Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Commentary

New views of evolution and regulation of vertebrate β-like globin gene clusters from an orphaned gene in marsupials

Ross C. Hardison
PNAS February 13, 2001 98 (4) 1327-1329; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.4.1327
Ross C. Hardison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Related Article

  • An orphaned mammalian β-globin gene of ancient evolutionary origin
    - Jan 30, 2001
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Few, if any, proteins have been studied in as many organisms as have the hemoglobins. They are found in bacteria, fungi, plants, and animals, serving physiological roles ranging from oxygen transport in the blood of vertebrates to catalyzing the combination of oxygen and nitric oxide to form nitrate in bacteria, yeast, and worms (1, 2). Hence hemoglobins and the globin genes encoding them have been an important system for investigating many biochemical and evolutionary issues. Furthermore, the tissue-specific and developmental regulation of globin gene expression has been studied intensively in mammals and birds. This led to the discovery of many cis-regulatory sequences such as promoters, enhancers, locus control regions (LCRs) (3), and insulators (4). If any model system were well understood both in terms of gene evolution and regulation, this should be the one. However, by their discovery of an orphaned β-like globin gene in marsupials, Wheeler et al. (5) show in a recent issue of PNAS that previously inferred relationships between the β-globin gene clusters in eutherian mammals and birds were oversimplified. The new data force a reconsideration of the evolutionary course of this gene cluster, how these regulatory elements evolved, and how they may be acting today.

… the eutherian ɛ-γ-δ-β-globin gene cluster appears to be descended from a different gene cluster from that which led to the avian ρ-β-ɛ cluster.

In all jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes) studied, distinctive forms of hemoglobin are produced during primitive erythropoiesis in embryonic life, followed by different hemoglobins produced during definitive erythropoiesis in fetal and adult life. These hemoglobins are tetramers of two α-like globins and two β-like globins, each with an associated heme to which oxygen can bind reversibly. The genes encoding the globins are clustered, with the α-like globin gene cluster on a different chromosome from the β-like globin gene cluster in birds and mammals. The human β-like globin gene cluster has five active globin genes, encoding the embryonic ɛ-globin, two fetal γ-globins, the adult δ-globin produced at low levels, and the abundant adult β-globin (Fig. 1). Extensive comparisons with homologous genes from other eutherian mammals deduced a parsimonious pathway for the evolution of this gene cluster by repeated gene duplications (6, 7), including a predicted cluster containing the ancestor to ɛ-globin and β-globin genes (Fig. 1). This prediction was verified by the discovery of linked ɛ-globin and β-globin genes in two marsupial species, the American opossum, Didelphis virginiana (8), and the Australian dunnart, Sminthopsis crassicaudata (9).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Model for the independent evolution of β-like globin gene clusters in birds and mammals. The diagram shows major phyla as broad branches leading to eutherian mammals, marsupials, and birds, with the contemporary species at the top. Within the broad species branches are gene trees for the β-like globin gene clusters. The ancestral gene cluster (bottom of the diagram) has proto-β-globin genes (pβ1 and pβ2, each colored red and blue) and a regulatory element (yellow and orange rectangle for an LCR and/or enhancer). This gene cluster is proposed to have duplicated to generate the ancestor to the eutherian β-like globin genes (eβ1 and eβ2, colored in shades of red, with an LCR as a yellow rectangle) and the ancestor to the avian β-like globin genes (aβ1 and aβ2, colored in shades of blue, with an enhancer as an orange rectangle). The path of evolution to the genes related to the eutherian ɛ-γ-δ-β-globin gene cluster is drawn with red lines, and the path to the genes related to the avian ρ-β-ɛ-globin gene cluster is drawn with blue lines. Separations of genes by duplications are marked with yellow circles, and separations of genes by speciation events are marked with mauve diamonds. Note that the duplication to generate the ancestors to eutherian and avian β-like globin genes preceded the divergence of birds and mammals, hence both gene clusters were present in all three lineages depicted and still are found in contemporary marsupial mammals. The marsupial photographed is a pretty-faced wallaby.

Chickens also have a developmentally regulated β-like globin gene cluster, but it is rearranged relative to that in eutherians (Fig. 1), with two embryonic genes, encoding ρ-globin and ɛ-globin, at the ends of the cluster and two β-globin genes, one expressed at hatching (encoding βH-globin) and one expressed abundantly in adult red blood cells (encoding βA-globin). Given that the avian ρ-β-ɛ-globin gene cluster and the eutherian ɛ-γ-δ-β-globin gene clusters are the only β-like globin gene clusters known in these two taxa, it was natural to consider them to be orthologous, i.e., they were thought to be derived from the same gene cluster in the last common ancestor to birds and mammals. The discovery of the marsupial ω-globin (5) argues against this. Rather, the eutherian ɛ-γ-δ-β-globin gene cluster appears to be descended from a different gene cluster from that which led to the avian ρ-β-ɛ cluster.

