Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Direct evidence that sulfhydryl groups of Keap1 are the sensors regulating induction of phase 2 enzymes that protect against carcinogens and oxidants

Albena T. Dinkova-Kostova, W. David Holtzclaw, Robert N. Cole, Ken Itoh, Nobunao Wakabayashi, Yasutake Katoh, Masayuki Yamamoto, and Paul Talalay
PNAS September 3, 2002 99 (18) 11908-11913; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.172398899
Albena T. Dinkova-Kostova
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. David Holtzclaw
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert N. Cole
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Itoh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nobunao Wakabayashi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasutake Katoh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masayuki Yamamoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Talalay
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Contributed by Paul Talalay

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  1. Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Mechanism of phase 2 response regulation. Nrf2 is anchored in the cytoplasm by binding to Keap1, which is attached to the actin cytoskeleton. Inducers disrupt the Keap1–Nrf2 complex, and Nrf2 migrates to the nucleus where it forms heterodimers with other transcription factors such as small Maf that bind to the ARE regions of phase 2 genes and accelerate their transcription. Several types of modifications of Keap1 by inducers are shown.

  2. Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Primary structures of murine Keap1 (Upper) and Neh2 domain of Nrf2 (amino acid residues 1–98) (Lower). Tryptic peptides of Keap1 are numbered, and residues are highlighted: cysteine (yellow), arginine (blue), and lysine (red).

  3. Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Irreversible reaction of Dex-mes (1) with a thiol group (Upper) and structures of the chemical probes used: 4,4′-dipyridyl disulfide (2), 2,2′-dipyridyl disulfide (3), sulforaphane (4), 2-HBA (5), and 4-HBA (6).

  4. Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    (a) SDS/PAGE of purified Keap1. (b) SDS/PAGE of Keap1 after labeling with [3H]Dex-mes: 5 μg of Keap1 was incubated with 50 pmol of [3H]Dex-mes for 60 min at 25°C, and unbound Dex-mes was removed by gel filtration. Labeled Keap1 was separated on a 10% gel and stained with Coomassie blue. The gel lane was cut into 2-mm slices, each digested with 30% H2O2, and radioactivity was counted.

  5. Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Inhibition of [3H]Dex-mes binding to Keap1. Each reaction mixture contained 10 μl (3.5 μg, 50 pmol) of Keap1 and 80 μl of 25 mM Tris-Cl/2 mM EDTA/0.01% Tween 20, pH 8.0. A range of concentrations of competitors (10 μl in 50% acetonitrile/50% water) was added, and the mixture was incubated for 30 min at 25°C. Then 10 μl of [3H]Dex-mes (27 pmol) was added, and incubation was continued for an additional 60 min. [3H]Dex-mes bound to protein was separated from unbound steroid by gel filtration, and radioactivity in the protein fraction was determined.

  6. Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Reaction of thiol groups of Keap1 with 4,4′-dipyridyl disulfide. To a solution of 0.5 μM Keap1 in 0.3 ml of 5 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, at 25°C, was added 0.5 μM (1 equivalent) 4,4′-dipyridyl disulfide in four sequential steps at times indicated with the arrows. Immediately after mixing, the increase in absorbance at 325 nm was monitored at 0.1-s intervals.

  7. Figure 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7

    Reaction of Keap1 with sulforaphane. (a) Absorption spectra of 50 μM sulforaphane (SF), the reaction mixture of 50 μM sulforaphane after it has been incubated with 0.7 μM Keap1 for 90 min in 5 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, at 25°C against a Keap1 blank (SF+Keap1), and their difference spectrum (DF). (b) Plot of the reaction rates of sulforaphane with 0.7 μM Keap1 under the same reaction conditions as a function of the concentration of sulforaphane. (c and d) Absorption spectrum kinetics of the reaction of 2-HBA with Keap1 in the absence (c) or presence (d) of 20 mM sulforaphane.

  8. Figure 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8

    Native gel electrophoresis showing complex formation between Keap1 (100 pmol) and the Neh2 domain (50 pmol) of Nrf2, and their dissociation. Concentration-dependent effects of DTT (a), Neh2 (b), sulforaphane (c), and 2-(ortho) and 4-(para) hydroxylated bis-(benzylidene)acetones (d) are shown. The binding reactions and native gel electrophoresis were carried out as described in Experimental Procedures. The 11.9-kDa Neh2 fragment migrates rapidly as a single band and is not shown in these gels.

