Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant–insect associations

Conrad C. Labandeira, Kirk R. Johnson, and Peter Wilf
PNAS February 19, 2002 99 (4) 2061-2066; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.042492999
Conrad C. Labandeira
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirk R. Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Wilf
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Andrew H. Knoll, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved December 11, 2001 (received for review September 18, 2001)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Evidence for a major extinction of insect herbivores is provided by presence–absence data for 51 plant–insect associations on 13,441 fossil plant specimens, spanning the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary in southwestern North Dakota. The most specialized associations, which were diverse and abundant during the latest Cretaceous, almost disappeared at the boundary and failed to recover in younger strata even while generalized associations regained their Cretaceous abundances. These results are consistent with a sudden ecological perturbation that precipitated a diversity bottleneck for insects and plants.

One of the most scrutinized events in the history of life is the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K/T) mass extinction at 65.51 ± 0.3 million years before present (1, 2). This event has been linked to the impact of an extraterrestrial object (3) on the Yucatán Peninsula of Mexico (4) that resulted in the losses of numerous lineages within such disparate animal groups as pelagic vertebrates, dinosaurs, mammals, foraminifera, and marine and freshwater mollusks (5–11). Paleobotanical evidence indicates a drastic decline of seed plants in the Western Interior of North America, seen in both the megafloral and palynofloral records (11–17).

Several quantitative studies at the family level indicate that the diversity of insects suffered no decrease beyond normal levels of background extinction at the K/T boundary (18–20). The extinction resistance of insect families is probably attributable to the high diversity of their constituent species and the spatiotemporal plasticity of their geographic ranges, resulting in exceptional longevity in the fossil record (19, 21). Although few studies exist below the family level, the demise of Late Cretaceous aphidioid, beetle, and ant genera (20, 22, 23) provides some evidence for extinctions. Establishing a comprehensive test for the presence or absence of an insect extinction has been hindered by the worldwide lack of appropriate, local deposits that span the K/T boundary and contain well-preserved, diverse, and sufficiently abundant insect faunas (24). The deposits that come closest to meeting these criteria are: Canadian amber of the upper Campanian Foremost Formation, occurring approximately 10 million years before the K/T boundary (20); and the Fur Formation, a Danish unit that brackets the Paleocene to Eocene boundary and contains an assemblage of insect compression fossils from approximately 11 million years after the event (25). Even if more suitable deposits are found, taxonomic occurrence data are inherently limited for addressing the ecological aspects of extinction (26).

Here, we use an explicitly ecological approach that takes advantage of insect-damaged fossil plants (ref. 27; Fig. 1), which document the trophic associations between plants and their insect herbivores, the latter estimated as approximately half of all extant insect species (28). This approach also allows us to investigate a possible insect extinction at the K/T boundary by using a high sample size and stratigraphic resolution that are not available from body fossils of insects.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

A spectrum of plant–insect associations from the Williston Basin of southwestern North Dakota. Associations range from the earliest Paleocene at upper left, 14.4 m above the K/T boundary, and continue to the older associations of the latest Cretaceous at lower right, 85.5 m below the boundary. All material is from the Denver Museum of Nature and Science (DMNH) or the Yale Peabody Museum (YPM). Following each plant host are, respectively, morphotype number (indicated by the prefixes HC or FU) (17), specimen number, DMNH locality number (loc.), and ± meter distances from the K/T boundary as in Fig. 2 (17). Damage types are indicated by the prefix DT (Fig. 2). (Scale bars: solid = 1 cm, backslashed = 0.1 cm.) (a) Two linear mines with oviposition sites (arrows), following secondary and then primary venation, terminating in a large pupation chamber (DT59), on the dicot Paranymphaea crassifolia (FU1), DMNH 20055, loc. 563, +14.4 m. (b) Single gall (DT33) on primary vein of Cercidiphyllum genetrix (Cercidiphyllaceae, FU5), DMNH 20042, loc. 562, +8.4 m. (c) Free feeding (DT26) on Platanus raynoldsi (Platanaceae, FU16), DMNH 20035, loc. 2217, +1.3 m. (d) Skeletonization (DT61) on a probable lauralean leaf (HC32), DMNH 19984, loc. 2097, −31.4 m. (e) Multiple galls (DT33) on Trochodendroides nebrascensis (Cercidiphyllaceae, HC103), DMNH 19976, loc. 1489, −33.7 m. (f) Initial phase of a serpentine mine (DT45) on Marmarthia pearsonii (Lauraceae, HC162), DMNH 7228, loc. 2087, −36.9 m. (g) Cuspate margin feeding (DT12, arrow) on Metasequoia sp. (Cupressaceae, HC35), DMNH 13108, loc. 567, −56.8 m. (h) Serpentine leaf mine (DT43) assigned to the Nepticulidae (Lepidoptera), on unidentified Rosaceae (HC80), YPM 6367a, loc. 567, −56.8 m. (i) Hole feeding pattern (DT57) on an unknown genus of Urticales (HC81), DMNH 19539, loc. 2203, −56.8 m. (j) General skeletonization (DT16) on Erlingdorfia montana (Platanaceae, HC57), DMNH 11013, loc. 571, −61.7 m. (k) Large scale-insect impressions (DT53) centered on primary veins of E. montana, DMNH 18829b. loc. 571, −61.7 m. (l) Slot hole feeding (DT8) on an unidentified genus of Platanaceae (HC109), DMNH 18658, loc. 434, −88.5 m. See Table 1, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site, www.pnas.org, for additional descriptions of damage types.

