Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand
- aGlobal Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801;
- bInstitute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801;
- cDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801;
- dDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095;
- eUniversity of California, Los Angeles-Department of Energy Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095;
- fCNRS, Unité Mixte de Recherche Biologie Végétale et Microbiologie Environnementale, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance 13115, France;
- gDepartment of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403;
- hDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130;
- iDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130;
- jMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm 14476, Germany;
- kDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081, The Netherlands;
- lDepartment of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;
- mDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom;
- nDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801;
- oDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287;
- pCenter for Bioenergy and Photosynthesis, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287;
- qDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803;
- rHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
- sDepartment of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
- tLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720;
- uRothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom;
- vDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332;
- wExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Annandale, NJ 08801;
- xDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011;
- yDepartment of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;
- zSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287;
- aaResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia;
- bbDepartment of Plant Biochemistry, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany;
- ccCluster of Excellence on Plant Science, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany;
- ddDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843;
- eeCAS Key Laboratory for Computational Biology, CAS-MPG Partner institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Richard Eisenberg, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, and approved May 28, 2015 (received for review December 18, 2014)

Abstract
The world’s crop productivity is stagnating whereas population growth, rising affluence, and mandates for biofuels put increasing demands on agriculture. Meanwhile, demand for increasing cropland competes with equally crucial global sustainability and environmental protection needs. Addressing this looming agricultural crisis will be one of our greatest scientific challenges in the coming decades, and success will require substantial improvements at many levels. We assert that increasing the efficiency and productivity of photosynthesis in crop plants will be essential if this grand challenge is to be met. Here, we explore an array of prospective redesigns of plant systems at various scales, all aimed at increasing crop yields through improved photosynthetic efficiency and performance. Prospects range from straightforward alterations, already supported by preliminary evidence of feasibility, to substantial redesigns that are currently only conceptual, but that may be enabled by new developments in synthetic biology. Although some proposed redesigns are certain to face obstacles that will require alternate routes, the efforts should lead to new discoveries and technical advances with important impacts on the global problem of crop productivity and bioenergy production.
- light capture/conversion
- carbon capture/conversion
- smart canopy
- enabling plant biotechnology tools
- sustainable crop production
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: d-ort{at}illinois.edu.
Author contributions: D.R.O., S.S.M., J.A., A.B., R.E.B., R.B., R.C., M.R.H., J.M.H., S.P.L., T.A.M., J.M., K.K.N., M.A.J.P., P.P.P.-Y., R.C.P., K.E.R., M.H.S., K.J.v.W., W.F.J.V., S.v.C., A.P.M.W., T.O.Y., J.S.Y., and X.G.Z. wrote the paper and participated in development of photosynthetic redesign.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.