Wallabies are medium-sized relatives of the kangaroos in Australia. The ω-globin was discovered as a component of a novel hemoglobin found in the blood of neonatal tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii). The ω-globin gene is expressed just before and after the birth of the joey (5). A partial amino acid sequence of the tammar ω-globin indicated that it was more closely related to bird β-globin than to the eutherian, marsupial, or monotreme β-globins (10, 11). The new studies from Wheeler et al. (5) show that the ω-globin gene is widely distributed in marsupials and provide the DNA sequence of the ω-globin gene from two species of marsupials, the tammar and the dunnart. This allows a more rigorous and complete phylogenetic analysis. The marsupial ω-globin genes form a sister group with the avian β-, ɛ-, and ρ-globin genes, clearly separated from the group containing the eutherian, marsupial, and monotreme β-like globin genes. Finally, Wheeler et al. (5) show that the ω-globin gene is found on a separate chromosome from the ɛ- and β-globin gene cluster; hence it is an “orphaned” β-like gene.

These new data argue for a significant change in the view of hemoglobin gene evolution in the warm-blooded vertebrates (Fig. 1). Marsupial mammals have both a bird-like ω-globin gene and a β-like gene cluster similar to that of eutherian mammals. If they inherited both gene clusters from an ancestor common to birds and mammals, then the β-like globin gene clusters of eutherian mammals and avians are not orthologous. By this model, at a time preceding the divergence of birds and mammals, an ancestral gene (or more likely, gene cluster) duplicated. One gene cluster diverged to generate the ɛ-γ-δ-β-globin gene clusters found in eutherian mammals and the ɛ-β-globin gene clusters found in marsupials. The other gene cluster diverged to form the avian ρ-β-ɛ-globin gene cluster and the orphaned ω-globin gene found in marsupial species. The eutherian β-like globin gene cluster still shares a common ancestor with the chicken ρ-β-ɛ-globin gene cluster, but it is earlier than the bird-mammal divergence.

An alternative model in which these two gene clusters remain orthologous requires substantial evolutionary convergence between the marsupial ω-globin gene and the bird β-like globin genes. If there were a single gene cluster at the time of the bird-mammal split, then one would have to propose a gene duplication in the marsupial lineage to generate the contemporary ɛ-β-globin gene cluster and the ω-globin gene. The ω-globin gene should diverge to fulfill some function in marsupials, but the convergence model would hypothesize that all of the similarity between the ω-globin gene and the bird β-like globin genes arose because of some common function in the two species. Because the trees showing the sister-group relationship between these two clades are based on coding region comparisons (5), this alternative cannot be rigorously excluded at this time, but it seems unlikely. Further mapping of adjacent genes may show regions of conserved synteny that would resolve the issue definitively.

This revised view opens several new avenues for further investigation. For example, what happened to the descendants of the genes in the eutherian lineage that became the marsupial ω-globin gene and the avian β-like globin genes, and vice versa? None have been found in the working draft sequence or the extensive expressed sequence tags available by routine searches (5). Perhaps they have been lost, leaving only one β-like globin gene cluster in eutherians and birds, but two clusters in marsupials, the latter reflecting the ancestral state. Alternatively, more refined searches may uncover the remnants of the “lost” β-like globin genes, or possibly show that they have evolved to provide a different function. Certainly, all hemoglobins may not yet be known, as illustrated by the recent description of neuroglobin in human brain tissue (12). Further studies in intermediate taxa such as monotremes, in a greater variety of birds, and in reptiles will provide a more complete picture of the evolution of this gene cluster.

The interpretation that the eutherian and avian β-like globin gene clusters are paralogous, duplicating before the bird-mammal divergence, has implications for views of gene regulation and the extent to which regulatory elements are conserved in vertebrates. Genes within the β-like globin gene cluster are regulated by their promoters, proximal enhancers, and, in mammals, a distal, strong enhancer called the locus control region, or LCR. The LCR is needed for high-level expression of globin genes in erythroid cells, both at the normal chromosomal location (13) and at ectopic integration sites examined in transgenic mice (3). Sequences homologous to the eutherian β-globin LCR are found upstream of the marsupial ɛ-β-globin gene cluster (R. Hope, R. Baird, J. Kuliwaba, S. Cooper, J. Czelusniak, and M. Goodman, personal communication; Fig. 1). A major enhancer is located between the βA- and ɛ-globin genes of chickens (14). Although much smaller and in a different location than the eutherian LCR, it mimics the effects of the LCR in transgenic mice (15). Furthermore, an insulator at the 5′ end of the gene cluster in chickens blocks activation by an enhancer and prevents position effect variegation (4). The relationship between accessible, open chromatin and gene expression was first (16) and most thoroughly described for the chicken globin gene clusters of chickens. In the chicken ρ-β-ɛ-globin gene cluster, the region of DNase sensitivity also shows increased histone acetylation and is bounded precisely by DNase-hypersensitive sites, the 5′ most of which is the insulator (17, 18).