Study Area, Specimens, and Methods

The Williston Basin of southwestern North Dakota is ideal for our study because it contains a megafloral sequence that is the most intensively sampled across the K/T boundary worldwide (17). The floras occur in a well-characterized composite section of 183 m of strata, representing an estimated 2.2 million years (2, 17) and lacking significant hiatuses (13, 17). The boundary is defined locally by an iridium anomaly, shocked minerals, and palynofloral extinctions. It also is associated with dinosaur extinctions and the loss of ≈80% of megafloral species (11, 13, 15, 17). We studied 13,441 plant specimens collected from 143 localities, in turn derived from 106 stratigraphic levels The megafloras (17) consist predominantly of dicotyledonous angiosperms, which comprise 86.3% of the 380 organ morphotypes in the combined Cretaceous and Paleocene floras (29); 307 of the dicot morphotypes are leaves. Bryophytes, ferns, one horsetail, gymnosperms, and monocotyledons also are preserved. The collections include the full plant diversity found in the field for each locality (17). Only five insect body fossils have been found in the collections. All specimens were collected by K.R.J. and are housed as vouchers at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science and the Yale Peabody Museum, New Haven, CT.

The most significant bias in our data, typical of most museum collections, may be the tendency to overcollect rare and under-represent common plant taxa. However, this bias is partially compensated for by the large sample size. Fossil plants in our sample were preserved in a full range of floodplain environments, including active and abandoned channels, splays, ponds, and swamps, all of which were locally present during both the Cretaceous and Paleocene (17). The majority of Cretaceous specimens were derived from channels versus ponds and swamps for the Paleocene, and there does not yet exist sufficient material for a facies-equivalent study. Nevertheless, we do not consider the facies change near the K/T boundary to be a major impediment because the K/T plant extinctions in our section are well documented, and extirpated taxa, on which Cretaceous insects depended, do not reappear elsewhere (17); diverse insect damage is known to be recoverable from swamp and pond deposits (30); and grain size differences should bias against observing an extinction because of the presumably low potential for preservation of insect-damaged leaves in relatively energetic, allochthonous settings such as channels (30). The leaf-bearing horizons in our section appear to have originated as single episodic burial events ranging from hours to days in duration and representing samples of the original vegetation ranging from approximately 104 m2 for parautochthonous to several square kilometers for allochthonous assemblages (31, 32).