  • Copyright © 2002, The National Academy of Sciences

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kensler T W
    (1997) Environ Health Perspect 105:965–970, pmid:9255588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Talalay P
    (2000) Biofactors 12:5–11, pmid:11216505.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Talalay P,
    2. Fahey J W,
    3. Holtzclaw W D,
    4. Prestera T,
    5. Zhang Y
    (1995) Toxicol Lett 82/83:173–179.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Talalay P,
    2. De Long M J,
    3. Prochaska H J
    (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:8261–8265, pmid:3141925.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Prestera T,
    2. Holtzclaw W D,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Talalay P
    (1993) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:2965–2969, pmid:8385353.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Prestera T,
    2. Spencer S R,
    3. Wilczak C,
    4. Zhang Y,
    5. Talalay P
    (1993) Adv Enzyme Regul 33:281–296, pmid:8356913.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hayes J D,
    2. Ellis E M,
    3. Neal G M,
    4. Harrison D J,
    5. Manson M M
    (1999) Biochem Soc Symp 64:141–168, pmid:10207627.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Hayes J D,
    2. McMahon M
    (2001) Cancer Lett 174:103–113, pmid:11689285.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Dinkova-Kostova A T,
    2. Massiah M A,
    3. Bozak R E,
    4. Hicks R J,
    5. Talalay P
    (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3404–3409, pmid:11248091.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Chui D H K,
    2. Tang W,
    3. Orkin S H
    (1995) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 209:40–46, pmid:7726861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Itoh K,
    2. Wakabayashi N,
    3. Katoh Y,
    4. Ishii T,
    5. Igarashi K,
    6. Engel J D,
    7. Yamamoto M
    (1999) Genes Dev 13:76–86, pmid:9887101.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Itoh K,
    2. Chiba T,
    3. Takahashi S,
    4. Ishii T,
    5. Igarashi K,
    6. Katoh Y,
    7. Oyake T,
    8. Hayashi N,
    9. Satoh K,
    10. Hatayama I,
    11. Yamamoto M,
    12. Nabeshima Y
    (1997) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 236:313–322, pmid:9240432.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Rushmore T H,
    2. Pickett C B
    (1990) J Biol Chem 265:14648–14653, pmid:2387873.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Enomoto A,
    2. Itoh K,
    3. Nagayoshi E,
    4. Haruta J,
    5. Kimura T,
    6. O'Connor T,
    7. Harada T,
    8. Yamamoto M
    (2001) Toxicol Sci 59:169–177, pmid:11134556.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Chan K,
    2. Kan Y W
    (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:12731–12736, pmid:10535991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Cho H Y,
    2. Jedlicka A E,
    3. Reddy S P,
    4. Kensler T W,
    5. Yamamoto M,
    6. Zhang L Y,
    7. Kleeberger S R
    (2002) Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 26:175–182, pmid:11804867.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Ramos-Gomez M,
    2. Kwak M K,
    3. Dolan P M,
    4. Itoh K,
    5. Yamamoto M,
    6. Talalay P,
    7. Kensler T W
    (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3410–3415, pmid:11248092.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Fahey J W,
    2. Haristoy X,
    3. Dolan P M,
    4. Kensler T W,
    5. Schollus I,
    6. Stephenson K K,
    7. Talalay P,
    8. Lozniewski A
    (2002) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7610–7615, pmid:12032331.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Adams J,
    2. Kelso R,
    3. Cooley L
    (2000) Trends Cell Biol 10:17–24, pmid:10603472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Simons S S Jr,
    2. Pons M,
    3. Johnson D F
    (1980) J Org Chem 45:3084–3088.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Brocklehurst K
    (1979) Int J Biochem 10:259–274, pmid:456716.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Talalay P,
    3. Cho C-G,
    4. Posner G H
    (1992) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:2399–2403, pmid:1549603.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Fahey J W,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Talalay P
    (1997) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:10367–10372, pmid:9294217.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Bradford M M
    (1976) Anal Biochem 72:248–254, pmid:942051.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Gill S C,
    2. von Hippel P H
    (1989) Anal Biochem 182:319–326, pmid:2610349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Gostick D O,
    2. Green J,
    3. Irvine A S,
    4. Gasson M J,
    5. Guest J R
    (1998) Microbiology 144:705–717, pmid:9534240.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Snyder G H,
    2. Cennerazzo M J,
    3. Karalis A J,
    4. Field D
    (1981) Biochemistry 20:6509–6519, pmid:6796114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Zheng M,
    2. Storz G
    (2000) Biochem Pharmacol 59:1–6, pmid:10605928.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Kang J-G,
    2. Paget M S,
    3. Seok Y-J,
    4. Hahn M-Y,
    5. Bae J B,
    6. Hahn J-S,
    7. Kleanthous C,
    8. Buttner M J,
    9. Roe J-H
    (1999) EMBO J 18:4292–4298, pmid:10428967.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Sun Y,
    2. Oberley L W
    (1996) Free Radical Biol Med 21:335–348, pmid:8855444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Barbirz S,
    2. Jakob U,
    3. Glocker M O
    (2000) J Biol Chem 275:18759–18766, pmid:10764757.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Yan B,
    2. Smith J W
    (2001) Biochemistry 40:8861–8867, pmid:11467947.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Direct evidence that sulfhydryl groups of Keap1 are the sensors regulating induction of phase 2 enzymes that protect against carcinogens and oxidants
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Direct evidence that sulfhydryl groups of Keap1 are the sensors regulating induction of phase 2 enzymes that protect against carcinogens and oxidants
Albena T. Dinkova-Kostova, W. David Holtzclaw, Robert N. Cole, Ken Itoh, Nobunao Wakabayashi, Yasutake Katoh, Masayuki Yamamoto, Paul Talalay
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2002, 99 (18) 11908-11913; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.172398899

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Direct evidence that sulfhydryl groups of Keap1 are the sensors regulating induction of phase 2 enzymes that protect against carcinogens and oxidants
Albena T. Dinkova-Kostova, W. David Holtzclaw, Robert N. Cole, Ken Itoh, Nobunao Wakabayashi, Yasutake Katoh, Masayuki Yamamoto, Paul Talalay
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2002, 99 (18) 11908-11913; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.172398899
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 99 (18)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Experimental Procedures
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • Abbreviations
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490