Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Empirical redefinition of comprehensive health and well-being in the older adults of the United States

Martha K. McClintock, William Dale, Edward O. Laumann, and Linda Waite
PNAS first published May 16, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514968113
Martha K. McClintock
aDepartments of Psychology and Comparative Human Development and the Institute for Mind and Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mkm1@uchicago.edu
William Dale
bSection of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward O. Laumann
cDepartment of Sociology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
dNORC, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Waite
cDepartment of Sociology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
dNORC, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by James S. House, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, and approved March 22, 2016 (received for review July 28, 2015)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Health has long been conceived as not just the absence of disease but also the presence of physical, psychological, and social well-being. Nonetheless, the traditional medical model focuses on specific organ system diseases. This representative study of US older adults living in their homes amassed not only comprehensive medical information but also psychological and social data and measured sensory function and mobility, all key factors for independent living and a gratifying life. This comprehensive model revealed six unique health classes, predicting mortality/incapacity. The healthiest people were obese and robust; two new classes, with twice the mortality/incapacity, were people with healed broken bones or poor mental health. This approach provides an empirical method for broadly reconceptualizing health, which may inform health policy.

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as a “state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” Despite general acceptance of this comprehensive definition, there has been little rigorous scientific attempt to use it to measure and assess population health. Instead, the dominant model of health is a disease-centered Medical Model (MM), which actively ignores many relevant domains. In contrast to the MM, we approach this issue through a Comprehensive Model (CM) of health consistent with the WHO definition, giving statistically equal consideration to multiple health domains, including medical, physical, psychological, functional, and sensory measures. We apply a data-driven latent class analysis (LCA) to model 54 specific health variables from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP), a nationally representative sample of US community-dwelling older adults. We first apply the LCA to the MM, identifying five health classes differentiated primarily by having diabetes and hypertension. The CM identifies a broader range of six health classes, including two “emergent” classes completely obscured by the MM. We find that specific medical diagnoses (cancer and hypertension) and health behaviors (smoking) are far less important than mental health (loneliness), sensory function (hearing), mobility, and bone fractures in defining vulnerable health classes. Although the MM places two-thirds of the US population into “robust health” classes, the CM reveals that one-half belong to less healthy classes, independently associated with higher mortality. This reconceptualization has important implications for medical care delivery, preventive health practices, and resource allocation.

  • comprehensive health
  • aging
  • disease
  • well-being
  • health policy

In 1946, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” (1). In 1977, George Engel (2) built on this definition, calling for a new biopsychosocial model. It integrated traditional medicine with psychosocial factors, which stimulated the field of psychosomatic medicine. These ideas have been honored more as an ideal than in practice.

Here, we seek to apply this comprehensive definition to characterize the health of US older adults living in their homes. Studying a representative sample of the US population ages 57–85 y old [the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP)], we gathered wide-ranging information on the diseases of the traditional “Medical Model” (MM) and also, psychological well-being and physical function in a “Comprehensive Model” (CM) informed by the approach by Engel (2, 3). We empirically determined if these health measures formed distinct constellations, characterizing groups of people with different patterns of health and well-being. Our large survey of 3,005 community-dwelling older adults ages 57–85 y old was not a clinical sample or a sample of convenience but one systematically selected to represent all older, community-dwelling adults of the United States, regardless of their health status.

The standard MM of health, sometimes called the biomedical model, has its origins in the 1910 Flexner Report (4), which codified medical education and focuses on diseases, specifically their pathology, biochemistry, and physiology (5⇓⇓–8). It is exemplified in hospital-based care responding to failure of specific organ systems, codified in international health care reimbursement categories [International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes (9)] and historically instantiated in the organization of the National Institutes of Health [e.g., National Cancer Institute (1937) and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (1948) (10)].

More typically, however, older adults often have more than one organ system-based disease (e.g., both diabetes and hypertension), forming a cluster of problems (11), although their other organ systems continue to function (e.g., kidneys and lungs). Therefore, our first step was to empirically identify distinct constellations of health states within the MM. We used data on prevalent causes of death to select diseases for inclusion (12). These selected diseases are heart disease, cancer, lung disease, stroke, diabetes, kidney disease, and liver disease. We also include common diseases in older adults, albeit with low associated mortality: arthritis, hypertension, asthma, and thyroid disease (measures 1–19 in Fig. S1 document the organ system diseases).

  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S1.

Health measure definitions, their cutpoints, and categories used in LCAs for the MM and the CM and in reports of their prevalence within each health class relative to the US population (US Pop.) in Figs. 1 and 2 and Fig. S4. External validation is provided by national surveys and citations reporting US prevalence comparable with those of the NSHAP along with numbered citations for health measure definitions and categories (26, 30, 39, 65⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–154). ADL, activities of daily living; BP, blood pressure; CAPI, composed of a personal interview; CES-D, Center for the Epidemiological Studies Scale - Depression; CRP, C-reactive protein; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DCCT, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial; HADS-A, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Subscale; HRS, Health and Retirement Study; HRS-UCLA, HRS short form of the University of California Los Angeles loneliness scale; HTN, hypertension; ID, identification; M, men; NASM, NSHAP's Anxiety Symptoms Measure; NFLM, NSHAP's Felt Loneliness Measure; NHUM, NSHAP's Happiness - Unhappiness Measure; NPSM, NSHAP's Perceived Stress Measure; NDSM, NSHAP's Depressive Symptoms Measure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SPMSQ, Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; STD, sexually transmitted disease; STI, sexually transmitted infection; TIA, transient ischemic attack; W, women.

We then propose the CM intended to correspond theoretically to the health definitions of the WHO (1) and Engel (2) by incorporating five additional functional dimensions relevant for broadly characterizing health and well-being: health behaviors, psychological health, sensory abilities, neuroimmune function, and mobility (Fig. S1). These dimensions and the domains within them are not part of the biomedical model (2). They reflect the integrative role of the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral nervous system with behavior (13, 14) and undergird the robust health crucial to quality of life and continued independence in older adults (15, 16). The additional 35 health measures (Fig. S1, measures 20–54), although not exhaustive, were selected to represent all five dimensions. For conceptual clarity and analytic tractability, we focus our analysis on physical and psychological domains of these dimensions, keeping the individual at the center of the analysis. We consider the social domains only in relation to these other person-centered domains and characterize people in terms of marital status, sexual intimacy, social interactions, and socioeconomic status as well as age, race, and gender.

To group all respondents into distinct constellations or classes based on their multiple health measures, we used latent class analysis (LCA; also called finite mixture modeling) (17). LCA posits an underlying structure to a population that is not directly observable but can be identified using a sufficiently large collection of observable variables. The LCA then identifies distinct subgroups or classes within the larger population based on underlying commonalities among variables, commonalities that are assumed to arise from the underlying “latent” characteristic. After the classes have been identified mathematically (specifying the constellation of values of the health measures that group together), each respondent can be assigned to the most appropriate class based on his or her particular values for each of the health measures.

We ask several questions. What are the health characteristics that appear together in each of the classes identified? Which health measures best discriminate among the constellations? We report the prevalence of all health measures in each class relative to the general US population. We use heat maps (Figs. 1 and 2), in which each cell is color-coded to indicate prevalence of a measure significantly lower than, typical of, or higher than the general population (green, yellow, and red, respectively). The resulting heat map presents a visual snapshot of the characteristics of the classes across all health measures, allowing the reader to scan down characteristics for each class and across classes for different groups of characteristics, effectively and quickly summarizing constellations of health that appear in the US population of older adults.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

The MM with five distinct classes of organ system diseases and health. The column US population (US Pop.) reports the prevalence in 2005 of each disease in the older US Pop. ages 57–85 y old. Within each health class (columns), the prevalence of a given disease indexes the likelihood that any member of the class has that particular disease [rows; n = 19 health measures ordered by prevalence within each of the six domains (column 2) within the organ system dimension (column 1)] and shares similar constellations of disease and health. Colors indicate the prevalence of each class’s disease prevalence relative to the US Pop.: green, lower (P ≤ 0.01); yellow, typical [not significant (NS)]; red, higher (P ≤ 0.01). Morbidity was indexed by the proportion of class members who were incapacitated (i.e., too sick to interview at the 5-y follow-up), and mortality was indexed by the proportion who had died. *Given the health context of extensive multimorbidity, the classification of these blood pressure measures was overridden and designated vulnerable (red). BP, blood pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HTN, hypertension.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

The CM of health with six distinct health classes based on 54 health measures across six dimensions (listed in column 1). The column US population (US Pop.) reports the prevalence in 2005 of each disease or condition in the older US Pop. ages 57–85 y old (definitions and validation are in Fig. S1). Within each health class (columns), the prevalence of a given disease or condition indexes the likelihood that any member of the class has that particular disease [rows; n = 54 health measures ordered by prevalence within each health domain (column 2)] and shares similar constellations of disease and health. Colors indicate the prevalence of each class’s disease and conditions relative to the US Pop.: green, lower (P ≤ 0.01); yellow, typical [not significant (NS)]; red, higher (P ≤ 0.01; indicating greater vulnerability). Morbidity was indexed by the proportion of class members who were incapacitated and too sick to interview at the 5-y follow-up, and mortality was indexed by the proportion who had died. *Given the health context of extensive multimorbidity, the classification of these blood pressure measures was overridden and designated vulnerable (red). ADL, activities of daily living; BP, blood pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HTN, hypertension; ID, identification; STD, sexually transmitted diseases.