Each specimen was inspected for insect-mediated damage, which when present, was assigned to one or more of 51 insect damage types (Figs. 1 and 2). Herbivory was recognized on the basis of four explicit criteria, which were used singly or in combination. These criteria were: the presence of reaction tissue; anatomic details of the cut margin, such as excision cusps made by mandibles; stereotypy based on pattern, position, or size and shape of the damage; and plant-host specificity (24, 33). Each damage type then was classified into one of four functional feeding groups: external foliage feeding, subdivided into margin feeding, hole feeding, skeletonization, and special types of external feeding damage; galling; mining; and piercing and sucking; as well as a separate, nonfeeding damage type for oviposition. Additionally, we assigned each damage type to one of three categories based on the degree of plant-host specificity typically but not exclusively found in various insect species producing the same damage type today (24): generalized for polyphagy, intermediate for oligophagy, and specialized for monophagy. We note that some occurrences of damage types within our generalized category undoubtedly represent feeding by specialist as well as generalist insects, thus biasing toward a conservative estimate for specialist extinction. Host specificity assignments were based on published surveys of modern plant damage linked to ecologically known insect taxa, including the spectra of host–plants consumed by descendant or otherwise related taxa (34–36), occasionally supplemented by plant–host specificity patterns observed in the fossils (24, 37). Our determinations (Table 1) are an expansion of previous work characterizing insect damage on latest Paleocene to middle Eocene floras (27, 30).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Stratigraphic and sampling data for the 51 insect-mediated damage types from a 183-m composite section straddling the K/T boundary (orange bar), from the Williston Basin of southwestern North Dakota (Table 1 and Table 2, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). The estimated time duration for this interval is 2.2 million years (my) before present, of which 0.8 my are assigned to the postboundary interval and 1.4 my are allocated to the preboundary interval (2). The Cretaceous strata are within the Hell Creek and Fort Union formations, and the Paleocene strata are entirely within the Fort Union Formation (2, 17). Placement of the zero datum is at the K/T boundary, not the Hell Creek/Fort Union formational contact, because the contact is diachronous with respect to the K/T boundary timeline (17). Depicted are the raw presence/absence data for damage types, categorized by functional feeding group and subgroup at the bottom, and representing 106 discrete horizons. Eight damage types have single stratigraphic occurrences (dots); the ranges of those with multiple stratigraphic occurrences are shown as vertical shaded bars, categorized by host specificity from the color scheme at upper left (see text). Confidence intervals of 50% are provided for the 14 damage types whose regional last appearances occur before the boundary, using a method that accommodates nonrandom distributions of fossil horizons and sampling intensity by allowing recovery potential to vary stratigraphically (39) (see text). Of the 14 specialized damage types with multiple stratigraphic occurrences that disappear at or below the K/T boundary, six (42.9%) reappear during the latest Paleocene to middle Eocene of Wyoming and Utah (27, 30). All associations are extant today. Four confidence intervals that exceed our sampling range are shown without end bars. Total specimen frequencies are given at right, including all plant organs; note logarithmic scale. The gray horizontal lines in the main figure and corresponding gray squares at right indicate the 14 horizons with more than 200 specimens of identified dicot leaves, used in Fig. 3; meter levels for these floras are: −75.0, −65.0, −56.8, −47.8, −36.9, −34.6, −31.4, −15.0, −3.6, +0.2, +1.3, +30.9, +42.4, +50.0. Abbreviations: mar., margin feeding; skel., skeletonization; spl., specialized external feeding types; p., piercing and sucking; o., oviposition. Limitations on graphical presentation cause the flora at +0.2 m, which is Paleocene, to appear within the orange line representing the K/T boundary.

Of the examined 13,441 fossil plant specimens, 9,292 were Cretaceous and 4,149 were Paleocene. Although the Cretaceous was more heavily sampled than the Paleocene in the total specimen count, possibly biasing in favor of a greater apparent extinction, the critical lowest 5 m of the Paleocene was as well sampled as any 5-m portion of the Cretaceous, with 2,314 specimens. We also used two principal techniques to minimize sampling effects: confidence intervals on stratigraphic ranges that take varying sampling into account (Fig. 2) and bootstrap analyses, namely repeated and random resampling through a range of sample sizes (Fig. 3b and Table 3, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site).

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

(a) Frequency analyses (percentage basis) of insect damage for the 14 discrete horizons with at least 200 specimens of identified dicot leaves. The vertical scale shows the meter level with respect to the K/T boundary (orange bar). The horizontal scale is the percentage of leaves bearing insect damage. Binomial error bars of ±1 σ are placed on frequency data based on the number of specimens (30). In green are all damage types; black, generalized damage types only; and purple, lumped intermediate and most specialized damage types. Because some individual leaves contain more than one damage type, the total percentage (green) is usually less than the sum of the two other data series. (b) Damage diversity analysis of insect damage, with raw data bootstrapped to 5,000 replicates (27). Vertical scale and zero datum as in a; the data series shows the mean number of damage types for 200 specimens. The data labels show the number of leaves in each sample and also pertain to a. Limitations on graphical presentation result in the data from +0.2 m (500 specimens), which are Paleocene, to appear within the orange line representing the K/T boundary. Error bars represent ±1 σ around the mean and are mathematically forced to be small when the total number of specimens only slightly exceeds 200. Poor preservation is probably responsible for the lack of recovered insect damage around the 30- to 40-m interval. See Table 3.

The standard technique for computing classical confidence intervals (38) was inapplicable to our data because the distributions both of the fossil horizons and of sampling intensity are nonrandom (Fig. 2). The fossil recovery potential, which is the relative likelihood of sampling a particular damage type at a certain horizon L, is therefore not uniform. However, the recent method of Marshall (39) allows for nonrandomness if fossil recovery potential can be defined in relation to stratigraphic level. In our data set, the recovery potential of a damage type at a particular L is well approximated by the number of plant specimens from L examined for insect damage. Specifically, all of the 14 damage types with range tops below the K/T boundary occurred exclusively on dicot leaves, so we defined the number of identified dicot leaves within each of 184 1-m bins to be the relative potential of sampling a damage type within that bin. The sum of the numbers of dicot leaves in each bin within the range of a damage type, inclusive, was considered to be the cumulative relative potential of recovery, CP. A proportionality factor α for the desired confidence level, defined in equation 2 of ref. 39, was multiplied by CP to derive a scaled potential, SP, equal to the right side of equation 3 of ref. 39. The confidence interval must contain the same cumulative potential as SP, represented by the left side of equation 3 of ref. 39, and this potential was calculated in an analogous manner to CP: starting in the bin above the range top of a damage type and proceeding to sequentially higher bins. The number of dicot leaf specimens was summed until a number greater than or equal to SP was reached. The top of the highest bin summed was the top of the confidence interval.

