Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Directed vaccination against pneumococcal disease

Yi Li, Andrew Hill, Marie Beitelshees, Shuai Shao, View ORCID ProfileJonathan F. Lovell, View ORCID ProfileBruce A. Davidson, Paul R. Knight III, Anders P. Hakansson, Blaine A. Pfeifer, and Charles H. Jones
PNAS first published June 6, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603007113
Yi Li
aDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Hill
bAbcombi Biosciences Inc., Buffalo, NY 14260;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Beitelshees
aDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuai Shao
cDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan F. Lovell
cDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan F. Lovell
Bruce A. Davidson
dDepartment of Anesthesiology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Bruce A. Davidson
Paul R. Knight
dDepartment of Anesthesiology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260;eDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anders P. Hakansson
eDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260;fDivision of Experimental Infection Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, SE-221 00 Malmo, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: blainepf@buffalo.edu Anders_P.Hakansson@med.lu.se charles.jones@abcombibio.com
Blaine A. Pfeifer
aDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260;bAbcombi Biosciences Inc., Buffalo, NY 14260;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: blainepf@buffalo.edu Anders_P.Hakansson@med.lu.se charles.jones@abcombibio.com
Charles H. Jones
bAbcombi Biosciences Inc., Buffalo, NY 14260;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: blainepf@buffalo.edu Anders_P.Hakansson@med.lu.se charles.jones@abcombibio.com
  1. Edited by Robert Langer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved May 6, 2016 (received for review February 22, 2016)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & SI

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    S. pneumoniae pathogenesis outcomes and infectious disease statistics in the United States (1998–2013). (A) S. pneumoniae colonizes the human nasopharynx and produces a bacterial biofilm with an accompanying extracellular matrix capable of providing protection from external and host challenges. External triggers such as viral infection prompt the active release of virulent pneumococci that disseminate to secondary sites and cause disease. (B) Leading vaccination strategies [polysaccharide conjugate vaccines (PCVs), such as the Prevnar family] mediate protection against certain bacterial serotypes by promoting clearance of pneumococci before biofilm establishment. Clearing all bacteria opens the niche to colonization by nonvaccine serotypes or other bacterial species. (C) The strategy featured in this work mediates clearance of only virulent biofilm-released bacteria while maintaining the presence of the preexisting biofilm. (D) The annual infection rate per 100,000 people for the total population (blue) and children under the age of 5 y (red), 1998–2013. The first years following the introduction of Prevnar 7 and 13 are marked with dotted lines. (E) Prevalence of infectious pneumococcal strains, 1998–2013 (29). Strains are grouped into those covered by Prevnar 7 (blue), those covered by Prevnar 13 (red), and nonvaccine types (NVT; green). (F) The reduction in the annual infection rate in children under the age of 5 y from 1998–2008 relative to 1998–1999. The dashed line corresponds to the division between Prevnar 7 vaccine and nonvaccine type strains in 1999–2000 (35). (G) The reduction in the annual infection rate in children under the age of 5 y, 2008–2013. The dashed line corresponds to the division between Prevnar 13 vaccine and nonvaccine type strains in 2008–2009 (35).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Antigen identification and S. pneumoniae conditioning through an in vitro biofilm model. (A) S. pneumoniae were seeded on epithelial cells, and the biofilm structure was investigated using SEM. Visible in these images are the extracellular matrix, water channels, tower formations, and the honeycomb structure that pneumococci form with larger biofilms. (B and C) Mouse bacterial burden was determined after i.p. injections (sepsis model) (B) or aspiration with anesthesia (pneumonia model) (C) using broth-grown (Planktonic), biofilm-associated (Biofilm), or biofilm heat-released (Heat) S. pneumoniae strain EF3030. Each dot in the graphs represents an individual mouse. The dotted line represents the limit of detection for bacterial counts. (D) Time-to-death assessment of mice inoculated with biofilm heat-released bacteria; mice that were inoculated with either planktonic or biofilm-associated bacteria did not die in any challenge model. (E–G) Mice were immunized with various antigens and challenged with biofilm heat-released EF3030 in sepsis (E and F) and pneumonia (G) models. ***P < 0.001, compared with planktonic and biofilm samples (B and C) and PspA (E).

  • Fig. S1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S1.

    Characterization of Co-PoP liposomal delivery device. (A and B) HPLC analysis of Co-PoP (A) and the resulting mass spectrum (B). (C) Liposome-binding analysis for all proteins used in the study. (D and E) Particle diameter (D) and zeta potential (E) of liposomes formulated with 0, 5, and 15 μg of PspA.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Directed clearance of biofilm-released bacteria and protection against mouse-passaged challenge strains. (A) Bacterial burden at various anatomical sites was determined daily in unimmunized (filled circles) and GlpO + PncO immunized (open circles) mice. Mice were inoculated intranasally without anesthesia with planktonic or biofilm heat-released EF3030 (Upper) or D39 (Lower) bacteria. (B) Comparative analysis of the planktonic (black) and biofilm-released (red) EF3030 clinical isolate data from A. A value of 100% represents no difference between immunized and unimmunized subjects; values below 100% indicate a directed response. A full statistical comparison is presented in Table S5. (C and D) Protective capabilities of GlpO + PncO immunization were evaluated further in sepsis (C) and pneumonia (D) models with established mouse-passaged pneumococcal bacteria. Dotted lines represent the limit of detection for bacterial counts.

