Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Commentary

Telling tails

Mary B. Kennedy and Pat Manzerra
PNAS October 23, 2001 98 (22) 12323-12324; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.231486398
Mary B. Kennedy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pat Manzerra
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Related Article

  • Regulation of NMDA receptors by cyclin-dependent kinase-5
    - Oct 02, 2001
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-type glutamate receptor is one of three major classes of receptors for glutamate, the principle excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. It plays a key role in learning and in the formation of memories by acting as a “coincidence detector” that initiates changes in synaptic strength that lead to the formation of new neural networks (1). It is also an important mediator of several forms of pathological neuronal toxicity. The NMDA receptor responds at a synapse only when the presynaptic terminal releases glutamate at the same time that the postsynaptic neuron is strongly depolarized by the sum of activating influences impinging on it. In effect, it initiates the strengthening of all synapses that depolarize the same postsynaptic neuron at the same time and thus triggers formation of a new, more stable circuit. When the NMDA-receptor channel opens, it allows passage of calcium ions, as well as sodium and potassium, into the cell. The calcium ions trigger a cascade of biochemical signaling reactions catalyzed by enzymes located just underneath the postsynaptic membrane. These reactions modify other membrane channels in the synapse, ultimately leading to a change in the strength of the electrical signal produced when the synapse is activated again.

The processes of thinking, learning, and remembering are subtle and complex. Therefore, it isn't surprising that the magnitude and timing of calcium flux through NMDA receptors are tightly regulated by phosphorylation by several second-messenger-regulated protein kinases. The paper in this issue of PNAS by Li et al. entitled “Regulation of NMDA receptors by cyclin-dependent kinase-5” now provides evidence that a cyclin-dependent kinase that is highly expressed in brain also may be an important regulator of NMDA-receptor function (2). The cyclin-dependent kinases are a large family of 10 or more members that are known mostly for their involvement in orchestrating transitions in the cell cycle (3, 4). Cdk1 is the mammalian orthologue of the yeast cyclin-dependent protein kinase responsible for initiating the transition into mitosis (cdc2/cdc28). Other members of the family control critical functions, such as DNA replication, during the cell cycle. Most cdks are regulated by a family of small proteins called cyclins that are synthesized and degraded in a tightly controlled fashion as the cell cycle progresses. Only a few members of the family have functions outside the cell cycle; cdk5 is one of them. Its highest level of expression is in postmitotic neurons in developing and adult brain. The cdk5 catalytic subunit alone has no catalytic activity; however, it is not regulated by cyclins. Instead, it is activated by association with brain-specific regulatory proteins that have little sequence similarity to cyclins but seem to assume a cyclin-like fold (3). Cdk5 has many known functions in the brain, including an essential role in neuronal migration during development of the cortex (5, 6), regulation of cadherin adhesion, regulation of actin, neurofilament, and tubulin cytoskeletons, and regulation of dopamine signaling (3). In addition, cdk5 may mediate hyperphosphorylation of tau protein that leads to the formation of paired helical filaments in Alzheimer's disease (7). The work by Li et al. shows that cdk5 is concentrated together with the NMDA receptor at glutamatergic postsynaptic sites and can phosphorylate the cytosolic tail of a subunit of the NMDA receptor. The authors also show that roscovitine, an inhibitor of cdk5, reduces current through the NMDA receptor and blocks induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) in hippocampal slices. Their results suggest that cdk5 is part of a pathway that, directly or indirectly, regulates the amplitude of current through NMDA receptors.

Like most ligand-gated channels, the NMDA receptor is an oligomer of four to five individual subunits that come together in the membrane to form the channel (1). One of these subunits, NR1, is necessary for channel function and is similar in structure to the subunits of other ligand-gated channels (8). However, the four other principal subunits, termed NR2A–D, are unique among ligand-gated channels in having long extensions of their carboxyl-terminal tails that protrude into the cytoplasm beneath the membrane and serve as anchoring points for signal transducing enzymes (see Fig. 1; refs. 9 and 10). In the hippocampus and cortex, NR2A and NR2B are the most prominent. The ≈630-residue cytosolic tail of NR2A and the ≈650-residue tail of NR2B are homologous but are only ≈30% identical in sequence. The most similar regions are clustered in small segments of the tails (see Fig. 1). Thus, the two subunits may interact with some of the same, and some distinct, proteins. The tails of both subunits bind to the scaffold protein PSD-95 (11, 12) and also bind Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII; refs. 13 and 14), but the nature and consequences of that interaction may differ (15).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Phosphorylation sites on the cytosolic tails of NMDA-receptor subunits NR2A and NR2B. The domain diagrams compare the cytosolic tail of NR2A (residues 838-1464) and that of NR2B (residues 839-1482). Regions shown in red are 70% identical; in gold, 50%; in yellow, 40%; and in light blue, 20–30%. White regions show no similarity. The positions of phosphorylation sites discussed in the text are labeled, and the protein kinase believed to phosphorylate each is noted. Phosphorylation of Ser-1232 (in red) by Cdk5 is described by Li et al. in this issue (2).