Results

The stratigraphic structure of our presence–absence data is shown in Fig. 2. Generalized damage types are better represented than the intermediate and specialized types. Whereas all 12 generalized associations traverse the boundary, 37.5% (6/16) of the intermediate and 70.0% (14/20) of the specialized damage types present in the Cretaceous do not. Of the 14 Cretaceous associations that do not cross the boundary and occur at two or more stratigraphic levels, 10 have a last appearance in the uppermost Cretaceous horizon with a large sample size (Fig. 2), 3.6 m below the K/T boundary, or even higher in the Cretaceous. Therefore, at the limit of detection, these 10 damage types do not appear to have gone extinct before the boundary. These observations are reinforced by placement of 50% confidence intervals on the range tops of the 14 associations whose ranges terminate before the K/T boundary and whose apparent disappearances could be attributed to preservation or sampling (40) (Fig. 2). Only two of the 14 exhibit a 50% chance of extinction below the boundary. Of the remaining 12 associations, eight show a 50% chance of their real extinction occurring in the interval between the boundary and +8 m, and seven between the boundary and +3 m. Four of the 14 associations, with 50% confidence intervals that range above Fig. 2, are too rare for quantitative evaluation of their disappearance, yet three of these have a last appearance 3.6 m or closer to the boundary. The preceding observations, coupled with the major reduction of specialized insect damage immediately above the boundary that lasts throughout the sampled interval (Figs. 2 and 3), are consistent with a genuine extinction at the K/T boundary.

In addition to the presence–absence analyses (Fig. 2), we examined changes in the frequency and diversity of insect damage through the section (Fig. 3). Potential problems with such analyses are related to differential herbivory on various types of plant organs and to the lower likelihood of finding herbivory on the unevenly distributed fraction of unidentified plant specimens, which tend to be more poorly preserved. Following previous studies (27, 30), we avoided these biases by restricting the analyses for Fig. 3 to identified dicot leaves, which comprised 9,313 (69.3%) of the 13,441 specimens analyzed in Fig. 2. We further confined the analyses to the 14 discrete horizons containing at least 200 leaf specimens, which represented the best compromise between stratigraphic inclusiveness and sufficient sampling. Frequency (Fig. 3a) is expressed as the percentage of leaf specimens with insect damage, and damage diversity (Fig. 3b) is expressed as the bootstrapped number of damage types. Whereas the frequency data are not particularly affected by sample size once an adequate specimen count has been reached, damage diversity is quite sensitive to sampling intensity (27). Bootstrapping allowed comparisons at an equal sample size, in this case 200 leaves (Fig. 3b).

At the K/T boundary, all of the frequency analyses show a decrease in herbivory (Fig. 3a), with the most severe decrease among intermediate and specialized damage types, which decline from 16% to 4%. At +50.0 m, generalized feeding again rises to Cretaceous levels, but intermediate and specialized feeding remain relatively low (6%). The frequency data (Fig. 3a) are mirrored by the damage diversity data (Fig. 3b) near the boundary. Bootstrap values range from 12 to 24 damage types for Cretaceous samples, with particularly high diversity in the uppermost Cretaceous. These values decline, from 24 at −3.6 m to 13 at +0.2 m, with a modest rebound at +50.0 m.

Although there are also significant fluctuations before the boundary (Fig. 3), the combination of decreases together with parallel patterns in the presence–absence data (Fig. 2), the sustained low herbivory levels above the boundary, and the failure of specialized damage types to recover, appear to record a major extinction event. Given a positive correlation between herbivory and temperature (30), the high herbivory levels during the latest Cretaceous and low values during the Paleocene (Fig. 3) may be partly related to warming temperatures during the latest Cretaceous and cooling near the K/T boundary (14, 41). However, neither climatic nor local facies changes near the K/T boundary provides a sufficient explanation for the extirpation of specialized insect feeding (Fig. 2) that was coupled with a mass extinction of plants. Instead, the collapse of community structure is apparently analogous to the reduction in epifaunal tiering in marine habitats that followed the Permian/Triassic extinctions (42).