We hypothesized that including the measures covering the five additional dimensions of the CM of health would significantly change the constellation of characteristics defining distinct groups of older adults in the United States. Doing so, we argue, would illuminate the significant associations between functioning, well-being, and disease in older people. If so, these new constellations would create a richer picture of the diverse types of aging and could inform the ongoing restructuring of the US health care system.

To robustly validate the health of individuals within each health class, we used three standard health measures that were independent of the LCAs: (i) the number of vulnerable health measures per individual, with vulnerable defined by clinical or literature-based cut points (Figs. 1 and 2 and Fig. S1); (ii) the number of the major chronic diseases that each individual had [defined by the Charlson Index (18, 19); labeled as Charlson comorbid diseases], and (iii) the proportion of individuals in each class who died or were too incapacitated to be interviewed by the time of the second wave of data collection (labeled as deceased or incapacitated 5 y later). We refer to these three measures as the mortality and morbidity of the individuals within a class. The person’s subjective assessments of global physical and mental health are additional validators of the health classes (20, 21).

Aging has been conceptualized as the increasing loss of physiologic function, a trajectory followed by most people as they get older (22). If so, health classes in an aging population should be arranged linearly by chronological age as people progress from one class to the other in sequence. Alternatively, aging can be conceptualized as a diverse set of pathways (23, 24), with chronological age being a poor predictor of whether an aging pathway or sustained health will be followed. We follow individuals over a 5-y period, assessing the likelihood of stable class membership and the transition to improvement, incapacitation, or death.

Results

MM: Distinct Classes Distinguished by Diabetes and Hypertension.

Analysis of the organ system diseases of the MM identified five distinct classes of disease and health among older, community-dwelling Americans, each statistically independent of the others (Fig. 1). Diabetes, which accounted for only 3% of deaths over the age of 55 y old in 2010 (25), nonetheless had the greatest power to distinguish among these five health classes, dividing the five into two broader sets. One set was very robust, with a complete absence of diagnosed diabetes (0%) and only 7% (MM1) and 2% (MM2) with measured diabetes [HbA1C > 6.5 (26)] (Fig. 1, measures 1 and 2). The other set was quite vulnerable to diabetes and other diseases (MM3–5: 39–100% had diagnosed diabetes and 30–69% had measured diabetes).

Cardiovascular diseases (Fig. 1, measures 4–10), which account for 35% of deaths over the age of 55 y old (25), did not distinguish robust from vulnerable classes. Rather, blood pressure measured in the home distinguished the two robust nondiabetic classes. No one in MM1 [Unrecognized Hypertension class] had normal systolic blood pressure; 100% were elevated (61% into hypertension stage I or II). In sharp contrast, 0% of the second robust class (MM2 One Noncardiovascular Disease) had hypertensive blood pressure, and even the 34% diagnosed with hypertension were well-controlled. Instead, most in MM2 had only one, if any, of a variety of noncardiovascular diseases or conditions (e.g., asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, thyroid disease, ulcers, or cancer) (27).

All three indicators of mortality and morbidity (bottom three rows of Fig. 1) were significantly lower in the two robust classes (MM1 and -2) than in the overall population. These classes had the fewest number of health measures signifying disease as well as the lowest prevalence of physician-identified organ system diseases (Charlson comorbid diseases) (Fig. 1) (18, 19). Fully two-thirds of older adults in America were members of these robust classes.

Surprisingly, although cancer caused 24% of deaths among those over the age 55 y old in 2005 (25), no cancer type distinguished the five MM classes (Fig. 1, measures 17⇓–19). Rather, cancers seemed to develop randomly with respect to other organ system diseases.

The three vulnerable classes (MM3–5) shared a high prevalence of diabetes and hypertensive blood pressure but were distinguished by their constellations of other diseases. The Uncontrolled Diabetes class (MM3) was comprised entirely of diagnosed diabetics (100%), primarily uncontrolled (69% HbA1C > 6.5). Most (70%) were also diagnosed with hypertension, but it was well-controlled in the home interview (only 32% with systolic blood pressure in hypertension stage I or II), reflecting the recommended clinical practice of controlling hypertension before diabetes. In addition, one-half had arthritis (49%), which is typical of older adults, and 3% had severe liver disease, three times more than the overall population. In sum, they had more diseases than the general population (4.0, vulnerable health measures; 2.2, Charlson comorbid diseases).

Members of the remaining two diabetic classes (MM4 and -5) were the most vulnerable. In MM4, the prevalence of diabetes was twice that of the older population nationally, and most had been diagnosed with hypertension that was not controlled when measured at home (76–89%), with 0% in the normal range. Strikingly, cardiovascular diseases were two to three times more prevalent in MM4 than in the older US population, defining it as the Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes class. Only arthritis and peptic ulcers had a higher prevalence, whereas lung, kidney, and liver diseases were typical of the general population, and cancer prevalence was low. The fifth most vulnerable class had a very high prevalence of all diseases, making it the Extensive Multimorbidity class. Of note, the measured blood pressure of those in this class was usually lower than that in the other classes, consistent with advanced heart failure (28).

The characterization of the MM classes as either robust or vulnerable was independently supported by the 2.5-fold difference across the classes in the prevalence of being incapacitated or deceased (bottom row of Fig. 1). Of the two robust classes, 14% and 15% were incapacitated or deceased 5 y later, respectively, significantly lower than the three vulnerable classes at 20%, 24%, and 35%.

The constellations of diseases in the five MM classes are consistent with the traditional MM of organ system diseases with two added contributions. Diabetes and elevated blood pressure were identified as the “first tier” traits distinguishing among health classes of older community-dwelling adults. In addition, cancers did not form a distinct health class. Moreover, this analysis reveals that there are no significant differences in chronological age among the five classes, supporting the hypothesis that health and well-being of older adults do not follow a single linear progression and are associated less with age than with such sociodemographic traits as race, education, and gender (23, 29).

CM of Health: New Constellations of Disease and Health.

Organ function is coordinated in part by the CNS and the peripheral nervous system, which also integrate the body with the social and physical worlds essential for health and well-being. To create a CM of health, we augmented the MM with 35 measures drawn from five additional health dimensions involving the nervous systems: health behaviors, such as smoking, exercise, and sleep; psychological health (i.e., mental health and cognition); sensory function, such as vision and olfaction; neuroimmunity; and frailty. Within each dimension, specific domains included measures of conditions common at older ages, such as depressive symptoms, memory loss, poor vision, chronic inflammation, and impaired mobility. They also included trauma, such as bone fractures, as well as health behaviors, such as body composition, sleep quality, drinking, smoking, and sexually transmitted diseases. Although some of these comprehensive measures are physical, none are part of the standard MM (2).

Six distinct, statistically independent health classes emerged (Fig. 2). Many individuals categorized as in robust health by the MM were revealed to have important health vulnerabilities when the broader definition of health was used. Conversely, some with organ system disease showed many counterbalancing strengths, leading to a reassignment to a robust health class in the CM. Many individuals were reclassified from their MM classes to different CM classes (Fig. 3), yielding a rich reconceptualization of what constitutes health and well-being in the older population at home in the United States, characterized by specific constellations of disease and function.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Reclassification of each individual from a given MM class (columns) into one of the CM class (rows). The percentage of individuals in each MM class that was reclassified across the six CM classes is provided in Upper table, and the ORs of doing so are in Lower table. CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HTN, hypertension. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 (Bonferroni adjusted for multiple comparisons).

The CM identified two types of robust health at older ages (CM1 and -2), strikingly different from those identified by the MM and also, strikingly different from each other. Obesity characterized the first robust class, which comprised 22% of the older US population [54% of the Robust Obese class had an obese body mass index (BMI; 41% moderately obese and 13% morbidly obese; 0% had a normal BMI), and 60% had central obesity] (Fig. 2, measures 20 and 21). This class was also characterized by elevated blood pressure measured at home (45% systolic blood pressure hypertension stage I or II and 31% diastolic hypertension stage I or II) (Fig. 2 measures 5 and 6) (30). Although obesity is typically viewed as a severe health risk (31), this obese class had few organ system diseases or conditions per individual (Fig. 2) (individual average: 7.2, vulnerable health measures; 1.2, Charlson comorbid diseases). This class (CM1) had the lowest prevalence of dying or becoming incapacitated 5 y later (6%; one-third the prevalence in the general population), supporting the emerging concept that being overweight without complications and impaired mobility is not always deleterious to health, particularly in older adults (31⇓⇓–34). This class had notably better psychological health than the overall older population as well as better mobility and sensory function (other than taste) [Fig. S2A presents odds ratios (ORs) for the constellation of health characteristics, whose presence and absence distinguished the Robust Obese class from the rest of the population].

