Present-day African analogue of a pre-European Amazonian floodplain fishery shows convergence in cultural niche construction
- aCentre d’Ecologie Fonctionelle et Evolutive UMR 5175, CNRS Université de Montpellier, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France;
- bInstitut Universitaire de France, 75231 Paris, France;
- cInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR BOREA (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, l'Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR 7208, CNRS, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université de Caen Normandie), 75231 Paris, France;
- dArchéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements (UMR 7209), Sorbonne Universités, CNRS, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, CP 56, 75005 Paris, France;
- eEarth System Science Center, National Institute for Space Research, 12227-010 São José dos Campos, Sao Paulo, Brazil;
- fMt. Makulu Central Research Station, Zambia Agricultural Research Institute, Chilanga, Zambia;
- gBangweulu Wetlands Project, African Parks Network, Mpika, Zambia
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Charles S. Spencer, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, and approved October 13, 2016 (received for review September 12, 2016)

Significance
Erickson convincingly inferred a pre-European floodplain fishery unlike any present-day system he knew, illustrating the principle that archaeological inference should not be constrained by the range of cultural variation observed today. Our comparison of these inferences with observations from a present-day fishery in a similar environment suggests strong convergence in both the ecology of fish communities and the cultural means people have devised to exploit them, providing support for a predictive model of cultural niche construction. This conceptual framework emphasizes the synergistic action of human agency and environmental constraint in shaping patterns in the human use and management of ecosystems.
Abstract
Erickson [Erickson CL (2000) Nature 408 (6809):190–193] interpreted features in seasonal floodplains in Bolivia’s Beni savannas as vestiges of pre-European earthen fish weirs, postulating that they supported a productive, sustainable fishery that warranted cooperation in the construction and maintenance of perennial structures. His inferences were bold, because no close ethnographic analogues were known. A similar present-day Zambian fishery, documented here, appears strikingly convergent. The Zambian fishery supports Erickson’s key inferences about the pre-European fishery: It allows sustained high harvest levels; weir construction and operation require cooperation; and weirs are inherited across generations. However, our comparison suggests that the pre-European system may not have entailed intensive management, as Erickson postulated. The Zambian fishery’s sustainability is based on exploiting an assemblage dominated by species with life histories combining high fecundity, multiple reproductive cycles, and seasonal use of floodplains. As water rises, adults migrate from permanent watercourses into floodplains, through gaps in weirs, to feed and spawn. Juveniles grow and then migrate back to dry-season refuges as water falls. At that moment fishermen set traps in the gaps, harvesting large numbers of fish, mostly juveniles. In nature, most juveniles die during the first dry season, so that their harvest just before migration has limited impact on future populations, facilitating sustainability and the adoption of a fishery based on inherited perennial structures. South American floodplain fishes with similar life histories were the likely targets of the pre-European fishery. Convergence in floodplain fish strategies in these two regions in turn drove convergence in cultural niche construction.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: doyle.mckey{at}cefe.cnrs.fr.
Author contributions: D.B.M., M.D., and C.F.H. designed research; D.B.M., M.D., M.P., P.B., A.O., M.K., and C.F.H. performed research; D.B.M., M.D., M.P., P.B., A.O., and C.F.H. analyzed data; and D.B.M., M.D., M.P., P.B., and C.F.H. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1613169114/-/DCSupplemental.