Discussion

Our data support two nonexclusive scenarios for the termination of intermediate and specialized associations. First is a primary extinction in which the insects were exterminated outright by adverse environmental conditions. Alternatively, a secondary extinction occurred after the demise of plant hosts (43). Most insect herbivores are host–plant specialists (28); estimates of the number of insect species that consume only one or a few chemically similar plant–host genera are typically more than 70% for major phytophagous insect clades (44, 45). In either scenario, our data probably underestimate the severity of extinction because of the broad taxonomic coverage represented by the generalized damage types, which include some damage made by host-specialized insects.**

The simple demise of coupled plant and insect extinctions under the second scenario would be mitigated if some specialized herbivores were primarily tracking plant secondary chemistry (45–47), and thus survivors could colonize new but chemically similar host lineages (28). However, under conditions where approximately 80% of megafloral species were extinguished (13, 15), both continued host tracking and lateral transfer (43, 48) were largely unavailable. By contrast, generalist insects could have been significantly buffered from secondary extinctions by polyphagy, as suggested by studies of herbivore specificity on recently introduced plants (49, 50).

Our results, presently limited to a single basin, are potentially informative regarding the continuing debate over whether biotic changes at the K/T boundary were sudden (3, 7, 9, 11), gradual (51, 52), or indeterminate (40, 53). By comparison, even the dramatic climatic warming and vegetational changes associated with the Paleocene–Eocene boundary in nearby Wyoming did not incur a net loss of feeding associations (27, 30). Instead, only small turnovers of damage types occurred, demonstrating the capacity for insects to adapt to relatively gradual but cumulatively significant perturbations of the environment, shown also in studies of the Pleistocene (21). The sudden and sustained loss of many categories of feeding associations at the K/T boundary appears to be integrally related to the extinctions of about 80% of plant species (15) and stands in sharp contrast to the Paleocene–Eocene interval. This contrast supports a rapid and catastrophic failure of terrestrial ecosystems in the Williston Basin.

Theoretical explanations for plant–insect associations (28), including reciprocal genetic feedback that is inherent in true coevolution (46), would predict a bottleneck with lasting effects that would result from the decimation of both participants. In areas of the Northern Rocky Mountains and Great Plains sampled to date, plant diversity was not comparable to the latest Cretaceous until the early Eocene, more than 10 million years after the K/T event (54). Further, we reanalyzed late Paleocene and early Eocene herbivory data from nearby Wyoming (27), for direct comparison to Fig. 3. The resulting herbivory levels are lower than the latest Cretaceous, with values comparable to the highest stratigraphic horizon in Fig. 3.‡‡ Consequently, the possibility of a prolonged Paleocene interval of depauperate plant–insect associations deserves further investigation.

Acknowledgments

We thank L. Hickey and two anonymous colleagues for providing reviews. T. Baumiller, R. Burnham, D. Erwin, R. Horwitt, M. Foote, C. Marshall, P. Sheehan, and H. Sims provided valuable feedback on previous drafts. Special thanks go to M. Reynolds and L. Klise for help with collections at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science and the Yale Peabody Museum, respectively; the Denver Leaf Whackers, who enthusiastically collected fossil leaves; and B. Miljour and F. Marsh for assistance with graphics. Particular appreciation is expressed to C. Marshall and H. Wilf for valuable discussions regarding the use of confidence intervals; J. Alroy made an important suggestion improving Fig. 2. Funding of this research originated from the Scholarly Studies Program of the Smithsonian Institution and the National Geographic Society. Additional funds were provided to C.C.L. from the Walcott Fund of the Department of Paleobiology at the National Museum of Natural History; to K.R.J. from the Denver Museum of Nature and Science, the Pioneer Trails Regional Museum, and the Yale Peabody Museum; and to P.W. from the Michigan Society of Fellows and the Petroleum Research Fund of the American Chemical Society. This is contribution 89 of the Evolution of Terrestrial Ecosystems Consortium of the National Museum of Natural History.

Footnotes

    • ↵‡ To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0121. E-mail: labandeira.conrad{at}nmnh.si.edu.

    • ↵§ C.C.L., K.R.J., and P.W. contributed equally to this work.

    • ↵‡‡ The Wyoming data also are derived from plant fossils found in fine-grained, flood plain environments. The only difference in methodology is that the Wyoming data are from quantitative field censuses, not museum collections. Damage frequency for intermediate plus specialized damage types (Paleocene, Eocene): 3.87 ± 0.705%, 5.30 ± 0.796%; for generalized damage types: 24.8 ± 1.58%, 31.2 ± 1.65%; for all damage types: 28.3 ± 1.65%, 34.8 ± 1.69%. Bootstrapped number of damage types for 200 specimens: 15.0 ± 2.20, 13.9 ± 1.78 (27).