  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S2.

(A) Robust classes (CM1 and -2). Health measures that significantly distinguished a given CM health class from the remaining population [six logistic regression analyses, one for each CM class, each with all 54 health measures, and ORs (rounded to similar precision for ratios ranging from 0.0000 to 61)]. Cells above the dashed line (green) are health measures whose presence significantly distinguished the health class (OR > 1.0) independent of the other health measures. Cells below the dashed line (rose) are health measures whose absence significantly distinguished the health class (OR < 1.0). (B) Intermediate classes (CM3 and -4). Health measures that significantly distinguished a given CM health class from the remaining population [six logistic regression analyses, one for each CM class, each with all 54 health measures, and ORs (rounded to similar precision for ratios ranging from 0.0000 to 61)]. Cells above the dashed line (green) are health measures whose presence significantly distinguished the health class (OR > 1.0) independent of the other health measures. Cells below the dashed line (rose) are health measures whose absence significantly distinguished the health class. (OR < 1.0). (C) Vulnerable classes (CM5 and -6). Health measures that significantly distinguished a given CM health class from the remaining population [six logistic regression analyses, one for each CM class, each with all 54 health measures, and ORs (rounded to similar precision for ratios ranging from 0.0000 to 61)]. Cells above the dashed line (green) are the health measures whose presence significantly distinguished the health class (OR > 1.0) independent of the other health measures. Cells below the dashed line (rose) are health measures whose absence significantly distinguished the health class (OR < 1.0). ADL, activities of daily living; BP, blood pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Dx, diagnosis. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001; †biomedical health measures included in both the CM and the MM.

In marked contrast, people in the second robust class (One Minor Condition, CM2) were normal weight (0% central obesity and ≤1% obese; central obesity OR = 0.048; P = 0.001) (Fig. 2, measures 20 and 21 and Fig. S2A), with a low prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Instead, people in this class had one minor condition or disease [(e.g., peptic ulcers, problems with voiding, skin cancer, thyroid disease, or anemia (Fig. 2, measures 3, 14, 17, 49, and 53 and Fig. S2A)]. Although none of these are recognized high-risk factors for death, let alone its causes, the prevalence of dying or being incapacitated 5 y later (16%) was significantly higher than in the Robust Obese class, suggesting that these “minor” conditions could be early harbingers of vulnerability and might mandate aggressive preventive care, although cardiovascular, metabolic, lung, and kidney functions are robust. This class also had worse sensory function than the Robust Obese class (Fig. 2, measures 35–40), particularly hearing (Fig. S2A).

With two different models for defining health classes, we can ask which best discriminates robust health at older ages. The MM classified fully two-thirds of the older US population as robust in two classes with a low prevalence of disease (Fig. 1). The definition of robust health was fine-tuned by the CM; only one-half (54%) of people identified as robust in the MM were also assigned to the robust classes in the CM (Fig. 3, columns 2 and 3). But what of the other one-half deemed in robust health by the traditional MM?

Most were reassigned to two emergent classes (CM3 and -4) defined by traits actively ignored by the MM, which together comprised fully 28% of the US population (Figs. 2 and 3). The first new class (CM3) was characterized by people who had broken a bone after age 45 y old (100% of Broken Bones class; OR = 61) (Fig. S2B) and had the highest prevalence of osteoporotic fractures (28%; OR = 27.7) (Fig. 2, measures 47 and 48). These healed bone fractures were not the well-recognized end-of-life hip fractures that can lead to immobilization and eventually death from complications. Its members were less likely to be immobile, be inactive, or have trouble walking than the general population (0.152 ≤ OR ≤ 0.43) (Fig. S2B). In sharp contrast, mental health problems, poor sleep, and heavy drinking characterized the second new class (CM4; Poor Mental Health, particularly depression; OR = 12.4 (Fig. 2, measures 22–25 and 29–32 and Fig. S2B) along with poor olfactory function and slow gait, known correlates of depression (35, 36), as well as voiding dysfunction (Fig. 2, measures 39, 43, and 53).

None of the traditional medical health classes predicted membership in the new Broken Bones or Poor Mental Health classes, although participants from all MM classes were reassigned to these two new classes, underscoring the unique contribution of the CM and its additional health dimensions (0.7 ≤ all ORs ≤ 1.3; all NS) (Fig. 3). The Broken Bones class had a lower prevalence of diabetes but other than that, intermediate prevalence of organ system diseases typical of the older US population (Fig. 2, measures 1–19). Their mobility was relatively robust as was their mental and cognitive health. The Poor Mental Health class also had typical prevalence of traditional organ system diseases accompanied by normal weight and a low prevalence of immune surveillance dysfunction (Fig. 2, measures 1–20 and 41).

Finally, the two most vulnerable classes (CM5 and -6) were characterized by multiple comorbid diseases, which are common causes of death among older adults. In CM5 (Diabetes, Hypertension, and Immobility), uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension were more common than in the general population as were immobility and urinary incontinence, obesity (particularly morbid obesity at 36% and moderate at 35%), arthritis, peptic ulcers, and impaired immune function along with impaired vision, hearing, and touch (Fig. 2, measures 1, 2, 4–7, 13, 14, 20, 21, 27, 29, 37, 38, 40–46, 50, and 52). Nonetheless, they had lower odds of all mental health problems than the rest of the population (0.295 ≤ OR ≤ 0.74) (Fig. S2C). In contrast, the most vulnerable class (Extensive Multimorbidity and Frailty) was distinguished by poor mental health (anxiety OR = 5.2) (Fig. S2C) and a high prevalence of 47 of 54 measures indicating disease and health conditions, including cardiac, lung, liver, and kidney diseases and nonreproductive cancers as well as poor mental health, memory, and sensory function. As expected, these two most vulnerable classes had more diseases than older adults in the United States (individual averages of 12.1 and 17.0, vulnerable health conditions and 2.2 and 3.3, Charlson comorbid diseases in CM5 and -6, respectively) (Fig. 2). Although the Extensive Multimorbidity and Frailty class (CM6) had the highest concordance with the most vulnerable MM class [38% of those with extensive multisystem disease (MM5) were reclassified to Extensive Multimorbidity and Frailty (CM6) with an OR = 6.1] (Fig. 3), a majority came from other classes. The marked increase in the proportion of women in the most vulnerable classes between the MM and CM (39% vs. 65% women) (Fig. 4) indicates the two most vulnerable classes in these two models are quite distinct.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Demographic description of each class in (A) the MM and (B) the CM; ↑ indicates a significantly higher prevalence relative to the US population (US Pop.), and ↓ indicates a significantly lower prevalence. The US Pop. prevalence is based on 2005 Wave 1 weighted data. CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HS, high school; HTN, hypertension.

Fully 44% of this most vulnerable class [Extensive Multimorbidity and Frailty (CM6)] died within 5 y of the original interview or became incapacitated (Fig. 2), making its constellation of diseases a much better predictor of poor health outcomes than the MM based only on organ system diseases. In sum, the CM differentiated classes with more precision than the MM, because it expanded the range of class differences in prevalence of dying or becoming incapacitated from a 2.5-fold to a 7.3-fold range (14–35% to 6–44%).

Causes of Mortality and Morbidity.

In both models, the causes of death and becoming incapacitated were reassuringly consistent with the most prevalent diseases in a particular class. For example, in the three “diabetes” classes (MM3–5), deaths caused by diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and genitourinary complications were higher than the population average (Fig. S3A). In CM4, a class defined by mental health problems, deaths from substance abuse and suicide/homicide were higher than in either most robust or more vulnerable classes (Fig. S3B).

  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S3.

(A) Mortality. Causes of 5-y mortality among community-dwelling US adults (ages 57–85 y old in 2005) for health classes of the MM and the CM. The US population (US Pop.) prevalence is based on 2005 Wave 1 weighted data. (B) Morbidity. Causes of being too sick to interview in 2010 (incapacitated) among community-dwelling US adults (ages 57–85 y old in 2005) for health classes of the MM and the CM. The US Pop. prevalence is based on 2005 Wave 1 weighted data. CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HTN, hypertension.