Because both gene clusters share several regulatory features, such as expression exclusively in erythroid cells and switches in expression during development, one could imagine that these control systems were in place well before the divergence of birds and mammals (Fig. 1). For instance, it was reasonable to suppose that regulatory functions such as enhancement, domain opening, and insulation would be found in both the eutherian and avian globin gene clusters. However, no clear counterpart to the avian insulator has been described in the eutherian β-like globin gene cluster (19). Further investigation of the sequences surrounding these globin gene clusters (18, 20, 21) may clarify whether the insulator is a unique adaptation for this locus in birds or if an equivalent function is found more distally in mammals. A discrete cis-regulatory element acting solely to open a chromatin domain for the β-like globin genes has yet to be mapped in either gene cluster. Such a regulator may be further away from the gene clusters, or perhaps no discrete cis element accounts for tissue-specific domain opening. Determining the extent of the open chromatin domain containing the eutherian β-globin gene cluster is of considerable interest, because some aspects of the domain described so far could be specific to the chicken ρ-β-ɛ-globin gene cluster.

Enhancers are located within the eutherian LCR and between two globin genes in chickens. If they had a common ancestor, as proposed in Fig. 1, then one might expect that their DNA sequences would have been conserved. Surprisingly, no significant sequence matches were seen in the regulatory regions in alignments between the chicken ρ-β-ɛ-globin gene cluster and the human β-like globin gene cluster (22, 23), even though the enhancers share common binding sites for transcriptional activators. Thus either the cis-regulatory elements do share a common ancestry but have diverged so much that sequence alignments cannot detect them above the background, or they have arisen independently (i.e., convergent evolution of cis-regulatory sequences) as suggested by Wheeler et al. (5). Study of the regulatory elements of the ω-globin gene in marsupials should provide important insights into this issue.

The absence of alignment between the human and chicken enhancer sequences had indicated that these two species were too far apart to see conserved regulatory elements. However, more recent studies show that some regulatory elements at the SCL/TAL1 locus are revealed by genomic sequence alignments between human and chicken (24). Thus the absence of sequence matches between regulatory elements in the β-like globin gene clusters can be explained, at least partially, by the longer phylogenetic distance between them.

Further investigation of the extent of conservation of known regulatory elements in mammalian and avian species should provide a better context for evaluating the effectiveness of sequence comparisons for finding regulatory elements. Given the differences in rate and mode of evolution at different loci, different species may be more useful for comparisons at various loci (25, 26). The intriguing new findings from the marsupials (5) remind us that this class, with a time of divergence from eutherians intermediate between the mammal-bird split (about 300 million yr ago) and the primate-rodent split (about 100 million yr ago), could provide a helpful comparison species with human for the identification of candidate regulatory elements at some loci.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by Grants DK27635 and HG02238 from the National Institutes of Health. The photo of the rooster is from Dr. G. Barbato.

Footnotes

    • ↵* E-mail: rch8{at}psu.edu.

    • See companion article on page 1101 in issue 3 of volume 98.

