Religion as a means to assure paternity
- aDepartment of Anthropology and Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109;
- bDepartment of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520;
- cDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109;
- dArizona Research Laboratories Division of Biotechnology and
- eDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Rich Sosis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, and accepted by the Editorial Board May 1, 2012 (received for review June 27, 2011)

Abstract
The sacred texts of five world religions (Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Judaism) use similar belief systems to set limits on sexual behavior. We propose that this similarity is a shared cultural solution to a biological problem: namely male uncertainty over the paternity of offspring. Furthermore, we propose the hypothesis that religious practices that more strongly regulate female sexuality should be more successful at promoting paternity certainty. Using genetic data on 1,706 father–son pairs, we tested this hypothesis in a traditional African population in which multiple religions (Islam, Christianity, and indigenous) coexist in the same families and villages. We show that the indigenous religion enables males to achieve a significantly (P = 0.019) lower probability of cuckoldry (1.3% versus 2.9%) by enforcing the honest signaling of menstruation, but that all three religions share tenets aimed at the avoidance of extrapair copulation. Our findings provide evidence for high paternity certainty in a traditional African population, and they shed light on the reproductive agendas that underlie religious patriarchy.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bis{at}umich.edu.
Author contributions: B.I.S. designed research; B.I.S., B.F.H., T.M.K., and M.F.H. performed research; B.I.S., N.T.K., E.E.B., and B.W.G. analyzed data; and B.I.S. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. R.S. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1110442109/-/DCSupplemental.