More interestingly, deaths from cancer confirmed its random occurrence with respect to the health classes identified in both the MM and the CM of health. Deaths from cancer were higher than average in the healthier MM2 class, but in MM5, the most vulnerable class, cancer deaths were lower than the population average (Fig. S3A). Likewise, cancer more often afflicted the healthiest classes of the CM (CM1 and -2) (Fig. S3A), whereas in CM5, deaths were more often caused by cardiovascular, diabetic, and elimination system diseases rather than cancer. This pattern is consistent with a “competing causes of death” model, in which prevalence of a more randomly distributed cause of death (in this case cancer) is highest when other causes of death are low.

The most common disease causing incapacity 5 y later and preventing a second interview was dementia or other mental deterioration (63% across all classes) (Fig. S3B). Strikingly, frailty or accidents in the intervening 5 y were three to five times more likely to incapacitate the Broken Bones class (CM3). Additionally, no one was incapacitated by alcohol, drug abuse, or suicide attempts, except those in the Poor Mental Health class (9% of CM4), showing that identifying this novel health class has prognostic power over 5 y.

Sexual Motivation and Social Ties.

After assigning participants to a latent class based on their health measures [average assignment certainty = 0.83 (MM) and 0.89 (CM)], we sought to characterize the classes in terms of the participants’ social and demographic traits. At older ages, sexual motivation can be a key component of social connection, vitality, and well-being (37⇓–39). A fourfold difference in sexual motivation, indexed by sexual ideation (40), significantly distinguished the health classes in the CM [only 12% of the Robust Obese (CM1) class rarely thought about sex (less than once a month) in contrast with 52% of Extensive Multimorbidity and Frailty (CM6)] (Fig. 5B). In the MM, however, sexual motivation did not differ among its health classes (range = 26–33%) (Fig. 5A).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Psychosocial descriptors (20, 21, 40⇓⇓⇓⇓–45) of the health classes from (A) the MM and (B) the CM. Self-rated health (physical and mental), sexual ideation, and social ties are shown; ↑ indicates a significantly higher prevalence relative to the US population (US Pop.), and ↓ indicates a lower prevalence. The US Pop. prevalence is based on 2005 Wave 1 weighted data. CV, cardiovascular; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HTN, hypertension.

Likewise, social lives differed more among the CM than among the MM classes; only MM1 and -2, the robust classes, were more engaged socially than the US population and even so, on only a few measures (Fig. 5A) (41⇓⇓⇓–45). The two robust classes of the CM (CM1 and -2) had stronger and more varied social lives than the US population [e.g., more members of Robust Obese (CM1) were married, and few felt socially isolated, lived alone, or had low social participation] (Fig. 5B).

There was a socially embedded class and an isolated class within both the intermediate (CM3 and -4) and the vulnerable classes (CM5 and -6) (Fig. 5B). Members of the intermediate classes [Broken Bones (CM3)] rarely felt isolated (13%), had low social participation (14%), or a small social network (11%). In stark contrast, members of Poor Mental Health (CM4) were the most likely to feel isolated (64%), live alone (38%), rarely participate socially (37%), and have small social networks (23%). A similar dichotomy was observed within the vulnerable classes. Members of Diabetes, Hypertension, and Immobility (CM5) were less likely to feel isolated (17%) and as socially engaged as the general population, whereas 45% of the most vulnerable Extensive Multimorbidity and Frailty (CM6) felt isolated, were not socially engaged (35%), and lived alone (32%). The marked differences in social characteristics captured by the CM are clinically relevant, because social connections affect not only well-being but also, access to health care and compliance (46⇓–48).

Demographics of the Classes.

CM classes did not differ in age from the population average, with the exception of the sickest class (Extensive Multimorbidity and Frailty), which is 3 y older, and the Robust Obese class, which is 2.5 y younger (Fig. 4B), indicating that the health classes are not simply a strong age gradient. However, they did differ significantly in terms of gender, race, education, and household financial assets (Fig. 4B), again with greater differences within the CM than within the MM (Fig. 4A).

The two healthiest classes (CM1 and -2) were, on average, disproportionately men of all races, with more education and assets than the population as a whole. The Broken Bones class (CM3) was predominantly white women. Members of the Poor Mental Health class (CM4) were more likely to live alone with moderate income. Members of the Diabetes, Hypertension, and Immobility class (CM5) were more likely to be black, not have a high school degree, and have assets under $50,000. The most vulnerable class, Extensive Multimorbidity and Frailty (CM6), was disproportionately older women of all races, also with low education and few household assets.

Class Stability over 5 y.

We sought to confirm the CM by determining whether the same health classes emerged in 2010 when we followed the same LCA procedures (SI Methods and Fig. S4). We asked whether the health class structure of the population persisted as states of being over 5 y or whether it changed as the population aged and new participants were recruited. We found that the six class structure did persist virtually unchanged in 2010 with constellations of disease and characteristics similar to those in 2005, replicating the health classes derived from the CM (compare Fig. 2 with Fig. S4).

  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S4.

Replication of CM health classes. Based on LCA of 2010 Wave 2 [ages 62−90 y old; returning respondents n = 2,422 (76%) and their partners n = 774 (24%)]. Footnotes indicate how health measures in 2010 Wave 2 differed from those in 2005 Wave 1 (as described in SI Methods and Fig. S1). The US population (US Pop.) prevalence is based on 2005 Wave 1 weighted data. ADL, activities of daily living; BP, blood pressure; HTN, hypertension; ID, identification; MOCA-SA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Survey Adaptation; SPMSQ, Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire; STD, sexually transmitted disease.

We then asked whether individuals also persisted in their classes in the intervening 5 y, which would be expected if membership was the cumulative result of having lived their particular lives. Indeed, those in good health in 2005 often remained in good health (CM1 OR = 6.65; CM2 OR = 6.79; both P values ≤ 0.001). Likewise, people in the most vulnerable health class with multiple comorbid diseases in 2005 remained so (CM6 OR = 5.87; P ≤ 0.001) and faced a high risk of death or becoming incapacitated (OR = 4.44; P ≤ 0.001). Those in intermediate health classes were also significantly likely to remain in their 2005 classes but with lower odds, particularly Poor Mental Health (CM4) (CM3 OR = 3.41; CM4 OR = 1.57; CM5 OR = 3.33; all P values ≤ 0.001).

SI Methods

LCAs for 2005 Wave 1 and 2010 Wave 2.

The LCAs for both the MM and the CM of 2005 (Wave 1) were estimated by maximum likelihoods with robust SEs (MLR), which were optimized by an expectation, maximization, and acceleration algorithm and set to converge when the magnitude of the log-likelihood estimates change between iterations reached 0.011D-06 (Table S1). Ultimately, the models ended up converging after 112 and 569 iterations, respectively (typical numbers for models of these sizes and levels of complexity), yielding entropy values of 0.751 for the MM and 0.838 for the CM (entropy values >0.80 are thought to signify good classification quality) and Bayesian Information Criterion values (BIC, a conservative optimal penalized likelihood criterion) of 57,017 and 195,679, respectively (55, 59, 60).

Our sample of 3,005 respondents in 2005 was categorized using Bayesian Information Criterion values as criteria into five distinct classes based on 19 organ system health measures and six distinct classes based on these same organ system measures plus the additional more varied 35 health measures of the CM. For the CM, the respondents in class CM1 had an average certainty of belonging in class CM1 of 85%. Similarly, average certainties for classes CM2–CM6 were also high (87%, 96%, 86%, 85%, and 93%, respectively), indicating high certainty of individuals being assigned to their classes. In contrast, average certainties for the MM classes were a bit lower, reflecting the model’s lower classification quality: 83%, 82%, 87%, 81%, and 84% for the five classes, respectively. In addition, better model fit was indicated by higher entropy values for the CM than for the MM.

The 2010 Wave 2 LCA was conducted in exactly the same manner as Wave 1. The sole difference is in measurement of 19 of 54 health measures. Five disease measures were coded from an open-ended question listing “other diseases” rather than a direct question [thyroid disease, peptic ulcers, kidney disease, or cirrhosis/sexually transmitted disease(s) (STDs)] and one combined two 2005 questions (asthma plus emphysema/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/chronic bronchitis). Seven were measured with different methods in 2010 (eyesight, smoking, drinking problem, hours of sleep, cognition, gait speed, and pain while walking) (61⇓–63) (detailed in Fig. S4). Two (broken bones and osteoporotic fractures) measured broken bones just within the intervening 5 y (not since age 45 y old). Four of 2005 measures were unavailable in 2010 (taste identification, sense of touch threshold, self-esteem, and exercise restrictions).

Mortality and Incapacity.

Proxy reports of date and cause of death have been found to match or exceed the accuracy of information from death certificates (57). Moreover, reports of death or incapacity were available immediately after the proxy interview, enabling the NSHAP researchers to code the date and cause of death or incapacity with the participation of a geriatrician in the study who routinely assigns cause of death for death certificates.