    • Copyright © 2001, The National Academy of Sciences
    View Abstract

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Gardner P R,
      2. Gardner A M,
      3. Martin L A,
      4. Salzman A L
      (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:10378–10383, pmid:9724711.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. Minning D M,
      2. Gow A J,
      3. Bonaventura J,
      4. Braun R,
      5. Dewhirst M,
      6. Goldberg D E,
      7. Stamler J S
      (1999) Nature (London) 401:497–502, pmid:10519555.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Grosveld F,
      2. van Assendelft G B,
      3. Greaves D,
      4. Kollias G
      (1987) Cell 51:975–985, pmid:3690667.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. Chung J H,
      2. Whiteley M,
      3. Felsenfeld G
      (1993) Cell 74:505–514, pmid:8348617.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Wheeler D,
      2. Hope R,
      3. Cooper S J B,
      4. Dolman G,
      5. Webb G C,
      6. Bottema C D K,
      7. Gooley A A,
      8. Goodman M,
      9. Holland R A B
      (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1101–1106, pmid:11158601.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Goodman M,
      2. Koop B F,
      3. Czelusniak J,
      4. Weiss M L,
      5. Sightom J L
      (1984) J Mol Biol 180:803–824, pmid:6527390.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Hardison R C
      (1984) Mol Biol Evol 1:390–410, pmid:6599973.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    8. ↵
      1. Koop B,
      2. Goodman M
      (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:3893–3897, pmid:3375246.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Cooper S,
      2. Murphy R,
      3. Dolman G,
      4. Hussey D,
      5. Hope R
      (1996) Mol Biol Evol 13:1012–1022, pmid:8752008.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    10. ↵
      1. Holland R A,
      2. Gooley A A 2nd
      (1997) Eur J Biochem 248:864–871, pmid:9342240.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Holland R A,
      2. Gooley A A,
      3. Hope R M
      (1998) Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 25:740–744, pmid:9750967.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. Burmester T,
      2. Weich B,
      3. Reinhardt S,
      4. Hankeln T
      (2000) Nature (London) 407:520–523, pmid:11029004.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Bender M A,
      2. Bulger M,
      3. Close J,
      4. Groudine M
      (2000) Mol Cell 5:387–393, pmid:10882079.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Choi O-R B,
      2. Engel J D
      (1986) Nature (London) 323:731–734, pmid:3022151.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Reitman M,
      2. Lee E,
      3. Westphal H,
      4. Felsenfeld G
      (1990) Nature (London) 348:749–752, pmid:2175398.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    16. ↵
      1. Weintraub H,
      2. Groudine M
      (1976) Science 193:848–856, pmid:948749.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Hebbes T R,
      2. Clayton A L,
      3. Thorne A W,
      4. Crane-Robinson C
      (1994) EMBO J 13:1823–1830, pmid:8168481.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    18. ↵
      1. Prioleau M N,
      2. Nony P,
      3. Simpson M,
      4. Felsenfeld G
      (1999) EMBO J 18:4035–4048, pmid:10406808.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    19. ↵
      1. Bender M,
      2. Reik A,
      3. Close J,
      4. Telling A,
      5. Epner E,
      6. Fiering S,
      7. Hardison R,
      8. Groudine M
      (1998) Blood 92:4394–4403, pmid:9834246.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. ↵
      1. Bulger M,
      2. von Doorninck J H,
      3. Saitoh N,
      4. Telling A,
      5. Farrell C,
      6. Bender M A,
      7. Felsenfeld G,
      8. Axel R,
      9. Groudine M
      (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5129–5134, pmid:10220430.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. Bulger M,
      2. Bender M A,
      3. von Doorninck J H,
      4. Wertman B,
      5. Farrell C,
      6. Felsenfeld G,
      7. Groudine M,
      8. Hardison R
      (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:14560–14565, pmid:11121057.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      1. Reitman M,
      2. Grasso J A,
      3. Blumentahl R,
      4. Lewit P
      (1993) Genomics 18:616–626, pmid:8307571.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Hardison R
      (1998) J Exp Biol 201:1099–1117, pmid:9510523.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    24. ↵
      1. Gottgens B,
      2. Barton L M,
      3. Gilbert J G,
      4. Bench A J,
      5. Sanchez M J,
      6. Bahn S,
      7. Mistry S,
      8. Grafham D,
      9. McMurray A,
      10. Vaudin M,
      11. et al.
      (2000) Nat Biotechnol 18:181–186, pmid:10657125.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Miller W
      (2000) Nat Biotechnol 18:148–149, pmid:10657116.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Hardison R C
      (2000) Trends Genet 16:369–372, pmid:10973062.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    New views of evolution and regulation of vertebrate β-like globin gene clusters from an orphaned gene in marsupials
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    New views of evolution and regulation of vertebrate β-like globin gene clusters from an orphaned gene in marsupials
    Ross C. Hardison
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2001, 98 (4) 1327-1329; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1327

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    New views of evolution and regulation of vertebrate β-like globin gene clusters from an orphaned gene in marsupials
    Ross C. Hardison
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2001, 98 (4) 1327-1329; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1327
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 98 (4)
    Table of Contents

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
    Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
    Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
    Scientist looking at an electronic tablet
    Opinion: Standardizing gene product nomenclature—a call to action
    Biomedical communities and journals need to standardize nomenclature of gene products to enhance accuracy in scientific and public communication.
    Image credit: Shutterstock/greenbutterfly.
    One red and one yellow modeled protein structures
    Journal Club: Study reveals evolutionary origins of fold-switching protein
    Shapeshifting designs could have wide-ranging pharmaceutical and biomedical applications in coming years.
    Image credit: Acacia Dishman/Medical College of Wisconsin.
    White and blue bird
    Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
    Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
    Listen
    Past PodcastsSubscribe
    Goats standing in a pin
    Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
    CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
    Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science
    • Teaching Resources

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Librarians
    • Press
    • Site Map
    • PNAS Updates

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490