    • This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

    • ↵** Given an ≈80% extinction for plant species at the end of the Cretaceous (17) and that ≈70% of herbivorous insects are oligophagous or monophagous (44), then a very rough estimate is that 55–60% of herbivorous insects were extirpated at the K/T boundary, with the simplifying assumption that every plant species had the same number of dependent herbivore species, 70% monophagous and 30% polyphagous. This finding compares favorably to our value of a 41.7% decrease in total associations.

    Abbreviation

    K/T,
    Cretaceous-Paleogene
    • Received September 18, 2001.
    • Copyright © 2002, The National Academy of Sciences

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Jablonski D,
      2. Raup D M
      (1995) Science 268:389–391, pmid:11536722.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. Hartman J H,
      2. Johnson K R,
      3. Nichols D J
      1. Hicks J F,
      2. Johnson K R,
      3. Tauxe L,
      4. Clark D,
      5. Obradovich J D
      (2002) in The Hell Creek Formation and the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary in the Northern Great Plains: An Integrated Continental Record of the End of the Cretaceous, eds Hartman J H, Johnson K R, Nichols D J(Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO) , in press.
    3. ↵
      1. Alvarez L W,
      2. Alvarez W,
      3. Asaro F,
      4. Michel H V
      (1980) Science 208:1095–1108.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      1. Krogh T E,
      2. Kamo S L,
      3. Sharpton V L,
      4. Marin L E,
      5. Hildebrand A R
      (1993) Nature (London) 366:731–734.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    5. ↵
      1. Ward P D,
      2. Kennedy W J,
      3. MacLeod K G,
      4. Mount J F
      (1991) Geology 19:1181–1184.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Sheehan P M,
      2. Fastovsky D E,
      3. Hoffmann R G,
      4. Berghaus C B,
      5. Gabriel D L
      (1991) Science 254:835–839, pmid:11536489.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    6. ↵
      1. Coccioni R,
      2. Galeotti S
      (1994) Geology 22:779–782.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Lingham-Soliar T
      (1994) Biologist 41:215–218.
      OpenUrl
    7. ↵
      1. Hunter J P,
      2. Hartman J H,
      3. Krause D W
      (1997) Univ Wyoming Contr Geol 32:61–114.
      OpenUrl
      1. Alroy J
      (1999) Syst Biol 48:107–118, pmid:12078635.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. Pearson D A,
      2. Schaefer T,
      3. Johnson K R,
      4. Nichols D J
      (2001) Geology 29:39–42.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Wolfe J A,
      2. Upchurch G R
      (1987) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5096–5100.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    9. ↵
      1. Johnson K R,
      2. Nichols D J,
      3. Attrep M Jr,
      4. Orth C J
      (1989) Nature (London) 340:708–711.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    10. ↵
      1. Sharpton V L,
      2. Ward P D
      1. Johnson K R,
      2. Hickey L J
      (1990) in Global Catastrophes in Earth History: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Impacts, Volcanism, and Mass Mortality, eds Sharpton V L, Ward P D(Geological Society of America, Denver), pp 433–444.
    11. ↵
      1. Johnson K R
      (1992) Cret Res 13:91–117.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
      1. Sweet A R,
      2. Braman D R
      (2001) Can J Earth Sci 38:249–269.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    12. ↵
      1. Hartman J H,
      2. Johnson K R,
      3. Nichols D J
      1. Johnson K R
      (2002) in The Hell Creek Formation and the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary in the Northern Great Plains—An Integrated Continental Record at the End of the Cretaceous, eds Hartman J H, Johnson K R, Nichols D J(Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO) , in press.
    13. ↵
      1. Jarzembowski E A
      (1989) Mesoz Res 2:25–28.
      OpenUrl
    14. ↵
      1. Labandeira C C,
      2. Sepkoski J J Jr
      (1993) Science 261:310–315, pmid:11536548.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Pike E M
      (1995) Amber Taphonomy and the Grassy Lake, Alberta, Amber Fauna (Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, Canada).
    16. ↵
      1. Elias S A
      (1994) Quaternary Insects and Their Environments (Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC).
    17. ↵
      1. Grimaldi D A,
      2. Agosti D
      (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13678–13683, pmid:11078527.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Pakaluk J,
      2. Slipinski S A
      1. Scholtz C H,
      2. Chown S L
      (1995) in Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera, eds Pakaluk J, Slipinski S A(Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw), 1, pp 355–374.
      OpenUrl
    19. ↵
      1. Hartman J H,
      2. Johnson K R,
      3. Nichols D J
      1. Labandeira C C,
      2. Johnson K R,
      3. Lang P
      (2002) in The Hell Creek Formation and the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary in the Northern Great Plains—An Integrated Continental Record at the End of the Cretaceous, eds Hartman J H, Johnson K R, Nichols D J(Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO) , in press.
    20. ↵
      1. Rust J,
      2. Andersen N M
      (1999) Zool J Linn Soc 125:331–348.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    21. ↵