In contrast, the National Death Index (NDI) is produced by individual states, which varies considerably in the timeliness and completeness of the death certificates that are submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The NDI with cause of death codes can lag the date of death more than 2 y, and codes for cause of death are available only for “well-matched” cases (64). Therefore, proxy interviews ensured that cause and dates of death were available for virtually all deceased and incapacitated respondents and are at least as good as data from the NDI (if not better).

Discussion

In defining health in older adults, medicine traditionally focuses on absence of chronic diseases of major organ systems; those without diabetes, cancer, or cardiovascular, kidney, liver, or pulmonary disease are generally considered healthy. Medications treat hypertension and elevated cholesterol, risk factors for developing a chronic disease. When applied to the population of older adults in the United States, this standard MM (4⇓⇓⇓–8), identifies about two-thirds of the older US population as generally healthy, with no diseases of major organ systems. However, a closer look that includes health behaviors, psychological health, sensory function, neuroimmunity, and frailty paints a very different picture. It does so by both revealing constellations of health completely hidden by the MM and reclassifying about one-half of the people seen as healthy as having significant vulnerabilities that affect the chances that they die or become incapacitated within 5 y. At the same time, some people with chronic disease are revealed as having many strengths that lead to their reclassification as quite healthy, with low risks of death and incapacity.

A number of surprises appear in the CM. First, cancer, the second leading cause of death in the United States, is unrelated to the presence of organ systems disease (a pattern also seen in the MM; there is no cancer class). In fact, cancer is unrelated to health behaviors, psychological health, sensory function, and frailty. Cancer seems to appear essentially at random in the general population of older adults; those who get it either succumb to the disease or are treated and recover, in which case, they are randomly distributed across classes like anyone else.

Second, obesity, often pointed to as “epidemic” and life-threatening (49), characterizes those older adults in the most robust health as well as in more vulnerable health. Obesity in a person with excellent mental health, no chronic disease, intact sensory function, good health habits, and excellent physical functioning seems to pose very little risk. Obesity in a person with diabetes, poor mental health, poor sensory function, and poor mobility is a very bad sign in a tidal wave of bad signs for those in the vulnerable health classes.

Third, having broken a bone during or after middle age uniquely identifies a class consisting of one in seven older US adults. This is a class that is “hidden” in the MM of health. This class is about “average” in other respects, but having broken a bone removes them from being in one of the robust groups. In a medical history, a past broken bone might signal osteoporosis risk but little else. However, according to the CM, a broken bone is a “marker” for future health; accidents are the primary cause of incapacity 5 y later, and member’s mortality is as high as the general population. This group is an excellent “target” for interventions—to prevent these individuals from declining over time and move them into more robust health.

Fourth, another one in eight older adults is revealed as having pervasive poor mental health, including high levels of stress, symptoms of anxiety and depression, loneliness, unhappiness, and poor self-esteem. More of the people in this group sleep poorly, wake up tired, or drink excessively compared with those in other groups. This constellation of mental health problems and the consequences of attempts to deal with them stand out from the population of older adults more generally for the shape and scope of the health problems those in this group face, including high incapacity and mortality. They too are completely hidden in the MM of health.

Fifth, the most vulnerable group of older adults has serious problems in all health dimensions from chronic diseases and neuroimmunity to mental health, health behaviors, cognition, sensory function, and frailty. Note that 44% of this group, which comprises one older adult in eight living at home, will die or become incapacitated in the next 5 y. Only 35% of those in the sickest health class as identified in the MM died or became incapacitated. Clearly, the CM contains a great deal of prognostic information left out of the MM.

Health status in older adults does not correspond with chronological age; age differentiates only two of the classes at most by 3 y. The gender story is bigger, with disproportionately more men in the two robust classes and more women in broken bones and multimorbidity and frailty classes. The apparent paradox in having more men in the youngest and healthiest class and more women in the oldest and sickest class results directly from men having higher mortality rates. They die younger, and women survive longer, often with chronic disease and other aging conditions. This well-known pattern was not captured by the MM.

The current MM of health emphasizes organ system disease categories as the fundamental conception of health. A list of “diagnostic codes,” embodied in the ICD-10 system used to bill for health services, is emblematic of this approach. One consequence is that health policy neglects important aspects of health, such as mental health (50) and medical training for managing comorbidities in geriatric populations (51). By using the WHO definition of health, we have shown how expanding health dimensions and domains and incorporating positive aspects of health reveal six unique, replicable constellations of disease and health, including two previously unrecognized classes not apparent in the organ disease-focused MM. From a health system perspective, a shift of attention is needed from disease-focused management, such as medications for hypertension or high cholesterol, to overall health, especially for mental health concerns, sensory function, and mobility.

Although public health campaigns, such as “Choosing Wisely,” rightly emphasize the need to decrease unnecessary health interventions (52), they still accept the basic health conception of the MM as resting on organ system disease. Instead, the CM instantiates comorbidities and the equal importance of mental health, mobility, and sensory function in health and should inform policy redesign. For example, including assessments of sensory function, mental health, broken bones in middle age, and frailty in annual physician visits would enhance risk management. In addition to policies focused on reducing BMI, greater support for preventing loneliness among isolated older adults would be effective. In place of additional (expensive) new medicines for hypertension, helping older adults find social support through home care services or alternative living arrangements could be developed. In summary, taking a broad definition of health seriously and empirically identifying specific constellations of health and comorbidities in the US population provide a new way of assessing health and risk in older adults living in their homes and thereby, may ultimately inform health policy.

Methods

NSHAP Sampling and Field Methods.

The NSHAP designed and collected a probability sample of individuals ages 57–85 y old selected to represent US households in 2005 and 2006 [response rate of 74%; n = 3,005 (53)], and these individuals were reinterviewed (reinterview rate of 89%) together with their spouses/partners [response rate of 84%; total n = 3,377 (54)]. The data are sample-weighted values, so that they reflect estimates of the characteristics of the US community-dwelling population at the time of interview (SI Methods).

The interviews were comprised of a personal interview; anthropometric, clinical, and physiological measures; and a self-administered questionnaire (27, 40, 45). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of The University of Chicago and NORC of The University of Chicago; all respondents provided written informed consent.

Classifying Health Measures.

Each variable was coded either dichotomously or into ordinal categories, in which higher values indicate worse health. We used the 2005 clinical and literature-based cut points when available (Fig. S1 provides cut points). Respondents reported whether health professionals had told them that they had a specific disease. For other measures, such as happiness and how many hours the person usually sleeps, we identified those at the low ends of the measures as poor health scores.

Latent Classes and Heat Maps of Their Composition.

The latent class models described earlier were estimated using Mplus, version 6 (55). SI Methods and Table S1 provide model parameters and Bayesian Information Criterion values for determining class number. LCA searches for an underlying statistical structure to a population that is not directly observable but can be identified using a sufficiently large collection of observable variables. The LCA then identifies distinct subgroups, or classes, within the overall population based on underlying commonalities among variables, commonalities that are assumed to be caused by the underlying latent characteristic. Classes are estimated through structural equation modeling. There are no a priori assumptions about class identity that constrain the model, and it is possible to test the hypothesis that there are significant co-occurrences of diseases and other health states across the identified latent classes rather than random noise (under the assumption that health measures are independent given class membership). Each person can then be assigned to a single class based on his or her value on each of the health measures (average class assignment certainty = 0.83 for the MM and 0.89 for the CM).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table S1.

Characteristics of the LCA for the MM in 2005 and the CM for 2005 Wave 1 and 2010 Wave 2

We then characterized the constellation of presence of disease and health states for each class by calculating the percentage of each class with a particular disease (e.g., diabetes) or a poor score for a measure (e.g., waking up tired) (MM and CM of health in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively). We illustrate the constellation of disease and healthy states that characterizes each class reading down the columns of Figs. 1, MM and 2, CM of health. Class percentages were statistically compared with the overall population percentages using logistic regression (56) and then categorized as being higher, the same, or lower (P < 0.05). Color codes indicate the prevalence of each variable relative to the US population prevalence based on 2005 Wave 1 weighted data.

Our goal for the CM was consideration of all variables that could be useful beyond the MM by adding 35 health measures chosen for their connections to the broad functions of the nervous systems: mental health, cognition, sensory function, health behaviors, neuroimmunity, and frailty. After we established the six latent health classes, we then asked which of the 54 health measures distinguished each health class from the remaining population by either the presence or absence of disease or health states (i.e., their power to significantly predict class membership; six logistic regression analyses) (Fig. S2). Each logistic regression analysis determined the independent contribution (OR) of each of the 54 variables, controlling for the presence of the other health measures. Future work will determine the most parsimonious set of measures for predicting class membership.

Mortality and Incapacity.

Our measures were death and being “too sick to interview” (incapacity). If a respondent was unable to participate in 2010, a proxy was asked why and the date and cause of death or incapacity were coded overseen by a geriatrician who routinely assigns cause of death (Fig. S3). Such proxy reports are as accurate, if not more so, than the National Death Index (57) and were available immediately (SI Methods) (58).

