Lateral transport of soil carbon and land−atmosphere CO2 flux induced by water erosion in China
- aThe Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China;
- bSchool of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, People’s Republic of China;
- cLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Ènergies Alternatives, CNRS, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
- dDepartment of Ecology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China;
- eKey Laboratory of Alpine Ecology and Biodiversity, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, People’s Republic of China;
- fCAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, People’s Republic of China;
- gSchool of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, United Kingdom;
- hLand & Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
- iEarth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Donald E. Canfield, Institute of Biology and Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark, and approved April 28, 2016 (received for review November 25, 2015)

Significance
The role of soil erosion as a net sink or source of atmospheric CO2 remains highly debated. This work quantifies national-scale land−atmosphere CO2 fluxes induced by soil erosion. Severe water erosion in China has caused displacement of 180 ± 80 Mt C⋅y-1 of soil organic carbon during the last two decades, and the consequent land−atmosphere CO2 flux from water erosion is a net CO2 sink of 45 ± 25 Mt C⋅y-1, equivalent to 8–37% of the terrestrial carbon sink previously assessed in China. This closes an important gap concerning large-scale estimation of lateral and vertical CO2 fluxes from water erosion and highlights the importance of reducing uncertainty in assessing terrestrial carbon balance.
Abstract
Soil erosion by water impacts soil organic carbon stocks and alters CO2 fluxes exchanged with the atmosphere. The role of erosion as a net sink or source of atmospheric CO2 remains highly debated, and little information is available at scales larger than small catchments or regions. This study attempts to quantify the lateral transport of soil carbon and consequent land−atmosphere CO2 fluxes at the scale of China, where severe erosion has occurred for several decades. Based on the distribution of soil erosion rates derived from detailed national surveys and soil carbon inventories, here we show that water erosion in China displaced 180 ± 80 Mt C⋅y−1 of soil organic carbon during the last two decades, and this resulted a net land sink for atmospheric CO2 of 45 ± 25 Mt C⋅y−1, equivalent to 8–37% of the terrestrial carbon sink previously assessed in China. Interestingly, the “hotspots,” largely distributed in mountainous regions in the most intensive sink areas (>40 g C⋅m−2⋅y−1), occupy only 1.5% of the total area suffering water erosion, but contribute 19.3% to the national erosion-induced CO2 sink. The erosion-induced CO2 sink underwent a remarkable reduction of about 16% from the middle 1990s to the early 2010s, due to diminishing erosion after the implementation of large-scale soil conservation programs. These findings demonstrate the necessity of including erosion-induced CO2 in the terrestrial budget, hence reducing the level of uncertainty.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: nijinren{at}iee.pku.edu.cn.
Author contributions: J.N., P.C., S.P., and K.V.O. designed research; Y.Y. and J.N. performed research; J.N., P.C., and S.P. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Y.Y., T.W., M.H., T.L., and Y.W. analyzed data; and Y.Y., J.N., P.C., S.P., A.G.L.B., Y.W., and A.C. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1523358113/-/DCSupplemental.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.