Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Global threat to agriculture from invasive species

Dean R. Paini, Andy W. Sheppard, David C. Cook, Paul J. De Barro, Susan P. Worner, and Matthew B. Thomas
  1. aCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
  2. bPlant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia;
  3. cDepartment of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Bunbury, WA 6230, Australia;
  4. dSchool of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia;
  5. eCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia;
  6. fBio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand;
  7. gDepartment of Entomology, Penn State University, State College, PA 16802;
  8. hCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Penn State University, State College, PA 16802

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS first published June 20, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602205113
Dean R. Paini
aCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
bPlant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Dean.Paini@csiro.au
Andy W. Sheppard
aCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David C. Cook
cDepartment of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, Bunbury, WA 6230, Australia;
dSchool of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul J. De Barro
eCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan P. Worner
fBio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew B. Thomas
gDepartment of Entomology, Penn State University, State College, PA 16802;
hCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Penn State University, State College, PA 16802
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Harold A. Mooney, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved April 28, 2016 (received for review February 13, 2016)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

A key scientific and policy challenge relating to invasive species at the world level is to understand and predict which countries are most vulnerable to the threat of invasive species. We present an analysis of the threat from almost 1,300 agricultural invasive species to the world (124 countries). The analysis examines the global distribution of these species, international trade flows, and each country’s main agricultural production crops, to determine potential invasion and impact of these invasive species. We found the most vulnerable countries to be from Sub-Saharan Africa, while those countries representing the greatest threat to the rest of the world (given the invasive species they already contain, and their trade patterns) to be the United States and China.

Abstract

Invasive species present significant threats to global agriculture, although how the magnitude and distribution of the threats vary between countries and regions remains unclear. Here, we present an analysis of almost 1,300 known invasive insect pests and pathogens, calculating the total potential cost of these species invading each of 124 countries of the world, as well as determining which countries present the greatest threat to the rest of the world given their trading partners and incumbent pool of invasive species. We find that countries vary in terms of potential threat from invasive species and also their role as potential sources, with apparently similar countries sometimes varying markedly depending on specifics of agricultural commodities and trade patterns. Overall, the biggest agricultural producers (China and the United States) could experience the greatest absolute cost from further species invasions. However, developing countries, in particular, Sub-Saharan African countries, appear most vulnerable in relative terms. Furthermore, China and the United States represent the greatest potential sources of invasive species for the rest of the world. The analysis reveals considerable scope for ongoing redistribution of known invasive pests and highlights the need for international cooperation to slow their spread.

  • NIS
  • insect pests
  • fungal pathogens
  • trade

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: Dean.Paini{at}csiro.au.
  • Author contributions: D.R.P., A.W.S., D.C.C., P.J.D.B., S.P.W., and M.B.T. designed research; D.R.P. performed research; D.R.P. and D.C.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; D.R.P. analyzed data; and D.R.P., A.W.S., D.C.C., P.J.D.B., S.P.W., and M.B.T. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1602205113/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

View Full Text
Next
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Global threat to agriculture from invasive species
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Global threat to agriculture from invasive species
Dean R. Paini, Andy W. Sheppard, David C. Cook, Paul J. De Barro, Susan P. Worner, Matthew B. Thomas
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2016, 201602205; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602205113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Global threat to agriculture from invasive species
Dean R. Paini, Andy W. Sheppard, David C. Cook, Paul J. De Barro, Susan P. Worner, Matthew B. Thomas
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2016, 201602205; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602205113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 118 (9)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490