Although a number of sites on the tails of these two subunits have been shown to be phosphorylated by specific protein kinases (14, 16–21), evidence about the functional significance of these modifications is still inconclusive. Perhaps the best documented example of a functionally significant phosphorylation is the up-regulation of activity of NMDA receptors through phosphorylation by the src/fyn family of cytosolic protein Tyr kinases (for review, see ref. 22). The introduction of src or a peptide that activates src-family kinases into heterologous cells expressing NMDA receptors increases NMDA-evoked currents. Similar treatment of neurons increases the NMDA-receptor component of synaptically evoked currents. The same effects can be seen after application of these reagents to inside-out membrane patches containing NMDA receptors. However, the functional significance of these effects and the mechanisms underlying them are uncertain. For example, enhancement of recombinant NR1/NR2A currents is blocked by mutating specific Tyr residues in the cytosolic tail to Phe (Y1105, Y1267, Y1387; ref. 17), supporting the notion that the enhancement is caused by Tyr phosphorylation. However, the increased current is caused by a reduction of tonic, high-affinity, voltageindependent blockade of the channels by extracellular Zn2+, an effect that is not observed when recording from NMDA receptors in intact neurons (23). To complicate the interpretation further, the principal site phosphorylated in NR2B in vivo by the fyn Tyr kinase, a close relative of src, does not correspond to the residues that, when mutated in NR2A, block up-regulation by src (Y1472; ref. 20). This site, Tyr-1472, becomes more heavily phosphorylated in hippocampal slices after induction of LTP and after transient global ischemia (20). The sequence surrounding Tyr-1472 in NR2A is a consensus clathrin adaptor-2 (AP2)-binding domain that can mediate NMDA-receptor internalization if it is not masked by binding to the PDZ domain of PSD-95 (24). The increase in phosphorylation of the Tyr in the AP2-binding domain after induction of LTP suggests that phosphorylation of this site may help to regulate turnover of the NMDA receptor. In the same vein, Vissel et al. (25) have reported recently that dephosphorylation of a ring of Tyr residues in NMDA-receptor subunits NR1 and NR2A results in down-regulation of recombinant NR1/NR2A receptors, apparently by clathrin-mediated endocytosis. These sites can be phosphorylated and down-regulation can be blocked by the Src and Fyn protein Tyr kinases.

It is apparent that the NMDA receptor can be modified by a complex, integrative network of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation.

Thus, although it is not yet clear which phosphorylation sites are important for physiological regulation of the NMDA receptor or for assembly of its associated signaling complexes, it is apparent that the receptor can be modified by a complex, integrative network of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. The organization and functions of this network will be the focus of much research over the next few years. In particular, it will be interesting to see whether the Ser site in NR2A that is phosphorylated by cdk5 in heterologous cells also is phosphorylated in neurons, and whether phosphorylation of the site is required for normal current through the NMDA receptor.

Footnotes

    • ↵* To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: kennedym{at}cco.caltech.edu.

    • See companion article on page 12742.

