Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Evolution of the early Antarctic ice ages

View ORCID ProfileDiederik Liebrand, Anouk T. M. de Bakker, Helen M. Beddow, Paul A. Wilson, Steven M. Bohaty, View ORCID ProfileGerben Ruessink, Heiko Pälike, Sietske J. Batenburg, Frederik J. Hilgen, David A. Hodell, Claire E. Huck, Dick Kroon, Isabella Raffi, Mischa J. M. Saes, Arnold E. van Dijk, and Lucas J. Lourens
  1. aNational Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom;
  2. bDepartment of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  3. cLittoral Environnement et Sociétés, Université de La Rochelle, 17042 La Rochelle, France;
  4. dDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  5. eCenter for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany;
  6. fInstitute of Geosciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany;
  7. gDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3AN, United Kingdom;
  8. hDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom;
  9. iSchool of GeoSciences, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, United Kingdom;
  10. jDipartimento di Ingegneria e Geologia, Università degli Studi “G. d’Annunzio” di Chieti–Pescara, 66013 Chieti Scalo, Italy

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS first published March 27, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615440114
Diederik Liebrand
aNational Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Diederik Liebrand
  • For correspondence: diederik.liebrand@noc.soton.ac.uk
Anouk T. M. de Bakker
bDepartment of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands;
cLittoral Environnement et Sociétés, Université de La Rochelle, 17042 La Rochelle, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen M. Beddow
dDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul A. Wilson
aNational Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven M. Bohaty
aNational Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerben Ruessink
bDepartment of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gerben Ruessink
Heiko Pälike
eCenter for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sietske J. Batenburg
fInstitute of Geosciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany;
gDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3AN, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederik J. Hilgen
dDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David A. Hodell
hDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire E. Huck
aNational Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dick Kroon
iSchool of GeoSciences, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabella Raffi
jDipartimento di Ingegneria e Geologia, Università degli Studi “G. d’Annunzio” di Chieti–Pescara, 66013 Chieti Scalo, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mischa J. M. Saes
dDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnold E. van Dijk
dDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucas J. Lourens
dDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Mark H. Thiemens, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved February 24, 2017 (received for review September 15, 2016)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

The Antarctic ice cap waxed and waned on astronomical time scales throughout the Oligo-Miocene time interval. We quantify geometries of Antarctic ice age cycles, as expressed in a new climate record from the South Atlantic Ocean, to track changing dynamics of the unipolar icehouse climate state. We document numerous ∼110-thousand-year-long oscillations between a near-fully glaciated and deglaciated Antarctica that transitioned from being symmetric in the Oligocene to asymmetric in the Miocene. We infer that distinctly asymmetric ice age cycles are not unique to the Late Pleistocene or to extremely large continental ice sheets. The patterns of long-term change in Antarctic climate interpreted from this record are not readily reconciled with existing CO2 records.

Abstract

Understanding the stability of the early Antarctic ice cap in the geological past is of societal interest because present-day atmospheric CO2 concentrations have reached values comparable to those estimated for the Oligocene and the Early Miocene epochs. Here we analyze a new high-resolution deep-sea oxygen isotope (δ18O) record from the South Atlantic Ocean spanning an interval between 30.1 My and 17.1 My ago. The record displays major oscillations in deep-sea temperature and Antarctic ice volume in response to the ∼110-ky eccentricity modulation of precession. Conservative minimum ice volume estimates show that waxing and waning of at least ∼85 to 110% of the volume of the present East Antarctic Ice Sheet is required to explain many of the ∼110-ky cycles. Antarctic ice sheets were typically largest during repeated glacial cycles of the mid-Oligocene (∼28.0 My to ∼26.3 My ago) and across the Oligocene−Miocene Transition (∼23.0 My ago). However, the high-amplitude glacial−interglacial cycles of the mid-Oligocene are highly symmetrical, indicating a more direct response to eccentricity modulation of precession than their Early Miocene counterparts, which are distinctly asymmetrical—indicative of prolonged ice buildup and delayed, but rapid, glacial terminations. We hypothesize that the long-term transition to a warmer climate state with sawtooth-shaped glacial cycles in the Early Miocene was brought about by subsidence and glacial erosion in West Antarctica during the Late Oligocene and/or a change in the variability of atmospheric CO2 levels on astronomical time scales that is not yet captured in existing proxy reconstructions.

  • unipolar icehouse
  • early Antarctic ice sheet
  • Oligocene−Miocene
  • glacial−interglacial cycle geometries
  • bispectral analysis

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: diederik.liebrand{at}noc.soton.ac.uk.
  • Author contributions: D.L., A.T.M.d.B., H.M.B., P.A.W., S.M.B., G.R., H.P., S.J.B., F.J.H., D.A.H., C.E.H., D.K., I.R., M.J.M.S., A.E.v.D., and L.J.L. designed research; D.L., A.T.M.d.B., H.M.B., M.J.M.S., and A.E.v.D. performed research; P.A.W., G.R., H.P., F.J.H., and L.J.L. contributed analytic tools; D.L., A.T.M.d.B., H.M.B., M.J.M.S., and A.E.v.D. analyzed data; D.L., A.T.M.d.B., P.A.W., and S.M.B. wrote the paper; and all other authors contributed to writing the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1615440114/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

View Full Text
Next
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evolution of the early Antarctic ice ages
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evolution of the early Antarctic ice ages
Diederik Liebrand, Anouk T. M. de Bakker, Helen M. Beddow, Paul A. Wilson, Steven M. Bohaty, Gerben Ruessink, Heiko Pälike, Sietske J. Batenburg, Frederik J. Hilgen, David A. Hodell, Claire E. Huck, Dick Kroon, Isabella Raffi, Mischa J. M. Saes, Arnold E. van Dijk, Lucas J. Lourens
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2017, 201615440; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615440114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Evolution of the early Antarctic ice ages
Diederik Liebrand, Anouk T. M. de Bakker, Helen M. Beddow, Paul A. Wilson, Steven M. Bohaty, Gerben Ruessink, Heiko Pälike, Sietske J. Batenburg, Frederik J. Hilgen, David A. Hodell, Claire E. Huck, Dick Kroon, Isabella Raffi, Mischa J. M. Saes, Arnold E. van Dijk, Lucas J. Lourens
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2017, 201615440; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615440114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 118 (9)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Walvis Ridge Ocean Drilling Program Site 1264
    • Ice Volume Estimates
    • SI Methods
    • Sinusoidal Glacial−Interglacial Cycle Properties
    • Bispectral Analysis
    • Nonsinusoidal Glacial−Interglacial Cycle Properties
    • Climate–Cryosphere Evolution
    • SI Exploring Potential Cycle Shape Distortion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490