      1. Behrensmeyer A K,
      2. Damuth J D,
      3. DiMichele W A,
      4. Potts R,
      5. Sues H-D,
      6. Wing S L
      1. Damuth J D
      (1992) in Terrestrial Ecosystems through Time, eds Behrensmeyer A K, Damuth J D, DiMichele W A, Potts R, Sues H-D, Wing S L(Univ. of Chicago, Chicago), pp 182–203.
    22. ↵
      1. Wilf P,
      2. Labandeira C C,
      3. Johnson K R,
      4. Coley P D,
      5. Cutter A D
      (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6221–6226, pmid:11353840.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      1. Schoonhoven L M,
      2. Jermy T,
      3. Loon J J A v
      (1998) Insect-Plant Biology (Chapman and Hall, London).
    24. ↵
      1. Ash A W,
      2. Ellis B,
      3. Hickey L J,
      4. Johnson K R,
      5. Wilf P,
      6. Wing S L
      (1999) Manual of Leaf Architecture: Morphological Description and Categorization of Dicotyledonous and Net-Veined Monocotyledonous Angiosperms (Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC).
    25. ↵
      1. Wilf P,
      2. Labandeira C C
      (1999) Science 284:2153–2156, pmid:10381875.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Kidwell S M,
      2. Behrensmeyer A K
      1. Burnham R J
      (1993) in Taphonomic Approaches to Time Resolution in Fossil Assemblages, eds Kidwell S M, Behrensmeyer A K(Paleontological Society, Knoxville, TN), pp 57–78.
    27. ↵
      1. Kidwell S M,
      2. Behrensmeyer A K
      1. Johnson K R
      (1993) in Taphonomic Approaches to Time Resolution in Fossil Assemblages, eds Kidwell S M, Behrensmeyer A K(Paleontological Society, Knoxville, TN), pp 210–227.
    28. ↵
      1. Labandeira C C
      (1998) Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 26:329–377.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    29. ↵
      1. Cox M L
      1. Novotny V,
      2. Basset Y,
      3. Samuelson G A,
      4. Miller S E
      (1999) in in Advances in Chrysomelidae Biology 1, ed Cox M L(Backhuys, Leiden), pp 343–360.
      1. Cox M L
      1. Hespenheide H A,
      2. Dang V
      (1999) in in Advances in Chrysomelidae Biology 1, ed Cox M L(Backhuys, Leiden), pp 375–389.
    30. ↵
      1. Nyman T,
      2. Widmer A,
      3. Roininen H
      (2000) Evolution 54:526–533, pmid:10937229.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Wilf P,
      2. Labandeira C C,
      3. Kress W J,
      4. Staines C L,
      5. Windsor D M,
      6. Allen A L,
      7. Johnson K R
      (2000) Science 289:291–294, pmid:10894775.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    32. ↵
      1. Strauss D,
      2. Sadler P M
      (1989) Math Geol 14:411–427.
      OpenUrl
    33. ↵
      1. Marshall C R
      (1997) Paleobiology 23:165–173.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    34. ↵
      1. Silver L T,
      2. Schultz P H
      1. Signor P W III,
      2. Lipps J H
      (1982) in Geological Implications of Impacts of Large Asteroids and Comets on Earth, eds Silver L T, Schultz P H(Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO), pp 291–296.
    35. ↵
      1. Olsson R K,
      2. Wright J D,
      3. Miller K G
      (2001) J Foram Res 31:275–282.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    36. ↵
      1. Bottjer D J,
      2. Ausich W I
      (1986) Paleobiology 12:400–420.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    37. ↵
      1. Kelley S T,
      2. Farrell B D
      (1998) Evolution 52:1731–1743.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    38. ↵
      1. Bernays E A,
      2. Chapman R F
      (1994) Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects (Chapman and Hall, New York).
    39. ↵
      1. Termonia A,
      2. Hsiao T H,
      3. Pasteels J M,
      4. Milinkovitch M C
      (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3909–3914, pmid:11259651.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    40. ↵
      1. Berenbaum M
      (1983) Evolution 37:163–179.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    41. ↵
      1. Wahlberg N
      (2001) Evolution 55:522–537, pmid:11327160.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    42. ↵
      1. Yukawa J,
      2. Uechi N
      (1999) Esakia 39:1–7.
      OpenUrl
    43. ↵
      1. Jobin A,
      2. Schaffner U,
      3. Nentwig W
      (1996) Entomol Exp Appl 79:33–42.
      OpenUrl
    44. ↵
      1. Olckers T,
      2. Hulley P E
      (1989) J Entomol Soc S Africa 52:81–93.
      OpenUrl
    45. ↵
      1. Clemens W A,
      2. Archibald J D,
      3. Hickey L J
      (1981) Paleobiology 7:293–298.
      OpenUrlAbstract
    46. ↵
      1. Keller G,
      2. Barrera E,
      3. Schmitz B,
      4. Mattson E
      (1993) Geol Soc Am Bull 105:979–997.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    47. ↵
      1. Marshall C R,
      2. Ward P D
      (1996) Science 274:1360–1363, pmid:8910273.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    48. ↵
      1. Wing S L,
      2. Alroy J,
      3. Hickey L J
      (1995) Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol 115:117–155.
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Article Alerts
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant–insect associations
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
    Citation Tools
    Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant–insect associations
    Conrad C. Labandeira, Kirk R. Johnson, Peter Wilf
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2002, 99 (4) 2061-2066; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.042492999