  • Fig. S2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S2.

    Characterization of biofilm-released D39 bacterial virulence and vaccine protective capabilities. (A and B) Bacterial burden was determined for pneumococcal populations after i.p. injections (sepsis model) (A) or intranasal aspiration after anesthesia (pneumonia model) (B). Mice were inoculated with broth-grown (Planktonic), biofilm-associated (Biofilm), or biofilm heat-released (Heat) D39. Each dot in the graphs represents an individual mouse; an “x” represents a mouse that became moribund and was killed before the end of the experiment. The dotted line represents the limit of detection for bacterial counts. (C and D) Time-to-death assessment of mice inoculated with heat-released bacteria from the sepsis (C) and pneumonia (D) models after immunization with PspA or GlpO + PncO.

  • Fig. S3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S3.

    Bacterial burden associated with protection against mouse-passaged pneumococcal challenge strains. Mice were immunized with GlpO + PncO and challenged with planktonic D39 (A), A66.1 (B), WU2 (C), and TIGR4 (D) cells in either a sepsis or pneumonia model. Dotted lines represent the limit of detection for bacterial counts.

  • Fig. S4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S4.

    Characteristics of directed clearance and protection against an expanded set of strains. (A) Directed clearance of biofilm-released bacteria in passively immunized mice. Bacterial burden at various anatomical sites was determined daily in unimmunized (filled circles) and GlpO + PncO passively immunized (open circles) mice. Mice were inoculated intranasally without anesthesia with planktonic (red) or biofilm heat-released (blue) EF3030. Dotted lines represent the limit of detection for bacterial counts. (B) Protective capabilities of GlpO + PncO immunization were evaluated further in the sepsis model using an expanded set of mouse pneumococcal strains. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001; NS, not significant.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Bacterial dissemination and time-to-death assessment of mice stably colonized with pneumococci and triggered with IAV. (A and B) Bacterial burden of EF3030 or D39 in unimmunized or GlpO + PncO immunized mice was measured at 1 (A) or 5 (B) d postinfection with IAV. The dotted line represents the limit of detection for bacterial counts. (C and D) Protective capabilities of traditionally or passively GlpO + PncO immunized mice against in vivo IAV-mediated bacterial release of EF3030 (C) or D39 (D). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; NS, not significant.

  • Fig. S5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S5.

    Schedule of immunization and bacterial challenge.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table S1.

    Antigen cloning summary

    Antigen genePrimersSourceRestriction sitesPlasmidName
    dexBF: TAAGCACATATGCAAGAAAAATGGTGGCATAATGCCGTAGD39NdeI/XhoIpET21cpCJ05
    R: TAAGCACTCGAGTTCCACACAGAAAGCATCCCA
    htrAF: TAAGCACCATGGGGAAACATCTAAAAACATTTTACAAD39NcoI/XhoIpET20bpCJ06
    R: TAAGCACTCGAGAGATTCTAAATCACCTGAAC
    glpOF: TAAGCAGAGCTCGAATTTTCAAAAAAAACACGTGAATTGTCD39SacI/XhoIpET21cpCJ07
    R:TAAGCACTCGAGATTTTTTAATTCTGCTAAATCGTTGTTAG
    stkPF:TAAGCACATATGATCCAAATCGGCAAGATTTTD39NdeI/NotIpET21cpCJ08
    R: TAAGCAGCGGCCGCAGGAGTAGCTGAAGTTGTTTTA
    blpBF: TAAGCACCATGGGGAATCCTAATCTTTTTAGAAGD39NcoI/XhoIpET20bpCJ09
    R: TAAGCACTCGAGATCAGAATGGGTTAAAATTTTA
    pncOF:TAAGCACATATGAAAAAGTATCAACTTCTATTEF3030NdeI/XhoIpET21cpCJ10
    R: TAAGCACTCGAGCCCCAAGACCCTATGTAGAAAA
    prtAF: TAAGCAGAGCTCAAAAAAAGCACAGTATTGTCD39SacI/XhoIpET21cpCJ12
    R:TAAGCACTCGAGATCTTGATTTTTTTTCTTCAAT
    • View popup
    Table S5.

