

We use isolated sensory neurons to examine the response properties of nociceptors to painful stimuli. By using patch-clamp-recording techniques, we found that IB4-positive nociceptors have larger magnitude voltage-gated sodium currents. In contrast, IB4-negative nociceptors had larger noxious heat-induced ion currents, suggesting that IB4-negative nociceptors are the nociceptors that respond intensely to noxious heat (11). In addition, IB4-negative nociceptors are much more responsive to noxious chemicals that are elevated during inflammation, including low pH and serotonin (C.L.S., unpublished data). One hypothesis, which remains to be tested, is that IB4-positive nociceptors mediate neuropathic pain, whereas IB4-negative nociceptors mediate inflammatory pain (12).

Why Is Morphine Ineffective in Treating Nerve Injury Pain?

Opioid analgesics such as morphine are universally regarded as the most powerful pain-relieving drugs. Morphine acts through the μ-opioid receptor to inhibit signals that transmit pain (13). Pain that follows direct injury to a peripheral nerve is called neuropathic pain. Unfortunately, it is still not known what mechanisms underlie this prevalent pain syndrome. Neuropathic pain is an anomaly because it is insensitive to morphine as well as other opioid drugs and is currently best managed with antidepressants and antiepileptics (14). Neuropathic pain may be insensitive to morphine because damage of primary afferent nerves results in decreased expression of μ-opioid receptors on nociceptors and spinal neurons in the pain pathway, thus reducing the efficacy of morphine (15). In addition, other substances may modulate the efficacy of morphine. For example, when the neuropeptide cholecystokinin (CCK) is applied to the spinal cord, it reduces the inhibitory effects of morphine (16). At the cellular level, μ-receptors and CCK receptors are expressed in the same spinal neurons, suggesting that CCK may directly inhibit actions of morphine by means of signaling mechanisms within a given neuron (17). Furthermore, activation of μ-receptors increases release of CCK neuropeptide, which then reduces the effectiveness of morphine in a feedback manner (17). Thus, multiple mechanisms, including decreased μ-receptors and increased CCK-induced inhibition of morphine, make opioids ineffective in treating neuropathic pain.

Understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie the initiation of pain and the development and maintenance of plasticity in primary afferent and spinal neurons will undoubtedly reveal novel targets for the discovery of more effective, more specific pain therapies.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS40538-01 (to C.L.S.) and NS36929 (to M.S.G.), and by Nature Science Foundation of China Grant 39840160 (to X.Z.).

Footnotes

    • ↵† To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: cstucky{at}mcw.edu.

    • This paper is a summary of a session presented at the third annual Chinese–American Frontiers of Science symposium, held October 20–22, 2000, at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center of the National Academies of Science and Engineering in Irvine, CA.

    Abbreviations

    IB4,
    isolectin B4;
    CCK,
    cholecystokinin
    • Copyright © 2001, The National Academy of Sciences

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Loeser J D,
      2. Butler S H,
      3. Chapman C R,
      4. Turk K C
      , eds(2001) Bonica's Management of Pain (Lippincott, Philadelphia).
    2. ↵
      1. Woolf C J,
      2. Salter M W
      (2000) Science 288:1765–1768, pmid:10846153.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Hunt S P,
      2. Mantyh P W
      (2001) Nat Rev Neurosci 2:83–91, pmid:11252998.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Caterina M J,
      2. Schumacher M A,
      3. Tominaga M,
      4. Rosen T A,
      5. Levine J D,
      6. Julius D
      (1997) Nature (London) 389:816–824, pmid:9349813.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Caterina M J,
      2. Rosen T A,
      3. Tominaga M,
      4. Brake A J,
      5. Julius D
      (1999) Nature (London) 398:441–446, pmid:10201376.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Caterina M J,
      2. Leffler A,
      3. Malmberg A B,
      4. Martin W J,
      5. Trafton J,
      6. Petersen-Zeitz K R,
      7. Koltzenburg M,
      8. Basbaum A I,
      9. Julius D
      (2000) Science 288:306–313, pmid:10764638.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      1. McCleskey E W,
      2. Gold M S
      (1999) Annu Rev Physiol 61:835–856, pmid:10099712.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Averill S,
      2. McMahon S B,
      3. Clary D O,
      4. Reichardt L F,
      5. Priestley J V
      (1995) Eur J Neurosci 7:1484–1494, pmid:7551174.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Molliver D C,
      2. Wright D E,
      3. Leitner M L,
      4. Parsadanian A S,
      5. Doster K,
      6. Wen D,
      7. Yan Q,
      8. Snider W D
      (1997) Neuron 19:849–861, pmid:9354331.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Bennett D L,
      2. Michael G J,
      3. Ramachandran N,
      4. Munson J B,
      5. Averill S,
      6. Yan Q,
      7. McMahon S B,
      8. Priestley J V
      (1998) J Neurosci 18:3059–3072, pmid:9526023.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Stucky C L,
      2. Lewin G R
      (1999) J Neurosci 19:6497–6505, pmid:10414978.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Snider W D,
      2. McMahon S B
      (1998) Neuron 20:629–632, pmid:9581756.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Matthes H W,
      2. Maldonado R,
      3. Simonin F,
      4. Valverde O,
      5. Slowe S,
      6. Kitchen I,
      7. Befort K,
      8. Dierich A,
      9. Le Meur M,
      10. Dolle P,
      11. et al.
      (1996) Nature (London) 383:819–823, pmid:8893006.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Watson C P
      (2000) Clin J Pain 16,Suppl. S49–S55, pmid:10870740.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Zhang X,
      2. Bao L,
      3. Shi T J,
      4. Ju G,
      5. Elde R,
      6. Hokfelt T
      (1998) Neuroscience 82:223–240, pmid:9483516.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Kellstein D E,
      2. Price D D,
      3. Mayer D J
      (1991) Brain Res 540:302–306, pmid:2054623.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Zhang X,
      2. de Araujo,
      3. Lucas G,
      4. Elde R,
      5. Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z,
      6. Hokfelt T
      (2000) Neuroscience 95:197–207, pmid:10619476.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Davis J B,
      2. Gray J,
      3. Gunthorpe M J,
      4. Hatcher J P,
      5. Davey P T,
      6. Overend P,
      7. Harries M H,
      8. Latcham J,
      9. Clapham C,
      10. Atkinson K,
      11. et al.
      (2000) Nature (London) 405:183–187, pmid:10821274.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Mechanisms of pain
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Mechanisms of pain
    Cheryl L. Stucky, Michael S. Gold, Xu Zhang
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2001, 98 (21) 11845-11846; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.211373398

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Mechanisms of pain
    Cheryl L. Stucky, Michael S. Gold, Xu Zhang
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2001, 98 (21) 11845-11846; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.211373398
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 98 (21)
    Table of Contents

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Persistent Pain Is a Major Public Health Problem Today
      • Why Is Pain a New Frontier of Science?
      • Molecular/Cellular Mechanisms
      • Neuronal Plasticity
      • Why Focus on the Primary Afferent Neuron?
      • Do Specific Types of Nociceptors Mediate Different Types of Pain?
      • Why Is Morphine Ineffective in Treating Nerve Injury Pain?
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • Abbreviations
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Surgeons hands during surgery
    Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
    Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
    Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
    Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
    Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
    Image credit: Witsawat.S.
    Double helix
    Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
    Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
    Image credit: Nathan Devery.
    Steamboat Geyser eruption.
    Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
    Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
    Listen
    Past PodcastsSubscribe
    Multi-color molecular model
    Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
    A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
    Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
    • List of Issues

    PNAS Portals

    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science
    • Teaching Resources

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Librarians
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490