    • Copyright © 2001, The National Academy of Sciences
    View Abstract

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Dingledine R,
      2. Borges K,
      3. Bowie D,
      4. Traynelis S F
      (1999) Pharmacol Rev 51:7–61, pmid:10049997.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. Li B-S,
      2. Sun M-K,
      3. Zhang L,
      4. Takahashi S,
      5. Ma W,
      6. Vinade L,
      7. Kulkarni A B,
      8. Brady R O,
      9. Pant H C
      (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12742–12747, pmid:11675505, . (First Published October 2, 2001; 10.1073/pnas.211428098).
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    3. ↵
      1. Smith D S,
      2. Greer P L,
      3. Tsai L H
      (2001) Cell Growth Differ 12:277–283, pmid:11432802.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      1. Maccioni R B,
      2. Otth C,
      3. Concha I I,
      4. Munoz J P
      (2001) Eur J Biochem 268:1518–1527, pmid:11248668.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Ohshima T,
      2. Ward J M,
      3. Huh C G,
      4. Longenecker G,
      5. Veeranna,
      6. Pant H C,
      7. Brady R O,
      8. Martin L J,
      9. Kulkarni A B
      (1996) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:11173–11178, pmid:8855328.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Chae T,
      2. Kwon Y T,
      3. Bronson R,
      4. Dikkes P,
      5. Li E,
      6. Tsai L H
      (1997) Neuron 18:29–42, pmid:9010203.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Ahlijanian M D,
      2. Barrezueta N X,
      3. Williams R D,
      4. Joaklowski A,
      5. Kowsz K P,
      6. McCarthy S,
      7. Coskran T,
      8. Carlo A,
      9. Seymour P A,
      10. Burkhardt J E,
      11. et al.
      (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:2910–2915, pmid:10706614, . (First Published March 7, 2000; 10.1073/pnas.040577797).
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Moriyoshi K,
      2. Masu M,
      3. Ishii T,
      4. Shigemoto R,
      5. Mizuno N,
      6. Nakanishi S
      (1991) Nature (London) 354:31–37, pmid:1834949.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Monyer H,
      2. Sprengel R,
      3. Schoepfer R,
      4. Herb A,
      5. Higuchi M,
      6. Lomeli H,
      7. Burnashev N,
      8. Sakmann B,
      9. Seeburg P H
      (1992) Science 256:1217–1221, pmid:1350383.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Kennedy M B
      (2000) Science 290:750–754, pmid:11052931.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      1. Cho K-O,
      2. Hunt C A,
      3. Kennedy M B
      (1992) Neuron 9:929–942, pmid:1419001.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Kornau H-C,
      2. Schenker L T,
      3. Kennedy M B,
      4. Seeburg P H
      (1995) Science 269:1737–1740, pmid:7569905.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      1. Strack S,
      2. Colbran R J
      (1998) J Biol Chem 273:20689–20692, pmid:9694809.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      1. Gardoni F,
      2. Bellone C,
      3. Cattabeni F,
      4. Di Luca M
      (2001) J Biol Chem 276:7609–7613, pmid:11104776.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Bayer K U,
      2. De Koninck P,
      3. Leonard A S,
      4. Hell J W,
      5. Schulman H
      (2001) Nature (London) 411:801–805, pmid:11459059.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Omkumar R V,
      2. Kiely M J,
      3. Rosenstein A J,
      4. Min K-T,
      5. Kennedy M B
      (1996) J Biol Chem 271:31670–31678, pmid:8940188.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Zheng F,
      2. Gingrich M B,
      3. Traynelis S F,
      4. Conn P J
      (1998) Nat Neurosci 1:185–191, pmid:10195142.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Cheung H H,
      2. Gurd J W
      (2001) J Neurochem 78:524–534, pmid:11483655.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Liao G Y,
      2. Wagner D A,
      3. Hsu M H,
      4. Leonard J P
      (2001) Mol Pharmacol 59:960–964, pmid:11306676.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Nakazawa T,
      2. Komai S,
      3. Tezuka T,
      4. Hisatsune C,
      5. Umemori H,
      6. Semba K,
      7. Mishina M,
      8. Manabe T,
      9. Yamamoto T
      (2001) J Biol Chem 276:693–699, pmid:11024032.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Yang M,
      2. Leonard J P
      (2001) J Neurochem 77:580–588, pmid:11299320.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Ali D W,
      2. Salter M W
      (2001) Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:336–342, pmid:11399432.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Xiong Z G,
      2. Pelkey K A,
      3. Lu W Y,
      4. Lu Y M,
      5. Roder J C,
      6. MacDonald J F,
      7. Salter M W
      (1999) J Neurosci 19:RC37, pmid:10531471.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      1. Roche K W,
      2. Standley S,
      3. McCallum J,
      4. Dune Ly C,
      5. Ehlers M D,
      6. Wenthold R J
      (2001) Nat Neurosci 4:794–802, pmid:11477425.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Vissel B,
      2. Krupp J J,
      3. Heinemann S F,
      4. Westbrook G L
      (2001) Nat Neurosci 4:587–596, pmid:11369939.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Telling tails
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Telling tails
    Mary B. Kennedy, Pat Manzerra
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2001, 98 (22) 12323-12324; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.231486398

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Telling tails
    Mary B. Kennedy, Pat Manzerra
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2001, 98 (22) 12323-12324; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.231486398
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 98 (22)
    Table of Contents

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
    Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
    Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
    Large piece of gold
    News Feature: Tracing gold's cosmic origins
    Astronomers thought they’d finally figured out where gold and other heavy elements in the universe came from. In light of recent results, they’re not so sure.
    Image credit: Science Source/Tom McHugh.
    Dancers in red dresses
    Journal Club: Friends appear to share patterns of brain activity
    Researchers are still trying to understand what causes this strong correlation between neural and social networks.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/Yeongsik Im.
    White and blue bird
    Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
    Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
    Listen
    Past PodcastsSubscribe
    Goats standing in a pin
    Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
    CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
    Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
    • List of Issues

    PNAS Portals

    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science
    • Teaching Resources

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Librarians
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490