    Statistical comparison of the percent of directed vaccine effect for anatomical locations indicated in Fig. 3B

    DayMean diff.95% CI of diff.Significant
    Nasopharynx
     13024.02–35.98Yes
     23125.02–36.98Yes
     35650.02–61.98Yes
     49690.02–102Yes
     58478.02–89.98Yes
     68377.02–88.98Yes
     76155.02–66.98Yes
     89488.02–99.98Yes
     910498.02–110Yes
     104337.02–48.98Yes
     117569.02–80.98Yes
     127165.02–76.98Yes
     136054.02–65.98Yes
     146660.02–71.98Yes
    Nasopharynx lavage
     19892.02–104Yes
     2135129–141Yes
     36458.02–69.98Yes
     44337.02–48.98Yes
     59690.02–102Yes
     6112106–118Yes
     710094.02–106Yes
     88377.02–88.98Yes
     94034.02–45.98Yes
     102519.02–30.98Yes
     116155.02–66.98Yes
     125044.02–55.98Yes
     133327.02–38.98Yes
     144135.02–46.98Yes
    Lung
     1−22−27.98 to −16.02Yes
     23327.02–38.98Yes
     35246.02–57.98Yes
     43731.02–42.98Yes
     52620.02–31.98Yes
     65953.02–64.98Yes
     75448.02–59.98Yes
     85953.02–64.98Yes
     95852.02–63.98Yes
     104943.02–54.98Yes
     114741.02–52.98Yes
     125448.02–59.98Yes
     137771.02–82.98Yes
     146559.02–70.98Yes
    • CI, confidence interval; Mean Diff., mean difference between planktonic and biofilm-released values. All adjusted P values <0.0001.

    • View popup
    Table S2.

    S. pneumoniae strains used in the current study

    StrainCapsule type (serotype)Virulence patternIncluded in current vaccinesProtection in this study, %
    D3921Yes100
    D39, heat-released24Yes100
    DBL222Yes100
    A66.131Yes100
    WU231Yes100
    ATCC630332Yes100
    3JYP267032Yes50
    TIGR442Yes100
    DBL552Yes66
    WCH16, heat-released6A4Yes50
    DBL6A6B2Yes66
    ATCC-6312, heat-released12F4No83
    ATCC-10354, heat-released15B4No100
    EF303019F3Yes100
    EF3030, heat-released19F4Yes100
    ATCC-6324, heat-released244No100
    ATCC-6327, heat-released274No100
    • View popup
    Table S3.

    Virulence pattern description

    Virulence pattern classificationCarriageLung infectionSepsisComments
    1—+++++Bacteria carries poorly and transitions to the blood wherever placed
    2±++++Bacteria causes strong infection wherever placed; occasionally will transition to the blood and cause death
    3+++++±Bacteria carries well and infects locally but is unlikely to kill; rarely transitions to the blood and causes death
    4+++++++Bacteria carries well and causes strong infection wherever placed and can transition to the blood
    • View popup
    Table S4.

    PncO and GlpO antigen description and analysis

    GeneSize, bpFunctionVirulent gene expression (log2) relative toAverage log2 fold changeSurface accessibleStrain conservation, % homology
    PlanktonicBiofilmFull proteinSurface-accessible regionsSurface-accessible epitopes
    pncO690Bacteriocin ABC transporter transmembrane protein8.54.86.6Yes959397
    glpO1,827α-Glycerophosphate oxidase95.97.4Yes999898
    • Gene expression values were determined by Pettigrew et al. (36), and surface accessibility was established using the InterPro database (www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/). Strain conservation was calculated by accounting for gap and mismatches in the gene sequences of 30 S. pneumoniae strains with complete genomes available in BLAST (blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Epitope regions were predicted with the BepiPred linear epitope prediction method using IEDB Analysis Resource (tools.immuneepitope.org/bcell/).

Data supplements

  • Supporting Information

    • Download Supporting Information (PDF)
Next
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Directed vaccination against pneumococcal disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Directed vaccination
Yi Li, Andrew Hill, Marie Beitelshees, Shuai Shao, Jonathan F. Lovell, Bruce A. Davidson, Paul R. Knight, Anders P. Hakansson, Blaine A. Pfeifer, Charles H. Jones
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2016, 201603007; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1603007113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Directed vaccination
Yi Li, Andrew Hill, Marie Beitelshees, Shuai Shao, Jonathan F. Lovell, Bruce A. Davidson, Paul R. Knight, Anders P. Hakansson, Blaine A. Pfeifer, Charles H. Jones
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2016, 201603007; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1603007113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (49)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Materials and Methods
    • SI Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Modulating the body's networks could become mainstream therapy for many health issues. Image credit: The Feinstein Institutes for Medicine Research.
Core Concept: The rise of bioelectric medicine sparks interest among researchers, patients, and industry
Modulating the body's networks could become mainstream therapy for many health issues.
Image credit: The Feinstein Institutes for Medicine Research.
Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans. Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
Human heart evolved for endurance
Adaptations in heart structure and function likely enabled endurance and survival in preindustrial humans.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/Skeeze.
Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation. Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
Viscoelastic fluids and wildfire prevention
Viscoelastic carrier fluids enhance retention of fire retardants on wildfire-prone vegetation.
Image courtesy of Jesse D. Acosta.
Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate. Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
Climate change and desert bird collapse
Water requirements may make desert bird declines more likely in a warming climate.
Image courtesy of Sean Peterson (photographer).
QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He. Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.
Featured QnAs
QnAs with NAS member and plant biologist Sheng Yang He
Image courtesy of Sheng Yang He.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490