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael Kozlowski for running the time-consuming analyses, Hannah You, Joscelyn Hoffmann, and Jaclyn Smith for manuscript preparation, and the entire NSHAP team for fielding this survey and creating the extensive dataset. Support was provided by National Institute of Aging Grants R01AG021487, R37AG030481, and R01AG033903 and NORC of The University of Chicago.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: mkm1{at}uchicago.edu.
  • Author contributions: M.K.M., W.D., E.O.L., and L.W. designed research, performed research, contributed new reagents/analytic tools, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • Data deposition: The data reported in this paper are publically available at www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACDA/studies/20541/version/6 and www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACDA/studies/34921/version/1.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1514968113/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

View Abstract

References

  1. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    (April 7, 1948) Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 states. Official Records of the World Health Organization (World Health Organization, Geneva), no. 2, p 100
    .
  2. ↵
    1. Engel GL
    (1977) The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 196(4286):129–136
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Lindau ST,
    2. Laumann EO,
    3. Levinson W,
    4. Waite LJ
    (2003) Synthesis of scientific disciplines in pursuit of health: The Interactive Biopsychosocial Model. Perspect Biol Med 46(Suppl 3):S74–S86
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Flexner A
    (1910) Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (Merrymount Press, New York)
    .
  5. ↵
    1. Annandale E
    (2014) The Sociology of Health and Medicine: A Critical Introduction (Polity Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom), 2nd Ed
    .
  6. ↵
    1. Beck AH
    (2004) The Flexner report and the standardization of American medical education. JAMA 291(17):2139–2140
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Starr P
    (1982) The Social Transformation of American Medicine (Basic Books, New York)
    .
  8. ↵
    1. Stevens R
    (1971) American Medicine and the Public Interest (Yale Univ Press, New Haven, CT)
    .
  9. ↵
    World Health Organization WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Available at www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/. Accessed April 8, 2016
    .
  10. ↵
    1. National Institutes of Health
    (1949) National Institutes of Health Organizational Chart. Available at https://history.nih.gov/exhibits/history/docs/page_07a.html. Accessed April 8, 2016
    .
  11. ↵
    1. Tinetti ME,
    2. Fried TR,
    3. Boyd CM
    (2012) Designing health care for the most common chronic condition--multimorbidity. JAMA 307(23):2493–2494
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kung HC,
    2. Hoyert DL,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Murphy SL
    (2008) Deaths: Final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 56(10):1–120
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kandel ER
    (2013) Principles of Neural Science (McGraw-Hill Medical, New York), 5th Ed
    .
  14. ↵
    1. Ader R
    (2014) Psychoneuroimmunology (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam)
    .
  15. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    (2002) Report of the World Health Organization. Active ageing: A policy framework. Aging Male 5(1):1–37
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Rowe JW,
    2. Kahn RL
    (1997) Successful aging. Gerontologist 37(4):433–440
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. McCutcheon AL
    (1987) Latent Class Analysis (Sage, Newbury Park, CA)
    .
  18. ↵
    1. Charlson ME,
    2. Pompei P,
    3. Ales KL,
    4. MacKenzie CR
    (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. de Groot V,
    2. Beckerman H,
    3. Lankhorst GJ,
    4. Bouter LM
    (2003) How to measure comorbidity. A critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol 56(3):221–229
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Idler EL,
    2. Benyamini Y
    (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38(1):21–37
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Ahmad F,
    2. Jhajj AK,
    3. Stewart DE,
    4. Burghardt M,
    5. Bierman AS
    (2014) Single item measures of self-rated mental health: A scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 14:398
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Crimmins EM,
    2. Beltrán-Sánchez H
    (2011) Mortality and morbidity trends: Is there compression of morbidity? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 66(1):75–86
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Lowsky DJ,
    2. Olshansky SJ,
    3. Bhattacharya J,
    4. Goldman DP
    (2014) Heterogeneity in healthy aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69(6):640–649
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Wickrama KK,
    2. Mancini JA,
    3. Kwag K,
    4. Kwon J
    (2013) Heterogeneity in multidimensional health trajectories of late old years and socioeconomic stratification: A latent trajectory class analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 68(2):290–297
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Murphy SL,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Kochanek KD
    (2013) Deaths: Final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep 61(4):1–117
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Mostafa SA, et al.
    (2010) The potential impact and optimal cut-points of using glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c, to detect people with impaired glucose regulation in a UK multi-ethnic cohort. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 90(1):100–108
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Williams SR,
    2. Pham-Kanter G,
    3. Leitsch SA
    (2009) Measures of chronic conditions and diseases associated with aging in the national social life, health, and aging project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 64(Suppl 1):i67–i75
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Lee TT,
    2. Chen J,
    3. Cohen DJ,
    4. Tsao L
    (2006) The association between blood pressure and mortality in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J 151(1):76–83
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Seeman T, et al.
    (2008) Education, income and ethnic differences in cumulative biological risk profiles in a national sample of US adults: NHANES III (1988-1994). Soc Sci Med 66(1):72–87
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Chobanian AV, et al., National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee
    (2003) The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA 289(19):2560–2572
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Decaria JE,
    2. Sharp C,
    3. Petrella RJ
    (2012) Scoping review report: Obesity in older adults. Int J Obes 36(9):1141–1150
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Flegal KM,
    2. Kit BK,
    3. Orpana H,
    4. Graubard BI
    (2013) Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 309(1):71–82
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Flegal KM,
    2. Kit BK,
    3. Graubard BI
    (2013) Overweight, obesity, and all-cause mortality--reply. JAMA 309(16):1681–1682
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Lavie CJ,
    2. Loberg K
    (2014) The Obesity Paradox: When Thinner Means Sicker and Heavier Means Healthier (Penguin, New York)
    .
  35. ↵
    1. Yuan TF,
    2. Slotnick BM
    (2014) Roles of olfactory system dysfunction in depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 54:26–30
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Beheydt LL, et al.
    (2015) Psychomotor retardation in elderly untreated depressed patients. Front Psychiatry 5(196):196
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. DeLamater JD,
    2. Sill M
    (2005) Sexual desire in later life. J Sex Res 42(2):138–149
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. DeLamater J
    (2012) Sexual expression in later life: A review and synthesis. J Sex Res 49(2-3):125–141
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Lindau ST, et al.
    (2007) A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 357(8):762–774
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Galinsky AM,
    2. McClintock MK,
    3. Waite LJ
    (2014) Sexuality and physical contact in National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project Wave 2. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 69(Suppl 2):S83–S98
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Cornwell EY,
    2. Waite LJ
    (2009) Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav 50(1):31–48
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Kim J,
    2. Waite LJ
    (2016) Complex households and the distribution of multiple resources in later life: Findings from a national survey. Res Aging 38(2):150–177
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Klinenberg E
    (2012) Going Solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone (Penguin, New York)
    .
  44. ↵
    1. Cornwell B,
    2. Laumann EO,
    3. Schumm LP
    (2008) The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. Am Sociol Rev 73(2):185–203
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Cornwell B,
    2. Schumm LP,
    3. Laumann EO,
    4. Graber J
    (2009) Social networks in the NSHAP Study: Rationale, measurement, and preliminary findings. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 64(Suppl 1):i47–i55
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Trief PM,
    2. Ploutz-Snyder R,
    3. Britton KD,
    4. Weinstock RS
    (2004) The relationship between marital quality and adherence to the diabetes care regimen. Ann Behav Med 27(3):148–154
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Bronner K, et al.
    (2013) Determinants of adherence to screening by colonoscopy in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. Patient Educ Couns 93(2):272–281
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Yang YC, et al.
    (2016) Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(3):578–583
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Roberto CA, et al.
    (2015) Patchy progress on obesity prevention: Emerging examples, entrenched barriers, and new thinking. Lancet 385(9985):2400–2409
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Weil TP
    (2015) Insufficient dollars and qualified personnel to meet United States mental health needs. J Nerv Ment Dis 203(4):233–240
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. IOM (Institute of Medicine)
    (2008) Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce (National Academies Press, Washington, DC)
    .
  52. ↵
    1. Choosing Wisely Workgroup AGS, AGS Choosing Wisely Workgroup
    (2014) American Geriatrics Society identifies another five things that healthcare providers and patients should question. J Am Geriatr Soc 62(5):950–960
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. O’Muircheartaigh C,
    2. Eckman S,
    3. Smith S
    (2009) Statistical design and estimation for the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 64(Suppl 1):i12–i19
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. O’Muircheartaigh C,
    2. English N,
    3. Pedlow S,
    4. Kwok PK
    (2014) Sample design, sample augmentation, and estimation for Wave 2 of the NSHAP. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 69(Suppl 2):S15–S26
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Muthen LK,
    2. Muthen BO
    (2012) Mplus User's Guide (Muthen & Muthen, Los Angeles), 7th Ed
    .
  56. ↵
    1. StataCorp
    (2013) Stata: Release 13. Statistical Software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX), pp 43–45
    .
  57. ↵
