Reintroducing domesticated wild mice to sociality induces adaptive transgenerational effects on MUP expression
- aDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112;
- bSchool of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
- cBioinformatics and Computational Biosciences Branch, Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computational Biology, National Institute of Allergy And Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
- eDepartment of Neuroscience, Wexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210;
- dHuntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; and
- fSchool of Molecular Sciences, Department of Genetics, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Wyatt W. Anderson, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, and approved October 18, 2013 (received for review June 10, 2013)

Significance
When wild-derived laboratory mice are reintroduced to socially competitive populations, they quickly adapt by producing attractive sons that otherwise have no fitness advantages, consistent with the sexy sons model of sexual selection. These attractive sons inherit up-regulated expression of several pheromones belonging to the major urinary protein (MUP) family. Up-regulation is controlled by maternal social experience, and is associated with epigenetic modifications of MUP promoters that could enhance transcription. Inheritance of up-regulated MUPs is likely adaptive because females have odor preferences for male scent marks with higher MUP concentration. These results represent one of only a few cases where parental social experience adaptively modifies progeny phenotype.
Abstract
When brought into captivity, wild animals can adapt to domestication within 10 generations. Such adaptations may decrease fitness in natural conditions. Many selective pressures are disrupted in captivity, including social behavioral networks. Although lack of sociality in captivity appears to mediate domestication, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Additionally, determining the contribution of genetic inheritance vs. transgenerational effects during relaxed selection may provide insight into the flexibility of adaptation. When wild-derived mice kept under laboratory conditions for eight generations were reintroduced to sociality and promiscuity (free mate choice), they adapted within two generations. Fitness assessments between this promiscuous lineage and a monogamous laboratory lineage revealed male-specific effects. Promiscuous-line males had deficits in viability, but a striking advantage in attracting mates, and their scent marks were also more attractive to females. Here, we investigate mechanistic details underlying this olfactory signal and identify a role of major urinary protein (MUP) pheromones. Promiscuous-line males inherit higher MUP expression than monogamous-line males through transgenerational inheritance. Sociality-driven maternal and paternal effects reveal intriguing conflicts among parents and offspring over pheromone expression. MUP up-regulation is not driven by hormone-driven transduction pathways, but rather is associated with reduction in DNA methylation of a CpG dinucleotide in the promoter. This reduction in methylation could enhance transcription by promoting the binding of transcription factor USF1 (upstream stimulatory factor 1). Finally, we experimentally demonstrate that increased MUP expression is a female attractant. These results identify molecular mechanisms guiding domestication and adaptive responses to fluctuating sociality.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: adamnelson{at}fas.harvard.edu.
↵2Present address: Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Author contributions: A.C.N., J.W.C., and W.K.P. designed research; A.C.N., J.W.C., S.D.M., N.A.Y., and A.J.O. performed research; N.A.Y., A.J.O., R.J.N., B.R.C., and E.W. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.C.N. analyzed data; and A.C.N. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1310427110/-/DCSupplemental.














