Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Stereotype threat prevents perceptual learning

Robert J. Rydell, Richard M. Shiffrin, Kathryn L. Boucher, Katie Van Loo, and Michael T. Rydell
PNAS published ahead of print July 26, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002815107
Robert J. Rydell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard M. Shiffrin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn L. Boucher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katie Van Loo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael T. Rydell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited* by Claude M. Steele, Columbia University, New York, NY, and approved June 28, 2010 (received for review March 4, 2010)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Stereotype threat (ST) refers to a situation in which a member of a group fears that her or his performance will validate an existing negative performance stereotype, causing a decrease in performance. For example, reminding women of the stereotype “women are bad at math” causes them to perform more poorly on math questions from the SAT and GRE. Performance deficits can be of several types and be produced by several mechanisms. We show that ST prevents perceptual learning, defined in our task as an increasing rate of search for a target Chinese character in a display of such characters. Displays contained two or four characters and half of these contained a target. Search rate increased across a session of training for a control group of women, but not women under ST. Speeding of search is typically explained in terms of learned “popout” (automatic attraction of attention to a target). Did women under ST learn popout but fail to express it? Following training, the women were shown two colored squares and asked to choose the one with the greater color saturation. Superimposed on the squares were task-irrelevant Chinese characters. For women not trained under ST, the presence of a trained target on one square slowed responding, indicating that training had caused the learning of an attention response to targets. Women trained under ST showed no slowing, indicating that they had not learned such an attention response.

  • gender
  • math
  • visual search

Footnotes

  • 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rjrydell{at}indiana.edu.
  • Author contributions: R.J.R., R.M.S., and M.T.R. designed research; R.J.R., K.L.B., K.V.L., and M.T.R. performed research; R.J.R. analyzed data; and R.J.R., R.M.S., K.L.B., and K.V.L. wrote the paper.

  • ↵*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.

  • *The control instructions read: “In this laboratory, we have been researching how people solve a number of different types of problems. We hope to understand what strategies people use and how these strategies impact problem solving. Thus, we have created a task to attempt to look at how different people approach solving problems in the laboratory. It is important that you take this task seriously so that we can learn more about learning styles and problem solving.”

  • †The bulk of the ST instructions were taken verbatim from the Appendix of ref. 3, p. 276. We added: “One reason why women do more poorly on some math tasks, like word problems on the SAT or ACT, is that they have a more difficult time correctly choosing the information needed to solve the problem from the irrelevant and distracting information that is also provided. The current research is looking at this skill and why women perform more poorly at this skill than men.” This addition was to explicitly connect math to the search task.

  • ‡The shortened form of the control instructions read: “As was mentioned at the outset, we hope to understand what strategies people use and how these strategies impact problem solving. Thus, we have created a task that attempts to look at individual differences in problem solving style in the laboratory. It is important that you take this task seriously so that we can learn more about learning styles and problem solving.” The shortened form of the ST instructions read: “As was mentioned at the outset, one reason why women are poorer on some math tasks, like word problems on the SAT or ACT, is that they have a more difficult time correctly choosing the information needed to solve the problem from the irrelevant and distracting information that is also provided. The current research is looking at this skill and why women perform more poorly at this skill than men. In our lab, we are interested in how underperformance in information selection impacts math performance.”

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1002815107/-/DCSupplemental.

Next
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stereotype threat prevents perceptual learning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Stereotype threat prevents perceptual learning
Robert J. Rydell, Richard M. Shiffrin, Kathryn L. Boucher, Katie Van Loo, Michael T. Rydell
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2010, 201002815; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1002815107

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Stereotype threat prevents perceptual learning
Robert J. Rydell, Richard M. Shiffrin, Kathryn L. Boucher, Katie Van Loo, Michael T. Rydell
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2010, 201002815; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1002815107
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

Social Sciences

  • Emergence of analogy from relation learning
  • Defining the economic scope for ecosystem-based fishery management
  • Social threat learning transfers to decision making in humans
Show more

Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

  • Emergence of analogy from relation learning
  • Social threat learning transfers to decision making in humans
  • Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality
Show more

Related Content

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Scopus (37)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490