    1. Halanych JH, et al.
    (2011) Agreement on cause of death between proxies, death certificates, and clinician adjudicators in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Am J Epidemiol 173(11):1319–1326
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Pinto JM,
    2. Wroblewski KE,
    3. Kern DW,
    4. Schumm LP,
    5. McClintock MK
    (2014) Olfactory dysfunction predicts 5-year mortality in older adults. PLoS One 9(10):e107541
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Celeux G,
    2. Soromenho G
    (1996) An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. J Classif 13(2):195–212
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. ↵
    1. Marcoulides GA,
    2. Schumacker RE
    1. Muthen B
    (2001) Latent variable mixture modeling. New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling, eds Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), pp 1–33
    .
  61. ↵
    1. Huisingh-Scheetz M, et al.
    (2014) Geriatric syndromes and functional status in NSHAP: Rationale, measurement, and preliminary findings. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 69(Suppl 2):S177–S190
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Lauderdale DS, et al.
    (2014) Assessment of sleep in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 69(Suppl 2):S125–S133
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Shega JW, et al.
    (2014) Measuring cognition: The Chicago Cognitive Function Measure in the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project, Wave 2. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 69(Suppl 2):S166–S176
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    National Death Index National Death Index Early Release Pilot Program. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/ndi/ndi_early_release.htm. Accessed April 8, 2016
    .
  65. ↵
    1. Pleis JR,
    2. Ward BW,
    3. Lucas JW
    (2010) Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2009. Vital Health Stat 10 249:1–207
    .
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Canaris GJ,
    2. Manowitz NR,
    3. Mayor G,
    4. Ridgway EC
    (2000) The Colorado thyroid disease prevalence study. Arch Intern Med 160(4):526–534
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Ostchega Y,
    2. Yoon SS,
    3. Hughes J,
    4. Louis T
    (2008) Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control--continued disparities in adults: United States, 2005-2006. NCHS Data Brief 3:1–8
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Tardif JC
    (2009) Heart rate as a treatable cardiovascular risk factor. Br Med Bull 90(1):71–84
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Nabi H, et al.
    (2011) Combined effects of depressive symptoms and resting heart rate on mortality: The Whitehall II prospective cohort study. J Clin Psychiatry 72(9):1199–1206
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    (2007) Prevalence of heart disease--United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 56(6):113–118
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Yamasaki N, et al.
    (2003) Heart failure in the elderly. Intern Med 42(5):383–388
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Mannino DM,
    2. Homa DM,
    3. Akinbami LJ,
    4. Ford ES,
    5. Redd SC
    (2002) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease surveillance--United States, 1971-2000. Respir Care 47(10):1184–1199
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Akinbami LJ,
    2. Moorman JE,
    3. Liu X
    (2011) Asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality: United States, 2005-2009. Natl Health Stat Rep 32:1–14
    .
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Cheng YJ,
    2. Hootman JM,
    3. Murphy LB,
    4. Langmaid GA,
    5. Helmick CG, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    (2010) Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation --- United States, 2007-2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 59(39):1261–1265
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Coresh J, et al.
    (2007) Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 298(17):2038–2047
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. National Cancer Institute
    (2015) Cancer Statistics Review SEER 1975–2012. Available at seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2012. Accessed April 8, 2016
    .
  77. ↵
    1. Leiter U,
    2. Eigentler T,
    3. Garbe C
    (2014) Epidemiology of skin cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 810:120–140
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Hewitt M,
    2. Rowland JH,
    3. Yancik R
    (2003) Cancer survivors in the United States: Age, health, and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58(1):82–91
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    (2011) Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation, Geneva, 8–11 December 2008. Available at apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44583. Accessed April 8, 2016
    .
  80. ↵
    1. Nishida C,
    2. Ko GT,
    3. Kumanyika S
    (2010) Body fat distribution and noncommunicable diseases in populations: Overview of the 2008 WHO Expert Consultation on Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio. Eur J Clin Nutr 64(1):2–5
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    (2000) Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 894:i–xii, 1–253
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Gangwisch JE, et al.
    (2008) Sleep duration associated with mortality in elderly, but not middle-aged, adults in a large US sample. Sleep 31(8):1087–1096
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Divani AA,
    2. Majidi S,
    3. Barrett AM,
    4. Noorbaloochi S,
    5. Luft AR
    (2011) Consequences of stroke in community-dwelling elderly: The health and retirement study, 1998 to 2008. Stroke 42(7):1821–1825
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
    (2004) NIAA council approves definition of binge drinking. NIAA Newsletter (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Washington, DC)
    .
  85. ↵
    1. Blazer DG,
    2. Wu LT
    (2009) The epidemiology of at-risk and binge drinking among middle-aged and elderly community adults: National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Am J Psychiatry 166(10):1162–1169
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Blow FC,
    2. Barry KL
    (2002) Use and misuse of alcohol among older women. Alcohol Res Health 26(4):308–315
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Sacco P,
    2. Bucholz KK,
    3. Spitznagel EL
    (2009) Alcohol use among older adults in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions: A latent class analysis. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 70(6):829–838
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Etter JF,
    2. Vu Duc T,
    3. Perneger TV
    (2000) Saliva cotinine levels in smokers and nonsmokers. Am J Epidemiol 151(3):251–258
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. ↵
    1. van Vunakis H, et al.
    (1989) Relative sensitivity and specificity of salivary and serum cotinine in identifying tobacco-smoking status of self-reported nonsmokers and smokers of tobacco and/or marijuana. Arch Environ Health 44(1):53–58
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Cohen S,
    2. Kamarck T,
    3. Mermelstein R
    (1983) A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 24(4):385–396
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Spacapan S,
    2. Oskamp S
    1. Cohen S,
    2. Williamson G
    (1988) Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. The Social Psychology of Health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology, eds Spacapan S, Oskamp S (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), pp 31–67
    .
  92. ↵
    1. Payne C,
    2. Hedberg EC,
    3. Kozloski M,
    4. Dale W,
    5. McClintock MK
    (2014) Using and interpreting mental health measures in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 69(Suppl 2):S99–S116
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. ↵
    1. Kohout FJ,
    2. Berkman LF,
    3. Evans DA,
    4. Cornoni-Huntley J
    (1993) Two shorter forms of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression) depression symptons index. J Aging Health 5(2):179–193
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. ↵
    1. Hughes ME,
    2. Waite LJ,
    3. Hawkley LC,
    4. Cacioppo JT
    (2004) A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Res Aging 26(6):655–672
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. ↵
    1. Bjelland I,
    2. Dahl AA,
    3. Haug TT,
    4. Neckelmann D
    (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52(2):69–77
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Alwahhabi F
    (2003) Anxiety symptoms and generalized anxiety disorder in the elderly: A review. Harv Rev Psychiatry 11(4):180–193
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Beekman AT, et al.
    (1998) Anxiety disorders in later life: A report from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 13(10):717–726
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Robins RW,
    2. Hendin HM,
    3. Trzesniewski KH
    (2001) Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27(2):151–161
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  99. ↵
    1. Orth U,
    2. Trzesniewski KH,
    3. Robins RW
    (2010) Self-esteem development from young adulthood to old age: A cohort-sequential longitudinal study. J Pers Soc Psychol 98(4):645–658
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Ranzijn R,
    2. Keeves J,
    3. Luszcz M,
    4. Feather NT
    (1998) The role of self-perceived usefulness and competence in the self-esteem of elderly adults: Confirmatory factor analyses of the Bachman revision of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 53(2):96–104
    .
    OpenUrl
  101. ↵
    1. Russell JA,
    2. Carroll JM
    (1999) On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychol Bull 125(1):3–30
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    1. Chodosh J,
    2. Reuben DB,
    3. Albert MS,
    4. Seeman TE
    (2002) Predicting cognitive impairment in high-functioning community-dwelling older persons: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc 50(6):1051–1060
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Landis BN, et al.
    (2009) “Taste Strips” - a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 256(2):242–248
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G
    (2005) The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture 2003: Vision in elders--summary of findings of the SKI study. Optom Vis Sci 82(2):87–93
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Schumm LP, et al.
    (2009) Assessment of sensory function in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 64(Suppl 1):i76–i85
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Gruber N,
    2. Mosimann UP,
    3. Müri RM,
    4. Nef T
    (2013) Vision and night driving abilities of elderly drivers. Traffic Inj Prev 14(5):477–485
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Stevens JC,
    2. Patterson MQ
    (1995) Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: Changes over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 12(1):29–47
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Thornbury JM,
    2. Mistretta CM
    (1981) Tactile sensitivity as a function of age. J Gerontol 36(1):34–39
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  109. ↵
    1. Mueller C,
    2. Renner B
    (2006) A new procedure for the short screening of olfactory function using five items from the “Sniffin’ Sticks” identification test kit. Am J Rhinol 20(1):113–116
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  110. ↵
    1. Kern DW,
    2. Wroblewski KE,
    3. Schumm LP,
    4. Pinto JM,
    5. McClintock MK
    (2014) Field survey measures of olfaction: The olfactory function field exam (OFFE). Field Methods 26(4):1–14