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Request Permissions
    Share
    Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant–insect associations
    Conrad C. Labandeira, Kirk R. Johnson, Peter Wilf
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2002, 99 (4) 2061-2066; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.042492999
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Mendeley logo Mendeley
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
    Current Issue

    Submit

    Sign up for Article Alerts

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • Study Area, Specimens, and Methods
      • Results
      • Discussion
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • Abbreviation
      • References
    • Figures & SI
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    You May Also be Interested in

    Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
    Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
    Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
    Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
    Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
    Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
    Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
    Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
    Featured Profile
    PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
     Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
    Putative signature of monogamy
    A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
    Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
    Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
    Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
    Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
    Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

    More Articles of This Classification

    Biological Sciences

    • Structural basis for activity of TRIC counter-ion channels in calcium release
    • PGC1A regulates the IRS1:IRS2 ratio during fasting to influence hepatic metabolism downstream of insulin
    • Altered neural odometry in the vertical dimension
    Show more

    Evolution

    • Molecular mechanism and history of non-sense to sense evolution of antifreeze glycoprotein gene in northern gadids
    • Transitions between foot postures are associated with elevated rates of body size evolution in mammals
    • Hagfish from the Cretaceous Tethys Sea and a reconciliation of the morphological–molecular conflict in early vertebrate phylogeny
    Show more

    Related Content

    • Scopus
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited by...

    • An experimental assessment of the ignition of forest fuels by the thermal pulse generated by the Cretaceous-Palaeogene impact at Chicxulub
    • A Triassic-Jurassic window into the evolution of Lepidoptera
    • INSECT FOLIVORY IN AN ANGIOSPERM-DOMINATED FLORA FROM THE MID-CRETACEOUS OF UTAH, U.S.A.
    • Resilience of plant-insect interactions in an oak lineage through Quaternary climate change
    • A simple Bayesian method of inferring extinction
    • Climate Change and the Past, Present, and Future of Biotic Interactions
    • The Eocene Apex of Panorpoid Scorpionfly Family Diversity
    • Mass extinction of lizards and snakes at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary
    • Distinguishing Agromyzidae (Diptera) Leaf Mines in the Fossil Record: New Taxa from the Paleogene of North America and Germany and their Evolutionary Implications
    • Seasonality, the latitudinal gradient of diversity, and Eocene insects
    • Patchiness and long-term change in early Eocene insect feeding damage
    • Temporal lags and overlap in the diversification of weevils and flowering plants
    • NUTRIENT TURNOVER RATES IN ANCIENT TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS
    • Sharply increased insect herbivory during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum
    • Geographic variation in turnover and recovery from the Late Ordovician mass extinction
    • Decoupled plant and insect diversity after the end-Cretaceous extinction.
    • Tropical forests are both evolutionary cradles and museums of leaf beetle diversity
    • Cenozoic insect-plant diversification in the tropics
    • Leaf architectural profiles of angiosperm floras across the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary
    • Richness of plant-insect associations in Eocene Patagonia: A legacy for South American biodiversity
    • Land plant extinction at the end of the Cretaceous: a quantitative analysis of the North Dakota megafloral record
    • Confidence limits on fossil ranges that account for facies changes
    • Correlated terrestrial and marine evidence for global climate changes before mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary
    • A Tropical Rainforest in Colorado 1.4 Million Years After the Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary
    • Scopus (168)
    • Google Scholar

    Similar Articles

    Site Logo
    Powered by HighWire
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feeds
    • Email Alerts

    Articles

    • Current Issue
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive

    PNAS Portals

    • Classics
    • Front Matter
    • Teaching Resources
    • Anthropology
    • Chemistry
    • Physics
    • Sustainability Science

    Information

    • Authors
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers
    • Press
    • Site Map

    Feedback    Privacy/Legal

    Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490