Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
New Research In
Physical Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
-
Communicated by Jon H. Kaas, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN (received for review December 20, 2001)
Article Figures & SI
Figures
- Figure 1
The unusual anatomy of the naked mole-rat (H. glaber). (A) An adult mole-rat demonstrating the lack of fur and general proportions of the body. (B) The sensory hairs covering the tail that are used for navigation while traveling backward through tunnels. (C) Front view of a naked mole-rat showing the enlarged incisors that are located permanently exterior to the oral cavity. Note also the sensory whiskers covering the front part of the face and mouth region. (D) A mole-rat moves a small piece of earth with the teeth. (E–G) A remarkable feature of the lower incisors is their ability to move independently. This is possible because of a flexible mandibular symphysis connecting the two halves of the lower jaw. The specimen shown here was anesthetized to document their mobility in the dorso-ventral and medio-lateral planes. Analysis of slow-motion videotaped behavior shows that independent movements in these different directions are common. (Scales bars: 2 cm in A; 1 cm in C; 5 mm in E.)
- Figure 2
Results of microelectrode recordings from naked mole-rat case 4 showing the extent of S1 and the location of the representations for different body parts in the left hemisphere. Each circle marks an electrode penetration where neurons responded to tactile stimulation of the body surface. Each colored region indicates the extent of the representation of a different body part. The representation of the dentition (Green) was found to be greatly expanded in naked mole-rats, taking up approximately 31% of S1. Note also the relatively large size of S1 overall, and its extension into far caudal and medial cortex where visual cortex is usually located in other mammals. ⋆, microlesions; ×, unresponsive sites. Medial is up and rostral is to the left.
- Figure 3
The relative sizes of different sensory representations in naked mole-rats S1. The chart on the right shows the percentage of cortex devoted to different body parts. On the left the different body parts are illustrated according to their cortical proportions. This “mole-ratunculus” provides a graphic illustration of the cortical magnification of the incisors and head (illustration by Lana Finch).
- Figure 4
A comparison of the size and location of primary somatosensory cortex between laboratory rats (Long–Evans) and the naked mole-rat. (A) The location and size of S1 in a rat drawn from a section of layer 4 cortex processed for cytochrome oxidase histochemistry. Black ovals within S1 reflect the locations of cytochrome oxidase dark modules that represent whiskers and skin surfaces (30). S1 takes up approximately 21% of the neocortex in rats and is located rostral to primary visual (V1) and auditory cortex (A1). (B) The location and size of S1 in the naked mole-rat. S1 takes up approximately 31% of neocortex and extends far caudal and medial, occupying cortical territory usually taken up by visual areas in other mammals. (C) A section of flattened cortex from a naked mole-rat showing microlesions made where neurons responded to mechanosensory stimulation of body parts and outlining much of S1. Note the caudo-medial location of lesions D and E. Neurons at the lesions responded in the following sequence: A, tongue; B, lower incisor; C, forelimb; D and E, tail; F, facial vibrissae; G, hindlimb (in S2/PV); H, lower incisor.
- Figure 5
Comparison of the overall proportion of neocortex taken up by S1 in the naked mole-rat and Long–Evans laboratory rat. S1 was approximately 50% larger, as a proportion of total neocortex, in the naked mole-rat (Right). A second comparison is the proportion of sensory cortex taken up by S1 in the two species (Left). Total sensory cortex here was defined as cortex caudal to the rostral border of S1, which necessarily includes all visual cortex (V1 and V2), auditory cortex, and the secondary somatosensory area (S2) and parietal ventral somatosensory area (PV). Because mole-rats have less sensory cortex overall, S1 takes up a larger proportion of neocortex devoted to all sensory areas. Bars indicate SD.
Tables
Body part Case 1, mm2 Case 2, mm2 Case 3, mm2 Case 4, mm2 Average, mm2 SD, mm2 Incisors 27.1% (2.9) 30.4% (2.4) 34.7% (4.2) 30.8% (3.5) 30.8% (3.2) ± 3.1% (0.8) Head/vibrissae 23.3% (2.5) 20.9% (1.7) 14.7% (1.8) 16.0% (1.8) 18.7% (1.9) ± 4.0% (0.4) Buccal cavity 10.6% (1.1) 11.6% (0.9) 12.9% (1.6) 10.8% (1.2) 11.5% (1.2) ± 1.0% (0.3) Chin 5.5% (0.6) 10.5% (0.8) 7.3% (0.9) 6.6% (0.8) 7.5% (0.8) ± 2.2% (0.1) Trunk/tail 12.0% (1.3) 11.3% (0.9) 14.1% (1.7) 16.7% (1.9) 13.5% (1.4) ± 2.4% (0.4) Forepaw 11.3% (1.2) 10.5% (0.8) 7.7% (0.9) 11.4% (1.3) 10.2% (1.1) ± 1.7% (0.2) Hindpaw 10.2% (1.1) 4.7% (0.4) 8.7% (1.0) 7.7% (0.9) 7.8% (0.8) ± 2.3% (0.3) Total S1 (10.6) (7.9) (12.0) (11.4) (10.5) ± (1.8) Total neocortex (39.8) (25.3) (37.2) (32.5) (33.7) ± (6.4)
Somatosensory cortex dominated by the representation of teeth in the naked mole-rat brain
Sign up for Article Alerts
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
Astronomers thought they’d finally figured out where gold and other heavy elements in the universe came from. In light of recent results, they’re not so sure.
Image credit: Science Source/Tom McHugh.
Researchers are still trying to understand what causes this strong correlation between neural and social networks.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Yeongsik Im.
Aleix Martinez explains why facial expressions often are not accurate indicators of emotion.
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.