    .
    OpenUrl
  111. ↵
    1. Sindhusake D, et al.
    (2001) Validation of self-reported hearing loss. The Blue Mountains Hearing Study. Int J Epidemiol 30(6):1371–1378
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  112. ↵
    1. Clark K,
    2. Sowers M,
    3. Wallace RB,
    4. Anderson C
    (1991) The accuracy of self-reported hearing loss in women aged 60-85 years. Am J Epidemiol 134(7):704–708
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. ↵
    1. Nondahl DM, et al.
    (1998) Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss. Audiology 37(5):295–301
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. ↵
    1. McDade TW,
    2. Stallings JF,
    3. Worthman CM
    (2000) Culture change and stress in Western Samoan youth: Methodological issues in the cross-cultural study of stress and immune function. Am J Hum Biol 12(6):792–802
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. McDade TW,
    2. Lindau ST,
    3. Wroblewski K
    (2011) Predictors of C-reactive protein in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 66(1):129–136
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  116. ↵
    1. Williams SR,
    2. McDade TW
    (2009) The use of dried blood spot sampling in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 64(Suppl 1):i131–i136
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  117. ↵
    1. Podsiadlo D,
    2. Richardson S
    (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(2):142–148
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. ↵
    1. Wall JC,
    2. Bell C,
    3. Campbell S,
    4. Davis J
    (2000) The Timed Get-up-and-Go test revisited: Measurement of the component tasks. J Rehabil Res Dev 37(1):109–113
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Selvin E,
    2. Erlinger TP
    (2004) Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000. Circulation 110(6):738–743
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  120. ↵
    1. Ostchega Y,
    2. Paulose-Ram R,
    3. Dillon CF,
    4. Gu Q,
    5. Hughes JP
    (2007) Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and risk factors in persons aged 60 and older: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004. J Am Geriatr Soc 55(4):583–589
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  121. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    (2005) Mobility limitation among persons aged > or =40 years with and without diagnosed diabetes and lower extremity disease--United States, 1999-2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 54(46):1183–1186
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  122. ↵
    1. Bischoff HA, et al.
    (2003) Identifying a cut-off point for normal mobility: A comparison of the timed ‘up and go’ test in community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly women. Age Ageing 32(3):315–320
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  123. ↵
    1. National Center for Health Statistics
    (2004) Data Warehouse on Trends in Health and Aging. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/agingact.htm. Accessed April 8, 2016
    .
  124. ↵
    1. Lamarca R, et al.
    (2003) A changing relationship between disability and survival in the elderly population: Differences by age. J Clin Epidemiol 56(12):1192–1201
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. ↵
    1. Ormel J, et al.
    (1997) Chronic medical conditions and mental health in older people: Disability and psychosocial resources mediate specific mental health effects. Psychol Med 27(5):1065–1077
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. ↵
    1. Stuck AE, et al.
    (1999) Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: A systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 48(4):445–469
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  127. ↵
    1. Feinglass J, et al.
    (2007) Baseline health, socioeconomic status, and 10-year mortality among older middle-aged Americans: Findings from the Health and Retirement Study, 1992 2002. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 62(4):S209–S217
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  128. ↵
    1. He XZ,
    2. Baker DW
    (2004) Body mass index, physical activity, and the risk of decline in overall health and physical functioning in late middle age. Am J Public Health 94(9):1567–1573
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  129. ↵
    1. Shay CM, et al.
    (2012) Status of cardiovascular health in US adults: Prevalence estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2003-2008. Circulation 125(1):45–56
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  130. ↵
    1. Beckett LA, et al.
    (1996) Analysis of change in self-reported physical function among older persons in four population studies. Am J Epidemiol 143(8):766–778
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  131. ↵
    1. Klotzbuecher CM,
    2. Ross PD,
    3. Landsman PB,
    4. Abbott TA 3rd,
    5. Berger M
    (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: A summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15(4):721–739
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. ↵
    1. Ross PD,
    2. Davis JW,
    3. Epstein RS,
    4. Wasnich RD
    (1991) Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 114(11):919–923
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  133. ↵
    1. Cummings SR,
    2. Melton LJ
    (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359(9319):1761–1767
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  134. ↵
    1. Melton LJ 3rd,
    2. Chrischilles EA,
    3. Cooper C,
    4. Lane AW,
    5. Riggs BL
    (1992) Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7(9):1005–1010
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. ↵
    1. Mellinger E
    (1997) Identifying risk factors for and preventing hip fractures in elderly patients. AORN J 66(4):688–693
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  136. ↵
    1. White BL,
    2. Fisher WD,
    3. Laurin CA
    (1987) Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980's. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(9):1335–1340
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  137. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    (1968) Nutritional anaemias. Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 405:5–37
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  138. ↵
    1. Beghé C,
    2. Wilson A,
    3. Ershler WB
    (2004) Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in geriatrics: A systematic review of the literature. Am J Med 116(Suppl 7A):3S–10S
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  139. ↵
    1. Guralnik JM,
    2. Eisenstaedt RS,
    3. Ferrucci L,
    4. Klein HG,
    5. Woodman RC
    (2004) Prevalence of anemia in persons 65 years and older in the United States: Evidence for a high rate of unexplained anemia. Blood 104(8):2263–2268
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  140. ↵
    1. Lipschitz D
    (2003) Medical and functional consequences of anemia in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(Suppl 3):S10–S13
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  141. ↵
    1. Penninx BW, et al.
    (2003) Anemia and decline in physical performance among older persons. Am J Med 115(2):104–110
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. ↵
    1. Agree EM
    (1999) The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. Soc Sci Med 48(4):427–443
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. ↵
    1. Tomey KM,
    2. Sowers MR
    (2009) Assessment of physical functioning: A conceptual model encompassing environmental factors and individual compensation strategies. Phys Ther 89(7):705–714
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  144. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    (1994) Arthritis prevalence and activity limitations--United States, 1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 43(24):433–438
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  145. ↵
    1. Gill TM,
    2. Allore HG,
    3. Holford TR,
    4. Guo Z
    (2004) Hospitalization, restricted activity, and the development of disability among older persons. JAMA 292(17):2115–2124
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  146. ↵
    1. Markland AD,
    2. Goode PS,
    3. Redden DT,
    4. Borrud LG,
    5. Burgio KL
    (2010) Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Urol 184(3):1022–1027
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  147. ↵
    1. Nygaard I, et al., Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
    (2008) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 300(11):1311–1316
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  148. ↵
    1. Bogner HR
    (2004) Urinary incontinence and psychological distress in community-dwelling older African Americans and whites. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(11):1870–1874
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  149. ↵
    1. Bogner HR, et al.
    (2002) Urinary incontinence and psychological distress in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 50(3):489–495
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  150. ↵
    1. Haylen BT, et al.
    (2007) Has the true prevalence of voiding difficulty in urogynecology patients been underestimated? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(1):53–56
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  151. ↵
    1. Homma Y, et al.
    (1997) Epidemiologic survey of lower urinary tract symptoms in Asia and Australia using the international prostate symptom score. Int J Urol 4(1):40–46
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  152. ↵
    1. Stothers L,
    2. Thom D,
    3. Calhoun E
    (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: Urinary incontinence in males--demographics and economic burden. J Urol 173(4):1302–1308
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  153. ↵
    1. Whitehead WE, et al., Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
    (2009) Fecal incontinence in US adults: Epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 137(2):512–517
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  154. ↵
    1. Østbye T, et al.
    (2004) A 10-year follow-up of urinary and fecal incontinence among the oldest old in the community: The Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Can J Aging 23(4):319–331
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Next
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Empirical redefinition of comprehensive health and well-being in the older adults of the United States
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Comprehensive health of US older adults
Martha K. McClintock, William Dale, Edward O. Laumann, Linda Waite
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2016, 201514968; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514968113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Comprehensive health of US older adults
Martha K. McClintock, William Dale, Edward O. Laumann, Linda Waite
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2016, 201514968; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514968113
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 118 (3)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • SI Methods
    • Discussion
    • Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Large piece of gold
News Feature: Tracing gold's cosmic origins
Astronomers thought they’d finally figured out where gold and other heavy elements in the universe came from. In light of recent results, they’re not so sure.
Image credit: Science Source/Tom McHugh.
Dancers in red dresses
Journal Club: Friends appear to share patterns of brain activity
Researchers are still trying to understand what causes this strong correlation between neural and social networks.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Yeongsik Im.
White and blue bird
Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490